logo
Bangladesh will hold historic elections in 2026 but millions of its citizens will not be able to vote

Bangladesh will hold historic elections in 2026 but millions of its citizens will not be able to vote

Canberra man Mizan Rahman will fly more than 9,000 kilometres to vote when Bangladesh holds its general election next year.
"I've never had the chance to vote in Bangladesh, where national elections are celebrated like a grand festival," he told the ABC.
Asked why he would spend thousands of dollars to travel for the purpose of casting a single ballot, the Bangladeshi Australian dual national was unequivocal.
"Under Sheikh Hasina's regime, elections were essentially nonexistent, and the democratic system was dismantled," he said.
"I longed for the end of that era, and I've decided that the best way to celebrate its fall is by standing alongside those who fought for our right to vote and casting my ballot in this historic election.
Frustration over inflation, a lack of high-quality jobs and widespread corruption under prime minister Sheikh Hasina led to student protests deemed the "world's first gen Z revolution".
She fled into exile in India — paving the way for new elections in April 2026.
The estimated 7.5 million Bangladeshis who live in other countries, including Mr Rahman, have the legal right to vote in elections from overseas.
Sydney-based researcher Ashraful Azad said that in practice, however, complex postal voting procedures prevented them from doing so.
Bangladesh is the sixth-largest migrant-sending country in the world, according to the International Organization for Migration.
Many Bangladeshis work largely in wealthy Gulf nations in the Middle East, as well as parts of Asia including Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore.
A smaller, though growing, population of highly skilled migrants live in Western nations including Australia.
Bangladeshis abroad provide a vital source of economic growth via remittances they send home.
But it remained "almost impossible for this large diaspora to vote", Dr Azad found in recent research for the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
Local media reported in April that the Bangladesh Election Commission was assessing the feasibility of postal ballots, online voting or voting by proxy for overseas residents, but would not commit to a timeframe for implementation.
Iffath Yeasmine, who is studying for her masters in Australia, told the ABC she wanted to be able to choose the next government.
"But logistically speaking, it won't be possible for me to fly from Sydney to Dhaka to Chittagong, where I'm from, just to vote," she said.
Like many Bangladeshis, Ms Yeasmine said she had been unaware of her right to vote overseas — but would like to see the country's interim government make that a reality.
The ABC contacted the Bangladesh Election Commission and the country's embassy in Australia for comment but did not receive a response by deadline.
"It's really important that our voice is heard," said Ms Yeasmine, who previously worked for the United Nations in Bangladesh.
"We don't want to limit our right [to participate in the election] to a few social media posts."
Main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) boycotted the 2024 general election because it argued Ms Hasina was staging a "sham election".
Muhammad Yunus, the Nobel Peace Prize laureate appointed as interim leader of Bangladesh, has pledged to restore its democratic institutions.
"Sheikh Hasina was the key to the problem. She held fake elections one after another," Mr Yunus told FRANCE24 last year.
"We are free from all the oppression … all the mismanagement, all the corruption."
Yet holding elections announced for April 2026 will be a major undertaking.
Despite intending to fly to Bangladesh, Mr Rahman acknowledged that "holding a fully free and fair election will be difficult".
"The anti-Awami League forces are fragmented and lack unity," he said.
The Bangladesh Nationalist Party is expected to win government at the general election — not least because the Awami League has, controversially, been barred from participating.
While the BNP and its former ally, the Islamist Jamaat-e-Islami party, might appeal to segments of Bangladesh's Muslim majority, Flinders University democracy researcher Intifar Chowdhury wrote recently that they had "limited resonance with younger voters".
"At the same time, radical, right-wing, Islamist forces are exploiting the vacuum to reassert themselves, exacerbating tensions between Muslims and the Hindu minority," she said.
"We would be very keen to vote," said Chapal Choudhury, a Bangladeshi Hindu who has lived in Australia since 2004.
Hindus make up almost 10 per cent of Bangladesh's 174 million people, many of whom had supported Ms Hasina's secular-leaning Awami League.
Once Ms Hasina was booted from power, rioters targeted symbols of the Awami League and, in some cases, Hindus.
Mr Choudhury said he was concerned about the safety of his family — half of whom he said had already fled to Canada or India.
"The Islamic fundamentalists are taking the opportunity, exploiting the situation, to go after the minorities," he said.
Human Rights Watch alleged this week that Bangladesh's interim government had used arbitrary detention to target perceived political opponents.
"The hope of the thousands who braved lethal violence a year ago when they opposed Sheikh Hasina's abusive rule to build a rights-respecting democracy remains unfulfilled," said Human Rights Watch's deputy Asia director, Meenakshi Ganguly.
"The interim government appears stuck, juggling an unreformed security sector, sometimes violent religious hardliners, and political groups that seem more focused on extracting vengeance on Hasina's supporters than protecting Bangladeshis' rights."
The Bangladeshi Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs was approached for comment by the ABC.
Mr Choudhury said members of his family in Bangladesh who historically supported the Awami League had been threatened or extorted since Ms Hasina's fall from power.
While Ms Yeasmine agreed with blocking the Awami League from participating in the next general election, she said the voices of their voters still mattered.
"I want fairness for everyone, even for the people who had supported the ousted prime minister," she said.
"I want safety and security for them as well because their voice matters in democracy."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How many Australians are fighting with Israel's military in Gaza? This group is monitoring
How many Australians are fighting with Israel's military in Gaza? This group is monitoring

