Life Factory project: 'No more funds' after damning report
"No further funds" will be given by a council to a youth regeneration project after serious concerns were raised about leaders' financial management.Somerset Council froze funds to Glastonbury's Life Factory in January 2024, after bosses said they were not "able to adequately reconcile invoices" in grant claims with actual spend and progress on site.The new leadership team at Red Brick Building Centre, which runs the site, said its "deeply disappointed" with an independent audit's findings, which highlighted a lack of accountability.A council spokesperson said the authority accepts that its level of oversight and monitoring "could have been strengthened".
The report also warned the government could request its £2.89m back if officials decide the "terms of the grant have not been met".After the grant was halted in January, construction work stopped on site and several contractors were left unpaid.Some workers told the BBC that they are owed tens of thousands of pounds.
The Red Brick Building C project was previously awarded £2.89m from the government under the Glastonbury Town Deal (GTD) to develop a community space, mainly for young people. Spending of this money was being overseen by Somerset Council.But a South West Audit Partnership (SWAP) report has now concluded that it has "no assurance" that there were sound governance arrangements and financial controls in place at Red Brick Building Centre Ltd or Somerset Council.With regards to the Red Brick Building Centre, the report states: "We have seen no evidence of a delivery plan showing how the building will be delivered within budget, scope and on time."It said a condition of the grant funding was that match funding would be obtained, but this had not gone beyond gathering expressions of interest.
'Lack of accountability'
The report explains that a subsidiary company called Beckery Construction was set up to keep costs down, but said the introduction of this company confused the relationship between all parties, leading to a breakdown in communication, poor governance and lack of accountability.The report said: "The majority of control weaknesses in delivery lie with The Red Brick Building and Beckery Construction Company."At Beckery Construction, auditors found many standard HR processes were not followed, including no formal recruitment being in place sub-contractors, one employee didn't have a contract and timesheets were either incorrectly submitted or filled out at all.The report said: "Financial controls such as budget monitoring and cash flow forecasting were not operating, no approval for expenditure was sought from the Red Brick building board, and financial records were not always accessible, complete or accurate".With regards to the council, the auditors said: "Grant payments were not processed in line with the Grant Funding Agreement."Given the complexity of the renovation of Building C and the values involved more assurances should have been sought by [them] that robust governance and oversight arrangements were in place and a competent and qualified project team were in place."The report pointed out that the government may now ask for its money back, if it feels that the terms of its grant have not been met.
'Deeply disappointed'
In a statement posted on social media, the new leadership team at Red Brick report makes it clear this "was a collective failure" across all parties."While we deeply regret that the Life Factory will no longer be able to continue in its original form, we remain committed to learning from this experience and ensuring it is never repeated," they said.A former director of Beckery Construction and ex-member of the Red Brick board said the SWAP report "does not fully reflect the complexity, the good intentions, the actions taken, and the repeated efforts to gain clarity on the financial situation".It added that council representatives had frequent meetings with the project manager.And while the ex-director of Beckery was in post, he said the financial accounts for Life Factory were externally audited with "no serious concerns raised".
Somerset Council has released a statement saying "no further funds" will be released to the project.The council said the audit has made clear that despite almost £3m being spent on the Life Factory, "it cannot be successfully delivered in line with the Grant Funding Agreement, and it is therefore not clear if the project will ever be completed".Duncan Sharkey, the council's chief executive, said the authority "accepts the [report's] findings that our level of oversight and monitoring could have been strengthened".As a result, the council's management of other infrastructure projects have been reviewed.
What happens now?
