Putin summit presents the ultimate test of dealmaking for Trump
President Donald Trump's deadline for Russia to end its war in Ukraine or suffer severe economic punishment expires 8 August, but it's unclear how he plans to proceed amid new efforts toward a summit with Vladimir Putin and delicate trade negotiations with China.
Photo:
Reuters/Getty Images via CNN Newsource
Analysis:
Among the constants in Donald Trump's turbulent career have been a flair for drama and a belief in his dealmaking powers. In inviting Vladimir Putin, Trump will have plenty of the first - and put the second to the ultimate test.
Trump will speak to his Russian counterpart about the Ukraine war on Friday in Alaska, the two presidents' first standalone summit since a 2018 meeting in Helsinki where Trump's cowed appearance haunted him long afterward.
US officials said that Putin himself suggested the meeting. Trump agreed to invite him despite publicly saying how frustrated he has been with Putin's refusal to accept any proposal to halt the war.
Trump's invitation to Putin, who is under indictment by the International Criminal Court, effectively ends the West's shunning of the Russian president since the February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, whose leader Volodymyr Zelensky has called the Alaska trip a "personal victory" for Putin.
Trump and his aides have quickly tried to play down the significance.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a radio interview that a meeting "is not a concession" and that Trump wants to "look at this guy across the table" and see if he is serious.
Trump, voicing uncharacteristic humility about his diplomacy, said it was a "feel-out meeting" that would not in itself lead to a deal on Ukraine.
He said he would speak immediately after the summit with Zelensky and other European leaders, who have all insisted that Ukraine not be excluded from talks on its fate.
"European leaders, in the past, had the experience that whoever talks to Donald Trump last makes the most important impressions," said Liana Fix, a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.
There is "a very strong urge in Donald Trump to be the one who brings peace to Ukraine -- even for a fleeting moment of time, to have the picture of him agreeing with Vladimir Putin to a ceasefire," she said.
Trump had vowed to end the war, which has killed tens of thousands, within 24 hours of returning to the White House. But he has found the path difficult -- and his tactics have swung drastically.
Trump berated Zelensky during a heated on-camera meeting at the White House where Vice President JD Vance accused Ukraine of ingratitude for US support, which Trump briefly shut down.
Ukraine quickly realized it had to stomach Trump's approach and signed on to his ceasefire bid.
When Putin did not, Trump threatened sanctions on Russia, only to agree to meet Putin.
"The mere fact of holding such a summit will be a victory for Putin," Russian political analyst Konstantin Kalachev said.
"Putin has not offered Trump anything significant, and Trump is already inviting him to Alaska," he added, also calling the lack of new US sanctions by Trump an "unconditional victory" for Russia.
Trump has rejected criticism that he is soft, noting that he ramped up tariffs on India, a key buyer of Russian oil.
But Trump has also pushed for concessions from Zelensky, who has refused to surrender any land that Russia seized by force.
George Beebe, the former director of Russia analysis at the CIA who is now director of grand strategy at the Quincy Institute, which supports military restraint, said that Trump could begin to work out the outlines of a deal to end the war.
Russia could begrudgingly accept eventual European Union membership for Ukraine if it in turn, stays out of NATO, the transatlantic military alliance, Beebe said.
"As long as that relationship is limited to political and economic ties rather than military commitments, I think that's something that they can live with," Beebe said of Russia.
But he said that such a short-notice summit at the presidential level raised expectations that may not be met.
"Trump is tackling an issue that is fraught with political danger, and there's absolutely no guarantee that this is going to be a success," Beebe said.
- AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Here's what Putin really wants from Trump – and it's not peace in Ukraine
By Matthew Chance , chief global affairs correspondent, CNN Russian President Vladimir Putin. Photo: Sergei Guneyev / POOL / AFP Analysis : Alaska is unlikely to have been on many people's bingo cards as the venue for a key summit between the leaders of the United States and Russia. Yet America's biggest, remotest state is where Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are now set to meet for one of the most potentially consequential encounters of their presidencies. That's certainly the view from Moscow, where pro-Kremlin propagandists are already flushed with anticipation at the benefits this much-anticipated face-to-face meeting will deliver. Or, more specifically, will deliver for Putin. Firstly, the fact a summit with the US president is being held at all is a massive win for the Kremlin. "No one is talking about Russia's international isolation anymore, or about our strategic defeat," wrote Alexander Kots, a prominent pro-Kremlin military blogger on his popular social media channel. He added that the Alaska meeting had "every chance to become historic". He may be right. A presidential summit allows Putin to be seen back at the top table of international diplomacy, while thumbing his nose at critics and nations who want him shunned if not arrested on charges of war crimes in Ukraine. And a summit in the US state of Alaska, of all places, is red meat to resurgent Russian nationalists who still bluster about the territory being rightfully theirs. Just across the Bering Strait from the Chukotka region in the Russian Far East, Alaska was once a remote possession of the Russian Empire before being sold to the United States in 1867 for what was, even then, a paltry sum of US$7.2 million, about 2 cents an acre. The idea that Moscow got a raw deal still lingers and a visit to "our Alaska," as one prominent Russian state TV host dubbed it, bolsters Putin's nationalist credentials. Video clips of Trump mis-speaking at a White House news conference ahead of the summit, saying he was going to "Russia" to meet Putin, have also been trending on Russian social media with captions saying the US president had finally "admitted it is ours". Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump Photo: AFP / Sputnik / Mikhail Klimentyev For the rest of the world, though, the sole focus of this presidential summit is the war in Ukraine and whether Russia is prepared to make any concessions to end it. The White House has said Trump expects to focus squarely on ending the war in Ukraine, leaving other issues Moscow has said could be up for discussion for another time. On Wednesday (US time), Trump promised "very severe consequences" if Putin doesn't agree to end his war, following a call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders. But so far there's been little sign of real compromise from the Kremlin, which regards itself as having the upper hand on the grinding Ukrainian battlefield . As recently as last month, on a phone call with Trump, Putin reportedly reiterated that Russia would "continue to pursue its goals to address the root causes" of the conflict in Ukraine - these "root causes" having previously included long-held Russian grievances that include Ukraine's existence as a sovereign state, and NATO's eastward expansion since the end of the Cold War. On Wednesday, a Russian foreign ministry spokesman said the country's position on Ukraine was "unchanged," state media reported. More likely, Putin is up to something else. Details have emerged of a Russian peace offer reportedly made to US presidential envoy Steve Witkoff, before the Alaska summit was hastily arranged. In essence, the proposals involve Kyiv surrendering territory in the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine, in exchange for a ceasefire, an idea the Ukrainian leadership has firmly ruled out. US presidential envoy Steve Witkoff Photo: AFP / ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS "I am not going to surrender my country because I have no right to do so," said Zelensky ahead of the summit, which he was not invited to. "If we leave Donbas today, our fortifications, our terrain, the heights we control, we will clearly open a bridgehead for the preparation of a Russian offensive." But Trump, who is expected to discuss the idea with Putin in Alaska, appears to like the sound of a land-for-peace deal, even one so unpalatable to Ukraine and its European partners. Photo: Vladimir Astapkovich / Sputnik via AFP That clear difference of opinion represents an opportunity for Putin to portray the Ukrainians and the Europeans - not Russia - as the real obstacle to peace, potentially undermining Trump's already shaky support for the Ukrainian war effort. Trump has lost patience with Zelensky before, the Kremlin will have noted, and may do so again. If he were to cut off the remaining US military aid and intelligence sharing with Kyiv, Ukraine would struggle to continue its fight even with bolstered European support. Ahead of the summit, the White House