Indigenous 2SLGBTQ+ advocates brace for changes under Trump
Social Sharing
Indigenous people who advocate for 2SLGBTQ+ communities are questioning how their rights may change under the Trump administration in the U.S.
In January, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an order that the United States will recognize only two sexes, male and female, that are unchangeable.
Alex Wilson from Opaskwayak Cree Nation in Manitoba, an activist for queer, transgender, and two-spirit rights, said she sees growing anti-transgender sentiments brewing south of the border.
"It's a cycle that happens when there's policy that allows for the continuation of violence or that kind of condones it, then we see people picking it up and acting out those behaviours," Wilson said.
"They're not acknowledging that there is a gender diversity or even sexual diversity. And we're seeing that trickle over here, too."
Wilson sees these policies as a danger to Indigenous sovereignty.
"It negates the reality that we have had many genders, not just two, three, but many understandings of gender and many sexualities in our nations since the beginning. And it's even part of some of our creation stories."
Montana bill ruled unconstitutional
David Herrera, co-founder and executive director of the Montana Two Spirit Society, is of Mestizo and adopted Blackfeet background and an advocate and educator for 2SLGBTQ+ communities.
In 2023, the Montana Two Spirit Society along with members of the transgender, intersex community filed a lawsuit in Missoula County District Court challenging Montana Senate Bill 458, which would define "male" and "female" as binary based on the presence of XY or XX chromosomes.
They argued it would infringe on the rights of members of the 2SLGBTQ+ community, as well as the cultural and spiritual importance of two-spirit people. Last month, the plaintiffs won and the bill was declared unconstitutional.
"It's definitely part of the colonization that has occurred and the attempt to erase the two-spirit culture," said Herrera.
He said policies like these are nothing new and have played a culturally detrimental part in colonial history that has tried to erase Indigenous 2SLGBTQ+ identities.
"We are not going to go away. We are going to continue," said Herrera.
Charlie Amáyá Scott grew up in the Navajo Nation and now works as an educator focusing on what it means to be queer, trans, and Indigenous.
"I think what I'm seeing within my community is that there is a lot of fear of what this really means in the long run," Scott said.
"There's a lot of fear of the violence that could occur, whether it's being detained at the borders, whether it's being questioned about who you really are or whether it's you're being arrested, which all of that specifically would lead to incarceration."
Her focus is ensuring that people and their stories are protected.
"If I'm being quite frank, my concern is about myself right now and has been about my community ensuring their survival. I have been really focused on ensuring that my trans siblings and my relatives, whether they're two-spirit or part of the LGBTQ community, survives," said Scott.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Montreal Gazette
4 hours ago
- Montreal Gazette
Sabia's PMO appointment could boost Indigenous role in resource projects: Kahnawake chief
Canadian Politics By A Kahnawake council chief says Michael Sabia's appointment to the Prime Minister's Office signals Mark Carney is serious about getting resource projects done with Indigenous involvement. In his time as Hydro‑Québec CEO and president, Sabia focused on the company's relationship with Indigenous communities, which Kahnawake council Chief Paul Rice said was historically fraught. 'He had a genuine interest in advancing Indigenous relations with Hydro‑Québec ... and to advance Indigenous participation in major projects,' Rice said about Sabia in an interview. 'The way that Hydro‑Québec got its start (was) pretty much taking the land away from these nations in order to generate power, and then ultimately income. So there's a lot of pain and a lot of bad history between the nations and companies like Hydro‑Québec,' pointing to a historical conflict that arose when Hydro‑Québec established a dam on Cree territory in James Bay. Rice highlighted several projects under Sabia that reflect the company's commitment to Indigenous equity and participation. One notable example is the Hertel-New York interconnection transmission line, which Hydro-Québec signed with the Mohawk Council of Kahnawake in 2024. It marks the utility's first project involving shared ownership of transmission infrastructure with both a third party and a First Nation community. Rice also highlighted Sabia's handling of unpaid hydro bills in certain communities, linking the issue to Hydro-Québec's history of profiting from land taken from Indigenous Nations. He believes Sabia brought in experts to manage the situation more thoughtfully and responsibly. He also cited the council's recent successful bid to become equity partners in the 144-megawatt Les Jardins wind energy project as another sign of progress. 'When they place an importance on Indigenous equity and Indigenous participation in the projects, it really allows us to benefit,' he said in an interview. 'Not just from potential employment ... we're able to benefit tremendously from equity ownership and income.' In addition to collaborating with the Mohawk Nation on major energy projects, Rice noted that Hydro‑Québec donated $10 million to help build a new language and cultural centre. Rice is hopeful that bringing Sabia into the Prime Minister's Office will influence Carney's approach to energy projects, which he has found disappointing so far during Carney's time in office. 