The council said it is "not contractually responsible for any payments to contractors", but adds it does "understand the impact this is having on those with legitimate claims".Council bosses said they would continue to work with the Red Brick Building.A spokesperson for Red Brick Building Centre said they have "always had the community at the heart of this project and is the reason we took this project on"."And for these reasons, we called it into question and put a pause on the project at the beginning of 2024. "We are working very closely with Somerset Council to find a way through this, and our shareholder and creditors are our top priority," they added.The council's audit committee will discuss the report at its meeting on Thursday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Glastonbury Town Deal chair Dr Lynne Sedgmore resigns
The chair of the Glastonbury Town Deal board has resigned after a damning audit into a government-backed regeneration project in the board has been overseeing 10 projects, delivered by Somerset Council and other organisations, funded by £23.6m from the government's Towns an independent audit the council confirmed in May that it would not provide further funding towards the upgrade of the Red Brick Building C (also known as The Life Factory) - leaving local contractors in limbo and the work Lynne Sedgmore CBE, who chairs the advisory-only board, has now resigned from her position for "personal reasons", alongside another board member. In her resignation letter to council chief executive Duncan Sharkey, seen by the Local Democracy Reporting Service, Dr Sedgmore said: "I genuinely believe it is best for the board, in the context of continuing and increasing unsubstantiated public attacks on me, that I stand down." She added: "During my time as chair, I have willingly given considerable time, energy, skills, commitment and dedication to the effectiveness of the board. It has been a privilege to serve Glastonbury in this way."There has been significant progress on all but one town deal project (The Life Factory), and the two projects completed this year have been a huge success. There are many more successes to come before final completion in March 2026. Accusations 'without foundation' "I am on the receiving end of personal and professional attacks in the public domain suggesting financial impropriety. While the accusations are without foundation, this is damaging to the board as well as to myself."My resignation is not connected to any form of inappropriate fiscal accountability, on my part or that of the board."Dr Sedgmore had served as chair since October 2021, following the death of original chairman Robert McKenzie, a community representative who has sat on the board since its inception in 2020, has also vice chair and Glastonbury mayor Councillor Michael White will act as temporary a statement issued on Tuesday, the board said it was hopeful that additional funding could be secured urgently to complete the Life Factory project and pay outstanding creditors.A spokesman said: "Having read the SWAP report, we understand the rationale for this decision by the council as the accountable body. However, we remain very concerned about the impact this decision will have on our community."Somerset Council has previously said no more funds will be available for the Life Factory after the audit made clear that despite almost £3m being spent, the project cannot be delivered "in time with the Grant Funding Agreement".Duncan Sharkey, the council's chief executive, said the authority "accepts the [report's] findings that our level of oversight and monitoring could have been strengthened".
Reuters
9 hours ago
- Reuters
Norway fund's ethics body reviews Israeli bank stakes over West Bank settler loans
OSLO/LONDON/JERUSALEM, June 3 (Reuters) - The ethics watchdog for Norway's $1.9 trillion wealth fund is scrutinising Israeli banks' practice of underwriting Israeli settlers' housebuilding commitments in the occupied West Bank in a review that could prompt up to $500 million in divestments. The Council on Ethics, opens new tab, a public body set up, opens new tab by the Ministry of Finance, has, however, decided not to object to the Fund's investments in accommodation platforms such as Airbnb (ABNB.O), opens new tab that offer rentals in the Jewish settlements. The body checks that firms in the portfolio of the world's largest wealth fund meet ethical guidelines set by Norway's parliament. In an interview with Reuters on May 22, Council head Svein Richard Brandtzaeg said it was examining how Israeli banks offer guarantees that protect Israeli settlers' money if the company building their home in the West Bank should fold. Other practices are also being looked at "but this is what we can see so far", he said. "That is what is well documented." He declined to say how long the review would take. Brandtzaeg did not name the banks but, at the end of 2024, the fund owned about 5 billion crowns ($500 million) in shares in the five largest Israeli lenders, up 62% in 12 months, according to the latest data. The banks - Hapoalim ( opens new tab, Bank Leumi ( opens new tab, Israel Discount Bank ( opens new tab, Mizrahi Tefahot Bank ( opens new tab and First International Bank of Israel ( opens new tab - did not answer requests for comment. Since 2020, they have been included in a list, opens new tab of companies with ties to settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories compiled by a U.N. mission assessing the implications for Palestinian rights. Latterly, investor concern has grown around the world over a 19-month-old Israeli onslaught that has killed more than 50,000 Palestinians and devastated the Gaza Strip in response to an attack by Hamas militants that killed more than 1,200 Israelis. Around 700,000 Israeli settlers live among 2.7 million Palestinians in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Many settlements are adjacent to Palestinian areas and some Israeli firms serve both Israelis and Palestinians. The United Nations' top court last year found that Israeli settlements built on territory seized in 1967 were illegal, a ruling that Israel called "fundamentally wrong", citing historical and biblical ties to the land. In mid-2024, the Council on Ethics began a new review, opens new tab of investments linked to the West Bank and Gaza. It examined 65 companies but recommended only petrol station chain Paz ( opens new tab and telecoms company Bezeq ( opens new tab for divestment, resulting in share sales. The Council also scrutinised some multinationals to see if their activities in the West Bank met its guidelines. Among them were the accommodation platforms, including Airbnb (ABNB.O), opens new tab, (BKNG.O), opens new tab, TripAdvisor (TRIP.O), opens new tab and Expedia (EXPE.O), opens new tab, named on the U.N. list, opens new tab and accounting for about $3 billion in Fund investments. But the Council will not recommend watchlisting or divesting from those, Eli Ane Lund, head of its secretariat, said in the joint interview. "The company's activity must have some kind of influence on the (ethical) violations," she said. "It's not (enough) to have a connection, it has to have something to do with the violation, it must contribute to it." The Council's recommendations go to the central bank, which is not obliged to follow them but generally does. If investments are sold, it is done gradually to avoid alerting markets, and the decision is then made public. Pro-Palestinian campaigners say the Council sets its bar too high for recommending divestments, and that the Norwegian government should instruct the fund to conduct a general divestment from Israel just as it did for Russia in 2022, three days after Moscow invaded Ukraine. But most lawmakers support the Council's approach, and are set on Wednesday to formally endorse a parliamentary finance committee's decision not to order a wholesale boycott.
