Landlord demanded tens of thousands of dollars then threatened to kick out tenant if they did not pay up
A landlord who demanded tens of thousands of dollars from a tenant before they moved in then threatened to kick them out if they did not pay more money found herself in front of a magistrate.
The woman from NSW claimed she did not understand her obligations to handle rent, bond payments or a property condition report under WA's tenancy laws when she pleaded guilty to four charges of breaching the Residential Tenancies Act.
The NSW landlord owned a property in the Perth suburb of Ardross when she entered into a tenancy agreement and demanded $16,200 from her tenant to cover the first three months' rent, about a month before the tenant moved in.
She then demanded an additional $2700 in fortnightly rent about a month before the next due date and told the tenant in a text message she would find another tenant if the payments were not made.
The woman failed to lodge a further $16,200 paid as a security bond with the Bond Administrator at Consumer Protection within the 14-day time frame, then only lodged $5,400 of the bond four months after it was received.
She arranged to deposit the remaining $10,800 with the Bond Administrator after Consumer Protection started legal proceedings against her.
The court was also told the landlord provided the tenant with two copies of a property condition 32 days late.
The landlord was fined $8500 and received a spent conviction in the Perth Magistrates Court.
Magistrate Donna Webb said ignorance of the law was no excuse and the landlord should have inquired about her obligations.
Consumer Protection commissioner Owen Kelly said the Residential Tenancies Act was a vital safeguard for tenants, who were especially vulnerable during periods of high demand in the rental market.
The commissioner said the landlord violated the Act by seeking more than two weeks' rent from the tenant a month before the tenancy took occupancy.
He said the tenant was subjected to unnecessary risk by being asked to pay three months of rent upfront before moving in.
'When tenants have fewer options, they may have little to no power to negotiate with landlords before or during the tenancy,' he said.
'(The tenant) was also placed under unnecessary financial burden when further rent demands were made before that initial period had expired.'
The commissioner said handling security bond money was a serious matter, and the 14-day lodgement rule was in place to safeguard the interests of both tenants and landlords.
'All landlords with property in Western Australia need to familiarise themselves with the laws, or delegate this responsibility to a property manager, otherwise they risk facing legal repercussions,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Courier-Mail
6 hours ago
- Courier-Mail
Gladstone man first arrested after Qld's coercive control laws pass
Don't miss out on the headlines from QLD News. Followed categories will be added to My News. The first person in Queensland has been charged with coercive control in the initial week of landmark new legislation. On May 26, coercive control became a crime in Queensland after years of campaigning to recognise patterns of controlling behaviour as domestic violence. In the first week of the law being in place, eight coercive control offences have been reported to Queensland Police Service. Of those, one person has been officially charged, while police are still investigating six incidents, and one complaint has been withdrawn since first being reported. Police who charged a 37-year-old Gladstone man with 15 offences will allege the man breached his domestic violence order on a number of occasions over several months. He was taken into custody on June 3 and was charged with 13 counts of contravention of a domestic violence order, and one count each of coercive control, and common assault. The man initially appeared before Rockhampton Magistrates Court on June 4 and is due to appear in Gladstone Magistrates Court on July 14. The first person charged with coercive control is expected to appear in a Gladstone court in July. Small Steps 4 Hannah Foundation co-founders Sue and Lloyd Clarke said the charge was encouraging, but stressed that a public education campaign would help even more. 'It wouldn't surprise me if most Queenslanders have no idea that these laws even exist,' Mr Clarke said. 'It also wouldn't be surprising if many people who don't know what coercive control means or what behaviours are red flags. 'If communities aren't made aware of the help that's out there, these laws lose their power.' The new laws have been backed by the Clarkes – the parents of Brisbane mum Hannah Clarke who was murdered alongside her three children by her former partner in 2020. Hannah's controlling ex-partner stalked her as she drove out through Camp Hill before getting inside the car, dousing it with fuel and setting it on fire. Hannah Clarke was murdered along with her three children by her former partner in 2020. The Clarkes – along with the family of murdered Brisbane woman Allison Baden-Clay – heralded the laws, which were in line with recommendations made by the Women's Safety and Justice Taskforce. A spokesman from Queensland Police said the new laws represent a critical step forward in protecting victims and preventing further harm. 'Domestic and family violence is a community issue, and we all have a role to play in stopping it,' the spokesman said. 'Coercive control is dangerous, and these new laws will ensure perpetrators are held accountable before their behaviour escalates to physical violence. 'Police will continue working closely with support services, advocates, and the community to ensure victims and survivors feel heard, supported, and protected. 'We want Queenslanders to know that police are focused on enforcing the law, supporting those affected by coercive control, and ensuring every victim-survivor has access to the support they need.' Coercive control is defined as a pattern of behaviour which includes emotional, mental and financial abuse, isolation, intimidation, sexual coercion and cyberstalking. The coercive control offence holds a maximum penalty of 14 years' jail – double that of the penalty found in Victoria.