appeared to downplay expectations of a peace deal, characterising the high-stakes meeting as a "listening exercise." That may suit Putin just fine. It was, after all, the Kremlin who solicited the summit, according to the White House - possibly as a way of heading off a threat of US tariffs and secondary sanctions that Trump said would kick in last week. Keeping Trump talking may be an effective way of pushing back that deadline indefinitely. In comments on Thursday, Putin floated the idea of reaching a deal on nuclear arms with the Trump. More broadly, Putin sees a unique opportunity with Trump to fundamentally reset relations with Washington, and separate Russian ties with the US from the fate of Ukraine, a scenario that would also divide the Western allies. For months, Kremlin officials have been talking up possibilities for economic, technological and space cooperation with the US, as well as lucrative deals on infrastructure and energy in the Arctic and elsewhere. The fact the Kremlin's top economic envoy, Kirill Dmitriev - a key interlocutor with the Trump administration - is part of the Russian delegation to Alaska suggests that more talk of US-Russian deal-making will be on the agenda. And, if Putin gets his way in this summit, the "Ukraine question" may find itself relegated to just one of many talking points between the powerful leaders of two great powers - and not even the most pressing one. -CNN
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
What we know about the lawsuits that could shut down ‘Alligator Alcatraz'
By Isabel Rosales , Holly Yan , Jason Morris President Donald Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem tour "Alligator Alcatraz". Photo: AFP / Andrew Caballero-Reynolds Two separate lawsuits could halt plans for " Alligator Alcatraz ," the controversial makeshift immigrant detention center in Florida's swampy Everglades. Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis and President Donald Trump have touted the location of the facility, which can house 3,000 or more detainees. State officials say it's situated between a large airport runway to ease deportation flights and wetlands teeming with alligators to help prevent escapes. But Democratic lawmakers who toured the facility described the conditions as barbaric, with "wall-to-wall humans" "packed into cages." Detainees reported worms in their food, toilets that don't flush, floors flooded with fecal waste and mosquito infestations. Now, a lawsuit over environmental concerns and another over detainees' rights might stop operations at the facility - possibly leaving officials with the costly and logistically difficult task of rehousing the detainees elsewhere. "Alligator Alcatraz" is close to marshlands that serve as a crucial source of freshwater and drinking water for South Florida. Environmentalists are suing to stop the facility's operations. Friends of the Everglades - a nonprofit committed to preserving the Everglades and its interconnected ecosystems - and the Center for Biological Diversity asked a court to issue an injunction "to halt the unlawful construction of a mass federal detention facility for up to 5,000 noncitizen detainees," the lawsuit states. "Defending the Everglades in this legal case is critically important," said Tania Galloni, the Earthjustice managing attorney for Florida, which represents some of the plaintiffs. "This is a public natural resource we all depend on, and transforming this site into a mass detention center is reckless, especially without any environmental review." Last week, US District Judge Kathleen Williams ordered a 14-day pause on additional construction at the site while witnesses testified at a hearing. The temporary order doesn't include any restrictions on law enforcement or immigration enforcement activity. Williams indicated she will make a more permanent decision before the temporary restraining order expires on August 21. 'Detentio Depot' will be located within the Baker Correctional Institution. Photo: Florida Department of Corrections/AP via CNN Newsource The ACLU, the US Immigration Law Counsel, Florida Keys Immigration and others filed a lawsuit that "challenges the government's attempts to prevent people detained in civil immigration custody at Alligator Alcatraz from communicating with legal counsel and from filing motions with the immigration court that could result in their release from detention," the complaint states. "Defendants in this case have blocked detainees held at the facility from access to legal counsel. No protocols exist at this facility for providing standard means of confidential attorney-client communication, such as in-person attorney visitation and phone or video calls that are available at any other detention facility, jail, or prison." The lawsuit names Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and other officials as defendants in the lawsuit. A federal judge gave the state until late September to prepare arguments against an effort to get the civil rights litigation certified as a class action, The Associated Press reported. The Florida Immigrant Coalition lambasted "Alligator