Blinded by the light: Should there be restrictions on headlights?
This story was originally published on MyNorthwest.com
A Washington Congresswoman is shining a light on what she says is a persistent problem for drivers—overly bright headlights.
U.S. Representative Marie Gluesenkamp Perez told the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee that the blinding beams are a danger on the roadway.
She acknowledged that the new Bipartisan Infrastructure Law tried to improve safety by allowing manufacturers to install adaptive beams, which are supposed to adjust headlights to oncoming traffic and other environmental factors.
'But let's be honest. It has not helped,' Gluesenkamp Perez said.
She told the committee she'd like to work with it and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to set standards for headlights, 'that retain visibility for drivers, but also reduce glare and increase safety for other drivers on the road.'
She said this is not just a concern in her southwest Washington, Third Congressional District.
'This is something that draws ire from rural Americans, from older Americans, from law enforcement,' she said, adding social media is full of complaints.
KIRO Newsradio found no shortage of critics on Reddit.
'Why do you need to send 80,000 lumens into my brain just to see what's in front of you?' one user wrote.
Another wrote, 'Used to love driving in the dark too, but it's miserable now, sick of…being flash banged by oncoming vehicles.'
'If you're so blind that you need an industrial laser frying everyone else's retinas to see ahead of you, maybe just don't (expletive) drive,' wrote another.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
36 minutes ago
- CNBC
From bromance to bitter feud — a timeline of Trump and Musk's relationship
The bromance is over. An extraordinary social media feud between U.S. President Donald Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk Thursday showcased the public fracturing of their once-close relationship. Here's a rundown of how Trump and Musk got here: Musk publicly endorses Trump following an assassination attempt at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. Musk posts on social media platform X: "I fully endorse President Trump and hope for his rapid recovery." In August, Musk held a conversation with Trump on X. The glitchy livestream got off to an inauspicious start, with technical difficulties delaying the event for almost an hour. Trump and Musk congratulated each other in a wide-ranging chat, covering topics such as then-Vice President Kamala Harris, how Trump handled the assassination attempt and climate change. Musk later suggests he's "willing to serve" in government. The Tesla CEO posted an image of himself on X as a representative of DOGE, an acronym for the Department of Government Efficiency. In early October, Musk appears at a Trump rally in Pennsylvania, where Trump survived the earlier assassination attempt. Wearing a cap with the "Make America Great Again" slogan of the Trump campaign, Musk said Trump was the only candidate "to preserve democracy in America." Public displays of alignment continue, reinforcing Musk's growing proximity to Trump's political comeback. After Trump's re-election, Musk is appointed to lead DOGE alongside former GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy. The department is formed via executive order with a mission to slash federal spending and bureaucracy. "Together, these two wonderful Americans will pave the way for my Administration to dismantle Government Bureaucracy, slash excess regulations, cut wasteful expenditures, and restructure Federal Agencies," Trump said in a statement at the time. Ramaswamy would later leave his role as co-lead of DOGE to pursue elected office. Maye Musk, Elon's mother, later comments that the two "just seem to be having fun." Two weeks after his election victory, Trump attended a SpaceX "Starship" rocket launch in Texas alongside Musk. At Trump's inauguration, Musk receives lavish praise from the president: "We have a new star. A star is born. Elon!" Musk joins Trump's CEO calls, alongside leaders from Amazon, Google, Meta, and others. Musk begins overseeing aggressive cost-cutting at government agencies. DOGE forces through return-to-office mandates and eliminates some remote-first government programs. Musk's DOGE team faces backlash after overreaching into agencies like the U.S. Institute of Peace. In early March, Trump tells members of the Cabinet that they are in charge of the respective agencies and departments they oversee — not Musk. The tech mogul later posts on X that the meeting was "very productive." Trump turns the White House lawn into a Tesla showroom and defends Musk as the electric vehicle maker incurs a global backlash. "He's built this great company, and he shouldn't be penalized because he's a patriot," Trump said at the time. The president also described the cars as "beautiful" and said he would buy one. Musk pledges to "significantly" reduce his involvement in DOGE over the coming weeks. Reports emerge of Musk being distracted and over-stretched, fueling concerns among Tesla and SpaceX investors. At the time of Tesla's first-quarter earnings in April — which missed expectations — the EV maker's shares were down more than 40% over the year so far. In an interview with CBS News, Musk publicly criticizes Trump's signature tax and spending bill, saying it counters the work he's been doing to reduce wasteful government spending. "I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decrease it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing," he said. Trump responded to the critique by saying he wasn't happy with certain aspects of the bill, "but I'm thrilled by other aspects of it. That's the way they go." One day after airing his criticism of Trump's bill, Musk leaves the White House. He thanks the president for the opportunity to run DOGE. Trump holds a farewell event for Musk, commending his work in government but says he is "not really leaving" and will occasionally return to the White House because DOGE is his "baby." Musk lashes out further at Trump's spending bill, calling it a "disgusting abomination" that will explode federal budget deficits. "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," Musk said on X. The criticism quickly escalates into an all-out online brawl between Trump and Musk, with the pair trading barbs over the course of several hours. The U.S. president threatened to pull back billions of dollars in government contracts for Musk's companies, while the Tesla CEO suggested Trump could not have won the election without him. "Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore," Trump said.
