logo
Ex-interior minister denies Yoon ordered power, water cut off at media outlets, pollster

Ex-interior minister denies Yoon ordered power, water cut off at media outlets, pollster

Korea Herald11-02-2025

Former Minister of Interior and Safety Lee Sang-min dismissed the prosecution's claim based on the investigation records that then-President Yoon Suk Yeol had ordered him to cut off power and water to a list of media organizations on the night of Yoon's Dec. 3 martial law declaration, during the seventh hearing of Yoon's impeachment trial on Tuesday.
Lee, who resigned on Dec. 8, was one of four witnesses that included: National Security Office Chief Shin Won-sik; ex-National Intelligence Service Third Deputy Director Baek Jong-wook; and the National Election Commission Secretary General Kim Yong-bin.
'The call I made to the fire chief (the night of Dec. 3) was purely to ask for thorough attention to public safety, not to issue any instructions about cutting off the power or water,' Lee said, speaking from the witness' podium.
According to the prosecution's indictment, Yoon handed a piece of paper to Lee during a meeting with Cabinet members prior declaring martial law, instructing the power and water to be cut off at Kyunghyang Shinmun, Hankyoreh, MBC and JTBC as well as pollster Ggot.
'If the president had given such instructions, considering the gravity of the martial law situation, I would have conveyed it as quickly as possible instead of delaying for over two hours before informing the fire chief,' Lee said.
But Lee admitted to having seen the piece of paper, saying that it had been on the table during the meeting that night.
Lee further argued that while no Cabinet members explicitly stated their support or opposition to Yoon's plan to declare martial law, concerns were generally conveyed during the meeting.
'No one believed that the declaration of martial law was unconstitutional or illegal. However, there were significant concerns about whether the public would accept martial law being declared for the first time in 45 years, how it might impact foreign relations and the economy, and whether the administration could withstand future attacks from the opposition party,' he said.
When asked by Yoon's lawyers whether he had conveyed his intent to dissuade the president from declaring martial law, Lee said, 'Yes.'
'(During the Cabinet meeting), Yoon acknowledged the economic, diplomatic and political burdens being discussed, but he emphasized that the level of awareness, sense of crisis and responsibility felt by each Cabinet member was fundamentally different from that of the president,' according to the ex-minister.
Lee also argued that regarding the declaration of martial law to be an act of insurrection was a 'misguided frame.'
Saying he believes it to be an incorrect interpretation to see the declaration of martial law as leading an insurrection, he argued that it is a legitimate power granted to the president by the Constitution.
'I wondered whether other ministers from different departments understood these circumstances. I thought the president must have been deeply troubled,' according to him.
Meanwhile, the suspended president criticized adopting witness testimony as evidence for his trial, arguing that their was a "discrepancy" between their oral testimony and the prosecution's investigation records surrounding his Dec. 3 martial law declaration.
'It is inappropriate to adopt these records as evidence and use them as a basis for fact-finding,' he argued at the beginning of the hearing.
'The records themselves don't match up with each other well. During the witness questioning of Hong Jang-won (ex-first deputy director of the National Intelligence Service) and others, many must have felt that there was a discrepancy between what was written in the records and what was actually heard," according to Yoon.
He argued that the investigation was not "consistent" in the way it was conducted.
'The investigation was not conducted systematically by a single agency such as the prosecution, military prosecution, Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials, or the police. Instead, multiple agencies rushed in, resulting in a disorganized investigation mixed with records from National Assembly hearings,' Yoon told the justices.
He asked for the court's careful review of the investigation records and testimony.
'I believe the justices may also share this view. While determining the value of the evidence is up to the court, adopting these records as evidence and reflecting them in fact-finding is problematic because the investigation was not systematic. I don't know but they don't match up well, so please take a thorough look at that issue."
Following Yoon's statement, acting Constitutional Court Chief Justice Moon Hyung-bae said, '(The justices) will discuss it during their meeting.'
The final hearing of Yoon's impeachment trial is Thursday. It is expected that the court may add more hearings for additional witness examination, such as by summoning impeached Prime Minister Han Duck-soo, but the court said that 'nothing has been decided on adding more hearings' as of Monday. It is most likely the hearings will end at the end of February and the verdict will be out in mid-March.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lee, Vietnam's President agree to deepen economic ties
Lee, Vietnam's President agree to deepen economic ties

Korea Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Lee, Vietnam's President agree to deepen economic ties

President Lee Jae-myung talked over the phone with Vietnamese President Luong Cuong on Thursday and agreed to elevate bilateral ties across the economy and in the infrastructure and energy sectors, Lee's office said. In their first conversation, Lee praised the development of bilateral relations since the establishment of diplomatic ties in 1992 and vowed to work closely with Cuong to further advance the comprehensive strategic partnership, according to presidential spokesperson Kang Yu-jung. "The two leaders agreed to expand and deepen bilateral cooperation to match the level of their comprehensive strategic partnership, including in strategic sectors, such as high-speed rail and nuclear power," Kang told reporters. During the 25-minute call, Cuong described South Korea as a "key partner" in Vietnam's economic cooperation and invited Lee to Vietnam, the office said. Lee responded that he hopes to visit Vietnam for further discussions and to enhance high-level exchanges in light of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit to be held in South Korea in November, it noted. It marks Lee's first call with a Southeast Asian leader since taking office last week, and the fifth conversation with a foreign head of state, following phone talks with the leaders of the United States, Japan, China and the Czech Republic. (Yonhap)

