Lester Holt to anchor last ‘NBC Nightly News' tonight before stepping down
Earlier this year, we told you about Lester Holt's announcement that he's stepping down as the anchor of 'NBC Nightly News.'
Holt will anchor his final broadcast of the program tonight at 6:30 p.m. EDT. You can watch it LIVE on Channel 11.
NBC News reports that Holt will continue at the network with a full-time role at 'Dateline,' which he has also anchored for 15 years.
Tom Llamas will take over as anchor and managing editor of 'NBC Nightly News' after Holt steps down. Llamas is currently a senior national correspondent and anchor of 'Top Story with Tom Llamas' on NBC's streaming platform, which he will continue each weeknight.
Download the FREE WPXI News app for breaking news alerts.
Follow Channel 11 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch WPXI NOW
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump Sets Out To Create His Own Deep State
A lot of things happened. Here are some of the things. This is TPM's Morning Memo. Sign up for the email version. It's always the same with Trump. His attacks on his foes usually telegraph not what they're doing, but what he plans to do himself. So it is with the Deep State. You have probably seen by now the Trump OPM's new hiring policy which was unveiled last week. It is a road map for creating a politicized federal workforce – a Deep State, if you will. It is a marked departure from decades of efforts to professionalize federal workers and protect them from raw partisan politics. But it is also a logical next step following the mass purges of federal workers: replace them with loyalists. Most glaringly problematic in the new policy is the essay-writing requirement for applications for positions at GS-05 and above. One of the four required essays comes with this prompt: 'How would you help advance the President's Executive Orders and policy priorities in this role?' It is a green light for hiring to be done on a politicized basis, as political scientist Don Moynihan notes: I cannot think of anything like this level of politicization being formally introduced into the hiring process. Under the George W. Bush administration, it was a scandal when appointees in the Justice Department were caught scanning candidate CVs for civil servant positions to try to discern their political leanings. Now they will just ask them to explain how they can serve President Trump's agenda. Within the space of a generation, backdoor politicization practices went from being a source of shame to a formal policy. What makes the Trump version of politicization arguably worse is that it's not pinned to ideology or partisan leanings but to personal loyalty and fealty to him. In that, it is arbitrary, ever changing, and subject to constant re-evaluation. All of this comes against the backdrop of Trump, with the Roberts Court's blessing, having already neutered the Merit Systems Protection Board and other mechanisms for protecting federal workers. As Moynihan suggests, Trump in breaking the existing merit system is unleashing vast consequences that will take generations to fix. NBC News: 'In four months, the Trump administration has dismantled key parts of that law enforcement infrastructure, creating what experts say is the ripest environment for corruption by public officials and business executives in a generation.' The New Yorker's Evan Osnos wanders through the New Gilded Age America like a man in a foreign country: 'In a matter of weeks, the flood of cash swirling around the White House swamped whatever bulwarks against corruption remained in American law and culture.' NBC News: Trump pardons drive a big, burgeoning business for lobbyists. 'He's dismantling not just the means of prosecuting public corruption, but he's also dismantling all the means of oversight of public corruption. The law is only for his enemies now.'–Paul Rosenzweig, a George Washington University law professor who was a senior homeland security official in the Bush II administration, on President Trump The Trump DOJ has abruptly dropped the civil lawsuit to force Trump White House official Peter Navarro to turn over to the National Archives his Proton emails from the Trump I presidency. Greg Rosen, who was the chief of the Capitol Siege Section of the D.C. U.S. Attorney's Office, resigned from the Justice Department last week after being demoted by former interim D.C. U.S. attorney Ed Martin. Lisa Rubin, on the Trump's one-two punch against the American Bar Association and the Federalist Society: [I]n an era where fidelity to the whims of Trump is far more important than allegiance to any conservative legal agenda, much less the rule of law, Trump aims to be the sole arbiter of who's qualified and fit for federal judgeships. If Trump can reduce or even eliminate both the ABA's and the Federalist Society's impact on the judicial selection process, he'll become the only judge of judges who matters — which is exactly, I would posit, how he wants it. A Milwaukee man allegedly tried to get a witness in the armed robbery case against him deported so he wouldn't be able to testify. Seizing on anti-immigrant fervor, the man sent letters in the name of the witness threatening to assassinate President Trump. The witness was arrested, but law enforcement eventually figured out the scheme and have filed new charges against the imposter, but not before DHS Secretary Kristi Noem trumpeted the initial arrest. U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth of D.C., an 81-year-old Reagan appointee, issued a preliminary injunction blocking the Trump administration from ending hormone therapy and social accommodations for transgender inmates in federal prisons, while the lawsuit proceeds. In a decision reportedly timed to coincide with Pride month, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered the Navy to strip Harvey Milk's name from an eponymous naval vessel. The assassinated gay icon was a Navy veteran. 