4 Indian cardinals eligible to vote for new pope
The death of Pope Francis has set in motion a long process in which cardinals from around the world, including India, will gather in Vatican City for his funeral and subsequently hold the closed-door papal conclave within the Sistine Chapel to elect the new leader of the Catholic Church.
Four of the six cardinals of the Catholic church in India are eligible to vote in the conclave.
They are: Filipe Neri Ferrao, the Archbishop of Goa and Damman; Baselios Cleemis, Major Archbishop of the Syro-Malankara Catholic Church in Kerala; George Koovakkad, former head of the Journeys Office of the Secretariat of State of the Holy See, and Anthony Poola, the Metropolitan Archbishop of Hyderabad and the first archbishop from the Dalit Christian community.
The two other Indian cardinals, Oswald Gracias, the former Archbishop of Bombay and Cardinal George Alencherry, Major Archbishop Emeritus of the Syro-Malabar Church, cannot vote in the papal conclave as they have crossed the age limit of 80 years.
Francis, born Jorge Mario Bergoglio, in 1936, the first pontiff from Latin America, died on Monday morning in Vatican City at the age of 88 following a bout of chronic lung disease that left him hospitalised for 38 days and extremely physically weak.
Yet, on Easter Sunday, the Pope braving his illness, made a public appearance from the same gallery where he was introduced in March 2013 as the leader of the Catholic Church , which has around 1.3 billion followers worldwide.
Cardinal Baselios Cleemis, one of the eligible electors, said Francis would be remembered as a Pope of the people.
'My assessment was always that he would die with the people. And that's exactly what happened. Yesterday, on Easter, he met thousands of people at St Peter's Square.
'And this morning, he has gone home, ' the cardinal told reporters on Monday.
Cardinal Ferrao said the deceased Pope had a special love for India and 'longed' to visit the country. He recalled that the Pope canonised five saints from India during his tenure.
They are: St. Kuriakose Elias Chavara and St. Euphrasia Eluvathingal on 23rd November 2014; St. Joseph Vaz on 14th January 2015; St. Mariam Thresia Chiramel on 13th October 2019 and St. Devasahayam Pillai on 15th May 2022.
Cardinal Alencherry, who had participated in the 2013 conclave to elect Pope Francis, told reporters on Monday evening that he would be leaving for the Vatican shortly to take part in the funeral.
'Pope Francis was one who used not only his brain but also his heart to communicate with the people. He used the papal position as a mode of service for the cause of the poor, marginalised, orphans and refugees.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Where are we heading to as a society: Khan Sir reacts strongly to Muzaffarpur rape case
Patna: Responding stronly to Muzaffarpur rape case, popular educator and YouTuber Khan Sir on Saturday questioned the very fabric of humanity in today's society. His remarks came after the tragic death of an 11-year-old Dalit girl, who was reportedly sexually assaulted and then denied timely medical care, ultimately succumbing to her injuries. Speaking to IANS, Khan Sir said, 'This is not just a case of crime, this is a question of our collective humanity." Describing the inhumanity of the incident, he said, 'Arif Mohammad Khan (Bihar Governor), who came to meet me, was very shaken. He told us, 'How can a human being be so devoid of empathy that a child – a 11-year-old girl – comes out limping after being raped, and even then, the system fails to respond?' She was taken away in an ambulance, and even then, she was shuttled between hospitals without proper treatment.' 'Where are we going as a society? The pain of another should feel like our own – this is the essence of humanity. If we lose this, then what is the difference between humans and animals?" he told IANS. Khan Sir further called on the legal fraternity to introspect. 'Why do some lawyers take up the cases of such criminals—rapists, acid attackers, and murderers? I know many responsible lawyers who refuse to fight for someone they know is guilty. It's time more people follow this principle. The unity and conscience of the legal community can make a real difference.' He also wished the nation on Bakra Eid, expressing his deep respect for Bihar Governor Arif Mohammad Khan, who visited his classroom on the occasion. 'It's our good fortune that someone as intellectual and compassionate as Arif Mohammad Khan is serving as our Governor,' he said. Sharing an anecdote from the visit, Khan Sir recalled how the Governor insisted on visiting the classroom and was moved by the inclusive atmosphere. 'We have reserved front-row benches for a person with disability. They study free of cost, and we make sure they get the best experience. When the Governor saw this, he was impressed and even expressed interest in taking a class here someday.' Calling it a proud moment, Khan Sir added, 'He said, 'Tell me a topic and I will come to teach your students.' It's a great honour, and we are looking forward to that day.' When asked about his personal life, as he was recently married, he said, 'Everything is normal, just like any other couple.' Khan Sir further responded to the Bihar government's action of suspending the Medical Superintendent of Sri Krishna Medical College and Hospital in Muzaffarpur, where the girl was allegedly denied timely treatment. 'The suspension is a start, but it's not enough. There should be a clear protocol for critical cases. If someone is shot or raped, you don't delay treatment for paperwork. She died in the ambulance, waiting for admission. This is not just negligence – it's criminal apathy.' He proposed systemic reforms in hospital operations. 'In big hospitals, there is always a separate corridor for emergencies. Why don't we have one in Bihar's biggest government hospital? There should be a direct route for super-critical cases. A building alone doesn't make a hospital – it's the system and intent inside that matter.' 'In smaller towns or villages, you can understand some lack of infrastructure. But in Muzaffarpur? This is unacceptable. It brings shame to the entire district, the entire state.' Khan Sir concluded with a plea: 'We need to look within. These brutal crimes are becoming frequent. The time for silence is over. We have to stand up – as citizens, as educators, as humans. Because if we don't, we fail not just the victim, but the idea of humanity itself.'
Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
‘Indian Philosophy, Indian Revolution': How caste can be a conduit of identity and revolution
I grew up in a supposedly 'caste-less' world. I grew up not knowing my caste. My surname was just a cool name I had, one that linked me to my father's family, and made it apparent that I come from a line of heritage restaurants and celebrated scientists. My name made it clear that I was Punjabi. I grew up in a world where my tiny high school batch of 47 people went unquestioned. My access to spaces in my city was just like that – a fact of my life. But I also grew up listening to vicious rhetoric against reservation, to aggrieved seniors angry at the race for seats in engineering colleges, and I grew up with humanities classes at school not addressing caste. I then went on to study at a private college, where, shielded from the world outside (read public universities), I thought about caste in abstract terms. In a world far, far away, caste operates – but me? It is not for me, I don't care about caste. Caste in small worlds It is true, I don't. Caste does not impede my life. It is not my first thought when I wake up every morning, my interactions are not mediated by the idea that the other person might take offence at my name. I don't think before I give my full name, I don't worry, I don't mask it. I say it because I don't care what my caste is. In the South Asian context, as I will later learn, this is my privilege. A genetic privilege in some ways, a thing that I got at birth and will probably retain through the course of my life. I care so little about caste and yet caste is the thing that makes my world go round. My friends in grad school, undergrad, at my workplace – are all upper caste. I say I picked my friends, we found each other in this big, big world – but unfortunately, the world is small. I know more people in New York than in Ahmedabad – a testament to my caste and class privilege. I work with Kantibhai. He is a Dalit man who works with scheduled castes in villages in Gujarat. He tirelessly files cases against atrocities, advocates for more rights for those oppressed, and thinks about his caste all the time. He taught himself enough English so that when he petitions the President in cases of violence against Dalits, his petitions are read. In his kind, booming voice, he collects the Dalits in the villages we survey and tells them about the constitution, about the law, about the whole world that remains inaccessible to them. I sit with him in these interviews as he does animated impressions – of interactions between non-Dalits and Dalits, mostly to tell me that even shaking hands is an unimaginable thought to people here. He accidentally calls women his age maaji, and he makes us laugh about petty politics that often undergird village life. Kantibhai recites poetry about Ambedkar on the go; he takes us to all the Ambedkar statues in the villages and makes sure we get a picture with them. And he tells me and our respondents how thankful he is that we care even a little bit about the stories Dalits have to share with us. He keeps asking me about Dalit politics in Punjab – and I sadly shake my head, tell him that I don't know anything about it. I lived in a city far too sanitised to even have the opportunity to interact with anyone outside of my community. As I flipped through Indian Philosophy, Indian Revolution: On Caste and Politics by Divya Dwivedi and Shaj Mohan, I found myself thinking about Kantibhai. I think about the world he inhabits and the world I inhabit. And it is true – there are two Indias. We both live in Ahmedabad, and the segregation even within cities, which Ambedkar had once hailed as an alternative to villages, is apparent. As the book walks you through the several ideas around caste, it reveals that the idea of a majority in India is lopsided. The book takes on what it means to participate in Dalit politics in recent years, how the upper caste 'majority' is a conspiracy of power, and how Dalit lives have been impacted in more ways than one. But more importantly, the body of work that Dwivedi and Mohan build is staunchly to question post-colonial literature and literary theory. In this political space between coloniality and post-coloniality, Dwivedi and Mohan argue through these texts that decoloniality in India is not the answer to the question of caste. Upper caste hegemony extends above and beyond, using the excuse of abolishment of the status quo as a way to exert more control over subjugated populations. A world outside caste The Dalit call for revolution has always been undergirded by the abolishment of caste, but the imagination of the Indian state, and its nationalism, hinges on a precarious idea of Hindu identity that is created and explained over and over again so that the myth remains. Even Gandhi relied on this idea of an idyllic past to fight against colonial forces. The idea of Western reasoning, science, and other such conceptions, when co-opted into resistance by Dalits, becomes a threat to upper caste hegemony. Dwivedi and Mohan painstakingly break down these ideas, arguing that fascist states often insist on action and this orientation of action-led governance propels a society that is scared to think – but intellectualism at the lowest levels will propel a world outside of caste. Dwivedi and Mohan are not just writing to excavate the idea of caste, they are framing a scholarship on caste that, instead of treating it as a fact of Indian society, considers it a conduit of identity and revolution. As I worked through the