Keir Starmer braced for fresh rebellion over reforms
The Independent
Sir Keir Starmer is reportedly facing another rebellion from his backbenchers over reforms to support for children with special needs in England, just days after he was forced into a humiliating climbdown on welfare cuts. On Sunday, education secretary Bridget Phillipson insisted that ministers are committed to reforming support for children with learning difficulties or disabilities, which currently costs £12bn a year. But she refused to rule out scrapping key documents that families rely on to guarantee specialist help.
Education, health and care plans (EHCPs) are statutory documents which outline the support needed to help children with special needs and disabilities achieve key life outcomes. Many seeing them as the only way to get schools to provide the support children need. Asked whether she could rule out getting rid of EHCPs, Ms Phillipson described it as a "complex and sensitive area". Speaking to the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme, she added: "What I can say very clearly is that we will strengthen and put in place better support for children."
"I've been spending a lot of time listening to parents, to disability rights groups, to campaigners and to others and to colleagues across Parliament as well, because it's important to get this right," she added, but said it is "tough". But now senior Labour figures have told The Times that the plans risk becoming "welfare mark two", claiming that dozens of MPs are prepared to rebel over the issue.
One Labour MP urged the government to "think again now or they'll be repeating the same mistake they made with welfare reform."
"We're all in favour of reforming the system but that cannot be driven by saving money and taking support away from children", they added.
A second Labour MP said: "If they thought taking money away from disabled adults was bad, watch what happens when they try the same with disabled kids."
It comes after Sir Keir was forced to abandon a key plank of his controversial benefit cuts in order to get them through parliament following a major revolt from his backbenchers. In a letter shared with The Guardian, campaigners have said that without EHCP documents in mainstream schools, "many thousands of children risk being denied vital provision, or losing access to education altogether". They said: "For more than 40 years, children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities have had a statutory right to an education that meets their needs.
"Set alongside catastrophic plans to cut benefits for disabled people, this raises the question of who we are as a country and the kind of society in which we want to live. "Whatever the Send system's problems, the answer is not to remove the rights of children and young people. Families cannot afford to lose these precious legal protections." Signatories to the letter include the heads of charities, professors, Send parents including actor Sally Phillips, and campaigners including broadcaster Chris Packham. The government has said it "inherited a Send (special educational needs and disabilities) system left on its knees" and it is "looking at changes" to improve support for children and parents.
Data from the Department for Education released in June indicated that the number of EHCPs has increased. In total, there were 638,745 EHCPs in place in January 2025, up 10.8 per cent on the same point last year. The number of new plans that started during 2024 also grew by 15.8 per cent on the previous year, to 97,747. Requests for children to be assessed for EHCPs rose by 11.8 per cent to 154,489 in 2024.
A Department for Education spokesperson said: "The evidence is clear that this government inherited a Send system left on its knees — which is why we are looking at changes to improve support for children and stop parents having to fight for help. We have been clear that there are no plans to abolish Send tribunals, or to remove funding or support from children, families and schools. "This government is actively working with parents and experts on the solutions, including more early intervention to prevent needs from escalating and £740 million to encourage councils to create more specialist places in mainstream schools.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
13 hours ago
- Zawya
Qatar, Oman discuss reinforcing cooperation in labour field
Muscat: A delegation from the Ministry of Labour (MOL) has wrapped up a two-day visit to the Sultanate of Oman to discuss facets of cooperation between the two sisterly countries, bolstering coordination in the labor field and deliberating on the executive program for cooperation in this area for 2025-2027. The delegation was headed by Assistant Undersecretary for National Manpower Affairs in the Private Sector Khames Mohammed Al Naimi and Assistant Undersecretary for Migrant Labour Affairs at MOL, Hamad Faraj Dalmouk. Composed of a technical team, the delegation convened a series of meetings with officials of the Ministry of Labour in Oman, with representatives from several directorates, labor and human resource development sectors, and relevant professional associations in attendance. Both sides conferred on the aforementioned program, which includes a variety of proposed cooperation fields, notably the exchange of professional expertise and studies in the areas of labor and workforce empowerment. The program, likewise, includes intensification of mutual visits between the two countries with the aim of imparting knowledge and sharing national competencies in a variety of sectors. It comprises cooperation in holding events, exhibitions, and workshops of shared interest, in addition to executing a professional training module, in pursuit of advancing national competencies and integrating them into the labor market. © Dar Al Sharq Press, Printing and Distribution. All Rights Reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (
Middle East Eye
a day ago
- Middle East Eye
Dozens of Palestinian children from Gaza to be brought to UK for treatment
A group of between 30 and 50 Palestinian children will be evacuated from Gaza to Britain for medical treatment in the coming weeks, according to the BBC. Children from Gaza have been brought privately to the UK for medical treatment, but this marks the first time that the British government itself will evacuate children for treatment. Last week 96 MPs from several parties wrote to the government urging it to bring sick and injured children from Gaza to Britain, warning that many were at risk of imminent death. Earlier this month the government said plans to bring children to the UK for treatment were being carried out "at pace". The children will be allowed to travel with family members, and some are expected to enter the asylum system afterwards, since they may be unable to return to Gaza. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters More than 50,000 children have been killed or injured since October 2023, according to the UN. Is Britain finally realising that Palestinian children are human? Read More » Last month more than 100 humanitarian organisations warned that "mass famine" has been spreading across the Gaza Strip since Israel blocked humanitarian aid from entering in early March and began providing inadequate aid through the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Fund at the end of May. In February this year British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced that the government would seek to prevent Palestinian refugees from living in the UK using a refugee scheme established for Ukranians. Starmer insisted in parliament that the Home Office will shut a "legal loophole" that allowed a Palestinian refugee family from Gaza to stay in the UK. The Home Office refused an initial application by the Palestinian family in May last year, but in September an immigration tribunal ruled in their favour. More than 190,000 Ukranians have come to the country since Russia invaded in March 2022.
