logo
People are only just realising why so many supermarkets have a clock tower and it's blowing their minds

People are only just realising why so many supermarkets have a clock tower and it's blowing their minds

The Suna day ago

SUPERMARKETS across England have one feature that is often overlooked by shoppers.
Brits were floored to find out the reason why so many stores seem to have a clock tower.
4
4
Filmmaker Chris Spargo took to YouTube to explain the history.
He also pointed out that many of the clocks don't actually show the correct time.
The trend dates back to the 1970s, when an Essex council was given a very strict design guide.
It wanted to put a supermarket next to the town square but the council was firmly told that the building had to have "specific Essex characteristics".
The YouTuber explained: "So Asda came up with an idea. 15 miles away in a town called Coggeshall, there is a 14th century barn and a Victorian clock tower."
From there, UK chains seemed to draw inspiration and replicas started popping up everywhere.
It went on to be known as the "Essex barn style".
In 1991, 23 of the 28 Tescos that were built had clocks.
Way into the 1990s, Tesco, Sainsbury's and Morrisons all built stores in this way.
However, new stores being built today are less likely to have the feature.
One comment by a dumbfounded Brit read: "This is something I've simultaneously noticed everywhere and yet never noticed."
Writing in a thesis on the history of supermarket designs, academic Audrey Kirby said: "Possibly the design provided the customers with a classless feeling of comfort, security, wholesomeness and prosperity."
4
4

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Calls for Lord Hermer to quit over role in Lucy Connolly prosecution
Calls for Lord Hermer to quit over role in Lucy Connolly prosecution

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Calls for Lord Hermer to quit over role in Lucy Connolly prosecution

On Saturday night, Kemi Badenoch, the Tory leader, called on Sir Keir Starmer to sack his legal chief, saying: 'His judgment is a national embarrassment. After Southport, facts were buried while ministers ranted about far-Right thugs. 'Starmer should sack Hermer, or admit he's not really in charge. It speaks volumes that our Attorney General is content to keep people like Lucy Connolly behind bars for a tweet as violent criminals are released early.' 'Connolly should never have been prosecuted' Suella Braverman, who served as attorney general between 2021 and 2022, said: 'Lucy Connolly should never have been prosecuted, and should now be freed from prison. The charges brought against her were not in the public interest, and if I was attorney general I would not have granted consent to prosecute. 'The CPS has a woeful track record of prosecuting rapists and domestic abusers, yet the Attorney General considered Lucy's Twitter post sufficiently serious to justify prosecution. The Government is recklessly letting out dangerous criminals early, yet this Attorney General thought the costs and resources required to prosecute Lucy for her message were proportionate. 'This Attorney General is enforcing two-tier Britain under two-tier Keir. No wonder the UK has become a global byword for free speech in crisis, our reputation tarnished by political prosecutions and lawfare.' Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said: 'Lord Hermer has shown consistently poor judgment in a number of areas. 'From cheerleading the Chagos Islands giveaway to smearing political opponents as Nazis, it is quite clear he is not an appropriate person to serve as Attorney General and should be removed. 'No one condones the contents of Lucy Connolly's post, but her two and a half year prison sentence seems duly harsh given that people who commit actual acts of violence receive far lower sentences.' Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, told The Telegraph: 'Lord Hermer sums up Starmer's Government. A group of detached two-tier human right lawyers. No wonder the public have given up on them all.' Attorney General consent for prosecution Connolly was jailed for inciting racial hatred, which is an offence under the Public Order Act (1986). That offence, along with 60 others, requires that the Attorney General give their consent to any prosecutions. The requirement was designed to act as a safeguard to prevent the criminal justice system unreasonably clamping down on free speech, The Telegraph understands. When deciding whether or not to give consent for a prosecution, the Attorney General must first determine whether a conviction is likely and if so, if it would be in the public interest, it is understood. Across last year, the Attorney General was presented with 32 prosecutions to consider relating to the offence of inciting racial hatred – 17 of which were to do with the Southport riots. It is rare for the Attorney General to refuse to give consent because, by the time it reaches their office, the Crown Prosecution Service will have itself determined that a successful prosecution is likely, it is understood. Last September, Connolly pleaded guilty to writing a social media post intended to stir up racial hatred to her 10,000 followers on X on the evening after three children were murdered in a knife attack in Southport. She wrote: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f---ing hotels full of the b------s for all I care, while you're at it take the treacherous government politicians with them. I feel physically sick knowing what these [Southport] families will now have to endure. If that makes me racist, so be it.' Following the peak of the disorder in August, Lord Hermer described the jailing of individuals advocating for attacks on migrant hotels as 'a stark warning that you cannot hide behind your keyboard'.