book, the urgency of the matter at hand was apparent throughout. The call to reason and scientific thinking, to enable the creation of a countermemory, is ever present. Archives that highlight the moment of India's independence often study Indian constitutionalism and then Ambedkar as one of the figures in the framework – perhaps the reverse is true. It is Ambedkar's work during the creation of the Constitution that has led to the upliftment of tens of thousands of people. It is Ambedkar that Kantibhai quotes when he visits these villages, entering houses with an affectionate Jai Bhim. He is not just a Dalit hero, he is the person that a whole country equates to the law. They tell me it is Babasaheb's Qaida that made things better for them. He is the law, the constitution, and human rights for what constitutes a vast majority of 'Indians'. Dwivedi and Mohan insist that no articulation of Indian identity should be bereft of caste. Caste is not Hindu – it is South Asian. It operates beyond Hinduism, it is a structure that has become a sociological fact of life. Caste may even be more insidious than race – not instantly discernible but ever-present. It is the truth of and basic structure on which the society operates, and to treat it as tertiary is a disservice to the majority of the country. As we continue to go through monumental changes, with electoral upheavals, this book will become essential reading. It is our loss if, in universities, our understanding of caste is still framed as a disciplinary tangent. Instead, it should be canon, and this book of essays definitely should be included. Kantibhai proudly shows me the Ambedkar statue that they are constructing in Ahmedabad. There are indigo-blue posters everywhere. And there is a loud community, building the revolution. Jai Bhim, they say.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
4 hours ago
- Business Standard
Can American pope bring US-style fundraising to fix Vatican finances?
As a bishop in Peru, Robert Prevost was often on the lookout for used cars that he could buy cheap and fix up himself for use in parishes around his diocese. With cars that were really broken down, he'd watch YouTube videos to learn how to fix them. That kind of make-do-with-less, fix-it-yourself mentality could serve Pope Leo XIV well as he addresses one of the greatest challenges facing him as pope: The Holy See's chronic, 50 million to 60 million euro ($57-68 million) structural deficit, 1 billion euro ($1.14 billion) pension fund shortfall and declining donations that together pose something of an existential threat to the central government of the 1.4-billion strong Catholic Church. As a Chicago-born math major, canon lawyer and two-time superior of his global Augustinian religious order, the 69-year-old pope presumably can read a balance sheet and make sense of the Vatican's complicated finances, which have long been mired in scandal. Whether he can change the financial culture of the Holy See, consolidate reforms Pope Francis started and convince donors that their money is going to good use is another matter. Leo already has one thing going for him: his American-ness. US donors have long been the economic life support system of the Holy See, financing everything from papal charity projects abroad to restorations of St Peter's Basilica at home. Leo's election as the first American pope has sent a jolt of excitement through US Catholics, some of whom had soured on donating to the Vatican after years of unrelenting stories of mismanagement, corruption and scandal, according to interviews with top Catholic fundraisers, philanthropists and church management experts. I think the election of an American is going to give greater confidence that any money given is going to be cared for by American principles, especially of stewardship and transparency, said the Rev. Roger Landry, director of the Vatican's main missionary fundraising operation in the US, the Pontifical Mission Societies. So there will be great hope that American generosity is first going to be appreciated and then secondly is going to be well handled, he said. That hasn't always been the circumstance, especially lately. Reforms and unfinished business Pope Francis was elected in 2013 on a mandate to reform the Vatican's opaque finances and made progress during his 12-year pontificate, mostly on the regulatory front. With help from the late Australian Cardinal George Pell, Francis created an economy ministry and council made up of clergy and lay experts to supervise Vatican finances, and he wrestled the Italian-dominated bureaucracy into conforming to international accounting and budgetary standards. He authorized a landmark, if deeply problematic, corruption trial over a botched London property investment that convicted a once-powerful Italian cardinal. And he punished the Vatican's Secretariat of State that had allowed the London deal to go through by stripping it of its ability to manage its own assets. But Francis left unfinished business and his overall record, at least according to some in the donor community, is less than positive. Critics cite Pell's frustrated reform efforts and the firing of the Holy See's first-ever auditor general, who says he was ousted because he had uncovered too much financial wrongdoing. Despite imposing years of belt-tightening and hiring freezes, Francis left the Vatican in somewhat dire financial straits: The main stopgap bucket of money that funds budgetary shortfalls, known as the Peter's Pence, is nearly exhausted, officials say. The 1 billion euro (USD1.14 billion) pension fund