Salt Lake City accepts $2.2M grant in pursuit to preserve 200 acres of Great Salt Lake wetlands
Utah's capital city officially received a financial boost as it seeks to preserve 200 acres of wetlands by the shores of its namesake.
Salt Lake City added a nearly $2.23 million grant from the Great Salt Lake Watershed Enhancement Trust to its budget as one of the many items in a $21.9 million budget amendment that members of the Salt Lake City Council approved Tuesday night. The trust awarded the grant to the Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities in 2023, and Tuesday's measure was more of an accounting item to include it in the budget, said Laura Briefer, the department's director.
It was awarded to Salt Lake City, along with seven other projects that received a total of $8.5 million. All eight projects aim to "protect and enhance" more than 13,000 acres of the Great Salt Lake's wetlands.
Salt Lake City is seeking to acquire 200 acres of private commercial land near the Rudy Drain, a section of the lake's wetlands near Salt Lake City International Airport, as well as duck hunting club land and Farmington Bay in Davis County. The land is owned by Scannell, one of the many entities that have built warehouses across the city's growing Northwest Quadrant.
"It's part of a broader goal to protect the wetlands along the Great Salt Lake shoreline within Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County," Briefer told KSL.com.
The grant is expected to cover about one-third of the project cost. The remaining cost — projected by the trust to be about $4.47 million — is yet to be figured out, but Briefer said the city could receive about another $2.5 million from the Utah Inland Port Authority. Both external financial sources are contingent on a land agreement being reached, which — in the grant's case — must be reached by the end of 2026.
The ultimate goal is that a future conservation easement is placed on the land to protect it from development as more buildings creep into the wetlands. If successful, the project would include new trails linking to regional trail systems, such as the Jordan River Parkway Trail.
"Large land preservation projects can be really complex," Briefer said. "This is a very large and ambitious land preservation effort, so it does take time to sort out the nature of any kind of transaction and the future of the landscape."
Salt Lake City reached an agreement with the Great Salt Lake Watershed Enhancement Trust late last year toward the goal. In a statement to KSL.com, Marcelle Shoop, executive director of the Great Salt Lake Watershed Enhancement Trust and director of Audubon Society's Saline Lakes Program, said the group is looking forward to the project coming to fruition.
"We are excited for this project that will conserve and restore wetlands and their important connections to sustaining Great Salt Lake's water flows and the essential habitat that birds and other wildlife depend on," she said.
Salt Lake City also received $406,102 from the Utah Department of Transportation for new Capitol Hill bicycle lanes, as well as a $63,675 donation from the Utah Bar Foundation for a "mobile courtroom" to reach people at resource centers and other areas of need.
While the city added some money to its budget, city leaders also voted to approve new expenditures. Those funds include new staff hires, as well as $150,000 for items like treatments for the city's struggling sycamore trees. Other notable spending items include:
$3.9 million toward public infrastructure at the city's Fleet Block property. The money comes from an anticipated sale of a parcel as redevelopment on the project begins.
$239,050 for an update to the city's Community Wildfire Protection Plan.
$50,000 to double the size of the city's July 4 and Pioneer Day drone shows.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Salt Lake City considers raising costs of metered parking, minimizing free time
SALT LAKE CITY () — Parking in downtown Salt Lake City may start making a bigger dent in your wallet. As part of the city budget for the 2026 fiscal year, the Salt Lake City Council is considering changing the hourly rates for metered parking throughout the city, as well as the collection days and hours. Currently, metered parking is available at just $2.25 an hour. The city collects this fee between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday. On Saturday, the parking is free for two hours, while on Sunday, parking is free for the whole day. Carp chaos at Utah Lake as carp overpopulation becomes serious problem Under the proposed changes, the hourly rate for metered parking would rise to $3.50 an hour. The proposal would also take away the two free hours on Saturday and extend the collection hours from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m. Monday through Saturday. Sunday would keep its free parking. The Salt Lake City Council will next meet on Tuesday, June 10, at 1 p.m. for a work session, where the calendar includes considering unresolved issues. A formal City Council meeting will be held at 7 p.m., where council members will consider adopting the proposed budget. Escape today to OUTRIGGER Ka'anapali Beach Resort Jeffries declines to embrace Musk amid the billionaire's feud with Trump Salt Lake City Mission hosting pickleball event to help kids, change lives Elevate your outdoor adventure with the 2025 Forest River Rockwood Roo 17E Trump administration faces growing bipartisan pressure over Job Corps Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Axios
5 days ago
- Axios
A new "VidAngel for audiobooks" is trying to to filter profanity — while sidestepping copyright issues
A Utah company has launched a digital service to filter profanity from audiobooks — à la VidAngel, but without the copyright lawsuits. The intrigue: Lehi-based Siftbooks links to the listener's own Audible account to ensure the books they're modifying are already bought and paid for, reports.
