Four decades on, still no justice for South Africa's Apartheid-era atrocities
Lukhanyo Calata was 3 years old when his father's body was found. He says he was too young to remember his dad, and only recalls his funeral.
'I remember seeing what I grew up calling 'the red box',' he said, referring to his father's coffin.
'I remember seeing it being lowered into the ground, and I knew that my father was in there. What I didn't know at the time was that I would have to grow up without him,' said the 43-year-old.
Fort Calata was an anti-Apartheid activist from the town of Cradock in the Eastern Cape. He was raised by his grandfather, the secretary general of the African National Congress (ANC), who instilled in him the fight for civil rights.
As Calata grew into a young man, his activism gained traction in Cradock and he became a target of the state's security apparatus.
On June 27, 1985, Calata and his comrades Matthew Goniwe, Sparrow Mkonto and Sicelo Mhlauli drove to Port Elizabeth for a United Democratic Front meeting. But they never returned.
Their desecrated corpses were found burned, with signs of torture. They would become known as the Cradock Four.
'They had pulled my father's tongue out of his mouth,' Calata said. 'And they had cut off his ring finger. I don't know why.'
The suspected killers of the Cradock Four asked for amnesty but were denied.
Read more on FRANCE 24 EnglishRead also:In South Africa, poor governance leads to collapse of Johannesburg's infrastructureOpenly gay imam shot dead in South Africa
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC Sports
2 hours ago
- NBC Sports
NFL will continue to put social justice message in end zones
Whether the league will admit it or not, it's currently engaged in a high-wire regarding diversity initiatives, with a desire to do the objectively right thing on one hand and an urgency to placate certain political forces on the other. As it relates to the messages that have been painted on the back lines of end zones since 2020, those will continue. Via the Associated Press, all 32 teams will have one of four messages at the back of one end zone: End Racism, Stop Hate, Choose Love, or Inspire Change. At the back of the other other end one will be the message, 'It Takes All of Us.' Here's the reality. Some messages will invite less scrutiny from anti-DEI types than others. Choose Love, Inspire Change? Fine. End Racism, Stop Hate? Tread lightly. That said, 'End Racism' will be the message for each of the four international games. And the Eagles will rotate through all four messages. Kudos for the NFL to not suspending or postponing or pausing the end-zone messages. Especially if the gesture at some point triggers a social-media attack and/or a suggestion that the effort to acquire 10 percent of ESPN could be scrapped unless the messages are erased.
Los Angeles Times
3 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Judge strikes down Trump guidance against diversity programs at schools and colleges
WASHINGTON — A federal judge on Thursday struck down two Trump administration actions aimed at eliminating diversity, equity and inclusion programs at the nation's schools and universities. In her ruling, U.S. District Judge Stephanie Gallagher in Maryland found that the Education Department violated the law when it threatened to cut federal funding from educational institutions that continued with DEI initiatives. The guidance has been on hold since April when three federal judges blocked various portions of the Education Department's anti-DEI measures. The ruling Thursday followed a motion for summary judgment from the American Federation of Teachers and the American Sociological Association, which challenged the government's actions in a February lawsuit. The case centers on two Education Department memos ordering schools and universities to end all 'race-based decision-making' or face penalties up to a total loss of federal funding. It's part of a campaign to end practices the Trump administration frames as discrimination against white and Asian American students. The new ruling orders the department to scrap the guidance because it runs afoul of procedural requirements, though Gallagher wrote that she took no view on whether the policies were 'good or bad, prudent or foolish, fair or unfair.' Gallagher, who was appointed by President Trump, rejected the government's argument that the memos simply served to remind schools that discrimination is illegal. 'It initiated a sea change in how the Department of Education regulates educational practices and classroom conduct, causing millions of educators to reasonably fear that their lawful, and even beneficial, speech might cause them or their schools to be punished,' Gallagher wrote. Democracy Forward, a legal advocacy firm representing the plaintiffs, called it an important victory over the administration's attack on DEI. 'Threatening teachers and sowing chaos in schools throughout America is part of the administration's war on education, and today the people won,' said Skye Perryman, the group's president and CEO. The Education Department did not immediately comment on Thursday. The conflict started with a Feb. 14 memo declaring that any consideration of race in admissions, financial aid, hiring or other aspects of academic and student life would be considered a violation of federal civil rights law. The memo dramatically expanded the government's interpretation of a 2023 Supreme Court decision barring colleges from considering race in admissions decisions. The government argued the ruling applied not only to admissions but across all of education, forbidding 'race-based preferences' of any kind. 'Educational institutions have toxically indoctrinated students with the false premise that the United States is built upon 'systemic and structural racism' and advanced discriminatory policies and practices,' wrote Craig Trainor, the acting assistant secretary of the department's Office for Civil Rights. A further memo in April asked state education agencies to certify they were not using 'illegal DEI practices.' Violators risked losing federal money and being prosecuted under the False Claims Act, it said. In total, the guidance amounted to a full-scale reframing of the government's approach to civil rights in education. It took aim at policies that were created to address longstanding racial disparities, saying those practices were their own form of discrimination. The memos drew a wave of backlash from states and education groups that called it illegal government censorship. In its lawsuit, the American Federation of Teachers said the government was imposing 'unclear and highly subjective' limits on schools across the country. It said teachers and professors had to 'choose between chilling their constitutionally protected speech and association or risk losing federal funds and being subject to prosecution.' Binkley writes for the Associated Press.
Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
Tech, utilities brace for clean energy crackdown
President Donald Trump's regulators are poised to make it even harder for new wind and solar projects to get Biden-era tax breaks — a prospect that worries even some of the companies the administration says it wants to help. Upcoming guidance from the Treasury Department implementing tax changes in the GOP megalaw could narrow the path to claiming clean energy credits. That could mean fewer renewable projects added to the power grid even as the artificial intelligence boom drives rising energy demand. The guidance — due next week — is in response to an executive order last month in which Trump called for an end to 'market distorting subsidies for unreliable, foreign controlled energy sources.' The administration instead argues that fossil fuels, including coal, are the reliable energy sources needed to power a new wave of AI data centers. But a range of interests — from utilities to tech giants — say onerous changes could harm their bottom lines. Thanks, but no thanks The Edison Electric Institute, which represents investor-owned utilities, told me and my colleague Brian Dabbs that renewable energy is 'critical to meeting energy dominance goals' in the short term. Because utilities have long planning horizons for new generation, member utilities may have already made 'substantial investments' in wind and solar projects, which could become more expensive if regulations change. Tech interests told us they are reiterating to the Trump administration that the path to AI dominance runs through the power grid — which means using any available energy source. The Data Center Coalition, which represents large tech companies and data center developers, is calling for a 'unified, technology-neutral approach' that does not subject wind and solar power to 'more restrictive or ambiguous eligibility frameworks' than other energy sources. The Information Technology Industry Council warned that blunting renewable energy 'could undermine efforts to power high-growth sectors such as advanced manufacturing and AI.' What might change Treasury's guidance could alter one key metric — the definition of the 'beginning of construction' — in a way that makes it harder for renewable energy projects to qualify for tax credits that sunset starting in 2026. Tougher rules would fit with the Trump administration's assault on wind and solar incentives, which the White House says skew the electricity market and lessen incentives for 'dispatchable' fossil fuel power. In negotiations over the megalaw, Trump promised hard-right House members that he would use executive authority to further tighten tax credits. But more moderate Republicans — who fought against efforts to implement an even faster rollback — are pressuring the administration to follow existing tax credit rules. Senate Republicans Chuck Grassley of Iowa and John Curtis of Utah are holding up confirmation for some Treasury nominees to get their way. Clean energy advocates argue that stripping away renewable energy tax incentives will hurt the economy. Advanced Energy United, for example, said any rules that make it harder to build wind and solar will mean electricity prices go up. Already, the megalaw has left a dent on the energy market. A report this week from LevelTen Energy, a clean energy marketplace, found that prices for power purchase agreements — long-term contracts for electricity supply that can boost renewable developments — are already up 4 percent in the month since the law's passage. That reflects the 'new risks and headwinds' of the renewable marketplace, LevelTen wrote. It's Thursday — thank you for tuning in to POLITICO's Power Switch. I'm your host, Jason Plautz. Power Switch is brought to you by the journalists behind E&E News and POLITICO Energy. Send your tips, comments, questions to jplautz@ Today in POLITICO Energy's podcast: Zack Colman breaks down what's happening at Sierra Club after its leader was fired this week. Power Centers Space launches could get environmental passTrump wants to exempt the commercial space industry from some environmental reviews and regulatory requirements, writes Michael Doyle. A new executive order directs the Transportation Department to 'eliminate or expedite the [department's] environmental reviews for, and other obstacles' to the granting of launch and reentry licenses and permits. The order specifies that the agency will evaluate which space operations might be exempted from the National Environmental Policy Act. Among the companies that could benefit from the rollback: Elon Musk's SpaceX. Nordic heat wave was even hotter thanks to climate changeClimate change made a July heat wave in Nordic countries worse and more likely to happen, according to new research, Louise Guillot writes from Brussels. Researchers from the World Weather Attribution compared the recent heat wave to pre-industrial times using peer-reviewed methods and models. They found that climate change made the two-week stretch in Norway, Sweden and Finland 10 times more likely and 2 degrees Celsius hotter. And it's just getting started. 'We definitely expect more of these events in the future and we also expect them to become more intense,' said Erik Kjellström, a climatology professor at the Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute who worked on the study. Oil industry lawsuit divides Republicans in LouisianaRepublican leaders in Louisiana have successfully sued an oil company to force it to pay for coastal cleanup and restoration, a break from their otherwise loyal approach to Trump's energy dominance agenda, Mike Soraghan writes. The suit put Chevron on the hook for $744 million and has drawn the ire of MAGA faithful including Laura Loomer, who called Gov. Jeff Landry a 'perfect example of a Republican speaking out of both sides of his mouth.' 'What we're essentially saying is, 'Come on in, invest in Louisiana, and then in about 20 years or so, we're going to sue the hell out of you,'' said Marc Ehrhardt, executive director of the Grow Louisiana Coalition. Locals disagree. 'I think it's reasonable for some of the companies to come and clean some of this stuff up,' said Richie Blink, a charter tour company owner in Plaquemines Parish, where the Chevron verdict was reached. In Other News Boom or bust? The oil and gas industry hasn't yet been a major job creator in Appalachia since the fracking boom started there in 2008, new research shows. Sweat measure: A NASA scientist created a 'stickiness index' that measures a combination of heat and humidity in an attempt to understand and mitigate the risk of extreme temperatures. Subscriber Zone A showcase of some of our best subscriber content. Advisory committees that help create safety rules for air and rail travel have been dissolved or cut back in part over concerns about DEI and climate advocacy. Green groups are beefing up their legal departments in preparation for battles against Trump administration policies. Some utilities are urging the Environmental Protection Agency to keep its authority to regulate power plant emissions. Democrat David Rosner officially became chair of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on Wednesday. That's it for today, folks! Thanks for reading.
