Don't Be Fooled: Donald Trump Got Absolutely Torched This Week
That's the first reason Trump needs to be worried. Even if his name does not appear on some master list created by Epstein with a heading like 'Good Friends of Mine Who Raped Underage Girls With Me,' it still has to be the case that there are emails, photographs, and other material that at the very least won't look good. (I couldn't help wondering what Maurene Comey, the sex crimes prosecutor in New York's Southern District who was fired by Attorney General Pam Bondi on Wednesday, knows about Epstein and Trump.)
And here's the second and more interesting reason. These cracks in the MAGA coalition right now are only that—cracks—but time may prove this week to have been a pivotal, even decisive, moment in MAGA history.
On Monday, several voices in MAGA world (Charlie Kirk, Laura Ingraham, Megyn Kelly) were outraged over the administration declaring the Epstein matter closed. On Tuesday, a lot of those same voices said okay, nothing to see here, time to move on. Then, on Wednesday, they pivoted back to outrage, suggesting that on this one matter, social-media marching orders from Dear Leader could not staunch the blood flow. And Thursday night, the Journal story broke.
We don't know yet what the impact of the Journal story will be in MAGA world, though it seems to be rallying some of his Epstein critics to his defense. So it might be that the story allows Trump to play victim and blame the fake news. Trump denies that he wrote the greeting and, as usual, has vowed to sue, which means he's suing none other than Rupert Murdoch, who quite interestingly—if Trump's Thursday night rant on Truth Social is to be believed—turned down the chance to use his power to kill the story.
Or it might edge some to start coming to grips with the fact that their hero is not the valiant knight they imagined him to be. To a certain kind of person who consumes a certain kind of media, Trump is a sea-green incorruptible: the man who quite literally risks his life (the two assassination attempts) to slay the debauched and ossified dragons that have been perverting America for decades and keeping the decent God-fearing people of 'normal' American down.
Now? As I said, we can't make any conclusions just yet. But this is the week the pixie dust didn't work. Maybe it's a one-time thing. On the other hand, maybe it's not.
Before we get to all that, let's do a quick deconstruction of what the Journal reported. There was a drawing of a naked woman (and why the Journal hasn't posted an image of this thing is weird). Inside the drawing was a typewritten imagined dialogue between Trump and Epstein:
Voice Over: There must be more to life than having everything.
Donald: Yes, there is, but I won't tell you what it is.
Jeffrey: Nor will I, since I also know what it is.
Donald: We have certain things in common, Jeffrey.
Jeffrey: Yes, we do, come to think of it.
Donald: Enigmas never age, have you noticed that?
Jeffrey: As a matter of fact, it was clear to me the last time I saw you.
Donald: A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.
Obviously, the key line here is Trump saying 'enigmas never age.' I have to say I give him credit for seeming to know what the word 'enigma' means. In fact, the use of 'enigma' is the one piece of evidence that suggests that maybe this wasn't Trump!
But 'never age.' And Epstein replying that this fact was 'clear to me the last time I saw you.' That's clearly a reference to a specific event. If you want to believe it refers to that time they bought Girl Scout cookies together, be my guest.
If this is a genuine article, well, it's very rare in this life that things like that card exist in isolation. The two were joined at the hip for 15 years. There will almost certainly be new explosions in the coming weeks. They probably won't emerge from the grand jury materials whose release Trump authorized in the wake of the Journal scoop. We can presume that material has been vetted to exculpate Trump. But maybe there were things that the grand jury didn't see. As The Washington Post noted Friday morning, 'the grand jury testimony would constitute only a fraction of the evidence amassed by federal authorities.'
But back to that pixie dust. That's the story here. Every single thing Trump has done for 10 years—every outrage against decency, every crime, every incitement to violence, all the rest—have been justified in MAGA world because Trump was doing all these things for them.
