Gujarat High Court directs man seen on toilet seat during virtual hearing to pay fine of Rs 1 lakh
The Division Bench of Justice AS Supehia and Justice RT Vachhani, while dictating the order, said that a report of the court registry had revealed that the man had joined the virtual proceedings in the court of Justice Nirzar Desai on June 20 for a total period of 74 minutes, and was seen on a toilet seat while relieving himself.
The Surat man, who was personally present in court on Monday, has been directed to deposit Rs 1 lakh to the court's registry before the next hearing on July 22.
On the same day, the court also heard the suo motu contempt plea against Senior Advocate Bhaskar Tanna, who tendered an unconditional apology for appearing in a virtual proceeding while drinking from a beer mug. The Division Bench, during an oral exchange with Tanna, who submitted that he had 'no intention' to disrespect the court, asked if 'lack of intent could erase a contemptuous act'.
In the case of the Surat man, the court also questioned his lawyer whether he had been advised about appropriate behaviour in court. The lawyer informed the court that the man had been advised to present himself in an appropriate manner. The lawyer had represented the man in the June 20 hearing, which pertained to quashing a case in which the Surat resident was a complainant.
Meanwhile, referring to Tanna's case, the bench said that the court registry had submitted a report stating that the senior advocate remained connected to the virtual proceedings for 26 minutes on June 26 before Justice Sandeep Bhatt when he was 'seen talking on phone and having a drink in a beer mug' during the proceedings.
While submitting his unconditional apology, Tanna said, 'I am not defending myself. I'm only pointing out so it can be taken care of. If control (with regard to joining the proceedings) is with the lawyers, this problem may arise. In my case, it was a pure error. If control is kept with officers of the court, our entry into the court wouldn't happen… And that's what the Supreme Court does.'
During the hearing of the contempt petition, the court said that the Registrar of Information Technology had not submitted a report apprising the court about the 'mechanism to deal with contumacious litigants during online proceedings'. When the division bench was informed that the framing of the mechanism had been undertaken and submitted to the Chief Justice for approval, the court decided to hear the matter on July 22.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
20 minutes ago
- Hans India
Ensure transparency in excise policy: CM
Vijayawada: Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu said that transparency will be the cornerstone of Andhra Pradesh's new excise policy. In a review meeting with excise department officials on Tuesday, he stressed zero tolerance for substandard or illicit liquor and ordered a complete ban on suspicious brands. Only national and international high-quality labels should be sold, he said, adding that public health was the top priority. Naidu criticised the previous government for allowing fake brands and linked the spread of drugs and ganja to politically backed 'J brands.' These brands, he noted, have now largely disappeared. Officials informed him that 68 per cent of the liquor market was once dominated by such anonymous brands, but the new policy has nearly wiped them out. Under the current liquor policy, state revenue has improved, and cross-border purchases have declined. Liquor prices in AP have also dropped for the first time — by Rs 10 to Rs 100 per bottle—saving consumers around Rs 116 crore monthly. The Chief Minister directed officials to integrate advanced technologies such as Artificial Intelligence and GPS to track liquor movement in real time from distilleries to retail outlets. He called for full digitalisation of transactions, a strict trace-and-track system, and analytics-based audits of inventories. Naidu also stressed the need to eradicate illegal outlets and monitor activities like ginger ale extractions and natu sara (illicit liquor) production using drones. The review meeting was attended by Excise Principal Secretary Mukesh Kumar Meena and other senior officials.
Hans India
21 minutes ago
- Hans India
Indian Nurse On Death Row: Nothing much govt can do, Centre tells SC
New Delhi: The Centre on Monday informed the Supreme Court that the government could do 'nothing much' in the case of an Indian nurse facing execution on July 16 for murder in Yemen. Attorney General R Venkataramani informed a bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta that the government was doing 'utmost possible'. 'Having regard to the sensitivity and status of Yemen as a place, there is nothing much the Government of India can do,' he said. He continued, 'There is a point up to which the Government of India can go and we have reached that point.' Venkataramani said the government recently wrote to the public prosecutor of the area concerned to find out if the execution could be suspended for the time being. 'The Government of India is trying its best,' Venkataramani said, 'and has also engaged with some sheikhs who are very influential people there.' He said the government was keen to save one of its citizens. The apex court was hearing a plea seeking a direction to the Centre to use diplomatic channels to save Indian nurse Nimisha Priya, 38, facing execution in Yemen. Priya, a nurse from Palakkad district of Kerala, was convicted of murdering her Yemeni business partner in 2017. She was sentenced to death in 2020, and her final appeal was rejected in 2023.
Hans India
21 minutes ago
- Hans India
Freedom of speech is being abused
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday said the right of freedom of speech and expression was being 'abused' while hearing the plea of a cartoonist accused of sharing alleged objectionable cartoons of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and RSS workers on social media. A bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Aravind Kumar asked the counsel of cartoonist Hemant Malviya, 'Why do you do all this?' Malviya has sought anticipatory bail in the matter. Advocate Vrinda Grover, representing Malviya, said the matter was over a cartoon made in 2021 during the Covid-19 pandemic. 'It may be unpalatable. Let me say it is in poor taste. Let me go to that extent. But is it an offence? My lords have said it can be offensive, but it is not an offence. I am simply on law. I am not trying to justify anything,' she said. Grover agreed to delete the post made by Malviya. 'Whatever we may do with this case, this is definitely the case that the freedom of speech and expression is being abused,' Justice Dhulia observed. Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj, appearing for Madhya Pradesh, said such "things" were repeatedly done 'It is not the question of maturity alone. It is something more,' Nataraj said, while responding to Grover, who had said there should be some maturity. Referring to the time of the cartoon's inception, Grover said there had been no law and order problem since then. She said the issue was of personal liberty and whether this would require arrest and remand. Grover requested the bench grant interim protection to the petitioner until then. 'We will see this on Tuesday,' the bench is challenging a Madhya Pradesh High Court order passed on July 3 refusing to grant him anticipatory bail. The cartoonist was booked by the Lasudiya police station in Indore in May on a complaint filed by a lawyer and Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh worker, Vinay Joshi. Joshi had alleged that Malviya hurt the religious sentiments of Hindus and disturbed communal harmony by uploading objectionable material on social media. The FIR mentioned various "objectionable" posts, including allegedly inappropriate comments on Lord Shiva as well as cartoons, videos, photographs and comments regarding PM Modi, RSS workers and others.