Scottish Sun
9 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Council slammed for £50million ‘bridge to nowhere' as officials admit they ‘can't afford to finish half-built road'
ROAD RAGE Council slammed for £50million 'bridge to nowhere' as officials admit they 'can't afford to finish half-built road' A COUNCIL has been slammed for building a "bridge to nowhere" that may never be finished. The £50 million bridge was part of a project started by Lincolnshire County Council in 2022 to ease traffic on the A16. Advertisement 3 Construction has been delayed by monetary issues Credit: Bav Media 3 The "bridge to nowhere" has left locals angry about wasted taxpayer money Credit: Bav Media 3 An estimated £50 to £60 million is needed to finish the project Credit: Bav Media On Monday, May 2, officials admitted the project - known as the Spalding western relief road - might not be completed. It comes as the council are seeking up to £33 million in "external funding" in the hopes of finishing the development. They cited "turbulent" years for the shortage of cash, including rising costs during the pandemic, inflation, and problems caused by the national economy. This led the council to scrap nearly £28 million in funding in 2023 for their road projects. Advertisement As a result, the relief road has been left with a "road to nowhere bridge." Residents and campaigners have been left frustrated by the lack of progress on the project. They have criticised it as a waste of taxpayer money, as aerial photos showed that the ongoing work had suddenly stopped. In a YouTube video about the project, Jon Jefferson who runs Auto Shenanigans, was critical of the "road to nowhere bridge." Advertisement Commenters on the video shared their own frustrations with similarly unfinished projects across the UK. One wrote: "We have an unfinished roundabout with NO finish date for when it will ever open. Total p*** take of the tax-payers." Blyth's Crisis: Locals Voice Anger Over Crime, Job Losses, and Political Betrayal Another sarcastically commented: "Awesome. A road with no traffic and rail lines with no trains." Others expressed their disappointment at the state of British infrastructure, writing: "It's got to the point I'll be dizzy with astonishment and suspicion when a road project success story comes along." Advertisement Construction of the north section of the four-mile-long, five-section road was completed in October 2024 - including the bridge. This 0.6 mile stretch of road, was complete with a T-junction for later extension, and a bridge over a railway between Doncaster and Peterborough. The council's highways department told The Times: "Construction of the north section of the Spalding western relief road was completed in October 2024. According to the department, £27.7 million has been set aside for the southern section of the road in the upcoming 2025-26 budget. Advertisement This is still much lower than the estimated cost of £50 to £60 million, leaving developers trying to find other sources of funding to make up the shortfall. They said: "The current estimated cost of building this section is between £50 and £60 million, which means external funding will be needed." The council said they are working closely with South Holland district council to "identify funding opportunities, including remaining in touch with Homes England." They added: "In addition, no funding has yet been allocated or secured for the middle sections of the relief road as these are intended to be built in the long term." Advertisement According to the project description, "the primary source of funding for both [southern and middle roads]" is likely to come in the form of contributions from developers. Their ongoing plans are outlined in the South East Lincolnshire Local Plan. Project bosses have estimated that the project will now take until 2030, with the financial issues causing significant setbacks. The completed northern section of the road has freed up land that could be used for 1,100 properties. Advertisement Parts of the project remain fenced off. We have reached out to Lincolnshire County Council for comment.