And he was supposed to blow the lid off this whole Epstein thing for them, too. Instead, he's covering up for himself. The order to Bondi about the grand jury material just looks like the kind of ass-covering bullshit move any politician would make. Members of the r/Conservative subreddit on Friday morning were definitely not appeased.
Most of MAGA will continue to believe. Some people will need a photograph of Trump in flagrante delicto with a 12-year-old before they reconsider. And even then, they may insist the photo is fake.
But others are already starting to question the whole enterprise. If Trump loses just 15 percent of his hard-core supporters, that's huge; electorally, it's potentially decisive. If we put his hard-shell supporters at 30 or 35 percent of the country, well, 15 percent of that is 4 or 5 percent. In a country this narrowly divided, that's a lot to lose—a lot of midterm voters who decide the hell with it, I'm staying home.
And finally, let's not forget what this is about. Epstein did literally the sickest things a human being can do. Even if Trump didn't do them, if he was that close to Epstein for that long, there's roughly zero chance he didn't know something. Is that what supposed Christians want in a president of the United States? Some of them are already wondering. As other shoes drop, more will.
This article first appeared in Fighting Words, a weekly TNR newsletter authored by editor Michael Tomasky. Sign up here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
11 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump to sign order pushing cities and states to remove homeless people from streets
Amid record high homelessness, Trump wants to move homeless people from the streets and into treatment centers. WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump is set to take executive action that looks to make it easier for cities and states to remove homeless people from the streets. Under an executive order Trump is prepared to sign on July 24, the president will direct Attorney General Pam Bondi to "reverse judicial precedents and end consent decrees" that limit local and state governments' ability to move homeless people from streets and encampments into treatment centers, according to a White House summary of the order reviewed by USA TODAY. Trump's signature will redirect federal funds to ensure the homeless people impacted are transferred to rehabilitation, treatment and other facilities, the White House said, though it was not immediately clear how much money would be allocated. More: In major decision, Supreme Court allows cities to ban homeless camps The order, which the White House has dubbed "Ending Vagrancy and Restoring Order," further requires Bondi to work with the secretaries of Health and Human Services, Housing and Urban Development and Transportation to prioritize federal grants to states and cities that "enforce prohibitions on open illicit drug use, urban camping and loitering, and urban squatting, and track the location of sex offenders." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, in a statement to USA TODAY, said Trump is "delivering on his commitment to Make America Safe Again and end homelessness across America." "By removing vagrant criminals from our streets and redirecting resources toward substance abuse programs, the Trump Administration will ensure that Americans feel safe in their own communities and that individuals suffering from addiction or mental health struggles are able to get the help they need," Leavitt said. More: The average American is closer to being homeless than being Elon Musk Trump's action follows major Supreme Court decision on homeless camps Trump's action comes after the Supreme Court ruled in June that that people without homes can be arrested and fined for sleeping in public spaces, overturning a lower court's ruling that enforcing camping bans when shelter is lacking is cruel and unusual punishment. The 6-3 decision, split among ideological lines in the conservative-majority court, upheld a ban in Grant Pass, Oregon, prohibiting homeless residents from sleeping outdoors. Homeless residents of the southern Oregon city of 38,000 face fines starting at $250 and jail time for repeat offenses. More: Homelessness rates jumped by double digits in 2024 as Americans battled to afford housing Across the U.S., more than 771,800 people lived without housing in 2024, according to a HUD count taken annually on a single night in January. It was the highest tally ever recorded, a 18.1% jump than in 2023, when officials counted about 650,000 people living in homeless shelters or in parks and on streets. Many cities have struggled to build more affordable housing in recent years, while some communities have pushed for harsher laws banning tents and sleeping in public spaces. More: The homeless population is increasing. Will Trump's second term make it worse? Trump has often expressed his distaste of homeless camps, singling out the removal of encampments on parks and federal land in Washington as a priority. Trump, in a 2023 campaign video, said: "We will use every tool, lever, and authority to get the homeless off our streets. We want to take care of them, but they have to be off our streets' Others items in Trump's order include language that seeks to ensure that grants intended for substance use disorder prevention and recovery don't fund drug injection sites or illicit drug use. The White House said the order also prohibits convicted sex offenders who receive homeless assistance from being housed with children and supports new homeless programs to exclusively house women and children. Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.
