Tikanga or not tikanga, that's the regulatory review question
The regulations review committee is one of those select committees which does not get the recognition it deserves.
Given its role is, as the name implies, to scrutinise the thousands of regulations promulgated by the government annually, it has a reputation for being somewhat esoteric at best and nerdy at worst.
However, it is also a good training ground for backbench MPs as they learn the intricacies of the law-making process.
It is also interesting for being chaired by Labour's Arena Williams so as to ensure the government is not marking its own homework.
Next week, however, the regulations review committee is set to rise from obscurity and take its place in the front lines of the culture war, thanks to Southland National MP Joseph Mooney.
At the end of each order paper (the government's daily agenda of business in the House of Parliament) sits the notices of motion section, where any MP can suggest that the House take notice of anything at all.
Diamond wedding anniversaries and 100th birthdays often appear, and Dunedin Labour MP Ingrid Leary has one there at the moment: Dutch Week.
Added in on April 8 was a notice in Mooney's name that the House disallow a provision of the Professional Examinations in Law Regulations 2008.
(It turns out that any member of regulations review committee can make a notice of motion to strike down a regulation and that it takes effect within 21 sitting days unless otherwise dealt with. Who knew?)
So, why is Mooney (a lawyer) so vexed with the examination system he had to pass to qualify to practise?
Well, he is not per se - just the bit which the New Zealand Council of Legal Education (NZCLE) added two years ago, coming into effect this year, which requires that tikanga Māori be a compulsory component of all other compulsory subjects.
This proposal caused quite the stir in legal circles when it first surfaced.
The most high-profile dissent was that of Gary Judd KC, who as well as writing extensively on the subject also formally complained to the committee about it last year.
Judd does not object to tikanga as such, noting that it is obviously relevant in cases such as those determining customary title to Maori land.
However, he does object to "the holus-bolus adoption of tikanga as if it were part of the common law developed by the courts incrementally" and also the requirement for law students to study it, alongside property, criminal, contract and public law.
Judd is correct that tikanga is starting to assume a more prominent place in law.
Notably it was central to discussion in Takamore v Clarke (the so-called "body snatching" case, when a hapu buried a relative in defiance of the wishes of his immediate family).
In 2022 the Supreme Court issued a separate ruling as part of its consideration of the Peter Ellis case as to whether tikanga had a place in law.
Their honours decided that it did.
This was a development which many lawyers had no quibble with and took in their stride.
It was also why the NZCLE amended its regulations feeling, not unreasonably, that given a ruling by the land's highest court it was probably appropriate that people who wished to be admitted as lawyers should possess some knowledge and understanding of tikanga Māori as a core competency.
Judd and several other lawyers (notably former Russell McVeagh lawyer Winston Peters) begged to differ however, hence Judd's complaint.
The committee, including Mooney, heard Judd's complaint in mid-October last year and it also considered a submission in support of it from Auckland lawyer Thomas Newman, which raised the possibility that standing orders allowed the course of action which Mooney has now embarked upon.
The committee, whose membership includes Waitaki National MP Miles Anderson, issued its report in March.
The committee found that that the NZCLE regulation did not trespass unduly on personal rights and liberties, that the council did have the power to impose the regulation.
However, its three National MPs (the majority), found that although the NZELC had acted within its powers, the regulation to make tikanga Māori a compulsory component was an "unusual and unexpected use" of the council's powers and hence should be disallowed.
Judd has had the good luck, from his perspective, that the government has changed since the Ellis judgement.
His objections would likely have fallen on stoney ground in 2023, but in 2025 the committee majority was like-minded, Mooney was there to move his notice of motion, and the business committee decided to adopt it as House business.
It will be debated the next members' day (this coming Wednesday) and the odds are $1.01 and falling that the motion will be agreed to. The Geraldine insurrection
IT turns out that there is another live issue in the southern seats when it comes to the proposed electoral boundaries.
We are sure it is nothing personal about Waitaki's MP, but it turns out there are a substantial number of residents in the good town of Geraldine (population 3310) displeased about being in Anderson's electorate.
Despite being 38km to the north of the Canterbury town of Timaru - whose territorial authority Geraldine sits in for local government purposes - its voters make their mark at a national level in the Otago seat of Waitaki.
Whether from provincial parochialism or administrative practicalities, Geraldine folk are casting longing eyes towards the electorate of Rangitata.
Objections to the proposed new boundaries were released last week and several people have so far objected to their place in the world.
