Is Katy Perry dating Justin Trudeau? Duo spotted during private dinner Outing
Chef's Greeting and Post-Meal Kitchen Visit
Tour Stop Meets Post-Political Freedom
Live Events
Katy Perry - Justin Trudeau: Is Romance in the Air?
Friendly meal or something more?
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
International pop sensation Katy Perry and Canada's former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau have set tongues wagging after the duo was seen sharing an intimate dinner in Montreal on Monday night, as per a report by TMZ. The rendezvous, captured in footage obtained by TMZ, has intensified speculation around Perry's love life, with many questioning: Is Katy Perry dating Justin Trudeau?The unexpected sighting took place at Le Violon, a posh French restaurant known for its exclusivity and gourmet offerings. Eyewitnesses at the venue observed the two public figures engaged in animated conversation over cocktails and a series of shared dishes — notably, a lobster preparation. According to diners at the restaurant, Perry appeared deeply engrossed in what Trudeau had to say, frequently leaning across the table in a gesture of focused attention.Security detail for both individuals was reportedly stationed at the bar, discreetly monitoring the pair through mirrored glass without drawing attention.Adding a personal touch to the evening, the restaurant's head chef is said to have greeted the duo mid-meal. Following their dinner, Perry and Trudeau made their way to the kitchen to personally thank the staff — an act that did not go unnoticed by onlookers and further hinted at the special nature of the outing.Katy Perry, whose latest album 143 was released in September 2024, is currently on tour across Canada. After a performance in Winnipeg, she was scheduled to perform in Ottawa on Tuesday night, followed by another show in Montreal and additional stops in Quebec City and Toronto.Meanwhile, Justin Trudeau, who stepped down as Prime Minister of Canada in January 2025 following the end of his nearly decade-long tenure, has kept a relatively low profile since his separation from wife Sophie Grégoire Trudeau in 2023. The former couple share three children and had been married for 18 years.The timing of the dinner has raised questions about the nature of Perry's current romantic life. Having recently ended her long-standing relationship with actor Orlando Bloom — with whom she shares a daughter — Perry has been spotted solo during her tour stops. With both public figures newly single, observers are speculating whether this meeting marks the beginning of something more than friendship.However, sources close to both parties remain tight-lipped. While no official statement has been made, the speculation continues to mount online under the hashtags Katy Perry Boyfriend and Justin Trudeau Dating.Whether it was merely a dinner between two high-profile acquaintances or the early stages of a new relationship, the meeting between Perry and Trudeau has captured global attention. As fans scour social media for more clues, the unanswered question persists: Is this just a friendly meal, or the start of a new celebrity-political romance?In the absence of confirmation, admirers of both remain watchful — perhaps for the next sighting, or even a more public acknowledgment of what transpired behind the mirrored glass of Le Violon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Karnataka bus strike: State government advises WFH, calls for private operators to step in amid KSTRC, BMTC employees protest
Karnataka bus strike Live Events Plan B in Bengaluru amid BMTC strike (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Karnataka State Road Corporation employees have declared an indefinite strike from 6 am on Tuesday following two rounds of conciliatory talks with the Karnataka chief minister Siddaramaiah ending in a employees had raised concerns on the finer points of clearing arrears and salary revision. The staff's decision will likely cause inconvenience to daily commuters across the state. This comes despite Karnataka high court passing an interim order Monday directing the Joint Action Committee (JAC) of the Trade Unions of KSRTC employees to put on hold their proposed strike until Joint Action Committee of Transport Unions is unhappy because two of their key demands have not been met. This includes payment of 38 months' pending salary arrears (totaling Rs 1,785 crore) and a 25 per cent pay hike starting from January 1, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah tried to offer a partial solution of clearing Rs 718 crore covering only 14 months of arrears, but the unions rejected it. They also feel that a 25 per cent hike is fair until including the northeast and northwest arms and BMTC together transports about1.1 crore passengers on a daily basis. BMTC alone ferries more than 40 lakh commuters travel by BMTC alone every state government is preparing a plan B roping in private operators, should trade unions bring the KSRTC infrastructure to a standstill from Anantha Subba Rao, president of KSRTC Staff and Workers Federation, which is part of JAC, said