Gladstone man first arrested after Qld's coercive control laws pass
Don't miss out on the headlines from QLD News. Followed categories will be added to My News.
The first person in Queensland has been charged with coercive control in the initial week of landmark new legislation.
On May 26, coercive control became a crime in Queensland after years of campaigning to recognise patterns of controlling behaviour as domestic violence.
In the first week of the law being in place, eight coercive control offences have been reported to Queensland Police Service.
Of those, one person has been officially charged, while police are still investigating six incidents, and one complaint has been withdrawn since first being reported.
Police who charged a 37-year-old Gladstone man with 15 offences will allege the man breached his domestic violence order on a number of occasions over several months.
He was taken into custody on June 3 and was charged with 13 counts of contravention of a domestic violence order, and one count each of coercive control, and common assault.
The man initially appeared before Rockhampton Magistrates Court on June 4 and is due to appear in Gladstone Magistrates Court on July 14.
The first person charged with coercive control is expected to appear in a Gladstone court in July.
Small Steps 4 Hannah Foundation co-founders Sue and Lloyd Clarke said the charge was encouraging, but stressed that a public education campaign would help even more.
'It wouldn't surprise me if most Queenslanders have no idea that these laws even exist,' Mr Clarke said.
'It also wouldn't be surprising if many people who don't know what coercive control means or what behaviours are red flags.
'If communities aren't made aware of the help that's out there, these laws lose their power.'
The new laws have been backed by the Clarkes – the parents of Brisbane mum Hannah Clarke who was murdered alongside her three children by her former partner in 2020.
Hannah's controlling ex-partner stalked her as she drove out through Camp Hill before getting inside the car, dousing it with fuel and setting it on fire.
Hannah Clarke was murdered along with her three children by her former partner in 2020.
The Clarkes – along with the family of murdered Brisbane woman Allison Baden-Clay – heralded the laws, which were in line with recommendations made by the Women's Safety and Justice Taskforce.
A spokesman from Queensland Police said the new laws represent a critical step forward in protecting victims and preventing further harm.
'Domestic and family violence is a community issue, and we all have a role to play in stopping it,' the spokesman said.
'Coercive control is dangerous, and these new laws will ensure perpetrators are held accountable before their behaviour escalates to physical violence.
'Police will continue working closely with support services, advocates, and the community to ensure victims and survivors feel heard, supported, and protected.
'We want Queenslanders to know that police are focused on enforcing the law, supporting those affected by coercive control, and ensuring every victim-survivor has access to the support they need.'
Coercive control is defined as a pattern of behaviour which includes emotional, mental and financial abuse, isolation, intimidation, sexual coercion and cyberstalking.
The coercive control offence holds a maximum penalty of 14 years' jail – double that of the penalty found in Victoria.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
3 hours ago
- Perth Now
Police give devastating new update in Pheobe Bishop search
Police have given an update about missing 17-year-old Pheobe Bishop, whose body they believe was discovered at Good Night Scrub National Park near Gin Gin on Friday. Wide Bay Burnett Detective Inspector Craig Mansfield confirmed human remains have been found and a crime scene has been established. Det-Insp Mansfield said police have been in contact with Pheobe's family, who have advised them of this devastating development. He confirmed that additional testing and examination will take place on Saturday, with the hope that they will be able to formally identify Pheobe's remains. 'We always wanted to bring Pheobe home, and we believe that this is the first step in that process,' Det-Insp Mansfield said. 'We do hope that this development, coupled with the bring some level of closure to Pheobe's family so they can begin to move forward with their grieving process.' Murder charges following Pheobe Bishop's disappearance have left her family and community reeling. (HANDOUT/QUEENSLAND POLICE) Credit: AAP The human remains were discovered in 'vast' bushland that has an 'unforgiving terrain' approximately 9km from the original search location. Det-Insp Mansfield confirmed the human remains were not buried. As a result of telecommunications data and other snippets of information shared with police, they were able to find the location independently. Police have still not been able to locate Pheobe's luggage. Queensland Police charged James Wood, 34, and Tamika Bromley, 33, with one count each of murder and two counts each of interfering with a corpse. James Wood, 34. Credit: Unknown / Supplied Tanika Bromley, 33. Credit: Unknown / Supplied Mr Wood and Ms Bromley were living with Pheobe in a rundown, garbage-strewn house in the small Queensland town of Gin Gin when she vanished. The pair claimed they dropped her to Bundaberg airport in their grey Hyundai ix35 before she vanished on May 15. But police say CCTV at the airport proved she never made it. On May 21, police declared the teenager's disappearance as suspicious. Her home and the car she drove in with her two housemates were both declared crime scenes. On Wednesday this week, police announced they were calling off the 'physical search' for Pheobe. They later arrested Mr Wood before releasing him without charge. On Thursday, police charged both Mr Wood and Mr Bromley. They both received mentions in Bundaberg Magistrates Court before being remanded to reappear on August 11. At 2.30pm on Friday, officers discovered what they believe is Pheobe's body. A vigil will be held for the 17-year-old on Sunday afternoon at Kolan Community Park in Gin Gin.
