Indigenous 2SLGBTQ+ advocates brace for changes under Trump
Indigenous people who advocate for 2SLGBTQ+ communities are questioning how their rights may change under the Trump administration in the U.S.
In January, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an order that the United States will recognize only two sexes, male and female, that are unchangeable.
Alex Wilson from Opaskwayak Cree Nation in Manitoba, an activist for queer, transgender, and two-spirit rights, said she sees growing anti-transgender sentiments brewing south of the border.
"It's a cycle that happens when there's policy that allows for the continuation of violence or that kind of condones it, then we see people picking it up and acting out those behaviours," Wilson said.
"They're not acknowledging that there is a gender diversity or even sexual diversity. And we're seeing that trickle over here, too."
Wilson sees these policies as a danger to Indigenous sovereignty.
"It negates the reality that we have had many genders, not just two, three, but many understandings of gender and many sexualities in our nations since the beginning. And it's even part of some of our creation stories."
Montana bill ruled unconstitutional
David Herrera, co-founder and executive director of the Montana Two Spirit Society, is of Mestizo and adopted Blackfeet background and an advocate and educator for 2SLGBTQ+ communities.
In 2023, the Montana Two Spirit Society along with members of the transgender, intersex community filed a lawsuit in Missoula County District Court challenging Montana Senate Bill 458, which would define "male" and "female" as binary based on the presence of XY or XX chromosomes.
They argued it would infringe on the rights of members of the 2SLGBTQ+ community, as well as the cultural and spiritual importance of two-spirit people. Last month, the plaintiffs won and the bill was declared unconstitutional.
"It's definitely part of the colonization that has occurred and the attempt to erase the two-spirit culture," said Herrera.
He said policies like these are nothing new and have played a culturally detrimental part in colonial history that has tried to erase Indigenous 2SLGBTQ+ identities.
"We are not going to go away. We are going to continue," said Herrera.
Charlie Amáyá Scott grew up in the Navajo Nation and now works as an educator focusing on what it means to be queer, trans, and Indigenous.
"I think what I'm seeing within my community is that there is a lot of fear of what this really means in the long run," Scott said.
"There's a lot of fear of the violence that could occur, whether it's being detained at the borders, whether it's being questioned about who you really are or whether it's you're being arrested, which all of that specifically would lead to incarceration."
Her focus is ensuring that people and their stories are protected.
"If I'm being quite frank, my concern is about myself right now and has been about my community ensuring their survival. I have been really focused on ensuring that my trans siblings and my relatives, whether they're two-spirit or part of the LGBTQ community, survives," said Scott.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Feasibility without First Nations isn't feasible
Opinion Earlier this month, the governments of Ontario, Alberta and Saskatchewan signed an agreement to explore the 'feasibility of a new west-east pipeline to bring western oil and gas to southern Ontario refineries and ports.' In a news release, Alberta premier Danielle Smith said: 'By advancing a Canadian energy corridor from Alberta to Ontario, we are securing long-term energy access for families and businesses, creating thousands of jobs, and opening new doors for trade and investment, while strengthening our position as a global energy leader.' There's only one problem, and it's a big one: Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew didn't sign it. So much for feasibility. Since the federal government's passing of the One Canadian Economy Act (Bill C-5), which promises to expedite approvals for projects deemed 'in the national interest,' provinces have been rushing to position themselves with Prime Minister Mark Carney's cabinet in the hopes their regional initiatives and economic dreams will come true. Ontario has even passed its own version of the federal bill, in what is surely a move to speed up approval for the Ring of Fire critical mineral project despite Indigenous opposition. The challenge for all of this — if you can call it a challenge — has been Canada's legal requirement under Section 35 of the Constitution to attain 'free, prior, and informed consent' when it comes to including and respecting Indigenous and treaty rights. Simply put, few provinces have partnership agreements with First Nations to build economic projects and, for those that do, these were made after lengthy and costly court battles, negotiations, and conflict. The federal bill, Ontario's bill and the 'feasibility' agreement between Alberta, Saskatchewan and Ontario has no First