Land reform minister defends new race classification requirements for land transfers as part of dept's land audit
CAPE TOWN - Land Reform Minister Mzwanele Nyhontso has defended new race classification requirements in the transfer of land as part of his department's land audit.
He told Wednesday's economic cluster ministerial question session that government had to know who owned the land in the country and was not targeting any particular race.
Nyhontso was responding to a question from the Democratic Alliance (DA), which wants him to amend the new regulation that requires people who receive land to disclose their race and gender.
The DA's Mlindi Nhanha asked Minister Nyhontso what the legal and constitutional basis was for making the disclosure of race and gender mandatory in the new requirements for the transfer of property.
The DA also wrote to Nyhontso demanding that he withdraw the new race rules in the deeds offices across South Africa, calling on him to halt their enforcement.
But Nyhontso said that the requirement was necessary.
"This regulation is not going to be used against other races. This regulation is going to be used to understand the land and to understand who owns the land, so we are able to audit the land in this country."
Nyhontso also told the House that R26 billion was paid to former land owners and R27 billion was paid for financial compensation to claimants.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
5 hours ago
- The South African
Elon Musk blasts Donald Trump's mega-bill as 'disgusting abomination'
Tensions between Elon Musk and Donald Trump erupted as the world's richest man derided the president's key piece of economic legislation in a startling rupture just days after exiting a controversial job in the White House. Musk was lauded by the Republican leader as he left his advisory role atop Trump's 'Department of Government Efficiency' last week, despite criticism over his failure to deliver on promises of radical spending cuts. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk posted on X as he followed its progress from the sidelines, in by far his most caustic remarks on Trump's agenda. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong.' It was not Musk's first comments on Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful bill' which is set to add $3 trillion to US deficits over a 10-year horizon, despite deep cuts to health and food aid programmes. But Musk's previous criticism was more restrained, with the Tesla and SpaceX magnate offering only that it undermined his cost-cutting efforts. On Tuesday he said the bill – being considered by Congress – would burden 'citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' His post laid bare an increasingly tense relationship between the White House and Musk, who donated almost $300 million to Trump's 2024 election campaign. Musk has become disillusioned, US media reported, as his goals for White House action that would benefit him personally have gone unrealised. The bill he was criticising cuts the electric vehicle tax credit – bad news for Tesla – while Axios reported that Musk was rebuffed in his efforts to extend his role beyond the statutory 130-day limit. He also failed to have his Starlink satellite system used for air traffic control, according to Axios, and was angered by Trump withdrawing the nomination of Musk ally Jared Isaacman to be NASA chief. The normally pugilistic Trump has pulled his punches, aware of his biggest backer's enormous influence over young, tech-savvy and historically apathetic voters – a key Trump constituency in 2024. 'The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill, it doesn't change his opinion,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters in a rapid response to Musk's tweet. The spat came with House Republicans set to pass legislation sent from the White House to enshrine into law $9.4 billion of DOGE's cuts, mostly money destined for public broadcasting and foreign aid. House Speaker Mike Johnson called Musk's comments 'disappointing,' adding that he had walked the entrepreneur through the bill on Monday, and that he 'seemed to understand.' As the world's richest person bowed out of his role as Trump's cost-cutter-in-chief, their relationship appeared on an even keel as the Republican hailed his fellow billionaire's 'incredible service.' Trump even insisted that Musk was 'really not leaving' after a turbulent four months in which the South Africa-born tycoon cut tens of thousands of jobs, shuttered whole agencies and slashed foreign aid. DOGE led an ideologically driven rampage through the federal government, with its young 'tech bros' slashing tens of thousands of jobs. But its achievements fell far short of Musk's original boast that he could save $2 trillion – more than the government's entire discretionary spending budget for 2024. The DOGE website claims to have saved taxpayers less than a tenth of that total – just $180 billion – and fact checkers even see that claim as dubious, given previous inaccuracies in its accounting. Senate Democrats released a report on Tuesday itemising 130 examples of 'unethical or potentially corrupt' administration actions they say have helped Musk dodge regulation and add $100 billion to his wealth. The report came as senators began what is expected to be a fraught month of negotiations on Trump's mammoth policy package, expected to add between $2.5 trillion and $3.1 trillion to deficits over a decade. Trump said on Monday it was 'the single biggest Spending Cut in History,' although he added: 'The only 'cutting' we will do is for Waste, Fraud, and Abuse.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news. By Garrin Lambley © Agence France-Presse
