Uber driver jailed for raping woman walking home in Leeds
An off-duty Uber driver who raped a mother as she walked home from a house party has been jailed for 12 years.Daniel Hayelom, 36, attacked his victim after observing her making her way down Dewsbury Road in the Beeston area of Leeds at around 06:00 BST on 22 October 2023.Leeds Crown Court was told the woman was too drunk to consent to sexual activity with Hayelom, who sexually assaulted her before raping her in an alleyway.Sentencing the defendant, Judge Simon Phillips said the woman should have felt able to walk home safely, "without being targeted by a sexual predator".
The court heard Hayelom had finished working a shift at 01:00 BST earlier that morning and then went socialising with friends. He then went into the Dewsbury Road area at around 06:00 where he drove around while observing the woman for "five or six minutes".Hayelom's car was seen manoeuvring and turning around so he could keep sight of her.CCTV footage showed the victim was "clearly inebriated" as she made her way down the street and she had briefly paused to sit at a bus stop.Prosecutor Michael Smith said that after leaving his vehicle a short distance away from the area Hayelom approached the woman and said "happy day", before walking into her path and touching her buttocks. The woman walked away and said "no", but the defendant followed her saying he wanted "more", and calling her "sexy". He then sexually assaulted her in full view of the street, before raping her and then walking her the rest of the way home, it was said.
The defendant, who first came to the UK from Eritrea in 2011 and had no previous convictions, was found guilty of rape, sexual assault and sexual assault by penetration following a five-day trial last month. The court was told his victim felt unable to leave the house unaccompanied since the attack and had suffered emotional distress and insomnia. Mitigating for Hayelom, Sean Smith said that while the attack "became carefully planned", he had not initially gone to the area to "hunt" a victim.Sentencing the defendant to 12 years in prison, with an additional licence period of four years, Judge Phillips told Hayelom he had been "intent on pursuing" his victim."You were doing so in a predatory manner and you were intent on securing your own sexual gratification without any concern for her safety or welfare."Det Ch Insp James Entwistle, of West Yorkshire Police, praised Hayelom's victim for "the courage and mental fortitude she has shown during the investigation and the court process that has resulted in his conviction".He added: "We hope she can find some degree of comfort in seeing him held criminally accountable for what he did to her."Women and girls should be safe to live their lives free from the fear of violence and harassment, and we remain fully committed to working alongside our partner agencies to make the county a safer place."
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Coin Geek
4 hours ago
- Coin Geek
Illegal Bitcoin mining operation busted in UK's Bradford
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... In May 2025, a quiet industrial estate in Bradford, West Yorkshire, became the unlikely epicenter of a modern financial scandal when West Yorkshire Police uncovered an illegal Bitcoin mining operation on Holme Lane in the Holme Wood area. The discovery, reported on May 21, 2025, revealed rows of high-powered computer rigs—described as a 'Bitcoin factory'—powered by an unlawfully diverted electricity supply. This incident has thrust Bradford into the spotlight, highlighting the growing issue of illegal digital currency mining in the U.K. and raising questions about the intersection of energy consumption, regulatory oversight, and the allure of digital wealth. As the U.K. aligns its digital currency policies with global trends, this case underscores the challenges of balancing innovation with legal and ethical standards. The police raid, prompted by suspicious activity reports, uncovered a sophisticated setup of computer terminals mining BTC. What set this operation apart was its reliance on illegally siphoned electricity, bypassing the grid to avoid the high costs associated with Bitcoin mining's energy-intensive demands. West Yorkshire Police are investigating the offense of illegal abstraction of electricity, a crime that not only undermines the integrity of the power grid but also poses safety risks due to tampered electrical systems. The incident reflects a broader global trend where illicit mining operations exploit cheap or stolen power to maximize profits, as seen in recent crackdowns in Malaysia, Kuwait, and Russia. Bradford, a city gearing up for its role as the U.K. City of Culture 2025 is no stranger to economic transformation. With a 25% increase in city center footfall in Q1 2025, driven by events like the Soapbox Challenge and infrastructure investments, the city strives to reinvent itself as a vibrant hub. However, the discovery of this illegal mining operation casts a shadow over these efforts, exposing the darker side of the digital currency boom. While legal in the U.K., Bitcoin mining requires substantial energy—global estimates suggest it consumes more electricity annually than in some countries, with a single transaction equivalent to the power usage of an average household for weeks. In Bradford, the unauthorized diversion of electricity likely strained local resources, raising concerns about fairness and sustainability at a time when energy costs are a pressing issue for residents. The Holme Lane incident is