Fury as Labour minister suggests Brits on the dole can turn down job offers they do not like
Fury as Labour minister suggests Brits on the dole can turn down job offers they do not like

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Fury as Labour minister suggests Brits on the dole can turn down job offers they do not like

WELFARE Minister Alison McGovern was slammed last night after saying people on benefits will not be forced to take 'any job' offered to them. Under the last Tory government, people on the dole had to look for work and take up a role if a jobcentre found them one. 2 But MsMcGovern hit out at the policy and suggested that under Labour those on the dole would be able to pick and choose what job they take before having their benefits taken off them. She told The Guardian: 'The Tories used to talk about ABC: 'Any job, Better job, Career'. 'I think that if you think about the career [first] … If we can get people into an NHS job where they're more likely to move on and move up, then that is far better for them.' Tory shadow welfare chief Helen Whately hit back: 'The mask has slipped - and it's the same old Labour. 'Those who can work, should work. To do otherwise is unfair to them, unfair to the taxpayer and unfair to society which pays the spiralling cost of worklessness. 'It's one of the biggest problems facing the country. But with the employment minister telling people not to worry about getting a job, we know the Government hasn't got a grip.' 2 Last night, the government slapped down Ms McGovern - saying there was no change in policy and that jobless Brits on benefits must take work if offered it. A Government source said: 'There's no change in policy. The rules remain the same: jobseekers have to be actively seeking work and they have to take up reasonable job offers. 'The Tories ran down job centres and locked millions of people out of work. "This Labour government is changing the way job centres work to help more people into secure, well-paid jobs.'

‘Beautiful' schoolboy, 15, drowns in river after passers-by tried to save him as his devastated family pays tributes
‘Beautiful' schoolboy, 15, drowns in river after passers-by tried to save him as his devastated family pays tributes

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

‘Beautiful' schoolboy, 15, drowns in river after passers-by tried to save him as his devastated family pays tributes

A FAMILY have paid tribute to their "beautiful" boy who drowned in a river despite passers-by trying to rescue him. Lotus Bowker, 15, from Kirkham, Lancashire, died after getting into difficulty in water on May 17. Emergency services were called to the riverbank at around 2:30pm and the teenager was airlifted to hospital. But despite medics' best efforts, he passed away the following morning. Cops have urged anyone with information related to the boy's death to come forward and urged people to "think twice" before going into open water. The lad's parents have paid tribute to their "beautiful boy" who they say is "sadly" missed by his family. They said: "Our beautiful boy, sadly missed by his Mummy, Daddy, his brothers and sister deeply. Words cannot describe the pain we are going through.' Regarding the tragic incident, DI Adie Knowles, said: "First and foremost my thoughts remain with Lotus's loved ones at this incredibly difficult time. "They have lost a son and a brother in the most tragic circumstances and I just want to echo David's words around water safety. "I'd just ask that people think twice before going into rivers, reservoirs or any form of open water. You are unnecessarily putting your lives at risk, and I really don't want to have to knock on your parents door to tell them that you won't be coming home." "Any individuals with information related to Lotus's death should contact Lancashire Police on 101, quoting log 834 of May 17, 2025." 1

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store