"I object to being part of the Waitaki electorate when all our services and amenities are in the Rangitata electorate," one voter said, while another noted that Rangitata was under quota and Waitaki was over quota so Geraldine should be allowed to return home, so to speak.
The deadline for submissions is May 21, so there is still time for a full-on revolt to break out.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Business Review
8 hours ago
- National Business Review
Boris: Is Britain ready for his comeback?
Political popularity can be as fickle as voters' knowledge of their own best interests. For prime ministers, the rise and fall can be even faster if politicians on their own side have the say. The case of Boris Johnson is instructive. He was overwhelmingly selected leader of the British Conservative Party in a poll of its membership, rather than just its elected members of parliament, to succeed the hapless Theresa May. She had resigned after leading the party to an electoral loss of its majority in the wake of the Brexit referendum. She and most of the party's MPs had backed Remain, putting them out of step with public opinion outside of London; places such as Wales and northern England. Johnson – the country's most popular politician and mononymously known as Boris – had steered the 'Leave' campaign and was the obvious choice to 'get Brexit done' against the forces of parliament, the bureaucracy, the courts, and the business establishment. Against the odds, he succeeded in giving the public what they wanted. He led the Conservatives to a landslide victory in the December 2019 general election, scooping up more votes than any party leader since Margaret Thatcher in 1979. The party gained 80 seats in the House of Commons, and the post-Brexit government could look forward to a full five-year term. It had breached the so-called Red Wall, winning previously safe Labour seats in the de-industrialising north, which had embraced the Brexit rhetoric. Boris Johnson announces his resignation on July 7, 2022. Many enemies But, 20 months after that victory, Johnson's dream of 'levelling up' Britain outside of London and its prosperous environs was over. Faced with resignations from his senior ministers, and fallout from the Covid-19 pandemic, he surrendered to his many enemies. Typically, the Eton and Oxford-educated Johnson quotes William Shakespeare's version of Julius Caesar's dying words in Greek – kai su teknon ('you too, child'). 'If Caesar has 23 stab wounds, I ended up with 62,' was a reference to ministers Sajid Javid and Rishi Sunak, plus 60 other MPs. As in Rome, the new regime didn't last, losing to a Labour landslide that produced a 174-seat majority, though it was the smallest vote share of any majority government since record-keeping began in 1830. So far, Labour under Sir Keir Starmer looks set for a full term to 2029 and has already demonstrated an ability to govern without attracting the scandals and leadership changes that marred 14 years of Conservative rule. However, the party remains in dire straits, with Nigel Farage's anti-immigrant Reform Party wooing many of those former Labour voters who switched to Johnson but failed to endorse Sunak and his fellow usurpers. It has prompted talk, even in serious establishment media such as the Financial Times and The Economist, of a political comeback. Of course, no commentator thinks this would be a good idea, unless you wish the worst for the Tories. One suggested that approaching 61 on June 19, and with four children under six, Johnson has more than a handful for someone of his age. As an accomplished author, journalist, and public speaker, he would also earn more staying out of politics. Boris Johnson was a cycling advocate as mayor of London. Speaking tour He turned out his memoir, Unleashed, in double-quick time for a retired politician and, late last year, added a speaking tour Down Under. At nearly 800 pages, it is gargantuan but highly readable. It covers all his political life from age 40, when – as editor of The Spectator and an MP – he decided to run for the mayoralty of London. He was fired from The Spectator in 2005 and, three years later, in 2008, was elected mayor, defeating incumbent 'Red' Ken Livingstone. It meant resigning from the House of Commons. Johnson was triumphantly re-elected for a second four-year term but decided against a third. Instead, he returned to parliament in 2015 and was soon fronting the Leave campaign in the 2016 Brexit referendum. He had his first taste of betrayal when his close Brexit campaigner, Michael