part of a broader wave of illegal digital currency mining activities globally, driven by BTC's price surge past $110,000 in 2025. In Malaysia, electricity theft for crypto mining rose 300% between 2018 and 2024, with nationwide raids shutting down thousands of illicit setups. Similarly, Kuwait has cracked down on miners exploiting cheap electricity, with over 116 individuals under investigation for causing blackouts. In Russia, a $3.2 million digital currency mining scam defrauded 100 victims, highlighting the financial and social toll of such schemes. These cases illustrate the lengths to which unscrupulous miners go to bypass costs, often at the expense of public infrastructure and safety. In the U.K., the regulatory landscape for digital currencies is evolving. In April 2025, Finance Minister Rachel Reeves announced plans to bring crypto under compulsory regulation, aligning with U.S. policies to enhance consumer protection and market stability. While mining is not banned, the Bradford case underscores the need for stricter oversight to prevent energy theft and ensure compliance. The U.K.'s Insolvency Service also recently shut down BTCMining Limited, a U.K.-based crypto mining firm accused of failing to deliver promised returns to international clients, signaling a broader clampdown on fraudulent crypto activities. The environmental implications of BTC mining are another critical concern. A 2025 Harvard study found that U.S. BTC mining operations consume significant electricity, exposing millions to air pollution. While the Bradford operation's scale is smaller, its reliance on stolen power highlights the ethical dilemmas of crypto mining in a world grappling with energy scarcity and climate goals. Critics argue that such activities exacerbate environmental burdens, while proponents claim mining can stabilize grids by utilizing excess energy, as seen in legal operations in Zambia and Paraguay. For Bradford, the incident is a cautionary tale as it navigates its cultural and economic renaissance. The city's transformation, bolstered by a £48 million ($64 million) investment in infrastructure, aims to attract legitimate investment, not illicit schemes. The ongoing police investigation into the Holme Lane operation will likely deter similar activities, but it also serves as a reminder of the need for robust regulatory frameworks and public awareness. As Bitcoin's value continues to climb, drawing both legitimate and unscrupulous players, the U.K. must balance fostering innovation with preventing exploitation. The Bradford 'Bitcoin factory' raid encapsulates the challenges of the crypto era: a collision of technological promise, economic ambition, and ethical pitfalls. As global interest in Bitcoin mining intensifies, from Pakistan's state-backed initiatives to the U.S.'s pro-digital currency policies, the U.K. faces the task of ensuring its regulatory and energy systems keep pace. For now, Bradford's tale serves as a stark warning that pursuing digital wealth must not come at the cost of legality, safety, or fairness. Watch: Lessons on Triple Entry Accounting from Malta's TEA Conference title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen="">
Telegraph
7 hours ago
- Telegraph
Defendants should have right to choose judge-only trial, says Leveson
Defendants are to get the right to ask for a judge-only trial without a jury. Under plans for 'once-in-a-generation' reform to reduce court backlogs, an independent review set up by the Government will recommend ministers should follow the example of Canada, Australia and New Zealand and allow defendants in the crown court to opt for a judge-only trial. Sir Brian Leveson, the senior judge heading the review, will recommend the move as a way to speed up trials to tackle the record backlog of more than 75,000 cases which is forcing some victims to wait up to four or five years for justice. He told a conference on modernising justice: 'I can see the advantage in lots of cases. You will get a reasoned judgment [from a judge]. In front of a jury, you don't get a judgment at all, you get guilty or not guilty. 'The case will be undeniably speedier because the judge doesn't have to explain to the jury all the basic premises of the criminal law.' Sir Brian is also expected to recommend that the public should be spared jury service if a case is going to last more than 12 months because of the 'unfairness' of it taking a year out of their lives and livelihoods. Instead, such cases would be heard by a judge without a jury. Other proposals will further scale back people's right to a jury trial for some lower level offences such as assault of a police officer while resisting arrest, racially aggravated criminal damage, dangerous driving and possessing a class B drug like cannabis. These are likely to be tried either by an intermediate court comprising a judge and two magistrates or by extending the powers of magistrates to try cases carrying sentences of up to two years, rather than only those with maximum jail terms of one year, as at present. Sir Brian was appointed by Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary, who said that 'once-in-a-generation reform' of the courts was the only way to tackle justice delays for victims. Internal Ministry of Justice forecasts suggested the backlogs could rise to 100,000 without radical action. Sir Brian said there was a 'real risk that the system will collapse' as defendants take advantage of cases being delayed as long as 2029 and 'threw the dice' in the hope their victims or witnesses disengaged and prosecutions were abandoned. He also said it would be up to the Government to decide which types of cases it felt were appropriate for defendants to have the right to spurn a jury but he said the judges would have the discretion to overrule any request if it was in the public interest to do so. 