The Citizen
8 hours ago
- The Citizen
‘No justification for tampering with the constitution': MK party and DA slug it out over no-confidence motion limits
Have motions of no confidence become political weapons? The uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) party has rejected a proposal by the Democratic Alliance (DA) to amend the Constitution of South Africa, making it difficult to bring numerous motions of no confidence against the executive in all three spheres of government. The DA believes that over the years, motions of no confidence have been used for political point scoring, destabilising the work of governance and threatening the consistency of service delivery. The City of Johannesburg has been a victim of such motions of no confidence abuses. While not all mayors in this City were removed through motions of confidence, the city has elected more than eight mayors since 2016. How many motions of no confidence are enough? On Wednesday, MK party spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela said that the amendment would make it difficult to hold the executive accountable. This proposal constitutes a direct challenge to parliamentary oversight and represents a desperate attempt to shield the executive from scrutiny and accountability. 'It is a reactionary and democratic manoeuvre disguised as reform. Under the guise of creating stability, the amendment would tie parliament's hands for 12 months at a time, even in the face of ethical collapse, public outrage, or constitutional violations. 'This effectively grants political immunity to underperforming or compromised leaders,' he said. DA not prepared to withdraw Ndhlela said there are existing parliamentary rules that already allow the speaker of the National Assembly or presiding officers to reject frivolous or repetitive motions. He said there is 'no justification for tampering with the constitution' to solve 'a problem that doesn't exist'. 'The MK party rejects this amendment in its entirety. It is redundant, regressive, dishonest, unnecessary and dangerous. 'Parliament's power to hold the executive accountable must be expanded, not neutered. We call on the DA to withdraw this embarrassing and authoritarian stunt before further damaging what remains of its credibility,' he said. Speaking to The Citizen, DA spokesperson Willie Aucamp said the party is proposing two bills related to this matter. 'We cannot allow the kind of instability that we have seen in municipalities,' he said. Aucamp said the party will not withdraw the proposed bills. ALSO READ: Zuma point man touted to replace Shivambu as MK party SG Analyst weighs in Meanwhile, Theo Neethling, a political analyst from the University of the Free State (UFS), told The Citizen that limiting motions of no confidence in legislatures would reduce political grandstanding and make the submission of a motion of no confidence more meaningful. 'Personally, I would support restrictions on these motions only once every 12 months to the date of the last motion. The reason is that this could help reduce political grandstanding and reduce institutional instability,' he said. However, Neethling said he was not sure if other parties would support the DA's proposal. Former Minister of Co-operative Governance Thembi Nkadimeng had proposed a set of reforms aimed at stabilising coalition government while she was in office. This included introducing a cooling-off period after a motion of no confidence vote in councils. NOW READ: Did Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla's faction dribble Shivambu out of power?
IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
DA pressure reignites SANDF COVID drug investigation
Both the Hawks and the SIU are proceeding with the investigation into SANDF Cuban Covid looting spree, says the writer. The criminal investigation into how over R250 million was misspent by the SA National Defence Force in 2020 on an unapproved anti-COVID vaccine from Cuba is advancing again after significant DA pressure. Both the Hawks and the SIU are proceeding with this investigation, and complainant statements were taken in person this week to support the charges the DA laid with the SAPS in 2022. Because the criminal investigation had gone cold, the DA used Parliamentary Questions to the Minister of Police to prompt him on the delay in the investigation, and wrote letters to the Minister too, and following this DA intervention, the criminal investigation has been revived. The DA will now push for concrete timelines for the full investigation of this case, and we expect that it will be handed over for prosecution. Those responsible for the SANDF Cuban Covid looting spree, under the guise of a public health emergency, must be held to account — regardless of their rank or political connections. During the most recent sitting of the Joint Standing Committee on Defence (JSCD), the DA successfully proposed that all Hawks and SIU investigations into corruption and maladministration in the SANDF - including this scandal - be reported on quarterly. The committee supported this proposal, marking a critical step in restoring transparency and oversight in historical defence misspending. 'Whilst always abroad', Minister Motshekga may be comfortable with impunity in uniform. The DA is not. We will continue to demand answers and ensure that the Minister of Defence focuses her attention on Defence priorities inland. Nicholas Gotsell (MP) DA NCOP Member on Security & Justice