[Editorial] No retaliation in probes
[Editorial] No retaliation in probes

Korea Herald

time9 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

[Editorial] No retaliation in probes

Special counsels should be neutral figures to avoid suspicions of revenge, oppression Three bills mandating special counsel probes into allegations involving the administration of former President Yoon Suk Yeol were enacted Tuesday following approval at a Cabinet meeting. One of the bills requires special counsels to investigate insurrection and treason charges related to Yoon's failed declaration of martial law. The second bill calls for a probe into allegations against Yoon's wife, Kim Keon Hee. She allegedly accepted luxury goods as bribes, manipulated stock prices and intervened illegally in the People Power Party's nomination of candidates for the National Assembly. The third bill deals with the death of a Marine who drowned while searching for missing flood victims and the presidential office's alleged pressure on officials investigating his death. The bills mark the first legislation for President Lee Jae-myung since taking office last week. Their passage through the Assembly was led by the ruling Democratic Party of Korea. Simultaneous special counsels investigating three cases against key figures from the previous administration and possibly lawmakers from the People Power Party are unprecedented. In light of the seriousness of the allegations, the truth needs to be uncovered. But the investigations should be impartial and transparent. If not, they are likely to be caught up in suspicions of political retaliation. Investigations of the allegations in question are either completed or ongoing. They were conducted separately by the prosecution, the police and the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials. The government and the ruling party say the legislation was intended to increase the efficiency of the investigations by integrating the separate probes and revealing the overall truth in all three cases, but there is concern about the scale of the investigation and how special counsels are appointed. As many as 120 prosecutors will be assigned to three special counsel teams. This figure is more than half of the number of prosecutors at the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office, the nation's largest. Hundreds of investigation officers and assistants will also join. Allocating so many resources to the special counsel probes could set back investigations into other cases affecting the lives of ordinary people. Among other provisions, the bills give only the Democratic Party and the minor opposition Rebuilding Korea Party, which almost always stands by the now-ruling party, the exclusive right to recommend special counsels in the three cases. It is hard to dispel worries about the political neutrality of their investigations. The appointment of special counsels is a supplementary system designed to keep those in power from pushing biased investigations. It should be used in exceptional circumstances and only as necessary. But the Democratic Party unilaterally passed bills that expand the scope of special counsel probes and grant nominating authority exclusively to certain parties. It is true that suspicions about the previous administration still need to be addressed, and some investigations have been criticized as insufficient. But in a situation where Lee and the Democratic Party are now in power, it is questionable whether special counsels are even necessary to investigate the previous administration instead of using the existing judicial system. It is difficult to erase suspicions of political motivations. The opposition People Power Party has condemned the bills, arguing that the special counsels' "triple investigations" are political revenge. If the investigations were used as a lever of power for political suppression, as the People Power Party worries, it would be a grave threat to democracy. The special counsel investigations should not split the nation into "us versus them," either. People experienced deep division during the Moon Jae-in administration due to its drive to eliminate "the evils of the past," which led to claims of a political vendetta. Lee vowed to base his government on "integration." If so, the special counsel probes should serve as a just means of revealing the truth and ultimately restoring the rule of law, not a means for retaliation and oppression. That begins with appointing special counsels who are politically unbiased and widely respected.

Lee silences border loudspeakers
Lee silences border loudspeakers

Korea Herald

time19 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Lee silences border loudspeakers

Decision aimed at easing tension with Pyongyang: presidential office South Korea on Wednesday suspended its loudspeaker broadcasts aimed at North Korea, as part of the liberal Lee Jae-myung administration's efforts to ease tension with Pyongyang. According to the presidential office, President Lee ordered the broadcasts, via loudspeakers installed in border area, to be halted starting 2 p.m. Wednesday. 'This decision reflects President Lee's commitment to restoring trust with North Korea and advancing his peace policy for the Korean Peninsula,' Lee's spokesperson Kang Yu-jung said during a press briefing held Wednesday afternoon in Yongsan, Seoul. Kang further described the suspension as a 'step to ease the burden on residents in border areas who have long suffered from noise broadcasts targeting the North.' She added that the decision was made as a gesture of goodwill, particularly in light of the absence of any major provocations from North Korea in recent weeks. President Lee had pledged during his campaign ahead of the June 3 presidential election to halt the operation as part of broader efforts to ease inter-Korean tensions and rebuild trust. According to an official from the presidential office, the decision was made during a Cabinet meeting held the previous day. It came exactly a week after the Lee administration took office on June 4. The broadcasts had been resumed by the conservative Yoon Suk Yeol administration in June 2024 after a six-year hiatus. The decision came as North Korea continued sending waste-filled balloons across the border, prompting Seoul to suspend the 2018 inter-Korean military agreement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store