Yahoo
28-05-2025
- Yahoo
He once worked for Big Tech. Now this Utah lawmaker is leading efforts to regulate it
When asked about the biggest win Utah lawmakers achieved during the recent legislative session, Gov. Spencer Cox offered a surprising answer. His pick, HB418, wasn't surprising because it protects online user data — Cox has been one of the strongest proponents of reining in Big Tech — nor was it surprising that the governor picked a bill that passed with near-unanimous support from lawmakers in both parties. What was surprising was that the bill was the brainchild of a first-time lawmaker, who didn't miss a beat in shepherding it through the Utah Legislature in his first weeks in elected office. But the issue is something Rep. Doug Fiefia has been thinking about for years, going back to his time working for Big Tech companies like Google. It's no secret that Google collects a vast amount of data on millions of Americans, but when Fiefia began working in technology sales for the company he said he — along with many others in the company — viewed that data as a way for Google to improve its products by 'connecting the products or the companies to the people that were searching for them.' That view eventually gave way to an uneasiness about just how much information the company has and how it uses it, eventually leading to his departure, Fiefia said. 'The more and more I dove into it, the more and more I realized is this company, they're trying to make a bottom line. And the reality is that the features that they were building ... they are exploiting you and I,' the Herriman Republican told in an interview in the House lounge Tuesday. 'I think I realized very quickly that users — us, you and I — as regular citizens, were never the customer. We were always the product that was being sold and we were being served up on a silver platter.' Fiefia's answer was HB418, a first-of-its-kind bill that gives Utahns the right to control the data that is collected from them by social media companies. The bill requires that users be able to delete their data from a platform or download and transfer it to another platform. It also directs social media companies to enable communication across different platforms, akin to how email users can communicate with others regardless of provider. Cox called it 'as big a piece of legislation as I have ever seen a freshman (lawmaker) run' during a ceremonial signing of the bill in April, during which Fiefia said he hopes the law will 'shift power back to where it always should have remained — with the people.' 'They were trading our free will for profit margin and that's why I wanted to run this type of bill — to give people back the control of their data to own, manage and control it,' he said Tuesday. 'And I think this is the first step. I think there are probably more steps to come after this.' Google did not respond to a request for comment. In the case of HB418, Fiefia's youth was a key factor in building support for the bill, as he was able to explain the technicalities of online data collection in a way that made sense to older or less tech-savvy colleagues. He compared modern data ownership to regulations enabled by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which allow users to keep their phone numbers if switching providers. Put that way, Fiefia said, skepticism from colleagues warmed up to the idea, telling him: 'I don't understand all the technical pieces of this, but if that's the principle, I agree.' Fiefia looks like a conservative Republican on most issues — his campaign website declares him anti-abortion, pro-business and pro-gun — but his thinking on tech regulation mirrors a change within the conservative movement that has been led in part by Utah. The state was the first in the nation to enact broad social media regulations — though their future is still being worked out in the courts — and has joined with a coalition of states in suing major companies that own Facebook and TikTok. Fiefia still views himself as pro-business, but argues that social media companies have built their brands off of content created by users. Rather than view his data privacy bill as stifling business, he sees it as promoting individual ownership of intellectual property. 'We would never allow any other industry to do what we've allowed Big Tech to do,' he said. 'You're right, I believe in the free market, but when it comes to our identify, our digital footprint and their control of it and their manipulation of it, that's where I think conservatives came to the table and said: 'You know what, we don't like regulating, we believe in a free market, but this is just wrong. They've crossed the line.'' 'This is actually my property,' Fiefia added. 'I created this. I wrote that. I posted this. That is mine and what we've allowed them to do for so long is to claim it, to use it and to abuse it.' While governments are still scrambling to catch up with the disruption social media platforms have caused, the next powerful technology, artificial intelligence, is emerging. The 'reactive' approach to social media has contributed to poor mental health outcomes for children, Fiefia said, and the lawmaker is hopeful government will be more proactive this time around. 'I fear that if we do the same thing, if we take the same approach with AI, too many people will get hurt,' he said. 'The advancement of AI and the technology is so robust and so advanced that if we take a reactive approach, I fear that it's just going to be too late.' But Fiefia worries that Congress is already taking steps to make it harder for states to adopt artificial intelligence protections. Tucked into President Donald Trump's 'one, big, beautiful bill' — which passed the House Thursday — is a provision enacting a 10-year moratorium on state regulations of artificial intelligence. 'We believe that excessive regulation of the AI sector could kill a transformative industry just as it's taking off,' Vice President J.D. Vance said in February, per CNN, articulating the administration's position. Fiefia disagrees, arguing that states are nimbler and better able to adapt to rapid technological advances compared to an infamously unproductive Congress. He anticipates Big Tech and privacy issues are 'going to be my fight in the Legislature ... for the rest of my time here,' so AI will be on his mind regardless of what Congress does. That's not to say Fiefia is opposed to the advancing technology — it's just the opposite. He seems tremendous potential across the board, particularly in health care, where he is optimistic artificial intelligence will lead to medical breakthroughs and cures for disease that humans have been unable to master. He just doesn't want to make the same mistake many did with social media by overlooking the potential harms. 'We've got to find a balance, to figure out how do we protect users and make sure that we continue to support innovation?' he said. 'That's what I'm always thinking about. I don't ever want to over-regulate, but I also want to see if we allow this technology to run, what does it look like if it's used by the wrong hands?'