Is Zinc Additive Really Needed For Older Engines?
"The past," said English novelist L.P. Hartley in his 1953 novel The Go-Between, "is a foreign country; they do things differently there." As far as book openings go, it's pretty solid. Right up there with, "The sky over the port was the color of television tuned to a dead channel" or "The Man in Black fled across the desert, and The Gunslinger followed" in the pantheon of all-timer opening sentences. It's also a pretty fair assessment of early to mid-20th century automotive technologies. From Babbitt bearings and drum brakes to carburetors and leaded gasoline, the old ways often seem strange and foreign to today's car nerds.
One very important automotive technology that's changed dramatically over the years — although you might not think about it as "technology" the same as you would braking or suspension or engine management systems — is motor oil. In the past, motor oil had, as Derek Bieri likes to say, "All the vitamins and minerals old engines need." Over the years, however, engines and emissions standards changed and motor oils changed with them. Nowadays, motor oils — both synthetic and organic, as it were — are optimized for use in brand new engines stuffed with bleeding edge technologies and tolerances measured in Plancks.
What about older engines, though? What about our beloved Buick Nailheads and Chevy Small Blocks and Chrysler 440s? Do modern oils have enough of those good old vitamins and minerals to run safely in the engines that powered our fathers' Oldsmobiles?
Read more: What's The Stereotypical Old Person's New Car?
Honestly? Yeah, for the most part. Modern oils, especially synthetics, are way better at keeping your engine safe and running at peak performance than the dinosaur squeezins your granddad used. The one area where today's engine oils might be considered lacking is when it comes to the amount of zinc in the oil, and even then, it's kind of an edge case that really only matters if you have a flat tappet cam.
See, back in the day, most engines had flat tappets to operate their valves and soft, cast-iron camshafts to go with them. Despite the fact that both flat tappets and roller tappets (and their attendant camshafts) had been around forever, the latter was the go-to for mass produced vehicles. That's because flat tappet cams were cheaper, easier to produce, and tended to last the life of the car — remember, cars didn't last as long in the old days. Only high-po one-offs and race cars had fancy pants roller cams. In the '80s, though, as technology advanced, economy standards tightened, and horsepower demands increased, roller tappet cams became more common.
If you have an older vehicle with an engine that has a flat tappet cam in it, you should be using a zinc additive. How old, you ask? Well, if you're rocking a V6 or V8 made before the mid-1980s, you're probably going to want to throw some zinc additive into your crankcase every oil change. In the pre-roller tappet cam days, motor oils had more zinc in them. Zinc is slippery, and forms a very thin, sacrificial barrier between soft internal engine parts. The soft, cast iron camshafts used with flat tappets needed this sacrificial layer of zinc to prevent excess wear.
With the rise of both roller tappets and catalytic converters, however, zinc became less of a thing in oils because roller tappet cams are made of harder materials and zinc has a bad habit of clogging up cats if it gets into the engine's combustion chambers. That's kind of a TL;DR explanation of the technical aspects of it, but you get the idea.
You can pick up Zinc additives just about anywhere auto parts are sold, and it's not that expensive. If you're not doing your own oil changes (why aren't you doing your own oil changes?), your mechanic should definitely be able to get some zinc additive for you. Look at it like insurance — would you prefer to spend your money on a $15 bottle of zinc additive every few thousand miles, or an expensive, time-consuming, and possibly engine-out top end rebuild after you flatspot your cam doing burnouts?
Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox...
Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Will Texas Enforce FMCSA English Proficiency Rules for Intrastate CDL Drivers?
In Texas, drivers who cannot read or speak English may still be issued commercial driver's licenses if they operate solely within the state's borders. This policy is not new. Per Texas Transportation Code § 522.043(b), the state prohibits requiring English language proficiency for intrastate-only CDL holders. The Texas Administrative Code and the official Texas Commercial Motor Vehicle Driver Handbook support this stance, noting that ELP only applies to interstate drivers. But a new enforcement directive from FMCSA, effective June 25, states that any commercial motor vehicle (CMV) driver failing to meet the English proficiency standard under 49 CFR 391.11(b)(2) will be placed out of service if operating in interstate commerce. The issue? Texas isn't enforcing this for intrastate fleets and never really has. Federal Funds at Risk? MCSAP Says Maybe This enforcement discretion may violate the Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program (MCSAP), a federal grant program that gives states funding for enforcement in exchange for aligning with FMCSA safety regulations. 49 CFR 350.305 outlines the limited list of allowable state-level variances. English proficiency isn't one of them. So, unless Texas has formally petitioned FMCSA for a variance – and DPS leadership confirms the state hasn't – Texas' refusal to enforce this could jeopardize MCSAP funding. TDPS Says No to ELP Enforcement, But FMCSA Says That's Changing The Playbook directly messaged leadership at Texas DPS, and the agency stated that it does not have a formal FMCSA-approved exemption. However, historically, FMCSA has turned a blind eye. That leniency may be coming to an end. Texas never enforced English proficiency for Intrastate drivers before the 2014-2015 FMCSA enforcement directive and still hasn't. But now, with FMCSA saying ELP violations will result in out-of-service orders, the conversation is shifting. Texas may be forced to act if FMCSA chooses to enforce funding eligibility under MCSAP. What's at Stake for Fleets? For now, fleets operating intrastate in Texas may continue employing non-English-speaking drivers with a restricted CDL if they stay within the state. But