logo
Reigniting Actionable Allyship In This Moment Of Perpetual Uncertainty

Reigniting Actionable Allyship In This Moment Of Perpetual Uncertainty

Forbes16-04-2025

Lost and confused businessman walking in meadow. This is entirely 3D generated image.
Stress levels in the U.S. are at record highs with one in four adults having experienced mental illness in the past year. According to MSNBC, 'With election chaos, rising global costs, health concerns, work pressures, and relationship demands, nearly 40% of Americans report experiencing peak stress.' This perpetual uncertainty is not sustainable.
Focusing on what we can control in times of peak stress helps us cope. One of the best stress relievers is community, gathering with other humans, even when we might feel like isolating ourselves from the uncertain world. As a social species, we are not meant to survive alone. Humans are wired for connection. We seek places where we belong.
In this massively uncertain moment, allyship (supporting and receiving support from others different from yourself) can help facilitate belonging and connection.
In my conversation with Dr. Akilah Cadet, Founder and CEO of Change Cadet, and author of White Supremacy Is All Around: Notes From a Black Disabled Woman in a White World, Cadet said, 'Companies and leaders who remain committed to diversity, equity and inclusion need to move past allyship to being actionable daily, role modeling their own intersectionality that gives permission for their teams to do the same.'
Yet, the opposite is happening in corporate America. Organizations are scaling back from the inclusion work meant to drive belonging and community at work. A recent LinkedIn Live session hosted by author and organizational consultant Lily Zheng, Kenji Yoshino and David Glasgow underscored the importance of maintaining diversity, equity and inclusion programs, explaining that if organizations choose to pivot away from these programs, 'They're in for a world of pain.'
The risks of exclusion far outweigh the costs of inclusion programs. In my conversation with Karen Catlin, author of the Better Allies book series, she sees this as a stark reminder of the potential legal consequences of neglecting inclusion work. While she's heartened by organizations that are upholding their commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion, resisting threats from activist shareholders and the federal government, Catlin believes there's a role for individuals to play. 'There are lawful, everyday actions we can take in our workplaces to make them more inclusive, where everyone can do their best work and thrive.'
Cadet shared that 'Our intersectionality is at the core of how we use our power and privilege to show up for ourselves first and others second. With the federal attack on diversity, equity and inclusion, companies have been forced to make a decision on where they stand. But the question is, who did they include in these efforts? Were they only focused on women, white women, Black people? Was it inclusive from the start? For example, many efforts left out the disability community leaving us in a place to constantly advocate for ourselves with little to no allyship.'
Specifically, there are three federal acts that protect this work, that even under this anti-inclusion administration, are very unlikely to shift:
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 stands as a cornerstone of U.S. employment law, fundamentally prohibiting discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin. This protection extends across all facets of employment, from hiring and promotion to compensation and termination, ensuring equitable treatment for all individuals. Even under new leadership, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is required to enforce these provisions, empowering individuals to seek redress against discriminatory practices. Crucially, the law also safeguards those who report discrimination, preventing retaliation and fostering a culture of accountability in the workplace.
If organizations cut their inclusion programs, they are exposing their organization to discrimination lawsuits and legal fees associated with exclusion. The EEOC received 88,531 new charges of discrimination in 2024, a number up 9% from the previous year.
The Equal Pay Act of 1963 is a federal law that mandates equal pay for equal work, regardless of sex. Specifically, it requires that men and women in the same workplace receive the same pay for jobs that demand substantially equal skill, effort and responsibility under similar working conditions. This law aims to eliminate wage disparities based on gender, ensuring fairness in compensation. Enforcement of the Equal Pay Act, often handled in conjunction with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, is done through the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
In 2024, there was $40 million awarded in monetary relief for pay inequity. This is not only financially costly but also harmful to the organization's brand, leaving a stain on its reputation for current and potential employees and customers.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a civil rights law that prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in all areas of public life, including employment, education, transportation and public accommodations. It mandates that employers with 15 or more employees provide reasonable accommodations to qualified individuals with disabilities, unless doing so would cause undue hardship. The ADA ensures that people with disabilities have equal opportunities to participate fully in society, promoting inclusion and accessibility. Section 504 prohibits discrimination based on disability in programs or activities that receive federal financial assistance, which is being challenged under the current administration.
ADA lawsuits are also on the rise, with a total of 8,800 Title III complaints filed—a 7% increase from 2023. If your organization thinks that it can cut back on inclusion work unscathed, be prepared for increased lawsuits and brand reputation risk.
Where do we stand, and where do we go from here? Join Karen Catlin, Dr. Akilah Cadet and me as we tackle tough but necessary conversations on allyship, action and accountability in a free webinar on April 23. Learn how to move beyond performative gestures, re-engage meaningfully and navigate discomfort in today's political and social climate. Whether you're setting boundaries, or taking your activism further, consider this your invitation to allyship.​

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What are Americans' morning struggles?
What are Americans' morning struggles?