Black America Web
3 hours ago
- Black America Web
Op-Ed: Care For Constituents Or Chaos? Medicaid Cuts Will Devastate All Of Us
Source: Jemal Countess / Getty In our country, which has so much abundance, poverty shouldn't be a death sentence. However, proposed cuts to Medicaid will cause many individuals, families and communities to suffer for that very reason–poverty. Significant and potentially massive cuts to Medicaid will cause irreparable harm. Shockwaves will reverberate in rural, urban, and suburban communities, and impact individuals, working families, many of our most fragile elderly and our most vulnerable young and disabled. I offer this perspective as a public health practitioner. I have spent my career supporting and advancing health systems in our country, across Louisiana, the Gulf Coast, and in our nation's capital, Washington, D.C., Medicaid supports our workforce and health systems (hospitals and clinics), in addition to individuals, families, and communities Medicaid provides insurance to people with low incomes and people who have disabilities. This includes many individuals who work, but still don't work jobs with health insurance, work part-time, or don't make enough to cover insurance. It is the nation's single largest health insurance program. And it is wildly popular. More than 96% of Americans believe the program is important in their communities and recent national polls from January 2025 found that 80% of Americans have a favorable view of Medicaid. Some may wonder if I am overreacting. I'm not. More than 70 million Americans receive health care coverage under the Medicaid program. In Louisiana, where I live, one-third of our adult population is on Medicaid, and the percentage of coverage is even higher in rural areas. In fact, Medicaid plays a much larger role in covering rural communities in Louisiana and across our country than it does in metro/areas. In other parts of the South, like rural Kentucky, more than 40% of the population is on Medicaid. These individuals, like all of us, want nothing more than to live healthy and thriving lives while making ends meet for their families and making their children's futures more prosperous. The public may envision people on Medicaid as unworthy of receiving assistance. But there is no one profile of a Medicaid recipient. They come from all backgrounds, all races and ethnicities, all ages and all communities. In fact, most low-income Americans, whether rural or urban, Black or White, Republican or Democrat, share an economic fate impacted by hardship, and the solution to their support and prosperity is also shared. For instance, 'The number of people earning less than $25,750 for a family of four is rising in both Republican and Democratic districts, and across racial and geographic lines.' It's also important to understand the range of services people receive from Medicaid. Services include everything from general health services, to behavioral health (mental health and substance use) services, disability services, maternal health supports and more. Impacts across all of these areas could be devastating with federal and state cuts to beneficiaries or benefits. For example, maternal health outcomes, particularly maternal mortality, continue to devastate families and communities across our country. Louisiana had the nation's fourth-highest maternal mortality rate in 2021 at 60.9 deaths per 100,000 births, but I know this is not just a Louisiana problem; it's a national one. The March of Dimes reported that '870 maternal deaths occurred each year…and every year 50,000 women experience a life-threatening complication (sometimes called a near-miss)' or severe maternal health complication. With such high risk, good coverage and high-quality care is more important than ever, and over 42% of all births in our country are covered by Medicaid. Reducing these Medicaid benefits would be disastrous to mothers, babies and families. Chancing the lives of mothers and babies is simply too risky! While I referenced maternal health, Medicaid supports the existence of healthier communities. Beyond the immediacy of illness, sick people can't work, study, or play. They can't contribute to their families, our communities, and the country's economy—from kids, to employers, to the GDP, everyone loses. Our nation's health systems, from rural health centers to large urban hospital systems receive critical funding to cover the millions of peoples seeking care. The healthcare sector, one of the most important sectors of our economy overall, relies heavily on Medicaid reimbursement to sustain jobs and services. Cuts of great magnitude will threaten clinics, hospitals and medical providers. We will see the impacts of this immediately in rural regions with the shuttering of services, significant job losses, and further diminishing already challenged access to care. With health care