carriers need to be extremely careful: Interstate operations are subject to federal ELP enforcement. That includes for-hire and private carriers operating across state lines or hauling loads that begin or end outside Texas. MCSAP enforcement could force Texas to revise its policies or risk losing significant federal funding. Border state complications may emerge. As a border state, Texas is uniquely exposed to federal scrutiny, especially given the broader political climate and FMCSA's evolving enforcement stance. Compliance Is No Longer Optional The key takeaway? Carriers must evaluate whether their drivers are genuinely intrastate and ensure their CDL designations, load documentation and operational areas support that claim. The days of looking the other way on English proficiency may be numbered. As the FMCSA steps up enforcement and grant eligibility becomes more stringent, states like Texas may be forced to close the gap between state law and federal expectations or risk the financial and regulatory fallout. The post Will Texas Enforce FMCSA English Proficiency Rules for Intrastate CDL Drivers? appeared first on FreightWaves.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Uber to launch self-driving taxis in London next year
Self-driving cars are about to face one of their biggest hurdles yet: A medieval network of winding roads, more complex than the grid layouts of Californian cities, already mastered by this technology. Uber has announced it will launch self-driving taxis in London from spring 2026. The ride-hailing app company will operate services in partnership with artificial intelligence (AI) start-up Wayve. This has been enabled by the UK government's decision to bring forward trials of self-driving commercial taxis and 'bus-like services' in England to next spring. They were previously expected to begin when the Automated Vehicles Act becomes law from the second half of 2027. Uber's services will initially have a human in the driver's seat who can take over control of the vehicle in an emergency, but the trials will transition to being fully driverless. The company's existing trials of self-driving taxis are generally in US locations which have much simpler road layouts than London. Uber chief operating officer Andrew Macdonald described the English capital's roads as 'one of the world's busiest and most complex urban environments'. He added: 'Our vision is to make autonomy a safe and reliable option for riders everywhere, and this trial in London brings that future closer to reality.' Wayve co-founder Alex Kendall said the trial is 'a defining moment for UK autonomy' and 'brings us closer to bringing safe and intelligent driving to everyday rides across the UK and beyond'. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'The future of transport is arriving. 'Self-driving cars could bring jobs, investment, and the opportunity for the UK to be among the world-leaders in new technology. 'With road safety at the heart of our pilots and legislation, we continue to take bold steps to create jobs, back British industry and drive innovation.' The sale and use of self-driving private cars will only be permitted when the Automated Vehicles Act becomes law. This legislation will require self-driving vehicles to achieve a level of safety at least as high as 'competent and careful human drivers', the DfT said. It is hoped the vehicles will reduce road deaths and injuries as their systems will be designed to have faster reaction times than humans, and will not become distracted or tired. The development of automated vehicle technology could create 38,000 jobs in the UK and add £42 billion to the economy by 2035, according to the DfT. The UK's first autonomous bus service was cancelled in February because of a lack of passengers. Stagecoach began operating self-driving buses on a 14-mile route between Fife and Edinburgh via the Forth Road Bridge in May 2023. The vehicles still required two members of staff on board, consisting of a safety driver who could take control of the vehicle and a 'captain' to sell tickets and provide customer service.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Uber to launch self-driving taxis in London next year
Uber has announced it will launch self-driving taxis in London from spring 2026. The ride-hailing app company will operate services in partnership with artificial intelligence (AI) start-up Wayve. This has been enabled by the Government's decision to bring forward trials of self-driving commercial taxis and 'bus-like services' in England to next spring. They were previously expected to begin when the Automated Vehicles Act becomes law from the second half of 2027. Uber's services will initially have a human in the driver's seat who can take over control of the vehicle in an emergency, but the trials will transition to being fully driverless. The company's existing trials of self-driving taxis are generally in US locations which have much simpler road layouts than London. Uber chief operating officer Andrew Macdonald described the English capital's roads as 'one of the world's busiest and most complex urban environments'. He added: 'Our vision is to make autonomy a safe and reliable option for riders everywhere, and this trial in London brings that future closer to reality.' Wayve co-founder Alex Kendall said the trial is 'a defining moment for UK autonomy' and 'brings us closer to bringing safe and intelligent driving to everyday rides across the UK and beyond'. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'The future of transport is arriving. 'Self-driving cars could bring jobs, investment, and the opportunity for the UK to be among the world-leaders in new technology. 'With road safety at the heart of our pilots and legislation, we continue to take bold steps to create jobs, back British industry and drive innovation.' The sale and use of self-driving private cars will only be permitted when the Automated Vehicles Act becomes law. This legislation will require self-driving vehicles to achieve a level of safety at least as high as 'competent and careful human drivers', the DfT said. It is hoped the vehicles will reduce road deaths and injuries as their systems will be designed to have faster reaction times than humans, and will not become distracted or tired. The development of automated vehicle technology could create 38,000 jobs in the UK and add £42 billion to the economy by 2035, according to the DfT.