New York Post

time19 minutes ago

  • New York Post

What are Americans' morning struggles?

Two in five Americans are 'bad' at mornings, according to new research. The survey of 2,000 general population Americans revealed 38% agreed with this sentiment — and respondents get out of bed later than planned an average of eight times per month. Advertisement For one in 10 respondents, this happens more than 20 times per month. When they're rushing through their morning routine, after staying in bed longer than planned, respondents were most likely to skip eating breakfast (41%). But others will neglect their personal hygiene: 16% will skip showering, while 11% will go about their day without brushing their teeth. 5 The average alarm user sets two alarms in the morning, and a fifth will hit snooze at least three times before they actually get up out of bed according to new research. Ana Blazic Pavlovic – Advertisement Commissioned by Avocado Green Mattress and conducted by Talker Research, the survey also looked at respondents' alarm habits. Less than half (43%) use an alarm to wake up in the morning — and for these respondents, the results revealed their first alarm goes off at 6:33 a.m. Younger generations were more likely to rely on an alarm: While just a fifth (19%) of baby boomers set an alarm, 63% of Gen Z and millennials do the same. Across ages, the average alarm user sets two alarms in the morning, and a fifth will hit snooze at least three times before they actually get up out of bed. 5 The survey revealed that less than half of the people who participated (43%) use an alarm to wake up in the morning SWNS Advertisement The survey also split respondents by early birds and night owls to see how that impacts their alarm habits and their sleep overall. Two-thirds (67%) of early birds who use an alarm said it's 'very effective' at getting them out of bed on time — compared to just half (52%) of night owls. Early birds were more likely to use a 'standard' or preset alarm sound (70% vs. 58%), while night owls were more likely to have an 'annoying' sound — like a fire alarm or honking cars — to wake them up (20% vs. 12%). Unsurprisingly, night owls were more likely to struggle to get out of bed on time (54% vs. 17%). Night owls were also more likely to say their body needs more sleep than they're currently getting (70% vs. 55%). That's despite the two groups getting about the same amount of sleep — right around six and a half hours per night. Advertisement 'Whether you're a morning person or a night owl, quality sleep is non-negotiable,' said Laura Scott, Director of Brand Marketing at Avocado Green Mattress. 'Your natural sleep rhythm should be supported — not disrupted — by an environment designed for deep, restorative rest.' 5 51% of Americans are 'bad' at sleep due to their own anxieties keeping them awake. SWNS The top reason Americans aren't getting enough sleep? Their own worries are keeping them up (51%). That was followed by a sleep condition (like insomnia, sleep apnea, etc.) (30%) and nightmares or stress dreams (20%). Also in the top five was an uncomfortable bed or mattress making it more difficult to sleep (19%) and loud noises outside (14%) keeping respondents awake. 5 Sleep conditions, nightmares, uncomfortable mattresses, and loud noises are other significant sleep deterrents. Prostock-studio – While night owls (35%) and early birds (37%) were almost equally likely to struggle to stay asleep, night owls were more likely to face other difficulties. This included going to bed later than they 'should' in the evening (48% vs. 24%), struggling to fall asleep (44% vs. 27%) and staying in bed longer than they 'should' in the morning (25% vs. 8%). Advertisement 5 Creating a stable sleep habits is very important for daily living. Elnur – 'So many of us lie awake at night, our minds racing with worry or stress,' said Scott. 'That's why it's so important to create sleep spaces and habits that are calm and supportive — so you can wake up feeling like yourself again.' Survey methodology: Talker Research surveyed 2,000 general population Americans; the survey was commissioned by Avocado Green Mattress and administered and conducted online by Talker Research between May 9–15, 2025.