Alcatraz" and how authorities are filling it. "They've created this capacity issue at detention camps by indiscriminate witch hunting against immigrants," spokesperson Thomas Kennedy told CNN on Thursday. "It's a solution in search of a problem." And as the threat of hurricanes looms this season, he said officials don't have an adequate plan on how the tent city can withstand hurricane forces. The plan "was just a giant redacted black page," Kennedy said. "DeSantis stood at a press conference and said that these tents can withstand a category 2 hurricane when we've seen with our own eyes how the site flooded with just a regular summer Florida rain during the first day when Trump was there." But Florida Lt. Gov. Jay Collins said his state is leading the way in clamping down on illegal immigration. "We have partnered with the president of the United States, with the White House, with anybody and everybody who is serious about getting things done and getting illegal immigrants out of our nation and out of our country because that's what Florida does," Collins said Thursday. Attorney Daniel Karon, who is not involved in the lawsuits but has been following the cases, said the judge "could very well derail the state and federal government and shut down" the "Alligator Alcatraz" facility. "Both rulings for plaintiffs would shut down the facility and lead to difficult consequences, as these rulings would require the detainees to be rehoused, which would be logistically complicated and expensive," Karon said, adding that the lawsuits could also potentially thwart state and federal efforts to establish a second immigration detention facility in the state. DeSantis is doubling down on immigrant detention centers in his state - including the announcement of a new "Detention Depot," which will hold about 1,300 detainees. It'll be located within the Baker Correctional Institution, a temporarily closed state prison about 45 miles west of Jacksonville near Osceola National Forest. "The reason of this is not to just house people indefinitely. We want to process, stage and then return illegal aliens to their home country," DeSantis said. The facility will likely be ready in about two to three weeks, Florida Division of Emergency Management Director Kevin Guthrie said. - CNN
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Trump orders 800 National Guard deployed in Washington DC mission
The US National Guard has been deployed by the president to deter crime in Washington DC. Photo: Alex Wroblewski / AFP All 800 National Guard troops who were ordered to the US capital Washington to aid law enforcement personnel by President Donald Trump have now been mobilised, the Pentagon says. Trump ordered the deployment -- which follows a similar move during protests in Los Angeles in June -- as part of what he billed as a crackdown on crime in Washington , where violent offences are in fact down. "As of today, all 800 Army and Air National Guardsmen are mobilised... as part of Joint Task Force DC, and they are now here in our capital," Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson told journalists. They "will assist the DC Metropolitan Police Department and federal law enforcement partners with monument security, community safety patrols, protecting federal facilities and officers" and traffic control posts, Wilson said. The troops "will remain until law and order has been restored in the District, as determined by the president," she added. President Trump said he would place the city's Metropolitan Police under federal government control while also sending the National Guard onto the streets of the US capital. Photo: Jim Watson / AFP The US Army later said the National Guard's initial mission "is to provide a visible presence in key public areas, serving as a visible crime deterrent". "They will not arrest, search, or direct law enforcement," but they "have the authority to temporarily detain individuals to prevent imminent harm," the Army said in a statement. The troops will be equipped with protective gear, it added, saying that weapons would be available if needed but would remain in the armoury. Trump announced the National Guard deployment -- along with a federal takeover of the city's police department -- on Monday, vowing "to take our capital back". The overwhelmingly Democratic US capital faces allegations from Republican politicians that it is overrun by crime , plagued by homelessness and financially mismanaged. However, data from Washington police shows significant drops in violent crime between 2023 and 2024, although that was coming off the back of a post-pandemic surge. The deployment of troops in Washington comes after Trump dispatched the National Guard and Marines to quell unrest in Los Angeles, California, that was spurred by immigration enforcement raids. It was the first time since 1965 that a US president deployed the National Guard against the wishes of a state governor . Most National Guard forces answer to state governors and have to be "federalised" to be brought under presidential control, but in Washington these troops already report only to the US president. - AFP
