Lawyers Say New Evidence Challenges Trump on El Salvador Prisons
Attorneys on Monday filed a copy of statements that El Salvador submitted to a United Nations human rights office in April, stating that 'the jurisdiction and legal responsibility' for detainees 'lie exclusively' with the United States under agreements between the two countries.
The US government, however, has repeatedly insisted that it had no control over the Venezuelan prisoners once they were turned over to El Salvador. That position was backed by a federal judge in Washington, who ruled in June that the detainees were no longer in the 'constructive custody' of the US.
'The documents filed with the court today show that the administration has not been honest with the court or the American people,' Skye Perryman, president of Democracy Forward, one of the groups representing the Venezuelans, said in a statement.
The case is one of the highest-profile challenges to the Trump Administration's crackdown on immigration. The Venezuelan men, who the US claims are gang members, were sent to El Salvador's notorious Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo, a facility denounced by human rights groups.
A spokesperson for the State Department declined to comment, nor did public information officers for the office of El Salvador's president and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
US District Judge James Boasberg relied on a May declaration from a senior State Department official stating that 'the detention and ultimate disposition of those detained in CECOT and other Salvadoran detention facilities are matters within the legal authority of El Salvador.'
Lawyers for the Venezuelans argue the new evidence from the UN undermines that statement. The April documents were part of a probe into claims that El Salvador was responsible for the disappearance of people sent to its prisons from the United States. El Salvador denied wrongdoing.
It wasn't immediately clear how the latest filing will affect the case. The Venezuelans' lawyers suggested they could ask the judge's permission to gather more information from the government. The case is before a federal appeals court on the government's challenge to another part of Boasberg's June order requiring that the Venezuelans in El Salvador be given an opportunity to contest their removal.
The case is J.G.G. v. Trump, 25-cv-766.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump May Unleash Ukraine's Deadliest Strikes Yet; ATACMS Could Hit Deep Inside Russia
Donald Trump is reportedly weighing a major escalation in the Ukraine conflict. According to The Washington Post, Trump could authorize Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied ATACMS missiles at full range, striking deep into Russian territory. This would mark a shift from earlier policies that restricted the missiles' use to certain zones. Some ATACMS strikes have already led to civilian casualties, including a deadly incident in Crimea. Watch Read More
NDTV
43 minutes ago
- NDTV
No More Major Climate Change Reports On NASA Website: Trump Administration
Washington: The Trump administration on Monday took another step to make it harder to find major, legally mandated scientific assessments of how climate change is endangering the nation and its people. Earlier this month, the official government websites that hosted the authoritative, peer-reviewed national climate assessments went dark. Such sites tell state and local governments and the public what to expect in their backyards from a warming world and how best to adapt to it. At the time, the White House said NASA would house the reports to comply with a 1990 law that requires the reports, which the space agency said it planned to do. But on Monday, NASA announced that it aborted those plans. "The USGCRP (the government agency that oversees and used to host the report) met its statutory requirements by presenting its reports to Congress. NASA has no legal obligations to host data," NASA Press Secretary Bethany Stevens said in an email. That means no data from the assessment or the government science office that coordinated the work will be on NASA, she said. On July 3, NASA put out a statement that said, "All preexisting reports will be hosted on the NASA website, ensuring continuity of reporting." "This document was written for the American people, paid for by the taxpayers, and it contains vital information we need to keep ourselves safe in a changing climate, as the disasters that continue to mount demonstrate so tragically and clearly," said Texas Tech climate scientist Katharine Hayhoe. She is chief scientist at The Nature Conservancy and co-author of several past national climate assessments. Copies of past reports are still squirreled away in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's library and the latest report and its interactive atlas can be seen here. Former Obama White House science adviser and climate scientist John Holdren accused the administration of outright lying and long intended to censor or bury the reports. "The new stance is classic Trump administration misdirection," Holdren said. "In this instance, the administration offers a modest consolation to quell initial outrage over the closure of the site and the disappearance of the National Climate Assessments. Then, two weeks later, they snatch away the consolation with no apology." "They simply don't want the public to see the meticulously assembled and scientifically validated information about what climate change is already doing to our farms, forests, and fisheries, as well as to storms, floods, wildfires, and coast property - and about how all those damages will grow in the absence of concerted remedial action," Holdren said in an email. That's why it's important that state and local governments and every day people see these reports, Holdren said. He said they are written in a way that is "useful to people who need to understand what climate change is doing and will do to THEM, their loved ones, their property and their environment." "Trump doesn't want people to know," Holdren wrote. The most recent report, issued in 2023, found that climate change is affecting people's security, health and livelihoods in every corner of the country in different ways, with minority communities, particularly Native Americans, often disproportionately at risk.