Who's in charge? CDC's leadership 'crisis' apparent amid new COVID-19 vaccine guidance
Who's in charge? CDC's leadership 'crisis' apparent amid new COVID-19 vaccine guidance

San Francisco Chronicle​

time38 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Who's in charge? CDC's leadership 'crisis' apparent amid new COVID-19 vaccine guidance

WASHINGTON (AP) — There was a notable absence last week when U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced in a 58-second video that the government would no longer endorse the COVID-19 vaccine for healthy children or pregnant women. The director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — the person who typically signs off on federal vaccine recommendations — was nowhere to be seen. The CDC, a $9.2 billion-a-year agency tasked with reviewing life-saving vaccines, monitoring diseases and watching for budding threats to Americans' health, is without a clear leader. 'I've been disappointed that we haven't had an aggressive director since — February, March, April, May — fighting for the resources that CDC needs,' said Dr. Robert Redfield, who served as CDC director under the first Trump administration and supported Kennedy's nomination as the nation's health secretary. $9.2 billion-a-year agency without leader as nomination awaits The leadership vacuum at a foremost federal public health agency has existed for months, after President Donald Trump suddenly withdrew his first pick for CDC director in March. A hearing for his new nominee — the agency's former acting director Susan Monarez — has not been scheduled because she has not submitted all the paperwork necessary to proceed, according to a spokesman for Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., who will oversee the nomination. HHS did not answer written questions about Monarez's nomination, her current role at the CDC or her salary. An employee directory lists Monarez, a longtime government employee, as a staffer for the NIH under the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health. Instead, a lawyer and political appointee with no medical experience is 'carrying out some of the duties' of director at the agency that for seven decades has been led by someone with a medical degree. Matthew Buzzelli, who is also the chief of staff at the CDC, is 'surrounded by highly qualified medical professionals and advisors to help fulfill these duties as appropriate,' Andrew Nixon, an HHS spokesperson said in a statement. Adding to the confusion was an employee-wide email sent last week that thanked 'new acting directors who shave stepped up to the plate." The email, signed by Monarez, listed her as the acting director. It was was sent just days after Kennedy said at a Senate hearing that Monarez had been replaced by Buzzelli. The lack of a confirmed director will be a problem if a public health emergency such as the COVID-19 pandemic or a rapid uptick in measles cases hits, said Michael Osterholm, an epidemiologist at the University of Minnesota. 'CDC is a crisis, waiting for a crisis to happen,' said Osterholm. 'At this point, I couldn't tell you for the life of me who was going to pull what trigger in a crisis situation." An acting director rarely seen, and stalled decisions At CDC headquarters in Atlanta, employees say Monarez was rarely heard from between late January – when she was appointed acting director – and late March, when Trump nominated her. She also has not held any of the 'all hands' meetings that were customary under previous CDC chiefs, according to several staffers. One employee, who insisted on anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media and fears being fired if identified said Monarez has been almost invisible since her nomination, adding that her absence has been cited by other leaders as an excuse for delaying action. The situation already has led to confusion. In April, a 15-member CDC advisory panel of outside experts met to discuss vaccine policy. The panel makes recommendations to the CDC Director, who routinely signs off on them. But it was unclear during the meeting who would be reviewing the panel's recommendations, which included the expansion of RSV vaccinations for adults and a new combination shot as another option to protect teens against meningitis. HHS officials said the recommendations were going to Buzzelli, but then weeks passed with no decision. A month after the meeting ended, the CDC posted on a web site that Kennedy had signed off on recommendations for travelers against chikungunya, a viral disease transmitted to humans by mosquitos. But there continues to be no word about a decision about the other vaccine recommendations. The problem was accentuated again last week, when Kennedy rolled out recommendations for the COVID-19 vaccine saying they were no longer recommended for healthy children or pregnant women, even though expectant mothers are considered a high-risk group if they contract the virus. Kennedy made the surprise announcement without input from the CDC advisory panel that has historically made recommendations on the nation's vaccine schedule. The CDC days later posted revised guidance that said healthy kids and pregnant women may get the shots. Nixon, the HHS spokesman, said CDC staff were consulted on the recommendations, but would not provide staffer's names or titles. He also did not provide the specific data or research that Kennedy reviewed to reach his conclusion on the new COVID-19 recommendations, just weeks after he said that he did not think 'people should be taking medical advice' from him. 'As Secretary Kennedy said, there is a clear lack of data to support the repeat booster strategy in children,' Nixon said in a statement. Research shows that pregnant women are at higher risk of severe illness, mechanical ventilation and death, when they contract COVID-19 infections. During the height of the pandemic, deaths of women during pregnancy or shortly after childbirth soared to their highest level in 50 years. Vaccinations also have been recommended for pregnant women because it passes immunity to newborns who are too young for vaccines and also vulnerable to infections. Nixon did not address a written question about recommendations for pregnant women. Kennedy's decision to bypass the the advisory panel and announce new COVID-19 recommendations on his own prompted a key CDC official who works with the committee – Dr. Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos – to announce her resignation last Friday. 'My career in public health and vaccinology started with a deep-seated desire to help the most vulnerable members of our population, and that is not something I am able to continue doing in this role,' she wrote in an email seen by an Associated Press reporter. Signs are mounting that the CDC has been 'sidelined' from key decision-making under Kennedy's watch, said Dr. Anand Parekh, the chief medical adviser for The Bipartisan Policy Center. 'It's difficult to ascertain how we will reverse the chronic disease epidemic or be prepared for myriad public health emergencies without a strong CDC and visible, empowered director,' Parekh said. 'It's also worth noting that every community in the country is served by a local or state public health department that depends on the scientific expertise of the CDC and the leadership of the CDC director.'