'The Harvey Milk is a John Lewis-class oiler, a group of ships that are to be named after prominent civil rights leaders and activists,' reports. Other ships in that class are also being targeted by Hegseth for renaming, CBS News reports. They include the: USNS Thurgood Marshall USNS Ruth Bader Ginsburg USNS Harriet Tubman USNS Dolores Huerta USNS Lucy Stone USNS Cesar Chavez USNS Medgar Evers Yesterday's Morning Memo said the National Park Service's decision to close D.C.'s Dupont Circle event for an upcoming Pride event this month was made on 'what is clearly a pretextual basis,' but it's subsequently been confirmed that the request for the closure came from the D.C. police chief, who reversed her position yesterday. It remains up to the U.S. Park Police, which jurisdiction over the space, to decide whether to keep it open for the Pride event. The first eruption from Yellowstone's Black Diamond Pool captured on video since last summer's much larger hydrothermal explosion:
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Slurs, 911 calls and a crossbow: Records detail neighborhood disputes before Jonathan Joss' killing
Newlyweds Jonathan Joss and Tristan Kern de Gonzales held each other in their final moment together on Sunday. Joss, the 59-year-old voice actor best known as John Redcorn from 'King of the Hill,' had just been shot in the head in front of their San Antonio, Texas home. "I didn't want him to struggle and everything so I decided to tell him I loved him. And despite the severity of everything he was able to look up at me and acknowledge what I was saying so I know he heard me," Kern de Gonzales, 32, said. "I just kept telling him 'it's okay. You need to cross over. You don't need to keep struggling. You need to go ahead and cross over easy.'" Kern de Gonzales said Joss' alleged killer also had final words for the actor. He called him and his husband "jotos," a Spanish slur for gay people. "I've been called that word while I was sitting on a bench with Jonathan, eating lunch," Kern de Gonzales said. "And I got called that holding Jonathan while he died." Shortly after, police arrested one of the pair's neighbors, Sigfredo Alvarez Ceja, for Joss' killing. Kern de Gonzales says he believes Ceja, 56, killed his husband because of his sexual orientation. But the San Antonio Police Department says there's "no evidence" to indicate that Joss' killing was motivated by hate. Authorities have not yet revealed a motive or additional details of their investigation into the shooting. Police records obtained by NBC News and interviews with Kern de Gonzales and the pair's neighbors paint a complicated picture of what led up to the voice actor's tragic killing. Ceja could not be reached for comment. He has not yet acquired an attorney, according to the Bexar County District Clerk's Office. Kern de Gonzalez, who lived in his husband's childhood home since March 2024, said that he and Joss were regularly at odds with their neighbors, including Ceja, in recent years. He claims that many neighbors would hurl anti-gay slurs at them and complain about them being "loud," making them feel unwanted in the neighborhood. Police were called to respond to incidents at their home more than four dozen times, according to call logs obtained by NBC News, with most of the calls labeled as "disturbances." One of the pair's neighbors, who asked that their name not be shared due to fear of retaliation, said Joss was difficult to live by. "He's been a nightmare," the neighbor said. Kern de Gonzales acknowledged that his husband had a tendency to be "loud." "Me and Jonathan would be out there late at night playing the drums, singing, being a nuisance," Kern de Gonzales said. "If you're going to make it hard for us to live here, you ain't going to get no sleep." The couple's relationship with Ceja was particularly contentious. A spokesperson for SAPD confirmed with NBC News that the police department's "SAFFE" unit, which works to prevent crimes, had been mediating a dispute between Ceja and Joss for over a year. In June 2024, Ceja told police that Joss approached his house with a crossbow and hurled racial slurs at him, according to a separate police report. Joss confirmed to police that he walked over to Ceja's house to "talk about their dogs fighting with each other," according to the report. The report adds that Joss "got very defensive and stated that he does not bother" Ceja "at all." Authorities later searched Joss' home and retrieved a crossbow from his living room, police records say. And in January, Joss accused Ceja of burning their house down, according to police records. Joss told police that on the morning of the fire, he was using a barbecue in his living room because he did not have heat or electricity, according to the report. However, he said he turned the barbecue off before leaving the house to get lunch. He told police that an unnamed individual saw Ceja on his property the day before and suggested Ceja was responsible, according to the report. "I have classified this fire to be undetermined in nature at this time but cannot rule out