SBS Australia

time32 minutes ago

  • SBS Australia

How many Australians are fighting with Israel's military in Gaza? This group is monitoring

An Australian legal group says it is preparing a formal criminal complaint to the federal police seeking investigations into Australians serving with the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) for any potential offences committed. The Australian Centre for International Justice (ACIJ) reached out to the government in early June, requesting it issue warnings to the Australian public about the risks for Australians fighting for the IDF. It said such warnings should ensure citizens were aware "that engaging in hostilities with the Israeli military in the unlawfully occupied Palestinian Territory, may expose them to criminal investigation and prosecution under Australian law", or elsewhere "where there is evidence that they have participated in the commission of international crimes". Lara Khider, acting executive director of ACIJ, told SBS News: "We are currently monitoring at least 20 individuals who are serving or have served in the Israeli military, and are preparing criminal complaints to the AFP [Australian Federal Police] seeking investigations into potential offences against the Commonwealth." A Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade spokesperson confirmed to SBS News the department "does not track the movements of Australians overseas". "The Australian government encourages all Australians who seek to serve with the armed forces of a foreign country to carefully consider their legal obligations and ensure their conduct does not constitute a criminal offence," the spokesperson said. Is fighting for another army legal? Under Australian foreign incursion laws, it's not illegal to serve with a foreign government army — but recruiting someone to do so is. Australian authorities do not actively monitor Australians who may be serving in foreign armed forces, but the Australian Border Force may provide travellers leaving the country with information about their obligations under Australian law. Credit: AP The foreign incursion laws state it's an offence to enter a foreign country with an intention to engage in a hostile activity, unless serving in, or with, the armed forces of the government of a foreign country. It's illegal to recruit people to join an organisation engaged in hostile activities, or to serve in, or with, a foreign military. But the federal attorney-general can allow recruitment of people to serve with an armed force of a foreign country if "it is in the interests of the defence or international relations of Australia". "It is well known that Australians are currently serving in the Israeli military, and there have even been reported instances of recruitment occurring on Australian soil," Khider said. The exact number of Australians who've served or are serving has not been confirmed by Australian authorities. A freedom of information request in 2024 revealed ABF had intervened with three of four Australian citizens suspected of departing for Israel for military service since 7 October 2023. The Australian Border Force (ABF) previously confirmed that when it becomes aware that a person is departing Australia with the intention of travelling to a potential conflict zone, it "provides the traveller with information on their obligations under Australian law". The AFP said it cautioned all Australians who seek to engage in hostilities overseas to carefully consider their legal obligations and ensure their conduct does not constitute a criminal offence. "Any Australian suspected of committing a criminal offence while in a conflict zone may be investigated by the AFP, and, where appropriate, may face prosecution," a spokesperson told SBS News. The Australian Centre for International Justice is monitoring at least 20 Australians who have served or are serving in the Israel Defense Forces. Source: EPA / Abir Sultan The ACIJ pointed to the 2024 ruling from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) that ordered Israel to prevent acts of genocide in its war on Gaza . In the ruling, the ICJ called on Israel to "take all measures within its power to prevent and punish the direct and public incitement to commit genocide", and ordered Israel to "prevent the commission of acts" that fall under under the Genocide Convention — which include "deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part"; and "killing members of the group". The ACIJ said Australia, as a state party to the Genocide Convention, has legal obligations to take all possible measures to prevent genocide. Australia is also party to a number of international human rights treaties and recognises the ICJ and its jurisdiction on international law matters. IDF spokesperson Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari said last year the IDF is "a professional military committed to international law". Government warns Australians at the border SBS News obtained a copy of a letter from Attorney-General Michelle Rowland addressed to the ACIJ about the issue, in a reply dated 28 July. In the letter, Rowland said while it was not appropriate for the government to provide specific legal advice, "the government has been clear that all parties to the conflict must comply with international and relevant domestic legal obligations". Rowland said the government "continues to discourage" Australians from engaging in conflict overseas, and advocates for the protection of civilians, the upholding of international law and the unhindered flow of aid to the region. "The government continues to caution all Australians who seek to serve with the armed forces of a foreign country to carefully consider their legal obligations and ensure their conduct does not constitute a criminal offence," Rowland said in the letter. "Where appropriate, the AFP may work with foreign law enforcement agencies and international bodies as part of any potential investigation." However, ACIJ said it had been raising its concerns on the issue with the Australian government since December 2023 and said the government's reply was "manifestly inadequate". "The limited cautions issued to date do not sufficiently reflect the seriousness of the atrocities occurring against the Palestinians in Gaza," Khider said. "Issuing vague or weak cautions does not discharge Australia's obligations under international law. "The government must act with urgency and clarity to ensure that its international legal responsibilities are met, and that Australians are not complicit in atrocity crimes." An Australian war crimes investigation unit Greens senator David Shoebridge said his office had inquired nine months ago into why the Australian government was not tracking people fighting in the Israeli and Russian militaries, and had yet to receive a reply. "The Australian government's current policy is 'head in the sand'," Shoebridge said. "If you don't look for war crimes, you won't find them. "The conflict in these areas has only intensified, and concerns about people being implicated in war crimes have only heightened." "We know that thousands of people have been travelling to Israel over recent months, many to fight in the IDF, which is a concern when the government does not track or monitor who is fighting in this appalling war," Shoebridge said. The number of Australians serving or having served with the IDF has not been confirmed, but News Corp in 2023 reported there could be up to 1,000 who have served or were active reservists at the time. The Greens want a War Crimes Investigation Unit set up in Australia. "Other countries have these bodies, and they are effective. The lack of one in Australia makes everyone less safe."