Gove, also decided to run for the party leadership. (Ironically, Gove was the Brutus to Johnson's Caesar, and is now editor of The Spectator.) His leadership hopes dashed, Johnson had to settle for foreign secretary under May, a post where he excelled at being, in his words, a 'prize gaffe-merchant'. Though he might lack a reputation for competence, Johnson has sound instincts for summing up people and policies. He describes May as 'old grumpyknickers' and accuses her of 'school marmy self-righteousness'. He quit her Cabinet because of her 'surrender' to the devilish forces of the Europeans, who did everything they could to make Brexit as punishing as possible to the British public who voted for it. These are some of the best chapters, with Johnson riding high from defying a Supreme Court ruling against proroguing parliament and forcing a snap election to gain public approval for the agonisingly drawn-out Brexit agreement. Boris Johnson at a media conference during the Covid-19 pandemic. Captured vaccines He reveals how, during the Covid-19 pandemic, he planned a mission to seize five million doses held captive in a Dutch warehouse of the vaccine that he, more than any other European leader, had pushed through its approval stages. The mission did not go ahead, but it confirmed Johnson's strongest suspicions toward the European leaders, particularly France's Emmanuel Macron, whom he admired personally, though this was not reciprocated. They were wrong about Brexit and Covid, and about Russia and Ukraine. As the author of a bestselling biography about Winston Churchill, Johnson was knowledgeable about history. France and Germany were soft on President Vladimir Putin, doubting his intentions. Johnson last spoke with Putin in January 2022, describing the conversation as 'peculiar and ambiguous'. Johnson couldn't tell what Putin would do and was none the wiser after going to Kyiv a week before the invasion. But Johnson was convinced an invasion would happen after meeting the Five Eyes partners, including New Zealand, at the annual Munich Security Council on February 18, just days before Putin proceeded. Johnson's immediate pledge of military support to President Volodymyr Zelensky was genuine and, in three years' hindsight, is more deserving of praise than the reluctance of the Europeans to give Ukraine a better chance of resistance at a stage when the Russians could have been turned back. Revenge of a sort was achieved against Macron when at the G7 Summit at Calis Bay, Cornwall, in June 2021, Britain jointly formed the Aukus defence alliance on condition Australia dump its diesel submarine contract with France and opt for nuclear ones from the US. French President Emmanuel Macron resisted Boris Johnson's Brexit campaign. Words of advice Johnson has words of advice for all embattled democratic leaders who face constant criticism at home: go on a state visit to India, which he describes as 'balm for the soul'. Like Christopher Luxon, who has followed this advice, a British prime minister has the disadvantage of a fully state-paid health service that is a perennial political liability. While other countries have resolved this insatiable beast by opting for private schemes, Britain has continued with its National Health Service, thus providing easy grievance pickings for a hostile media. As Johnson says: 'Big international trips are great, but all politics is local.' Indeed, it was 'local politics' that brought his downfall – Covid-19 scandals of partying during lockdowns. His departure from office, over the appointment of a deputy chief whip, ended his vision of a reinvigorated Global Britain. This promised a country where all parts were linked by an infrastructure that 'levelled up' its major cities to the capital in a way France and Germany have done. It also depicted a Britain on the global stage that would encourage the Commonwealth, particularly its African members, to side with Western freedom rather than fall victim to the bribes of Russia and China. It's an unfinished agenda, and not likely to be followed by a Labour government. But, despite the likely public appeal of a Boris comeback, for all his weaknesses, this book may be his best legacy. It's a rewarding read for anyone interested in politics. Unleashed, by Boris Johnson (William Collins). Nevil Gibson is a former editor at large for NBR. He has contributed film and book reviews to various publications. This is supplied content and not paid for by NBR.
Otago Daily Times
9 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
‘Why can't Momoa live here?'