The Age
9 hours ago
- The Age
What the numbers really say about Crisafulli's crime crackdown
During the election campaign, Crisafulli vowed to resign as premier if he didn't reduce the number of victims affected by crime. This, he said, was the metric he should be judged on. 'I'm serious about it, and I'm not giving myself any wriggle room. It's victim numbers. 'It's not number of unique offences and what happens on a Wednesday and how many young people repeat. It's victim numbers. How many people have had their life torn apart? And there will be fewer victims.' We zoomed in on victim numbers, and found that for six of the 'adult crime, adult time' offences, they have been increasing, comparing just January to March annually, and decreased in 2025, but they're still higher than in 2022. Looking specifically at robbery and grievous assault on a quarterly basis, victim numbers have fluctuated and had a low point about the start of the pandemic. Despite a recent fall, robbery is still higher than in any quarter between 2001 and 2018. It's worth noting these victim numbers include victims of adults as well as child offenders. On May 21, the Crisafulli government added 20 extra offences to the adult crime, adult time framework, including rape and arson. We analysed statistics for rape and attempted rape, and arson, and found reported offences increased January to March 2022 and 2023, decreased in those months of 2024, but then increased in 2025. But what does this actually mean? Hemming says it's crucial to approach the data with caution. He also notes the time lags between arrests and the offender coming before a court. 'However, once the small hardcore group of repeat juvenile offenders begin to be impacted by the 'adult crime, adult time' legislation, there may well be a significant reduction in juvenile crime because 17 per cent of youth offenders commit almost half of all youth crime, and they will be off the streets for a longer period of time,' he says. Ultimately, Hemming says it's dangerous to predict trends when the factors are so complex and interrelated. He also notes there is ambiguity in the phrase 'victim', as it's unclear if multiple offences against one person should be counted as just one 'victim', or multiple. Labor recently moved an amendment to the latest youth crime laws, calling for monthly victim and offence data, so Queenslanders did not have to 'rely on inconsistent cherry-picked information through a partisan filter'. This was defeated during the parliamentary debate. We asked Angela Higginson, a quantitative criminologist and associate professor with QUT, to take look at the numbers for us. We also asked her if the government was cherry-picking data. She says: 'The simple answer is yes, when data is specifically extracted and used to support a policy position, it is invariably chosen deliberately.' 'This is not unique to the current government, and it is not necessarily deceptive.' Higginson notes the most important thing to recognise is that all crime statistics are the result of public reporting and police action. Therefore, there is no such thing as a completely neutral crime data source. Loading She says data on the number of charges is less useful than other comparisons, given it is a combination of reporting and police action, and so there is a lot of variability. 'This data is possibly the type most likely to be influenced by policy decisions,' she says. Higginson says a policy focus on the policing of young people not only tends to increase crime numbers, but research tells us that the earlier a young person comes into contact with police, the greater the likelihood of future offending. She says one of the most obvious external factors to influence crime trends in recent years was the pandemic, but also noted changes in numbers could be policy-driven.
Sydney Morning Herald
9 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
What the numbers really say about Crisafulli's crime crackdown
During the election campaign, Crisafulli vowed to resign as premier if he didn't reduce the number of victims affected by crime. This, he said, was the metric he should be judged on. 'I'm serious about it, and I'm not giving myself any wriggle room. It's victim numbers. 'It's not number of unique offences and what happens on a Wednesday and how many young people repeat. It's victim numbers. How many people have had their life torn apart? And there will be fewer victims.' We zoomed in on victim numbers, and found that for six of the 'adult crime, adult time' offences, they have been increasing, comparing just January to March annually, and decreased in 2025, but they're still higher than in 2022. Looking specifically at robbery and grievous assault on a quarterly basis, victim numbers have fluctuated and had a low point about the start of the pandemic. Despite a recent fall, robbery is still higher than in any quarter between 2001 and 2018. It's worth noting these victim numbers include victims of adults as well as child offenders. On May 21, the Crisafulli government added 20 extra offences to the adult crime, adult time framework, including rape and arson. We analysed statistics for rape and attempted rape, and arson, and found reported offences increased January to March 2022 and 2023, decreased in those months of 2024, but then increased in 2025. But what does this actually mean? Hemming says it's crucial to approach the data with caution. He also notes the time lags between arrests and the offender coming before a court. 'However, once the small hardcore group of repeat juvenile offenders begin to be impacted by the 'adult crime, adult time' legislation, there may well be a significant reduction in juvenile crime because 17 per cent of youth offenders commit almost half of all youth crime, and they will be off the streets for a longer period of time,' he says. Ultimately, Hemming says it's dangerous to predict trends when the factors are so complex and interrelated. He also notes there is ambiguity in the phrase 'victim', as it's unclear if multiple offences against one person should be counted as just one 'victim', or multiple. Labor recently moved an amendment to the latest youth crime laws, calling for monthly victim and offence data, so Queenslanders did not have to 'rely on inconsistent cherry-picked information through a partisan filter'. This was defeated during the parliamentary debate. We asked Angela Higginson, a quantitative criminologist and associate professor with QUT, to take look at the numbers for us. We also asked her if the government was cherry-picking data. She says: 'The simple answer is yes, when data is specifically extracted and used to support a policy position, it is invariably chosen deliberately.' 'This is not unique to the current government, and it is not necessarily deceptive.' Higginson notes the most important thing to recognise is that all crime statistics are the result of public reporting and police action. Therefore, there is no such thing as a completely neutral crime data source. Loading She says data on the number of charges is less useful than other comparisons, given it is a combination of reporting and police action, and so there is a lot of variability. 'This data is possibly the type most likely to be influenced by policy decisions,' she says. Higginson says a policy focus on the policing of young people not only tends to increase crime numbers, but research tells us that the earlier a young person comes into contact with police, the greater the likelihood of future offending. She says one of the most obvious external factors to influence crime trends in recent years was the pandemic, but also noted changes in numbers could be policy-driven.