'The first big move that the prime minister made was essentially to try to fast track a number of resource projects,' he said, referring to the Liberals' major projects legislation, which grants upfront regulatory approvals and eliminates all federal barriers to interprovincial trade. 'I'm not opposed to resource development and major projects, but the way in which he did it kind of alienated and infuriated a number of nations whose territories those projects are on,' he explained. 'Sabia, through his work at Hydro‑Québec, has empowered nations to be more involved as equity participants in projects.' Rice hopes Sabia's presence in the PMO will push the Liberal government to bring on Indigenous communities early in project planning, as well as consult them openly, involve them in the economics and business side, and make Indigenous equity participation mandatory for resource projects to move forward. Karl Moore, a professor in McGill's Faculty of Management who invites Sabia to speak to his class every year, said Sabia is knowledgeable of the Indigenous communities and their concerns, and will 'absolutely' bring these issues to the table as the clerk. 'He speaks fluent Carney,' Moore said, pointing to Sabia's background in Canada's Department of Finance and his role as Chief Financial Officer at CN Railway, as well as Carney's own deep financial credentials that helped secure his election win. 'Having been in the finance department in Ottawa, he would get what the prime minister's trying to accomplish.'
National Post
6 hours ago
- National Post
FIRST READING: Here's why three Senators crossed the floor to the Conservatives
First Reading is a Canadian politics newsletter curated by the National Post's own Tristin Hopper. To get an early version sent directly to your inbox, sign up here. Article content TOP STORY Article content The Senate, not normally a hub of political intrigue, has recently witnessed a sudden tide of defections to the Conservative caucus. So far this month, three Senators — two of whom were appointed by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau — have announced that they will henceforth be sitting as Conservatives. Article content It's been an unexpected reprieve for a caucus that was increasingly lurching towards extinction. As of this writing, 85 of 105 Canadian Senators were appointed by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Before the recent floor-crossings, one third of the 11 remaining Tories were set to reach mandatory retirement age within the next two years. Article content Article content As to why this is happening, the new Tory senators all cited different reasons, ranging from a generalized horror with regards to the state of the country, to a desire to 'build bridges' on Indigenous reconciliation. Article content Mary Jane McCallum, a veteran dentist and member of the Barren Lands First Nation in Manitoba, is the only member of the Senate to have been sent to an Indian residential school. From age 5 to 16, she attended Guy Hill Residential School. In Senate testimony, she has described her main emotions during that period as 'overwhelming loneliness' and a 'bewildering feeling of abandonment.' Article content Indigenous issues and reconciliation have come up often in her Senate work. In just the last couple of weeks, McCallum tabled legislation that would bind the RCMP to follow 'First Nations laws,' and another bill that would allow the prosecution of First Nations laws by Crown lawyers. On June 3, she said she would be asking for a Senate probe into whether Canada's treatment of Indigenous people constituted 'a crime against humanity and a genocide.' Article content As to why McCallum decided to join the Conservative caucus, in a Tuesday statement she framed it as a way towards 'building bridges.' Article content 'Our communities have long sought opportunities for greater collaboration and mutual understanding,' she said. 'By joining the Senate Conservative Caucus I hope to help broaden the conversation and ensure Indigenous perspectives are reflected across the full political spectrum.' Article content Article content BREAKING 🚨 DERNIÈRE HEURE Senator Mary Jane McCallum Joins Senate Conservative Caucus La sénatrice Mary Jane McCallum rejoint le caucus conservateur au Sénat — Senator Leo Housakos (@SenatorHousakos) June 10, 2025 Article content David Richards Article content Article content A novelist and playwright before he was appointed to the Senate by Trudeau in 2017, David Richards has been a vocal critic of the Liberal government for some time now. Article content This was most notable in 2023, when Richards delivered a scathing critique of the Online Streaming Act, the bill that gave broad powers to the CRTC to impose content quotas on streaming platforms such as YouTube and Netflix. 'I think it's censorship passing as national inclusion,' he said in a Senate soliloquy that mentioned George Orwell, Cicero, the East German Stasi and the censorship regime of Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin. Article content 'I think, overall, we have lately become a land of scapegoaters and finger pointers, offering accusations and shame while believing we are a woke society,' he said, concluding 'this law will be one of scapegoating all those who do not fit into what our bureaucrats think Canada should be.' Article content Richards' first Senate statements since the reopening of Parliament have stuck to the same general themes. On June 5, he asked Marc Gold, the government's representative in the Senate, if he could 'admit that much of the policy that the former government promoted in this chamber has bled in many ways into the horrible calamities that this country finds itself in today?'
