Trump signs executive order seeking to clarify college athletes' employment status
The move comes amid a dramatic increase in the money flowing into and around college athletics. It also follows key court victories won by current and former athletes angry that they were barred for decades, both from earning income based on their celebrity and from sharing in the billions of revenue they helped generate.
Facing a growing number of state laws undercutting its authority, the NCAA in July 2021 cleared the way for athletes to cash in with name, image and likeness deals with brands and sponsors.
That came mere days after a 9-0 decision from the Supreme Court that found the NCAA cannot impose caps on education-related benefits schools provide to their athletes because such limits violate antitrust law.
Trump's action directs the secretary of labor and the National Labor Relations Board to clarify the status of collegiate athletes through guidance or rules 'that will maximize the educational benefits and opportunities provided by higher education institutions through athletics.'
The NCAA's embrace of NIL deals set the stage for another massive change that took effect July 1: The ability of schools to begin paying millions of dollars to their own athletes, up to $20.5 million per school over the next year. The $2.8 billion House settlement shifts even more power to college athletes, who have also won the ability to transfer from school to school without waiting to play.
The NCAA has been lobbying for several years for limited antitrust protection to keep some kind of control over this new landscape — and avoid more crippling lawsuits — but a handful of bills have gone nowhere in Congress.
The 1,100 universities that comprise the NCAA have insisted for decades that athletes are students who cannot be considered anything like a school employee.
This stance has long been a part of the amateur model at the heart of college athletics, but that model is rapidly being replaced by a more professional structure fed by money that is coming from donors, brands and now the schools themselves.
Some coaches have even suggested collective bargaining is a potential solution to the chaos they see.
It is a complicated topic: Universities would become responsible for paying wages, benefits, and workers' compensation and schools and conferences have insisted they will fight any such move in court (some already have).
While private institutions fall under the National Labor Relations Board, public universities must follow labor laws that vary from state to state and it's worth noting that virtually every state in the South has 'right to work' laws that present challenges for unions.
___
AP college sports: https://apnews.com/hub/college-sports
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
22 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Canadian auto sector hopeful a U.S. trade deal will come with carve-outs
Automotive industry leaders are hoping to see exemptions for vehicles compliant with the current trade deal as Canada and the U.S. continue discussions ahead of the upcoming tariff deadline. Friday marks the deadline in Canada's trade talks with the U.S., as President Donald Trump has threatened to impose 35 per cent tariffs on a wide variety of Canadian goods if the two countries don't reach an agreement before then.
Winnipeg Free Press
22 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
UK transport secretary demands answers from air traffic control chief after flight disruption
LONDON (AP) — Britain's transport chief has summoned the head of the country's air traffic control operator to explain the problem that grounded and diverted dozens of flights Wednesday. More than 150 flights were cancelled across the U.K. as a result of what the National Air Traffic Service, or NATS, described as a 'technical issue' at the Swanwick control center that forced it to limit the number of aircraft in the London area. The problem was reported at 4:05 p.m Wednesday and the system was fully operational by 5:10 p.m., NATS said. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander will meet with NATS Chief Executive Martin Rolfe on Thursday to 'understand what happened and how we can prevent reoccurrence.'' 'The transport secretary is summoning in today the chief executive of of NATS to help us get to the bottom of what went wrong yesterday,'' Business Minister Gareth Thomas told Times Radio. 'Clearly, an incident happened two years ago and measures were taken then. It looks like those measures weren't enough, but we need to get to the bottom of what exactly happened, and conversations will take place today.' Among those hit was British Airways, which said the problem forced the carrier to reduce the rate of flights from 45 to 32 per hour for more than two hours. While airlines expressed frustration over flight disruptions, industry experts said it was 'unrealistic' to expect an air traffic management system could function without any technical failures. 'There are technical failures in all industries,' Graham Lake, a former director general of the air traffic management industry association Canso, told the BBC. 'I'm a regular rail user, certainly there are signal failures practically every day, so we accept technical failures. Radio programs go off the air occasionally, technical failures are inevitable. The point is that you have to … plan the contingency and make sure that the operation remains safe and effective.'' Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. The NATS system has suffered several software-related failures since it opened in 2002. A glitch in August 2023 resulted in flight plans being processed manually rather than automatically. Hundreds of flights were delayed or canceled at the height of the summer holidays, affecting some 700,000 passengers.