San Francisco Chronicle
11 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump's settlement with Columbia could become a model for his campaign to reshape higher education
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration's milestone settlement with Columbia promises to bring stability to a university in crisis. It also delivers a crucial win to President Donald Trump in his campaign to reshape higher education. And at colleges around the country, the deal clarifies the stakes for anyone weighing whether to fight the administration's demands or concede. Columbia agreed Wednesday to pay more than $220 million to the federal government to restore federal research money that was canceled in the name of combating antisemitism on campus. That decision offers a contrast to the path taken by Harvard University, which has lost billions of dollars in government funding as its legal battle escalates with no end in sight. Yet the Columbia deal also raises questions about university independence as the school submits to closer federal oversight. No sooner had Trump announced the deal than he sent a warning: Numerous other universities, he said, 'are upcoming.' The deal is the first to settle a federal investigation into allegations of campus antisemitism since Trump returned to office. It's also the first agreement with a university touching on so many elements of the president's agenda, including diversity, equity and inclusion programs and admissions to women's sports and campus protests. Columbia agreed to some provisions similar to those that Harvard rejected and called a dangerous precedent. The settlement requires the hiring of new faculty in Jewish studies and a review of academics to ensure 'balance.' Additionally, Columbia will be placed under the watch of an independent monitor and ordered to disclose hiring, admission and discipline data to be audited for compliance. In what Columbia described as a victory for university autonomy, the agreement includes a clause saying the government has no authority to dictate hiring, admissions decisions or the content of academic speech. Acting University President Claire Shipman said it was 'carefully crafted to protect the values that define us' while restoring the university's federal research funding. Where some see pragmatism, others see capitulation Some at Columbia called it the best feasible outcome. Some called it capitulation. Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., a Columbia graduate whose district includes the Manhattan campus, called it a 'cowardly' agreement that won't improve the campus. Columbia has effectively waved "the white flag of surrender in its battle at the heart of the Trump Administration's war on higher education and academic freedom,' Nadler said. Columbia had been threatened with the potential loss of billions of dollars in government support, including more than $400 million in research grants canceled earlier this year. David Pozen, a law professor at Columbia, said the settlement raises legal questions about Trump's strategy of regulation by dealmaking. Instead of applying a single standard across all of higher education, Pozen said, Trump is relying on one-off deals with individual universities as a condition to regain federal funding. It mirrors his hardball approach with trade partners and prominent law firms. 'In short, the agreement gives legal form to an extortion scheme,' he said. Lawrence Summers, a former Treasury secretary and former president of Harvard, called the settlement an 'excellent template' for agreements with Harvard and other universities. He said it preserves Columbia's independence while addressing antisemitism and renewing a focus on merit. 'This may be the best day higher education has had in the last year,' Summers wrote on the social media platform X. Dozens of colleges are facing federal investigations With the deal, Trump has new momentum in his expanding campaign to bring the nation's universities in line with his vision. Dozens of campuses are under federal investigation for allegations related to antisemitism, DEI and transgender athletes in women's sports. Trump has saved his strongest rebuke for elite private universities, yet his administration has also recently turned attention to big public universities including George Mason University. Among Trump's backers, the Columbia agreement is seen as a first step to counteract the liberal bias they say has permeated college campuses. Education Secretary Linda McMahon called Columbia's reforms a roadmap for universities looking to regain public trust. 