logo
UN Ocean Summit In Nice Closes With Wave Of Commitments

UN Ocean Summit In Nice Closes With Wave Of Commitments

Scoop12 hours ago

'We close this historic week not just with hope, but with concrete commitment, clear direction, and undeniable momentum,' Li Junhua, the UN's Under-Secretary-General for Economic and Social Affairs and Secretary-General of the summit, told reporters.
Co-hosted by France and Costa Rica, the five-day event brought 15,000 participants, including more than 60 Heads of State and Government, to France's Mediterranean coast.
With over 450 side events and nearly 100,000 visitors, the gathering, dubbed UNOC3, built on the momentum of previous ocean summits in New York (2017) and Lisbon (2022). It culminated in a shared call to expand marine protection, curb pollution, regulate the high seas, and unlock financing for vulnerable coastal and island nations.
Ambitious pledges
The conference's outcome, known as the Nice Ocean Action Plan, is a two-part framework that comprises a political declaration and over 800 voluntary commitments by governments, scientists, UN agencies, and civil society since the previous conference.
'These range from advocacy by youth to deep-sea ecosystem literacy, capacity building in science and innovation, and pledges to ratify intergovernmental treaties,' Mr. Li said.
The pledges unveiled this week reflected the breadth of the ocean crisis. The European Commission announced an investment of €1 billion to support ocean conservation, science, and sustainable fishing, while French Polynesia pledged to create the world's largest marine protected area, encompassing its entire exclusive economic zone – about five million square kilometers.
Germany launched a €100-million programme to remove underwater munitions from the Baltic and North Seas. In addition, New Zealand committed $52 million to strengthen ocean governance in the Pacific, and Spain announced five new marine protected areas.
A 37-country coalition led by Panama and Canada launched the High Ambition Coalition for a Quiet Ocean to tackle underwater noise pollution. Meanwhile, Indonesia and the World Bank introduced a 'Coral Bond' to help finance reef conservation in the country.
'The waves of change have formed,' Mr. Li said. 'It is now our collective responsibility to propel them forward – for our people, our planet, and future generations.'
A diplomatic stage
The summit opened Monday with stark warnings. 'We are not treating the ocean as what it is – the ultimate global commons,' said UN Secretary-General António Guterres, alongside the presidents of France and Costa Rica, Emmanuel Macron and Rodrigo Chaves Robles, who called for a renewed multilateralism anchored in science.
On Friday, France's special envoy for the conference, Olivier Poivre d'Arvor, recalled the stakes: 'We wanted in Nice... to take a chance on transformative change. I believe we have moved forward, but we can no longer go backwards.'
One of the conference's main objectives was to accelerate progress on the High Seas Treaty – known as the BBNJ agreement – adopted in 2023 to safeguard marine life in international waters. Sixty ratifications are needed for it to enter into force. Over the past week, 19 countries ratified the accord, bringing the total number as for Friday, to 50.
'This is a significant victory,' said Mr. Poivre d'Arvor. 'It's very difficult to work on the ocean right now when the United States is so little involved.'
The French envoy was alluding to the absence of a senior US delegation, as well as President Donald Trump's recent executive order advancing deep-sea mining. 'The abyss is not for sale,' he said, echoing remarks made earlier in the week by President Macron.
Still, Mr. Poivre d'Arvor emphasized the broad agreement achieved at the summit. 'One country may be missing,' he said. 'But 92 per cent of the 'co-owners' were present today in Nice.'
His counterpart, Arnoldo André-Tinoco, the Foreign Minister of Costa Rica, urged other nations to accelerate financing for ocean protection. 'Each commitment must be held accountable,' he said at the conference's closing meeting.
Momentum – and a test
For Peter Thomson, the UN's Special Envoy for the Ocean, Nice marked a turning point. 'It's not so much what happens at the conference, it is what happens afterwards,' he told UN News, recalling the early days of ocean advocacy when Sustainable Development Goal 14 (SDG14), on life below water, was first established.
'From the desert we were in back in 2015… to where we are now, where you see this incredible engagement.'
Looking ahead, attention is already turning to the Fourth UN Ocean Conference, slated to be co-hosted by Chile and South Korea in 2028.
'We're going to again see a big surge upwards from here,' Mr. Thomson predicted. He expressed hope that major global agreements — including the BBNJ treaty, the WTO Fisheries Subsidies Agreement, and the future Global Plastics Treaty – will all be ratified and implemented by then.
The 2028 summit will also mark a moment of reckoning, as SDG 14 approaches its 2030 target.
'What do we do when SDG 14 matures in 2030?' Mr. Thomson asked. 'Obviously, it's got to be raised ambition. It's got to be stronger.' He emphasized that while SDG14 had aimed to protect 10 per cent of the ocean by 2020 – a target the world failed to meet – the new benchmark is 30 per cent by 2030.
Wearing a shell necklace gifted by the Marshall Islands, the Fiji native praised small island nations and atoll collectives for setting ambitious marine protections.
'If small countries can make big measures like that, why can't the big countries follow suit?' he said.
He also saluted the 2,000 scientists who gathered for the One Ocean Science Congress ahead of the summit. 'What a great way to run things,' he said.
A show of unity
Despite the celebratory tone, tensions lingered. Small Island Developing States pushed for stronger language on loss and damage – harms inflicted by climate change that go beyond what people can adapt to. 'You cannot have an ocean declaration without SIDS,' one delegate warned earlier this week.
Others, including President Chaves, of Costa Rica, called for a moratorium on deep-sea mining in international waters until science can assess the risks – a step not included in the final declaration.
Still, the political declaration adopted in Nice, titled Our ocean, our future: united for urgent action, reaffirms the goal of protecting 30 percent of the ocean and land by 2030, while supporting global frameworks like the Kunming-Montreal Biodiversity Agreement (adopted in 2022, committing nations to halt and reverse nature loss by 2030 through ambitious conservation targets and sustainable biodiversity management) and the UN International Maritime Organization's (IMO) climate goals.
'The real test,' Mr. Li said, 'is not what we said here in Nice – but what we do next.'
As the sun dipped behind the Promenade des Anglais and the conference's final plenary adjourned, the sea – ancient, vital, and imperiled – bore silent witness to a fragile but shared promise.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Condemning The Right To Self-Defence: Iran's Retaliation And Israel's Privilege
Condemning The Right To Self-Defence: Iran's Retaliation And Israel's Privilege