shortages already existing, our conversations need to be continued around closing the gaps in access, not creating new chasms. Now more than ever, we need our leaders and legislative champions to protect our communities and their health and well-being! Given the adverse impact Medicaid cuts would have on the nation, we need to boldly reject proposals that will weaken the program and impact all of our communities. Given its importance, some may wonder why elected leaders would want to cut the program. Some legislators propose cutting Medicaid as part of a broader plan to give $4.5 trillion in tax cuts. Others want to lower the federal deficit, a $1.1 trillion deficit at the end of February 2025. Policymakers should not attempt to bring down federal spending with ill-conceived strategies that will only add to Americans' suffering. They should instead think strategically about taxation. Legislators can bring a great deal of confidence in their leadership by examining other alternatives to drastic Medicaid cuts, by reminding us that they care for all of their constituents, and that they are creating a vision for a healthier future based on their community's needs—timely doctors' visits, healthy births, high quality mental health care and substance use supports—not disregarding, or even worse targeting the thing that keeps us safe and well. Shelina Davis is the Chief Executive Officer of the Louisiana Public Health Institute. SEE ALSO: 'We All Are Going To Die': Joni Ernst's Chilling Defense Of Medicaid Cuts Sparks Outrage At Iowa Town Hall The Midnight Medicaid Cuts: Why The GOP's Reconciliation Bill Is A Raw Deal For The American People SEE ALSO Op-Ed: Care For Constituents Or Chaos? Medicaid Cuts Will Devastate All Of Us was originally published on Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE
Black America Web
3 hours ago
- Black America Web
Ex-Biden Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre Leaves Democratic Party
Source: NurPhoto / Getty Karine Jean-Pierre, who made history as the first Black woman and openly gay person to serve as White House press secretary, has announced that she is leaving the Democratic Party. According to a press release for her upcoming memoir Independent , Jean-Pierre has chosen to break from party affiliation entirely, registering as an independent and encouraging others to reconsider blind party loyalty in today's turbulent political climate. Text 'RICKEY' to 71007 to join the Rickey Smiley Morning Show mobile club for exclusive news. ( Terms and conditions ). Jean-Pierre served under President Joe Biden from May 2022 through the end of his term, stepping into the spotlight after Jen Psaki's departure. In her time at the White House, she was seen as a visible and vocal figure for the administration. But now, nearly a year after the 2024 election, Jean-Pierre is taking a different approach — one she says is motivated by disillusionment and a desire for honest reflection. In the press release from Legacy Lit, the Hachette Book Group imprint publishing her book, Jean-Pierre is quoted as saying that she began to question the value of partisan politics after leaving the White House on January 20. 'At noon on that day, I became a private citizen who, like all Americans and many of our allies around the world, had to contend with what was to come next for our country,' she said. LIKE US ON FACEBOOK. FOLLOW US ON TWITTER AND INSTAGRAM. SUBSCRIBE TO OUR YOUTUBE. Jean-Pierre's departure from the Democratic Party appears to be connected to the chaos surrounding Biden's decision to end his re-election bid. The book is expected to delve into what the publisher calls 'the betrayal by the Democratic Party that led to his decision,' suggesting that Jean-Pierre sees internal party tensions and political maneuvering as key factors in the president's withdrawal from the 2024 race. CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD OUR APP AND TAKE US WITH YOU ANYWHERE! Her memoir is set to be released on October 21 and promises a behind-the-scenes look at the challenges within the Biden administration, particularly as Biden faced growing scrutiny over his health and leadership ability. Jean-Pierre also emphasizes that stepping away from the party is not an abandonment of values but a call to 'free ourselves of boxes,' challenging Americans to think independently and strategically rather than remain trapped in rigid political identities. As Democrats work to rebuild momentum following election losses and internal divides, Jean-Pierre's public departure signals a larger conversation about party loyalty, leadership, and the future of political engagement in the U.S. HEAD BACK TO THE HOMEPAGE SEE ALSO Former Biden Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre Leaves Democratic Party to Register as Independent, Reportedly Tied to 'Betrayal by the Democratic Party' was originally published on