'I believe they will ripple across the higher education sector and change the course of campus culture for years to come,' McMahon said in a statement. The settlement follows smaller wins for the administration, including a recent deal with the University of Pennsylvania over transgender swimmer Lia Thomas. Penn agreed to modify school records held by Thomas and to apologize to female athletes 'disadvantaged' by Thomas' participation. Just days earlier, the president of the University of Virginia agreed to resign amid a Justice Department investigation over DEI policies. Dozens of university presidents have rallied behind Harvard in its fight against the Trump administration, seeing their own independence jeopardized by the government's sanctions against the Ivy League school. Harvard, the nation's oldest and wealthiest university, is often seen as a bellwether for other institutions, and some regard it as the best hope to repel the Trump administration's pressure campaign. Now even more rides on Harvard's case. Earlier this month, Trump said a deal with Harvard appeared imminent, only to lash out at the university this week following a court hearing in one of Harvard's legal battles. 'A big part of it is going to be how much Harvard gets in the future,' Trump told reporters this week. 'And they're not going to get very much.' Even before Trump took office, more universities had been pulling back on DEI and taking other steps to backtrack on what some see as a leftward political drift. Yet if the Columbia agreement becomes a model, it could force an even deeper reckoning. The agreement requires full compliance with the administration's interpretation of Title IX, the federal law barring sex discrimination in education. Trump officials have used the law to force the removal of transgender athletes from women's sports. The deal also requires regular reports to ensure Columbia does not 'promote unlawful DEI goals.' On admissions, the settlement pushes Columbia to limit the consideration of race even beyond the Supreme Court's 2023 decision ending affirmative action. That decision left open the possibility that universities could consider an applicant's discussion of how their race affected their life, including in college application essays. The Columbia deal appears to bar such considerations. It also requires Columbia to heighten scrutiny of international students and ask questions about their reasons for wanting to study in the United States. It orders the school to take steps to 'decrease financial independence' on international students. Columbia has one of the largest international student populations in the nation, making up about 40% of its enrollment. How much Columbia ceded in exchange may not be clear for years. There's also no guarantee that the school is fully in the clear — the agreement leaves open the possibility of future 'compliance reviews, investigations, defunding or litigation' by the government. Still, Trump commended the university for doing 'what is right.' 'I look forward to watching them have a great future in our Country, maybe greater than ever before!' he said on his social media platform. ___
The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump loses favor with independents, approval hits 37 percent: Gallup
President Trump's approval rating dropped to its lowest level of his second term, a shift fueled by a decline in support among independents, according to a new survey. The latest Gallup poll found 37 percent of U.S. adults say they approve of the president's performance in office — down from 40 percent in June, 43 percent in May and 44 percent in April. Trump's overall approval rating is also down 10 points since taking office in January, when 47 percent approved of his handling of the job. The decline in job approval rating is most acute among independents — 29 percent of whom say they approve of Trump's handling of the job in the latest survey. That's down 7 points since June and down 17 points since January, the survey revealed. Trump began his term with 46 percent approval among independents, but that dropped to the mid 30s for the past several months, before dipping into the high 20s in the July poll. Among Republicans, 89 percent approve of the president's handling of the presidency, a level that has remained largely consistent since his return to the Oval Office. Similarly, Democrats' approval of Trump's presidency so far has hovered in the low-single digits since January, with just 2 percent approving in the latest survey. Trump's favorability mirrors trends seen in his approval ratings. Among adults, 41 percent hold a favorable view of the president — down from 48 percent in January, the poll shows. Independents view Trump far less favorably than they did six months ago — with 34 percent holding a favorable view today, down from 47 percent in January, according to Gallup. The latest survey began shortly after the president signed into law his massive tax and spending bill, which contains a slew of the president's domestic policy priorities. The survey also overlapped with the growing frustration among Republicans over the government's handling of files related to the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The Justice Department released a memo on July 7 — the same day the poll launched — concluding there was no evidence Epstein kept a 'client list' and that officials would not pursue additional charges or disclose additional documents in the case. The Gallup survey was conducted July 7-21 featuring 1,002 adults and has a margin of error of 4 percentage points.