Scoop

timean hour ago

  • Scoop

Condemning The Right To Self-Defence: Iran's Retaliation And Israel's Privilege

There is a throbbing complaint among Western powers, including those in the European Union and the United States. Iran is not playing by the rules. Instead of accepting with dutiful meekness the slaughter of its military leadership and scientific personnel, Tehran decided, promptly, to respond to Israel's pre-emptive strikes launched on June 13. Instead of considering the dubious legal implications of such strikes, an act of undeclared war, the focus in the European Union and various other backers of Israel has been to focus on the retaliation itself. To the Israeli attacks conducted as part of Operation Rising Lion, there was studied silence. It was not a silence observed when it came to the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 by Vladimir Putin's Russia. Then, the law books were swiftly procured, and obligations of the United Nations Charter cited under Article 2(4): 'All members shall refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity of any state.' Russia was condemned for adopting a preventive stance on Ukraine as a threat to its security: that, in Kyiv joining NATO, a formidable threat would manifest at the border. In his statement on the unfolding conflict between Israel and Iran, France's President Emmanuel Macron made sure to condemn 'Iran's ongoing nuclear program', having taken 'all appropriate diplomatic measures in response.' Israel also had the 'right to defend itself and ensure its security', leaving open the suggestion that it might have been justified resorting to Article 51 of the UN Charter. All he could offer was a call on 'all parties to exercise maximum restraint and to de-escalate.' In a most piquant response, Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories stated that, 'On the day Israel, unprovoked, has attacked Iran, killing 80 people, the president of a major European power, finally admits that in the Middle East, Israel, and only Israel, has the right to defend itself.' The German Foreign Office was even bolder in accusing Iran of having engaged in its own selfish measures of self-defence (such unwarranted bravado!), something it has always been happy to afford Israel. 'We strongly condemn the indiscriminate Iranian attack on Israeli territory.' In contrast, the foreign office also felt it appropriate to reference the illegal attack on Iran as involving 'targeted strikes' against its nuclear facilities. Despite Israel having an undeclared nuclear weapons stockpile that permanently endangers security in the region, the office went on to chastise Iran for having a nuclear program that violated 'the Non-Proliferation Treaty', threatening in its nature 'to the entire region – especially Israel.' Those at fault had been found out. The President of the EU Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, could hardly improve on that apologia. She revealed that she had been conversing with Israeli President Isaac Herzog about the 'escalating situation in the Middle East.' She also knew her priorities: reiterating Israel's right to self- defence and refusing to mention Iran's, while tagging on the statement a broader concern for preserving regional stability. The rest involved a reference to diplomacy and de-escalation, toward which Israel has shown a resolute contempt with regards Iran and its nuclear program. The assessment offered by Mohamed ElBaradei, former Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), was forensically impressive, as well as being icily dismissive. Not only did he reproach the German response for ignoring the importance of Article 2(4) of the Charter prohibiting the use of force subject to the right to self-defence, he brought up a reminder: targeted strikes against the nuclear facilities of any party 'are prohibited under Article 56 of the additional protocol of the Geneva Conventions to which Germany is a party'. ElBaradei also referred anyone exercised by such matters to the United Nations Security Council 487 (1981), which did not have a single demur in its adoption. It unreservedly condemned the attack by Israel on Iraq's Osirak nuclear research reactor in June that year as a violation of the UN Charter, recognised that Iraq was a party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) and had permitted the IAEA inspections of the facility, stated that Iraq had a right to establish and develop civilian nuclear programs and called on Israel to place its own nuclear facilities under the jurisdictional safeguards of the IAEA. The calculus regarding the use of force by Israel vis-à-vis its adversaries has long been a sneaky one. It is jigged and rigged in favour of the Jewish state. As Trita Parsi put it with unblemished accuracy, Western pundits had, for a year and a half, stated that Hamas, having started the Gaza War on October 7, 2023 bore responsibility for civilian carnage. 'Western pundits for the past 1.5 days: Israel started the war with Iran, and if Iran retaliates, they bear responsibility for civilian deaths.' The perceived barbarian, when attacked by a force seen as superior and civilised, will always be condemned for having reacted most naturally, and most violently of all.