Economic Times
43 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump worried about embarrassing and massive protest on UK state visit - itinerary changed, here's what's planned
What does Donald Trump's revised UK itinerary look like? Live Events Are protests still expected during the visit? FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel US President Donald Trump's second UK state visit has been scaled back amid concerns over protests and negative optics. To avoid big protests and public embarrassment, British and American officials have worked behind the scenes to make the schedule more efficient, with a focus on Windsor instead of won't give a speech in Parliament or go to public events. Instead, he will go to a royal banquet in Windsor and meet with Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The goal of the trip is to avoid having more street protests and problems like those that have happened to Britain's former Washington envoy Sir Kim Darroch, Donald Trump's aides pushed to protect him from the irate crowds in London during his first state visit, as per a report by the Daily date of Trump's second state visit, and the decision to bar him from the lectern of the British House of Commons, was purely political, according to Whitehall sources who previously told The was because Labour MPs threatened to leave the green benches in protest, and organizers were afraid of television footage showing a half-empty chamber and the blimp to the Financial Times, Darroch, who oversaw protocol discussions for Trump's 2019 trip, now suggested that the president of the United States was aware that not much had changed from the first time, when White House planners urged him to avoid parliament and permit virtually no public interaction."That made them very happy," he said. They didn't mention that he desired to meet his devoted British audience. They were constantly aware of the possibility of humiliation, unfriendly crowds, or low attendance. Regarding Trump's first visit, he continued, "We were concerned about protesters with their enormous Trump-shaped balloon."Although a White House official previously told the Daily Beast that Trump's speech to parliament was "never expected or even discussed" this time, Darroch's remarks give some color to the recently revealed itinerary for his second state visit to Britain, which is scheduled for September 17– being denied the parliamentary address that Trump's political rivals, such as Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, and Emmanuel Macron, enjoyed, the trip will make Trump the first American leader to be granted two state visits, according to reports on a clever move, lawmakers will not have to debate whether the divisive world leader deserves the honor again because Westminster will be in recess during Trump's second to Darroch's 2019 leak of classified cables labeling Trump "inept," U.K. officials had alerted their counterparts to the possibility of protests in central London. During that previous visit, footage of the 20-foot "Trump Baby" blimp hovering over Whitehall became the most memorable time, a state banquet with King Charles III and an itinerary limited to Windsor are intended to give Trump the royal opulence he desires without resorting to the street theater he despises, as public opinion of Trump in the United Kingdom has not changed will meet with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who in February personally delivered Charles's invitation to the White House. According to a Friday Telegraph story, Downing Street is still rearranging schedules to meet with Starmer during what officials emphasize will be a deliberately low-key order to prevent new flashpoints, insiders have told the FT that an earlier side trip to his Scottish golf courses will remain "semi-private."Organizers were concerned about a backlash from lawmakers and protesters, particularly after Labour MPs threatened to boycott. The Commons will also be in recess, preventing any will attend a royal banquet with King Charles in Windsor and meet with Prime Minister Starmer. Public appearances are kept to a minimum.