Kiama MP Gareth Ward to fight expulsion attempt by Labor government in Supreme Court
Kiama MP Gareth Ward to fight expulsion attempt by Labor government in Supreme Court

News.com.au

time44 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Kiama MP Gareth Ward to fight expulsion attempt by Labor government in Supreme Court

Convicted rapist and sitting MP Gareth Ward will return before the Supreme Court in Sydney's CBD today as he fights attempts by the Labor-controlled state government to have him expelled from parliament. The Kiama MP was taken into custody on remand last week while awaiting sentencing after he was found guilty by a jury of three counts of indecent assault and a fourth count of intercourse without consent. The charges relate to acts against two young men – an 18-year-old at Meroo Meadow in 2013 and a 24-year-old man in Potts Point in 2015 – and sparked calls for the south coast MP to resign from parliament. A motion was expected to be introduced by Labor to the Legislative Assembly to expel Ward, with support from the Coalition earlier this week. If successful, it would mark the first expulsion from the NSW lower house since 1917. Instead, the matter was set down for a full-day hearing at the Supreme Court after an 11th hour injunction was applied for by Ward's lawyers, who argue the state parliament does not have the power to expel him. The last-minute legal move makes it almost impossible to expel Ward, who is still being paid by parliament and is the current member for Kiama, before the Legislative Assembly adjourns until next month. Leader of the House Ron Hoenig earlier in the week said the court did not have the authority to stop matters being but before legislators, but that the state government would abide by the injunction out of respect. The matter sets the stage for a peculiar legal challenge. Premier Chris Minns told 2GB on Tuesday morning most people would 'appreciate it's an unconscionable situation to have someone who's currently sitting in jail in Silverwater convicted of serious sexual offences who is demanding to remain a member of parliament and continue to be paid'. Asked why Ward had not resigned, Mr Minns said 'clearly, he's got no shame'. Opposition Leader Mark Speakman said that, if the government was prepared, they could resume 'in the interim with a small quorum of MPs'. 'We would be willing to do that. It would be possible, for example, to have just 20 MPs, the quorum deal with the matter,' he said. Mr Speakman said 'As a general principle, we are supporting the government's efforts in court. 'That includes as a general principle the arguments that it's putting in court and the outcome that it seeks, which is that the injunction is lifted and the parliament can proceed to expel Mr Ward.' The injunctive orders issued by the court, 'pending further order', restrain the defendant, Mr Hoenig, from 'from taking any steps to expel or otherwise resolve to expel' Ward between July 30 and 10am on Friday.