Security Council Meets In Emergency Session Over Iran-Israel Conflict, Amid Strikes And Counterstrikes
Security Council Meets In Emergency Session Over Iran-Israel Conflict, Amid Strikes And Counterstrikes

Scoop

time11 hours ago

  • Scoop

Security Council Meets In Emergency Session Over Iran-Israel Conflict, Amid Strikes And Counterstrikes

13 June 2025 The Council cleared its original schedule to address the rapidly evolving crisis, also hearing from the head of the UN-backed international nuclear watchdog, who warned of the grave risks to regional stability and nuclear safety. Overnight from Thursday into Friday, Israeli military strikes targeted nuclear facilities across Iran, including the Natanz enrichment site. Media reports indicate that Hossein Salami, the head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), as well as several prominent nuclear scientists, were among those killed. The strikes also caused significant damage, including reportedly dozens of civilian casualties. Airspace in the region has been largely closed and security forces are on high alert. Additional Israeli strikes were reported late Friday local time as well as ballistic missile launches by Iran which have reportedly struck parts of Israel, including Tel Aviv. Avoid conflagration at all costs: DiCarlo Rosemary DiCarlo, UN Under-Secretary-General for political affairs told ambassadors that the repercussions of the attacks were already reverberating. 'I reaffirm the Secretary-General's condemnation of any military escalation in the Middle East,' she said, urging both Israel and Iran to exercise maximum restraint and 'avoid at all costs a descent into deeper and wider regional conflict'. She also noted that the military escalation came just as 'some significant diplomatic developments' were unfolding, including the planned resumption of United States-Iranian talks in Oman at the weekend. Latest reports indicate that Iran will no longer attend. Ms. DiCarlo urged parties to stay the diplomatic course. 'A peaceful resolution through negotiations remains the best means to ensure the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear programme,' she said. 'We must at all costs avoid a growing conflagration which would have enormous global consequences.' Nuclear watchdog head urges protection of atomic sites Also briefing the Council, Rafael Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said his agency was in constant contact with the Iranian Nuclear Regulatory Authority to assess the status of affected facilities and determine broader impacts on nuclear safety and security. He stressed that nuclear sites must never be targeted – under any circumstances. 'Such attacks have serious implications for nuclear security, nuclear safety and safeguards, as well as regional and international peace and security,' Mr. Grossi said. He stands ready to travel to the region at the earliest opportunity, he added, to assess the situation and support safety, security and non-proliferation efforts in Iran. 'It is clear that the only sustainable path forward for Iran, for Israel, the entire region and the international community is one grounded in dialogue and diplomacy to ensure peace, stability and cooperation.' Mr. Grossi concluded by offering the IAEA as a neutral platform where 'facts prevail over rhetoric' and where technical engagement replace escalation. 'I reaffirm my personal and the agency's readiness to facilitate dialogue and support efforts that promote transparency, security and the peaceful resolution of nuclear issues in Iran.' Russia 'strongly condemns' Israeli actions Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia warned that Israel's actions in the Middle East are 'pushing the region to a large-scale nuclear catastrophe.' 'This completely unprovoked attack, no matter what Israel says to the contrary, is a gross violation of the UN Charter and international law,' he said, expressing Russia's 'strong condemnation' of the strikes. He accused 'Western members' of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal – formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) – of contributing to the current crisis through their policies toward Iran and its nuclear programme. 'They have been doing everything to fuel the escalation and essentially incited it,' he told ambassadors. Mr. Nebenzia concluded by urging renewed diplomatic efforts. 