Nations, Métis or Inuit approval. In other words, they are not worth much and are simply a cause for conflict. To be honest, development occurred much quicker when Canada was genocidal. Until the past five decades, Canada never had a legal duty to consult Indigenous peoples on the land, water, the economy, or frankly anything really — so, it didn't. Since the country's founding in 1867 (and arguably before that), Canadian legislators took Indigenous and treaty land, moved people whenever and wherever, and made unilateral decisions on Indigenous lives and families all the time. When law got in the way, other laws were passed under the justification that Canada's national interests were paramount. This meant that swaths of Indian reserve lands were taken whenever a company, corporation, or the military wanted. Or, that masses of Indigenous leaders were imprisoned, Indigenous women were stripped of rights, and children were taken. All this happened blatantly. A few kilometres from where Winnipeggers sit was the St. Peter's Indian Band, whose lands in and around Selkirk were taken illegally in 1907 while the community was removed to what is now Peguis Indian Reserve. The tide started to change in the 1970s, when Canada's Supreme Court recognized that Indigenous title (and therefore law, government, and rights) existed and Canada had to start to act justly, humanely, and with consideration of their humanity. Things were supposed to be different — but old Canadian habits die hard. From the One Canadian Economy Act to the actions of provincial premiers, Canadian leaders continue to act as if Indigenous peoples are an afterthought, using age-old arguments that Canada's 'national interests' are paramount. That is, until Kinew — who has not shied away from interest in lucrative land and resource projects — refused to join his provincial counterparts. 'In other parts of the country with other levels of government, there's the commitment to maybe push things through with legislation first,' Kinew told media, explaining his decision. 'That puts other partners on the back foot.' Don't be confused. When Kinew says 'other partners,' he means First Nations, Inuit, and Métis rights holders. What the premier is doing isn't because he's First Nations, it's because he's trying to follow Canadian law. History has proven it's a tremendous waste of time, money, and energy to exclude Indigenous rights holders from conversations surrounding land, resources, and, frankly, the country. The first and most important 'project in the national interest' is to include Indigenous governments at the outset of every single decision this country makes. Anything else is illegal. An unprecedented step however requires an unprecedented idea. For Kinew, it's a Crown corporation (on par with entities such Manitoba Hydro and Manitoba Public Insurance) that can assemble Indigenous leadership to review and give approval of economic land and resource projects alongside provincial regulators. This 'Crown Indigenous corporation' would require buy-in and unity from Indigenous leadership — and seems to have almost immediately gained it. This week, the Southern Chiefs' Organization and the Manitoba Métis Federation came to an agreement to collectively 'advance economic reconciliation, protect Indigenous rights, and collaborate on major infrastructure and development projects across Manitoba.' That's no coincidence. That's First Nations and Métis holders on the front foot and reserving their spot at the table. Niigaan SinclairColumnist Niigaan Sinclair is Anishinaabe and is a columnist at the Winnipeg Free Press. Read full biography Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Cision Canada
4 hours ago
- Cision Canada
Minister Dabrusin - Statement on the conclusion of the resumed Fifth Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on Plastic Pollution (INC-5.2) Français
Statement GATINEAU, QC, /CNW/ - The Honourable Julie Dabrusin, Minister of Environment and Climate Change, issued the following statement at the conclusion of the resumed fifth Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on Plastic Pollution (INC-5.2), held in Geneva, Switzerland, from August 5 to 14, 2025. "Three years ago, the United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA) unanimously adopted a historic resolution to develop a legally binding global treaty to end plastic pollution. The INC process has brought the plastic pollution crisis to the forefront of international agenda. While we had hoped to finalize an agreement at INC-5.2, Canada remains firmly committed to securing an ambitious, effective, and fit-for-purpose global treaty that addresses the entire lifecycle of plastics. "The plastic pollution crisis affects our environment, economy, and communities. Addressing this issue is complex and requires a comprehensive, system-wide approach to drive the lasting change necessary to end plastic pollution and create a cleaner, healthier future for generations to come. "Canada continues to take a leadership