Winnipeg Free Press
12 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
What are ‘nation-building projects' anyway?
Opinion The Canadian Press reports that 38 CEOs of Canadian energy companies signed a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney, congratulating him for his election win and pitching policy measures like overhauling (read 'gutting') the Impact Assessment Act, scrapping federal emissions caps on oil and gas and repealing industrial carbon pricing. Carney met with them and thanked them for their communications. (Carney talks partnerships with energy execs, Free Press, June 2). Then, 13 premiers met with the PM to pitch their favourite projects which include pipelines and nuclear plants. The process sounds more like a high-stakes version of Dragons' Den, with the feds ready to dole out the public purse, than it does a thoughtful, serious assessment of the very real dangers that Canada faces — not just from the U.S. tariffs and the economy, but also from climate change. Couldn't the premiers smell the smoke emanating from the infernos blazing across the northern forests as they sat behind closed doors in a Saskatoon hotel room? Now the PM and cabinet will make decisions about which of these projects make the cut — which ones will be 'pre-approved' and fast-tracked. A few hints are leaking out: looks like nuclear will make the short list, along with 'decarbonized barrels of oil' — which is shorthand for as yet unproven carbon capture, but which sounds like a perfect oxymoron. What are the criteria for these decisions? Does anyone know? Will the public get that information? Will Parliament? Just a week before that, 130 civil society organizations from across the country, representing many thousands of Canadians, also wrote the PM, reminding him that the 'nation-building' energy and infrastructure projects that Canada needs will not only create good jobs and build the economy, but also respect Indigenous rights and protect the climate. Oil and gas development and pipelines will not meet these goals, never mind the threats of Alberta separation. Did Alberta Premier Danielle Smith not get the memo that several oilsands sites were evacuating due to wildfires? Oh, the irony). Nuclear builds are too slow to address the global warming crisis and nuclear is among the most expensive forms of electricity production. Taxpayer dollars can be invested way more efficiently in actual renewable energy sources (including efficiency and storage) — all available now and ready to be deployed, and regional and national grid interconnections that are so sorely needed. These are the best investment for energy supply, requiring less capital investment and providing the best return on the dollar in terms of energy production, job creation, and rapid greenhouse gas reduction. And imagine for a moment a remote nuclear plant engulfed in a wildfire. (Thinking here about Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe who promotes 'small modular nuclear reactors' for remote communities while acknowledging at the time that his province 'cannot manage and handle a single other fire'). Oil, gas and nuclear projects are more properly 'nation destroying' projects. Ask any of the First Nations currently evacuating their homes and territories as climate change creates prime conditions for out-of-control fires. It's unlikely the PM will meet with civil society groups (though we did ask). Will he meet with and more importantly, hear the concerns of, First Nations worried that 'fast tracking' impact assessments will only run rough-shod over their rights and lands? As Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs Grand Chief Derek Nepinak put it 'We need to talk about these issues collectively… our inherent rights, treaty rights and human rights are at issue…' Also at issue: our children's future. How is it that we can be at this point in history where we know without a doubt what the impacts of climate change are — and yet our governments seem prepared to invest and go whole hog into the very same industrial development schemes that created the problem in the first place? If it's true as the International Energy Agency has stated that countries will be seeking non-fuel-dependent sources of energy and actually winding down fossil fuel infrastructure by 2030, why would Canada spend crucial resources (our money) on exactly these fuel dependent technologies? (For the record, nuclear is dependent on uranium and therefore not renewable). Can you say, 'stranded assets'? Not only are we at risk of betting the farm on unsustainable projects and creating even more economic chaos for the future, by not changing the development paradigm we put at risk the very building blocks and sustainers of life itself — water, air, forests, oceans, the ability to grow food. We owe it to future generations (as well as ourselves and especially those being drastically impacted by climate change today) to turn this ship around. The energy CEOs might not agree, but that's what our premiers should be calling for. That's what our new government should be determined to do. Anne Lindsey volunteers with the No Nukes MB campaign of the Manitoba Energy Justice Coalition and has been monitoring nuclear waste since the 1980s.