'Once again, settling issues related to the Iranian nuclear programme is only possible if a peaceful, political, and diplomatic pathway is followed,' he said. 'Iran has the right to self-defence': Pakistan Pakistan's Ambassador Asim Iftikhar Ahmad told the Council that Israel's 'blatant provocations' pose a grave threat to regional peace and stability. 'Iran has the right to self-defence under Article 51 of the UN Charter,' he said, alleging that Israel's actions in Gaza, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen 'reflect a continuing pattern of unilateral militarism'. 'The fact that these attacks against Iran have happened in the middle of a negotiations process aimed at finding a peaceful diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear issue makes it all the more morally repugnant and against international norms,' he added. Mr. Ahmad urged all parties to avoid further escalation and prioritise dialogue. He also called on the Security Council to 'hold the aggressor accountable for its actions. This Council must deny Israel the free hand and the impunity with which it continues to operate in defiance of international law and international opinion.' Iran must not acquire nuclear weapons: US Speaking for the United States, McCoy Pitt, a senior State Department official, accused Iran of having launched 'unprovoked, direct and proxy attacks' against Israeli civilians and of spreading of terror, instability and human suffering in the region. 'As President Trump has repeatedly said this dangerous regime cannot be allowed to have nuclear weapons,' he said. Mr. Pitt noted that the US had been informed of the Israeli strikes in advance but was not militarily involved. 'Our absolute, foremost priority is the protection of US citizens, personnel and forces in the region,' he said. He further said that the US will continue to seek a diplomatic resolution that ensures Iran will never acquire a nuclear weapon or pose a threat to instability in the Middle East. 'Iran's leadership will be wise to negotiate at this time,' he said. Iran calls for accountability Iranian Ambassador Amir Saeid Iravani told the Security Council he was addressing the body on behalf of his government and people 'with the utmost urgency and grave alarm.' 'We strongly and unequivocally condemn the barbaric and criminal attack, a series of targeted assassinations against senior military officials, nuclear scientists and innocent civilians,' he said. 'These deliberate and systematic killings were not only illegal and inhuman, a chilling display of calculated aggression. These atrocities constitute a clear act of State terrorism and flagrant violation of international law,' he added. He said Israel's attacks on protected nuclear facilities defied not only the fundamental principles of international law but also 'common conscience,' warning that damage to such sites could release catastrophic radiological consequences across the region and beyond. 'Only a regime devoid of humanity and responsibility would endanger millions of lives in pursuit of its destructive ambitions,' Mr. Iravani said. 'Those who support this regime, with the United States at the forefront, must understand that they are complicit. By aiding and enabling these crimes, they share full responsibility for the consequences.' Israel defends 'act of national preservation' Israeli Ambassador Danny Danon began his remarks by reminding Security Council members that – as they spoke – Iranian ballistic missiles were striking Israeli cities and injuring civilians. He said Israel's strikes were preventative and carried out with 'precision, purpose, and the most advanced intelligence' available. The mission, he added, was clear, 'dismantle Iran's nuclear programme, eliminate the architects of its terror and aggression and neutralize the regime's ability to follow through on its repeated public promise to destroy the State of Israel.' Mr. Danon accused Iran of taking steps toward building a nuclear arsenal. He also criticized the international community for failing to act and rein in Tehran. 'Israel did not act recklessly – we waited,' he said. 'This was an act of national preservation. It was one we undertook alone, not because we wanted to, but because we were left no other option.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store