talks with the CM failed. The unions have been pressing the state government to clear wage arrears and revise ease traffic congestion and minimise inconvenience, the government has requested private IT companies, particularly those based in Bengaluru, to allow staff to work from home during the strike has been done to ease traffic burden roads and public transport services, which are likely to be affected once the strike begins. Officials are also taking other precautionary steps to manage the impact of the protest on daily advisory comes as the state prepares for possible disruptions in public transport due to the strike. In a letter dated 2 August 2025, Dr N.V. Prasad, Principal Secretary of the Transport Department, asked the Department of Information Technology to communicate this request to all concerned companies.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
From delivering summary justice against landlords to fighting for Jharkhand statehood: political journey of Shibu Soren
Shibu Soren, who passed away on Monday, is widely recognised as the most influential leader of the Jharkhand movement. His radical politics in the 1970s reconceptualised the Jharkhandi identity, giving second wind to the faltering movement for statehood. But in the decades that followed, Soren would choose the path of moderation and compromise, often in the face of criticism, to help make the state of Jharkhand a reality. Here's a brief history. A new mobilisation The early movement for Jharkhand, helmed in the post-Independence years by Jaipal Singh Munda and his Jharkhand Party, ran out of steam by the late 1950s. There were a few fundamental reasons for this. The Jharkhand Party's support base was largely urban, and its leadership was drawn from a relatively small class of educated tribal elite. The conception of a Jharkhand state at this time was solely based on an assertion of adivasi identity and indigeneity that stood against the exploitative 'dikus' (outsiders). British geographer Stuart Corbridge argued that economic differentiation among adivasis and the changing demography of Chhotanagpur following the industrial development of the 20th century (Scheduled Tribes were only 26.21% of the state's population in the 2011 Census) meant that such a narrow conception of Jharkhand was unmaintainable ('Industrialisation, internal colonialism and ethnoregionalism: the Jharkhand, India, 1880-1980, 1987). It was in this context that Soren became an important player. Along with the Bengali Marxist trade unionist A K Roy and Kurmi-Mahato leader Binod Bihari Mahato, the Santal leader formed the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) in late 1972. Its vision was to create a 'red-green movement' that would fundamentally reconceptualise Jharkhandi identity, sociologist Gail Omvedt wrote in 'Ecology and Social Movements'. 'The Jharkhand Mukti Morcha was born with a green and red flag, and with the concrete practice of the alliance that this symbolised — Dhanbad mine workers, lower caste peasants, adivasis. 'Lalkhand-Jharkhand' was the slogan of early marches,' Omvedt wrote in 1984. The question of land The deliberate appeal to non-tribal workers would help the JMM introduce 'new forms of mobilisation around socio economic issues', political scientist Louise Tillin wrote in Remapping India: New States and their Political Origins (2023). 'Land was a major issue for the JMM,' Tillin wrote. 'The Chotanagpur Tenancy Act 1908 had made the sale of tribal lands to non-tribals illegal, but considerable tribal land had changed hands nonetheless.' This created an increasingly alienated peasantry, which was being squeezed further by exploitative moneylenders. 'We must eat all year round. So far, the Santhal has worked for twelve months and starved for twelve months, and the moneylender has reaped the harvest. This must change,' Soren said (quoted in the Economic and Political Weekly article 'Material Base of Santhal Movement', 1975). Even before the JMM came into being, Soren would travel from village to village on his motorcycle, encouraging adivasis and other landless tillers to harvest standing crops on land that was illegally acquired by the 'outsiders'. The so-called dhan katao andolan would peak with the harvests of 1974-75. In the late 1970s, the JMM took a leading role in protests against state forestry policies in Singhbhum, backing the so-called jungle katao andolan in which government-planted teak trees were cut down to reclaim land for cultivation. Soren's challenge to the status quo was often 'violent'. 'The JMM, and Shibu Soren in particular, became known for delivering summary justice against landlords and moneylenders, even holding their own courts,' Tillin wrote. But his charisma and candour made him a cult-like figure among the adivasis. In mainstream politics Till the early 1980s, the demand for statehood was simply a tool for Soren and the JMM to mobilise support for their primary fight. 