ABC News
14 hours ago
- ABC News
Canberra man guilty of raping sex worker by way of stealthing jailed for more than two years
A man found guilty of rape after he covertly removed his condom during an encounter with a Canberra sex worker has been sentenced to two-and-a-half years in jail by the ACT Supreme Court. Warning: This story discusses sexual assault. Aleksandar Ivanovski was charged with a single count of rape, after "stealthing" the woman in December 2021. The court heard Ivanovski had been involved in a booking with another sex worker before engaging the victim for a half hour session. He then obtained a 10 minute extension, for $100. During the encounter Ivanovski had asked for unprotected sex, but the woman told him she didn't do "natural" services. The woman said he had turned her to a position where she couldn't see what he was doing, and when she did turn around the condom was on the floor. "What the f*** were you doing?" she said to him at the time. "Did you just f****ing stealth me?" Ivanovski denied it. The woman reported the matter immediately to the manager who called police, and a statement was taken two days later. But it was not until nearly a year later that Ivanovski became aware he was being investigated by police. At his trial earlier this year the prosecution described Ivanovski's actions as driven by a sense of entitlement and called for full-time jail, saying the crime had been pre-meditated. Today Acting Justice John Burns said Ivanovski had been clearly aware the woman was not consenting, but he found it was opportunistic, rather than a premeditated crime. Acting Justice Burns told the court pre-sentence reports on Ivanovski recorded drug use including cocaine and methamphetamine, and noted his behaviour was emotionally driven. He also noted Ivanovski was "reluctant to discuss the offending". Acting Justice Burns said the reports indicated Ivanovski had been capable of understanding the situation. "Your behaviour demonstrated you were well aware of the boundaries," Acting Justice Burns told Ivanovski. "You have in fact demonstrated no remorse whatsoever." Acting Justice Burns sentenced Ivanovski to two years and six months' jail, to be suspended after a year, ahead of a good behaviour order.
7NEWS
15 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Hillcrest jumping castle victim's mother yells stinging wish at operator cleared over tragedy
Families of six children killed in a primary school jumping castle accident are angry and in disbelief after a court dismissed a workplace safety charge against its operator. Zane Mellor, Peter Dodt, Addison Stewart, Jalailah Jayne-Maree Jones, Jye Sheehan and Chace Harrison died after the incident at Hillcrest Primary School in Tasmania in December 2021. They were enjoying end-of-year celebrations on the school's oval when a wind gust lifted the castle into the air. Three other children were seriously injured in the accident. Rosemary Gamble, owner of Taz-Zorb which set up the equipment, had pleaded not guilty to failing to comply with a workplace health and safety duty. She was accused of failing to anchor the castle properly. In delivering his decision in Devonport Magistrates Court on Friday, Magistrate Robert Webster said Gamble 'in some respects' failed to comply with her health and safety duties. 'However I am not satisfied, pursuant to (the charge) those failures were a substantial or significant cause of the children being exposed to the risk of serious injury or death,' he said. Webster said the incident occurred due to an unprecedented weather system, namely a dust devil which was 'impossible to predict'. 'Gamble could have done more or taken further steps,' Webster wrote in his written decision. 'However, given the effects of the unforeseen and unforeseeable dust devil, had she done so, that would sadly have made no difference to the ultimate outcome.' Webster told the court the charge was dismissed and Gamble was 'free to go'. Mum of dead child yells at jumping castle operator after verdict Georgie Burt, mother of Zane Mellor, yelled at Gamble inside the courtroom after the decision was handed down. 'I hope you see them every time I miss a birthday, miss a Christmas,' she said. A representative of Gamble read a statement on her behalf outside court, saying she recognised the scars of the incident would likely remain forever. 'I never meant for something like this to happen. And I am just so sorry that it did,' the statement said. 'I am a mother. I can only imagine the pain that other parents are living with each and every day because of this terrible thing that happened. 'Their loss is something I will carry with me for the rest of my life.' Andrew Dodt, the father of Peter Dodt, said he had been broken for a long time. 'Our hopes are just shattered now,' he said. 'At the end of the day all I wanted was an apology for my son not coming home and I'm never going to get it and that kills me.' Gamble faced a 10-day hearing in November where it was alleged she only used pegs at four of the castle's eight anchor points, despite the manufacturer's instructions recommending eight. Her lawyer Chris Dockray argued she had been left out to dry by the castle's Chinese manufacturer. East Inflatables didn't provide instructions to Gamble upon purchase and only supplied four pegs, Dockray said. She instead downloaded a two-page manual from the company's website, he said, which resulted in an interpretation four pegs were sufficient. Preparations for an inquest were paused due to the criminal proceedings, while a class action has been launched against Gamble and the state of Tasmania.