human involvement intentional or unintentional," the officer filling out the report wrote. The fire caused the pair to be homeless, Kern de Gonzales said. But that did not stop them from getting married. They wed on Valentine's Day in Houston. "It was a very nice, simple ceremony, you know, just me and him and it, it really suited us," he said. "We were really and really proud to be married.' Kern de Gonzales said that he and his husband returned to their property on Sunday to retrieve mail. When they arrived, he said they found the skull of a dog on their property. The pair thought the skull belonged to their dog that perished in a fire and was placed there by a neighbor as a way to taunt them. The incident prompted Joss to march up and down their street with a pitchfork and begin yelling, Kern de Gonzales said. Several minutes later, he said, Ceja allegedly pulled up to their property and shot Joss. According to a police report from the Sunday shooting, Ceja told officers, "I shot him" upon his arrest on Sunday. 'I could give two f----s less if me or my husband had 50 pitchforks in every orifice of our body rolling up and down that street like tumbleweed," he said. "It don't matter." This article was originally published on
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Laura Loomer's White House access erases the line between the fringe and mainstream
Amid speculation that people close to Donald Trump have grown weary of right-wing activist Laura Loomer, NBC News reported that she was welcomed back to the White House complex this week for her latest high-level meeting. Vice President JD Vance met [Tuesday] with the far-right activist Laura Loomer in a one-on-one meeting inside the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, two sources familiar with the meeting confirmed to NBC News. ... The meeting was first reported by CNN. Shortly after the report was published, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt acknowledged during a briefing that the vice president and Loomer did have a private discussion, though she didn't elaborate on the details of the meeting. And while it's certainly of interest to know what the two talked about, that Loomer was even offered the opportunity for high-level access is extraordinary. Loomer might not be a household name, but in political circles, she has earned an unfortunate reputation. Loomer is a right-wing activist, a failed Republican congressional candidate who has described herself as 'pro-white nationalism' and a radical conspiracy theorist who has claimed that deadly school shootings were staged and the Sept. 11 attacks were 'an inside job.' She was also a close confidant to Trump during the 2024 campaign — whose access and influence appears to have grown. Last month, for example, Loomer reportedly had a hand in derailing Dr. Janette Nesheiwat's surgeon general nomination. Around the same time, Mike Waltz was ousted from his national security adviser position after getting on Loomer's bad side. Two weeks earlier, Loomer was also reportedly involved in the firing of a U.S. attorney in California. But perhaps the most important example came to the fore in early April. It was striking enough to see the president oust several members of the National Security Council and the two top leaders at the National Security Agency, but the story became even more dramatic when the public learned that the firings came on the heels of a meeting with Loomer, who promptly took credit for the developments. The New York Times published a striking behind-the-scenes look at what transpired at the White House. Sitting directly across from the president in the Oval Office, Ms. Loomer, the far-right agitator and conspiracy theorist, held a stack of papers that detailed a litany of accusations about 'disloyal' members of the National Security Council. The national security adviser, Michael Waltz, had arrived late and could only watch as Ms. Loomer ripped into his staff. Fire them, Mr. Trump instructed Mr. Waltz, according to people with knowledge of the meeting on Wednesday. The president was furious and demanded to know why these people had been hired in the first place. The Times' report, which has not been independently verified by MSNBC or NBC News, added that the situation 'perfectly encapsulates Mr. Trump's longtime penchant for soliciting information from dubious sources. The difference now, in Mr. Trump's second term, is that he has fewer people around him who try to keep those voices away.' In a normal and healthy White House, such a cartoonish scenario wouldn't even be possible. The idea that a sitting president would not only meet with someone like Loomer but would take her recommendations about national security personnel — as the actual White House national security adviser watches helplessly — sounds like the script of an unrealistic television show. But if the Times' account is accurate, that is what happened two months ago, before Loomer was rewarded again with one-on-one access to the vice president. The Times' report from April added that during the president's first term, officials 'spent a large portion of their days blocking off people they described as 'the crazies.'' Those aides have been replaced by others who approach their gatekeeping role very differently. And therein lies the point: It is hardly a secret that both parties have fringes, but only one party offers the fringe this kind of access and influence. This post updates our related earlier coverage. This article was originally published on