NCOA Applauds Reintroduction of Treat and Reduce Obesity Act
NCOA Applauds Reintroduction of Treat and Reduce Obesity Act

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

NCOA Applauds Reintroduction of Treat and Reduce Obesity Act

Bipartisan legislation would expand Medicare coverage of comprehensive obesity treatments View in browser Key Takeaways: The Treat and Reduce Obesity Act (TROA) has been reintroduced in the U.S. Senate. Reintroduction in the U.S. House of Representatives is expected soon. If passed and signed into law, TROA would require Medicare to cover anti-obesity medications, including GLP-1s, and expand access to intensive behavioral therapy for weight management. TROA has historically gained bipartisan support and was first introduced in Congress over 10 years ago. ARLINGTON, Va., June 5, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The National Council on Aging (NCOA), the national voice for every person's right to age well, applauds today's reintroduction of the bipartisan Treat and Reduce Obesity Act (TROA) in the U.S. Senate. Led by Sens. Bill Cassidy, R-La., and Ben Ray Luján, D-N.M., TROA would expand Medicare coverage for the full continuum of obesity care, recognizing obesity as a chronic, treatable disease that affects 40 percent of older Americans. First introduced in 2013, TROA aims to improve Medicare by removing outdated barriers to quality obesity care. The legislation has consistently received bipartisan support, highlighting a growing agreement among policymakers about the need to tackle the nation's obesity epidemic. "Obesity is a chronic condition that has affected millions of Americans for decades, but getting adequate care remains stubbornly difficult for too many older adults," said Ramsey Alwin, NCOA President and CEO. "The reintroduction of TROA is a welcome and vital step toward ensuring all Americans have access to the full range of obesity treatments." The legislation would repeal an outdated statute that prevents Medicare Part D from covering FDA-approved obesity medications. TROA also enhances access to intensive behavioral therapy (IBT) under Medicare Part B, which under current policy can only be provided by primary care doctors. TROA expands access to IBT to ensure a broader array of health care providers, including registered dietitian nutritionists, obesity medicine specialists, endocrinologists, bariatric surgeons, clinical psychologists, and community-based providers. By expanding access to lifestyle-based interventions like IBT, TROA ensures patients with obesity will have access to the full spectrum of obesity care. Obesity is linked to over 200 medical conditions and is responsible for an estimated 400,000 deaths annually. In addition to the health impacts of obesity, it is also an expensive disease, costing an estimated $173 billion in the United States in 2019. Expanding insurance coverage of obesity treatments could help reduce the cost burden of obesity to both patients and all Americans. According to the USC Schaffer Center, access to innovative anti-obesity medicines, including GLP-1s, can produce a 13% return on investment. Another recent study found that employees taking anti-obesity medications saw reduced growth in medical cost rates over two years compared to those not taking them, resulting in lower costs for their employers in addition to significant health improvements. NCOA has advocated for older adults with obesity to be treated fairly by providers free from weight stigma and bias. With the National Consumers League, NCOA helped develop the Obesity Bill of Rights in 2024. About NCOAThe National Council on Aging (NCOA) is the national voice for every person's right to age well. Working with thousands of national and local partners, we provide resources, tools, best practices, and advocacy to ensure every person can age with health and financial security. Founded in 1950, we are the oldest national organization focused on older adults. Learn more at and @NCOAging. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE National Council on Aging Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store