Middle East Eye
a day ago
- Middle East Eye
'Anti-Zionist' Zarah Sultana lays out vision for new left-wing party
On 3 July Zarah Sultana sent shockwaves through Britain's political scene when the popular left-wing MP made the surprise announcement that she was leaving the Labour party to co-lead a new party with former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. That new party doesn't even exist yet, but it has already scored above 10 percent in several public opinion polls and received more than 800,000 sign-ups. The Labour leadership is right to be concerned. Coming as it does alongside the rise of the right-wing populist party Reform UK and the near-decimation of the Conservatives, the Corbyn-Sultana party could accelerate the destruction of the old two-party system. But the new grouping has been largely shrouded in mystery. It is still not clear what it will look like, and it doesn't even have a name. Now Sultana has given a series of unprecedented insights into her vision for the party. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Significantly, she has gone to great lengths to distance it from Corbyn's leadership of Labour between 2015 and 2020. On Sunday she declared "loudly and proudly" on social media that "I'm an anti-Zionist", a political stance that has long been beyond the pale in mainstream British political discourse. This is something new. Clearly, the political landscape has changed quite dramatically from when Corbyn was leader of the opposition. The smears won't work this time. I say it loudly and proudly: I'm an anti-Zionist. Print that. — Zarah Sultana MP (@zarahsultana) August 17, 2025 Sultana has declared that she doesn't care about establishment "smears". The crucial difference this time round, of course, is that while Corbyn's Labour aimed to enter government and win over most of the British public in the process, the new party is unlikely to harbour such ambitions. This means it doesn't have to play by the rules that Corbyn's Labour did. Even if it receives 15 percent of the vote, it could be an existential threat to the Starmer government by robbing it of a majority. Most of the supporters the party will attract will be unmoved by negative mainstream media coverage or condemnation by Labour and Conservative politicians. They're more likely to view the disapproval of the political class as a badge of honour. Criticising Corbynism In an interview with the New Left Review published over the weekend, Sultana said that "we have to build on the strengths of Corbynism - its energy, mass appeal and bold policy platform - and we also have to recognise its limitations". She accused Corbynism of having "capitulated to the IHRA definition of antisemitism, which famously equates it with anti-Zionism". Sultana avoided criticising Corbyn personally but levelled serious criticism against the party under his leadership (while she was involved with the party during that time, she didn't become an MP until the December 2019 general election). How independent MPs transformed British politics Read More » She said she heard from friends who had been at the top of Labour that it was in parts "a highly dysfunctional working environment with toxicity and bullying - not from Jeremy, but from some people around him". The criticism came thick and fast in the interview. Sultana added that Corbynism "didn't make a real effort to channel its mass membership into the labour movement or tenants unions, which would have enriched the party's social base". She continued: "When it came under attack from the state and the media, it should have fought back, recognising that these are our class enemies. But instead it was frightened and far too conciliatory." Corbyn, one of the most recognisable figures in Britain, has almost certainly been the biggest factor drawing people to the nascent party. But Sultana is evidently firmly asserting herself and her own position. "I'm always learning from Jeremy and I'd like to think there are insights I can offer him as well," she said, emphasising that a "co-leadership with equal powers would mean that neither of us is a tokenistic figure". So how important will prominent personalities be to the new party's structure? Sultana clarified that the process of establishing the party through a conference this autumn "can't be led by just MPs", pointing out that five of the six independent MPs are men. 'I'm always learning from Jeremy and I'd like to think there are insights I can offer him as well' - Zarah Sultana MP "This shouldn't be what our party looks like going forward," she told the New Left Review, adding that "the committee that's organising the conference should be gender balanced as well as racially and regionally diverse, all with an equal stake and voting rights". And to hammer the point home: "Anything less would be a boys' club." Significantly, Sultana has also put an end to rumours that the new party won't be a real party at all, but rather a sort of federation or movement. "A lot of unofficial local groups have also been springing up since we announced the party, but we will be formalising our structures at the upcoming conference," she said. "The overall party structure has to be unitary, otherwise it won't be a cohesive project that unites the existing spectrum of movements and struggles. "A federation will not be as able to galvanise people or go on the offensive; it could end up being little more than a loose collection of different groups rather than a powerful, united bloc." This is all quite emphatic: the new party aims to be powerful and united. It will be established through an "open and pluralistic conference" which will break the "conventions of British politics". Moreover, it is clearly moored to a broader left-wing and anti-establishment vision for society. "We don't just want electoralism - we want a project that's tied in to tenants unions, labour organising, the fight to defend the NHS from privatisation and the Palestine solidarity movement." And the ultimate aim? "The goal is to change politics forever." No one can accuse the independents of aiming too low.
