logo
Library of Congress blames "coding error" for missing sections of online Constitution

Library of Congress blames "coding error" for missing sections of online Constitution

Axios5 days ago
The Library of Congress on Wednesday pointed to an unspecified "coding error" that led to key parts of the U.S. Constitution being deleted from the Constitution Annotated website.
Why it matters: The missing sections included foundational provisions, such as the right to habeas corpus — which protects people from unlawful detention — and the foreign emoluments clause.
Those constitutional principles have risen to the forefront of political and legal debate amid the president's immigration crackdown and foreign dealings.
As of Wednesday afternoon, most of Article I Section 8 had been restored, but Sections 9 and 10 appeared to still be missing.
Driving the news: As highlighted by tech news site TechCrunch, an archived version of the website shows that a chunk of Article I Section 8 was cut, in addition to the entirety of Sections 9 and 10 of Article I.
According to captures from the Wayback Machine, those sections were present as recently as mid-July.
What they're saying: " It has been brought to our attention that some sections of Article 1 are missing from the Constitution Annotated ...website," the Library of Congress said in a statement posted to social media. "We've learned that this is due to a coding error."
A banner across the top of the site read, "The Constitution Annotated website is currently experiencing data issues. We are working to resolve this issue and regret the inconvenience."
Links for certain provisions included in those sections, such as Section 9's text on ex post facto laws, directed to an error page that read "Page Not Found" with a portrait of George Washington. That page appears to have since been restored.
The Library of Congress did not immediately respond to Axios' request for further information.
Context: The text of Article I Section 8, which outlines congressional powers, trailed off after enumerating Congress' power to "To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years."
Rather than continuing to the next line, "To provide and maintain a Navy;" the section ended abruptly on a semicolon.
The Militia Clauses, among others that follow in Section 8, were also missing as of early Wednesday afternoon.
Zoom out: Article I Section 9, which places limits on congressional power, and Section 10, which covers powers denied to the states, had also vanished.
One critical clause of Section 9 is the right of habeas corpus, which reads, "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."
Stephen Miller, the president's top policy adviser, said in May that the White House was exploring the option of suspending habeas corpus amid its fight against judges curtailing its deportation push.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem botched questions about the legal principle at a Senate hearing in May, falsely asserting habeas corpus gives the president a "constitutional right" to conduct deportations.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hogsett to introduce budget proposal without tax increases
Hogsett to introduce budget proposal without tax increases

Axios

time3 hours ago

  • Axios

Hogsett to introduce budget proposal without tax increases

The City of Indianapolis' budget will grow next year — just not as much as leaders expected before the legislative session. The big picture: Mayor Joe Hogsett will introduce his budget proposal to the City-County Council tonight, and it's expected to include small cuts for most departments, outside of public safety. Catch up quick: Lawmakers passed a property tax overhaul earlier this year that dramatically cut how much cities bring in from that major source of revenue for Indy. The city could raise local income taxes to make up the gap, but Hogsett has said from the outset that he's "not interested" in raising taxes. What they're saying: Dan Parker, Hogsett's chief of staff, told Axios the mayor will introduce a balanced budget with no tax increases. The budget will grow, Parker said, but departments were asked to look for savings so the city could meet the obligations of labor agreements made last year — before the property tax changes. The city will also start "laying the foundation" to capture the $50 million in road funding that lawmakers paved the way for in 2027, so long as the city can match it, Parker said. The other side: Minority Leader Michael-Paul Hart said he'll advocate to protect the council budget from any cuts. The council budget is $3.5 million — a drop in the bucket of the city's $1.5 billion annual budget. In his blog, Hart said that while the city "still faces serious decisions about how to balance its books," the council is committed to passing a balanced budget. Reality check: Despite opposition from the Republican caucus and three Democrats last year, Hogsett passed the budget he wanted — with new investments in pedestrian safety and raises for city employees. Yes, but: Tension between Hogsett and the council has only grown since then as the investigation into his handling of sexual harassment allegations against his former deputy, Thomas Cook, uncovered text messages between Hogsett and several young women that some councilors have called inappropriate. Hogsett told Axios he developed a "casual, conversational" style of communicating with those he worked closely with but did not mean to make anyone uncomfortable. At least four councilors have called for Hogsett's resignation — something he's firmly resisted — which could complicate budget negotiations.

The Harvard-Trained Lawyer Behind Trump's Fight Against Top Universities
The Harvard-Trained Lawyer Behind Trump's Fight Against Top Universities

New York Times

time4 hours ago

  • New York Times

The Harvard-Trained Lawyer Behind Trump's Fight Against Top Universities

When President Trump wants to rattle academia, he turns to his deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller. And then Mr. Miller turns to May Mailman. Ms. Mailman, a 37-year-old Harvard-trained lawyer, is the most important, least-known person behind the administration's relentless pursuit of the nation's premier universities. The extraordinary effort has found seemingly endless ways to pressure schools into submission, including federal funding, student visas and civil rights investigations. Her hand in deploying these levers of power was evident from the beginning of Mr. Trump's second term. As his ambitions around reshaping higher education expanded, so did her remit. She is credited as an animating force behind a strategy that has intimidated independent institutions and undercut years of medical and scientific research. The policies Ms. Mailman helped devise — and is now leveraging as she leads the White House's negotiations with colleges — have sent shock waves through higher education, dividing faculty and alarming some students who see an effort to silence dissent. The aggressive tactics could have far-reaching implications for the future of academic freedom, the admissions practices at the most competitive colleges and the global reputations for some of the crown jewels of the nation's university system. So far, only Harvard has been willing to fight back in court, a sign of the strength of the federal government's negotiating position. 'There are a lot of good ideas floating around this building, but somebody has to capture those ideas, make sure that the right people are involved and that there is a process to put them into action,' Ms. Mailman said in a recent interview at the White House. 'So I'm the catcher of floating ideas.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store