role in addressing plastic pollution by advocating for effective, science-based solutions. Our country is recognized internationally for its commitment to combating plastic pollution, which began with the introduction of the Ocean Plastics Charter during our G7 Presidency in 2018. Domestically, we are implementing a comprehensive plan to reduce plastic waste and pollution, promote a circular economy for plastics, and foster science, innovation, and transparency. "Our delegation to INC-5.2 included representatives from provinces and territories and national Indigenous organizations, who have provided vital input throughout this process. Indigenous Peoples are disproportionately affected by plastic pollution and Canada has consistently advocated for the treaty to reflect Indigenous rights, knowledge and perspectives. "Canada actively engaged in the negotiations to tackle plastic pollution, and organized virtual roundtables that brought together environmental organizations, industry representatives, and civil society. These discussions enhanced collaboration and will inspire innovative solutions to this pressing issue. "Canada did not accept a treaty that only focuses on cleaning up the problem. Any global treaty on plastic pollution must prevent the problem from continuing. It also must recognize the right of Indigenous Peoples to be protected. "Despite the efforts and hard work of thousands of delegates at INC-5.2, more work is needed to secure an effective global treaty that addresses the entire lifecycle of plastics. "Canada continues to believe there is value in continuing the challenging negotiations on this issue understanding its interlinkages to climate change and biodiversity loss. Canada's delegation is working closely with other like-minded countries to define clear next steps and ensure that the momentum we have made over the past two and a half years is not lost. "As we move forward, Canada will continue working in collaboration with global and domestic partners, provinces and territories, Indigenous Peoples, and industry and civil society to forge a strong international treaty. Together, we can ensure that plastics remain part of a circular economy while striving for a cleaner and healthier environment for everyone." Quick facts As an inaugural member of the High Ambition Coalition to End Plastic Pollution and founder of the INC Host Country Alliance, Canada has consistently pushed for an ambitious, effective, and fit-for-purpose treaty to tackle plastic pollution. The Government of Canada is implementing an ambitious, evidence-based plan to reduce plastic waste and pollution. This comprehensive plan promotes a strong and resilient circular plastics economy that works for all and protects the environment and human health. Working with partners, Canada's plan advances a range of complementary actions across the plastics lifecycle. Canada's approach to plastic waste is evidence-based. The Government continues to invest in science to guide actions and track progress. It supports initiatives aligned with the waste hierarchy to prevent plastic pollution and improve how plastics are made, used, and managed. This keeps them in the economy and out of the environment. Actions include banning harmful plastic products; supporting Canadian innovations enabling a systematic shift towards a circular economy; and greening our operations and procurement. The federal, provincial and territorial governments are working together, through the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, to implement the Canada-wide Strategy on Zero Plastic Waste and Action Plan. This includes developing guidance to make producers responsible for the waste their products generate; helping Canadians make informed decisions about their plastic use; and preventing plastic pollution from sources such as stormwater, industrial releases, and natural disasters. SOURCE Environment and Climate Change Canada
Calgary Herald
5 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
North American Indigenous Games withdraws Calgary's hosting rights for the 2027 Games
The North American Indigenous Games Council has withdrawn Calgary's hosting rights for the 2027 Games, said the Games' hosting society, which 'cited it faced shifting requirements and unreasonable demands'. Article content The hosting society accused Tourism Calgary of withholding committed operational funding from the City of Calgary, 'leaving the Host Society without the resources needed to plan and deliver the Games as envisioned.' Article content Article content Article content 'As Indigenous people, we recognize these challenges within the broader context of systemic barriers that continue to limit our self-determination,' added the hosting society, which was formed after the bid to host the Games in Calgary was won. Article content Article content 'Given the challenges that emerged throughout the planning process, we support the NAIG Council and its difficult decision to withdraw the 2027 Games from Calgary.' Article content