'There are some cases, which I would not consider appropriate for a judge to try alone, and I would give the judge a discretion,' Sir Brian said. 'So a defendant may say, 'I would like to be tried by a judge alone', and the judge would be perfectly entitled to say, 'I think not'.' Public opprobrium He suggested one type of case judge-only trials could be where there was significant 'public opprobrium' over the case such as sexual or sadistic violence and could sway the jury. 'I can see defendants, perhaps charged with cases that attract public opprobrium being concerned about a jury coming in from their daily lives to face that trial,' he said. 'Equally, I can see if it's that much public opprobrium, why a judge may say, 'I'm not sure about that.' So there is a balance to be done, but judges make judicial decisions all the time.' He said it could also apply to factually or legally extremely complex cases where a jury may struggle to fully understand the case. A third type could where there had been alleged confession or identification, where judges tended to be more rigorous in scrutinising its validity than necessarily a jury. Sir Brian said there had been a limited number of cases where judges had heard cases alone such as where a jury had to be discharged due to evidence of jury tampering. He is expected to deliver his report to Ms Mahmood next week with publication expected in early July. It follows a similar review of sentencing by David Gauke, the former Tory justice secretary, which recommended freeing some prisoners as little as a third of the way through sentence to tackle prison overcrowding.
Wales Online
10 hours ago
- Wales Online
Company boss pocketed £150,000 in fraudulent Covid business loans
Company boss pocketed £150,000 in fraudulent Covid business loans A judge told Zahid Afzal that at a time of national emergency the government had set up a system to help businesses which he had abused A company boss fraudulently obtained £150,000 in loans designed to help businesses hit by the Covid pandemic, a court has heard. Zahid Afzal made two legitimate applications for "Bounce Bank" loans but then used his knowledge of the application process to acquire three more loans he was not entitled to. A judge at Swansea Crown Court told the defendant that at a time of national emergency the government had set up a system to help businesses which he had abused to obtain loans he was not entitled to. Harry Dickens, prosecuting, told the court that the UK government established "Bounce Back" loans to help small and medium businesses during the coronavirus pandemic, and that the scheme allowed companies to borrow between £2,000 and £50,000 at a low interest rate. He said the defendant made two legitimate applications for his companies Phones Onn and Phone Bits Ltd to HSBC and NatWest respectively, and the applications were successful. However, he said Afzal subsequently made three more applications to Lloyds, Starling, and Metro Bank during 2020 for the same phone companies and in each case falsely declared there had been no previous applications for those firms. The court heard the defendant also inflated the turnover figures of the firms in order to access the maximum £50,000 loan amounts. Article continues below The prosecutor said the three loan applications were successful and a total of £150,000 was paid into the companies' accounts, much of which was subsequently transferred out into personal accounts. Zahid Afzal, aged 37, of Albert Street, Haverfordwest, Pembrokeshire, had previously pleaded guilty to three counts of fraud by false representation when he appeared in the dock for sentencing. He has no previous convictions. Jon Tarrant, for Afzal, said the defendant employed eight people, and said six of those needed the employment to maintain their UK visas. He said the father-of-three was a successful businessman who had established himself in a positive light to many people but that position "has now been reversed". He said the defendant's remorse for his "unwise decisions" had been "palpable" during their conferences. For the latest court reports sign up to our crime newsletter Judge Catherine Richards said at a time of nation emergency the UK government had established a system to help businesses that was paid for by society and which "relied on the trust and confidence that each gives the other as a member of this society". She told Afzal he had deliberately abused that by applying for loans he knew he was not entitled to and which, ultimately, were not for business use. The judge said while she had no doubt the offending justified immediate custody she was concerned that "the public finances are not further prejudiced" by Afzal's actions. She also said she was mindful of the impact of immediate custody on others. With one-quarter discounts for his guilty pleas Afzal was sentenced to two years in prison suspended for two years and was ordered to complete 300 hours of unpaid work. A proceeds of crime investigation will now be launched into the defendant's finances. Article continues below The prosecution barrister said he wanted to out the court on notice that a written application would be made for a restraint order to be made in respect of the defendant's personal Santander bank account which currently contains some £74,000.