Minister for the South Island James Meager. PHOTO: PHILIP CHANDLER The National-led government's South Island minister believes lifting the foreign buyer ban for $5million-plus Queenstown residential properties makes sense. At the last election, National campaigned on a $2m threshold for overseas buyers — currently only Aussies and Singaporeans are exempt from the ban introduced by the previous Labour government in 2018 — but kept the ban on as part of its coalition agreement with New Zealand First. Visiting Queenstown this week, James Meager, the first South Island Minister, agrees high-net-worth foreigners "bring a lot of investment and opportunities, and they don't really have a big physical footprint in terms of, you know, strains on resources or infrastructure". "I'd be very surprised if any of these people are coming here and using the public health system, anything like that. "So we campaigned on the $2m [threshold], couldn't get that across the line." He says Prime Minister Christopher Luxon's "very public" about looking at that. "It's something we continue to work on in government, and I think it's something if we can't get across the line in this government, we will certainly campaign on." Meager says even if it's a higher limit like $5m for places like Queenstown, "I think people will accept that". "Look at the kind of people who are looking to move here. "I mean, [Hollywood actor] Jason Momoa basically lives here, right? "But wouldn't it be fantastic to have him base himself in and out of Queenstown, flies internationally, brings in so much business and marketing and commerce from his movies and his franchises. "I think it makes sense, and you can do it in a way which doesn't put pressure on the housing for the workers and for the people who have lived here for 50 years and actually want to be able to have a home." Meanwhile, Meager's acutely aware of the limitations with Queenstown's current hospital and how, for example, a high proportion of local women give birth out of town — last year, there were 396 births outside Queenstown Lakes/Central Otago. While in Queenstown he visited friends who'd had a baby five weeks ago, who initially went to Invercargill to get ready. Things didn't move as quickly as they thought, so they returned to the resort. "Then all of a sudden away she went, and then it was a helicopter trip to Dunedin because Invercargill's full. "And then that meant [the parents] were actually separated for the birth." Meager says that "brings home the idea that for a place like Queenstown, that's probably not ideal". "There's a very low threshold in the medical profession here for saying, if it even looks like you're going to get in trouble, we'll call a helicopter in, and that's not ideal because it's stressful, it's time, it's costs." Meager says the Health Minister's aware of it and working on it — "I know there are proposals from a couple of entities around bringing private capital in and just getting a hospital up and running and maybe contract everything out to [the] public [system]". "I think we can get some solutions in the next few years." Supports our regional deal James Meager says he supports the proposal for a regional deal the Queenstown Lakes, Central Otago and Otago Regional councils have put to the government, describing it as "very good". Under a regional deal, the government works with councils to improve infrastructure, which can include public transport and health facilities — in this case a mass transit Queenstown cable car and a base hospital. The government's yet to approve any, but in the South Island "Queenstown and West Coast seem to be well on track", Meager says.
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Legal action over changes to resource teaching roles 'possible'
By Rachel Helyer Donaldson of RNZ The country's largest teaching union is considering legal action against the government's decision to cut resource teachers in primary schools, confirmed last month as part of the Budget. Ministry of Education documents from February show that 84 schools employed resource teachers for literacy support, 40 employed resource teachers for Māori and three schools employed both. Nationally, there are a maximum of 121 full-time positions for Resource Teachers of Literacy (RTL) and 53 for Resource Teachers of Māori (RTM). Minister for Education Erica Stanford said that was a small number of teachers for the country's 2000 primary schools, and, during a consultation process in March, schools had told her the current system was "not equitable". Stanford said funding was now in place for 349 structured literacy teachers, who would provide support within classrooms - rather than driving from school to school as was the case under the current system - and she encouraged literacy resource teachers "who are amazingly well-qualified and passionate people" to consider applying for those roles. NZEI national secretary Stephanie Mills said the union was waiting on more information from Stanford about how she came to the decision, and then it would decide next steps. "We've said from the beginning of the consultation process that we will explore all options to keep those resources intact. It's not about getting rid of a certain number of positions, it's a service that's been built up over time." 'Disrespected and gaslit' Mills said NZEI had requested details about how Stanford reached her decision via an official information request. The union had asked to see the consultation document prior to the announcement and was told that would be provided a fortnight in advance, but confirmation the roles would be defunded came as part of the Budget. Teachers felt "really disrespected and gaslit" as a result, she added. "These teachers are some of our most experienced and skilled, and they're not being treated in a good way." Mills said many of the current resource teachers were working in rural places and she feared those schools would no longer get the same support. "It will be quite a different role in the new system. The [same] service won't exist and the jobs won't exist." Mills said it was an "irony" the literacy resource roles were being cut, "when the government wants structured literacy". Meanwhile RTMs were, in many situations, the only frontline support for kaiako and tamariki Māori. "Māori RTs are like a taonga." Not a cut but 'a reinvestment' Stanford said she would not be commenting on what action the resource teachers might take. The move was about schools and students, not the teachers, she said. "It's about the way we deliver the service, and this advice was given to me by the sector itself, by schools saying 'the way the model is being delivered it's not equitable and many schools are missing out' ... The ones who are getting the service may not have the greatest need, so it's very inequitable. "What we are doing is shifting that model to an in-class delivery - small groups, intervention teachers, in school." Stanford said the NZ Resource Teachers Literary Association had had "clear information and met multiple times with ministry officials" and they had been "very clear about the reasons, about the opportunities for them in other roles, and they've met a number of times and they have been given that information". The move was not a cut but a "reinvestment", Stanford insisted. "We've already resourced 349 Tier 2 structured literacy intervention roles, over and above the 100 literacy positions that there currently are, so it is not a cut, it is a reinvestment into a better delivery model."