Winnipeg Free Press
22 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Canadian auto sector hopeful a U.S. trade deal will come with carve-outs
Automotive industry leaders are hoping to see exemptions for vehicles compliant with the current trade deal as Canada and the U.S. continue discussions ahead of the upcoming tariff deadline. Friday marks the deadline in Canada's trade talks with the U.S., as President Donald Trump has threatened to impose 35 per cent tariffs on a wide variety of Canadian goods if the two countries don't reach an agreement before then. 'I think everybody has seen that the Americans, in spite of the fact that they are fighting us for no reason at all, have shown a tendency to show value for USMCA compliance,' said Flavio Volpe, president of the Automotive Parts Manufacturers' Association. He said roughly 50 per cent of the parts that go into vehicles made in Canada come from U.S. factories. 'I think there's some hope here that we can somehow work a deal that works for both sides, but includes a USMCA exemption on vehicles. If it does, then that would be a sign of relief, but it is also beneficial to Americans,' he said. The North American automobile industry is deeply integrated and vehicles imported into the United States that comply with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade are still being hit with 25 per cent duties on their non-American components. Given the current trade agreement, which was negotiated by the first Trump administration, auto industry leaders are hoping to see carve-outs. David Adams, president and CEO of Global Automakers of Canada, said he ideally wants to see no tariffs on the industry. He highlighted that Canada previously negotiated a trade agreement with the U.S., and companies have since made significant investments based on that agreement. As the industry holds out hope for carve-outs, tariffs are taking their toll. General Motors reported last week that its profit declined 35 per cent in its second quarter as it took a US$1.1 billion hit from tariffs. In May, GM lowered its profit expectations for the year, bracing for an estimated tariff impact as high as US$5 billion in 2025. Meanwhile, Stellantis, the company behind brands including Jeep, Chrysler and Fiat, said in its latest earnings release that tariffs cost the company 300 million euros during the first half of the year. By and large, Volpe said companies have absorbed the impact of tariffs, which has resulted in lower sales volumes and higher costs. 'You can't run those losses indefinitely. You're going to have to make strategic decisions on what excess capacity you are going to fold inside the U.S., or you're going to concede those sales,' he said. Adams said that companies are 'making do,' but there are longer-term concerns. 'The challenge becomes how do you sustain the manufacturing base in Canada when, effectively, the manufacturing base here has been oriented around having duty-free exports of vehicles into the United States for the last 40-50 years,' he said. TD economist Marc Ercolao said in a note on Tuesday that Canada's automotive exports have fallen to late-2022 levels after tariffs took hold in April. 'Canadian automakers have since slashed production as they deal with trade challenges,' the report said. If the two countries are not able to reach a deal, Volpe said the current tariff regime would continue to hurt the industry. 'It's a slow bleed on the volume of vehicles made in Canada because they're, for the most part, destined for the U.S. So we would definitely be in emergency planning on how to make that vehicle manufacturing production more geared to Canadian consumers and Canadian consumption,' he said. However, he noted that Canada does not own the car companies, and the process would require billions of dollars in restructuring efforts and would be time-consuming. Despite the uncertainty surrounding the deal negotiations, Volpe said he thinks there's a chance a trade deal will be reached this week. 'I know for a fact that the right people are talking at an increased intensity around the clock,' he said. In contrast to previous trade discussions between Canada and the U.S., Volpe said these discussions have been 'very quiet.' He said sometimes, governments and negotiating teams use 'strategic leaks,' when required. However, this process has taken place behind closed doors, which Volpe said is likely the better way to negotiate with Trump at this time. On the Canadian side of the negotiations, Adams said that it appears Prime Minister Mark Carney is trying to temper expectations about the prospects of getting a deal, especially one without any tariffs. 'Maybe a good strategy because anything above that relatively low bar, in my view, could be viewed as success.' Canada-U.S. trade discussions are occurring after Trump recently announced a number of trade frameworks, notably with Japan and the European Union. Matt Blunt, president of the American Automotive Policy Council, posted on social media last week, saying 'any deal that charges a lower tariff for Japanese imports with virtually no U.S. content than the tariff imposed on North American-built vehicles with high U.S. content is a bad deal for U.S. industry and U.S. auto workers.' Volpe said he is hopeful there is an understanding that there is 'no comparing trading partners' and the Canadian and U.S. sectors are deeply integrated. 'The U.S. manufacturer of an assembly of vehicles doesn't rely on European factories or Japanese parts factories, or raw material supply. They don't buy Japanese steel and aluminum or European steel and aluminum,' he said. 'But all of that is true for Canada. Canadian capabilities are a force multiplier for the Americans. Also, our market is the number one export market for American-made vehicles.' — With files from Ian Bickis in Toronto and The Associated Press This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 31, 2025.