PBS wait times a more urgent issue than Donald Trump's potential pharmaceutical tariffs, peak medicines body warns
PBS wait times a more urgent issue than Donald Trump's potential pharmaceutical tariffs, peak medicines body warns

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

PBS wait times a more urgent issue than Donald Trump's potential pharmaceutical tariffs, peak medicines body warns

Excessive wait times for medicines to be listed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) are a much greater threat to the sector than US President Donald Trump's far-reaching tariffs, according to the peak industry body, which has warned people could die waiting for treatment. The Albanese government is frantically working to shield Australia from Donald Trump's ever-expanding tariffs, with the US president now flagging a possible 250 per cent tariff on pharmaceuticals, one of Australia's largest export products to the US. "We'll be putting a, initially, small tariff on pharmaceuticals. But in one year … it's going to go to 150 per cent and then it's going to go to 250 per cent because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country," Mr Trump told CNBC on Wednesday local time. But Medicines Australia CEO Liz de Somer said a more pressing concern was the process behind listing new medicines on the PBS, with a median wait time of 22 months for a new medicine to land on the scheme once it is approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). "And this will have a far greater effect on the Australian system than anything else." When drugs are placed on the PBS, patients are able to receive important and sometimes lifesaving medicines at a small portion of the cost — currently just over $30. The rest of the cost is covered by the federal government. But patients, advocacy groups and pharmaceutical companies argue the process leading up to the PBS listing is overly complex, takes too long and involves excessive red tape. The first complete review of the system in 30 years was handed to the federal government last year, making a raft of recommendations to streamline processes so people could access medicines earlier. The recommendations included expanding access to medicines already subsidised for common cancers to other cancers, when that is backed by evidence. The review also concluded that if pharmaceutical companies applied to have their medications approved by the TGA and placed on the PBS at the same time, 90 per cent of promising new medicines could be listed within six months of TGA registration. Federal Health Minister Mark Butler heralded the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) review as "visionary" but has yet to formally respond to its findings, instead setting up an advisory group to help guide the government's next steps. Rare Cancers Australia CEO Christine Cockburn said urgent action was required, with many people unable to afford lifesaving medication that can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. "They sometimes access superannuation, which of course that is not what superannuation is for, or they remortgage their houses. "Crowdfunding is not uncommon in cancer treatment spaces, which of course comes with a terrible loss of dignity. It's a terrible thing to have to do, and there are people as well who just have to go without because they can't do any of those things." The time it takes to list medications on the PBS is a long-held gripe of US pharmaceutical companies. They also argue the scheme's pricing policies undervalue American innovation and threaten billions of dollars in lost sales. In March, American medical giants pressed Donald Trump to target Australia with punitive tariffs, labelling the PBS as one of the "egregious and discriminatory" programs that undermines US exports. Labor has already categorically ruled out touching the PBS in any trade negotiations, and a raft of frontbenchers have consistently stressed the Trump administration could not exert any direct influence on the scheme. But the government remains concerned that frustrations over the PBS could see the Trump administration retaliate by hitting Australian pharmaceutical exports. Last year, Australia exported $2.2 billion in pharmaceutical products to the US — about 40 per cent of Australia's pharmaceutical exports — according to the UN's Comtrade database. Ms de Somer said the government could better negotiate with the US, while still protecting the PBS, if it followed recommendations from the review. "If the government committed to implement the reforms of the PBS that they have already identified need to happen, it would go some way to assuage the concerns raised by Donald Trump and the US pharmaceutical industry," she said. "Partly, it is about the time it takes for patients to get access to new medicines, and partly it is about valuing innovation and giving the right value to things that are new and transformative and change people's lives." Former chair of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC), which recommends medicines for the PBS, and chair of the review's implementation advisory group, Andrew Wilson, said the complexities of the system made it difficult to reform. "I don't think there's anybody involved in this process that doesn't want to see this happen faster," Professor Wilson said. "One of the challenges that we've had in the past is not that things haven't changed, but they've changed in a piecemeal fashion. They've changed little bits here and not there and the concern has been the extent to which those changes have actually improved the system, or just made it more complicated." However, Shadow Health Minister Anne Ruston accused the government of dragging its feet in its response to the review. "We're sitting here now nearly 12 months after the review has been delivered to government and we have absolutely nothing more from the government," she said. Mr Butler said the implementation advisory group's final report was due early next year, and would help inform future government decisions on reform. "The Albanese government is continuing to make medicines available to Australian patients faster and cheaper," he said. "We know patients want faster access to cutting-edge medicine and treatments. "That's why our government is working through the recommendations of the HTA review, so Australians can get faster access to the best medicines and therapies, at a cost that patients and the community can afford."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store