shortfall that Pell warned about a decade ago remains unaddressed, though Francis had planned reforms. And the structural deficit continues, with the Holy See logging an 83.5 million euro ($95 million) deficit in 2023, according to its latest financial report. As Francis' health worsened, there were signs that his efforts to reform the Vatican's medieval financial culture hadn't really stuck, either. The very same Secretariat of State that Francis had punished for losing tens of millions of euros in the scandalous London property deal somehow ended up heading up a new papal fundraising commission that was announced while Francis was in the hospital. According to its founding charter and statutes, the commission is led by the Secretariat of State's assessor, is composed entirely of Italian Vatican officials with no professional fundraising expertise and has no required external financial oversight. To some Vatican watchers, the commission smacks of the Italian-led Secretariat of State taking advantage of a sick pope to announce a new flow of unchecked donations into its coffers after its 600 million euro ($684 million) sovereign wealth fund was taken away and given to another office to manage as punishment for the London fiasco. There are no Americans on the commission. I think it would be good if there were representatives of Europe and Asia and Africa and the United States on the commission, said Ward Fitzgerald, president of the US-based Papal Foundation. It is made up of wealthy American Catholics that since 1990 has provided over $250 million (219 million euros) in grants and scholarships to the pope's global charitable initiatives. Fitzgerald, who spent his career in real estate private equity, said American donors especially the younger generation expect transparency and accountability from recipients of their money, and know they can find non-Vatican Catholic charities that meet those expectations. We would expect transparency before we would start to solve the problem, he said. That said, Fitzgerald said he hadn't seen any significant let-up in donor willingness to fund the Papal Foundation's project-specific donations during the Francis pontificate. Indeed, US donations to the Vatican overall have remained more or less consistent even as other countries' offerings declined, with US bishops and individual Catholics contributing more than any other country in the two main channels to donate to papal causes. A head for numbers and background fundraising Francis moved Prevost to take over the diocese of Chiclayo, Peru, in 2014. Residents and fellow priests say he consistently rallied funds, food and other life-saving goods for the neediest experience that suggests he knows well how to raise money when times are tight and how to spend wisely. He bolstered the local Caritas charity in Chiclayo, with parishes creating food banks that worked with local businesses to distribute donated food, said the Rev. Fidel Purisaca Vigil, a diocesan spokesperson. In 2019, Prevost inaugurated a shelter on the outskirts of Chiclayo, Villa San Vicente de Paul, to house desperate Venezuelan migrants who had fled their country's economic crisis. The migrants remember him still, not only for helping give them and their children shelter, but for bringing live chickens obtained from a donor. During the Covid-19 pandemic, Prevost launched a campaign to raise funds to build two oxygen plants to provide hard-hit residents with life-saving oxygen. In 2023, when massive rains flooded the region, he personally brought food to the flood-struck zone. Within hours of his May 8 election, videos went viral on social media of Prevost, wearing rubber boots and standing in a flooded street, pitching a solidarity campaign, Peru Give a Hand, to raise money for flood victims. The Rev. Jorge Milln, who lived with Prevost and eight other priests for nearly a decade in Chiclayo, said he had a mathematical mentality and knew how to get the job done. Prevost would always be on the lookout for used cars to buy for use around the diocese, Milln said, noting that the bishop often had to drive long distances to reach all of his flock or get to Lima, the capital. Prevost liked to fix them up himself, and if he didn't know what to do, he'd look up solutions on YouTube and very often he'd find them, Milln told The Associated Press. Before going to Peru, Prevost served two terms as prior general, or superior, of the global Augustinian order. While the order's local provinces are financially independent, Prevost was responsible for reviewing their balance sheets and oversaw the budgeting and investment strategy of the order's headquarters in Rome, said the Rev. Franz Klein, the order's Rome-based economist who worked with Prevost. The Augustinian campus sits on prime real estate just outside St. Peter's Square and supplements revenue by renting out its picturesque terrace to media organizations (including the AP) for major Vatican events, including the conclave that elected Leo pope. But even Prevost saw the need for better fundraising, especially to help out poorer provinces. Toward the end of his 12-year term and with his support, a committee proposed creation of a foundation, Augustinians in the World. At the end of 2023, it had 994,000 euros ($1.13 million) in assets and was helping fund self-sustaining projects across Africa, including a centre to rehabilitate former child soldiers in Congo. He has a very good interest and also a very good feeling for numbers, Klein said. I have no worry about the finances of the Vatican in these years because he is very, very clever.