'Even if Jharkhand does not come into being in my lifetime, why should I be bothered? Our first concern is to chase away the bloodsuckers and help the people lead a respectable, quiet and fraternal life,' he said (quoted in EPW, 'Containing the Jharkhand Movement', 1979). But it was an important tool nonetheless. In a 2007 interview with Tillin, Soren described it as a 'bridging mechanism' between the Marxist social ideals of the JMM and the sphere of reference of the locals. 'I used to tell Roy-ji (A K Roy)… that the people in Jharkhand understand the language of Birsa Munda, Tilka Manjhi, Sidhu and Kanhu Murmu and Shekh Bhikhari (leaders of 18th and 19th century revolts). They don't understand the language of Lenin. People here have a right to land, forest and water,' he told Tillin (quoted in Remapping India). After he was elected to Lok Sabha in 1980, however, Soren is said to have struck a deal with Indira Gandhi in exchange for immunity for his activities in the 1970s, which significantly tempered his politics. From a tool to galvanise support, statehood became the primary end of JMM's politics. In 1983, the JMM dropped the red from its flag. For the next two decades, Soren championed the cause of a Jharkhand state in Parliament. Along with a number of other players who entered the political scene in the 1980s — most notably the BJP, which supported the creation of Jharkhand but for very different reasons — the JMM helped build mainstream political consensus on statehood by taking the path of moderation, often in the face of criticism from the ground. Jharkhand officially became a state on November 15, 2000.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump says he's cut drug prices by up to 1,500%. That's not possible
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Days after he sent letters instructing top pharmaceutical manufacturers to use a "most favored nation" pricing model for prescription drugs, President Donald Trump told reporters on Sunday that he had cut costs by up to 1,500%.But Trump's grandiose claim is mathematically a closer look at the "You know, we've cut drug prices by 1,200, 1,300, 1,400, 1,500%. I don't mean 50%, I mean 14 - 1,500%."THE FACTS: This is false. Cutting drug prices by more than 100% would theoretically mean that people are being paid to take medications. The Trump administration has taken steps to lower prescription drug prices, but experts say there's no indication costs have seen such a massive Joyce, director of health policy at the University of Southern California 's Schaeffer Center, called Trump's claim "total fiction" made up by the Republican president. He agreed that it would amount to drug companies paying customers, rather than the other way around."I find it really difficult to translate those numbers into some actual estimates that patients would see at the pharmacy counter," said Mariana Socal, an associate professor of health policy and management at Johns Hopkins University who studies the U.S. pharmaceutical market. She added that Trump's math is "really hard to follow."Asked what Trump was using to back up his claim, White House spokesman Kush Desai said: "It's an objective fact that Americans are paying exponentially more for the same exact drugs as people in other developed countries pay, and it's an objective fact that no other Administration has done more to rectify this unfair burden for the American people."The White House provided a chart of price differentials for drugs in the U.S. and comparable countries, but did not offer any other evidence. On Sunday, Trump also described cuts to drug prices as a future development, not that already happened."So we'll be dropping drug prices," he said. "It will start over the next two to three months by 1,200, 1,300 and even 1,400%."Prices for most prescription drugs - unbranded generics are the exception - are higher in the U.S. than they are in other high-income countries. This is in large part due to the way drug prices are negotiated in the United made his recent appeal in letters to 17 pharmaceutical manufacturers, the White House announced last week. He asked them to reduce costs in the U.S. by matching the lowest prices of prescriptions drugs in other comparably developed countries. Some drugmakers have since indicated that they are open to cutting move follows an executive order Trump signed in May setting a 30-day deadline for drugmakers to electively lower prices in the U.S. or face new limits in the future over what the government will federal government has the most power to shape the price it pays for drugs covered by Medicare and Medicaid. It's unclear what - if any - impact the Trump administration's efforts will have on millions of Americans who have private health pointed out that if drug manufacturers had cut costs to the extent Trump claims, they would be shouting it from the rooftops, especially given the heat they've taken over the years for their pricing practices."My expectation would be that they would make announcements - public announcements - and that those announcements would come way in advance of the actual effective dates when those price cuts would come into effect," she agreed that there has been no indication of a substantial cut."Not at all, not at all, none whatsoever," he said. "And let alone 1,500."
