logo
How the rise of dupes and store brands could change the way you shop

How the rise of dupes and store brands could change the way you shop

Yahoo24-07-2025
Adrianna Rinaldi has enough high-quality leggings to last a week of remote work in New York without having to do laundry - and it didn't cost her a small fortune.
Instead of continuing to spend up to $118 for one pair from Lululemon, she now buys a version that is a third of the price. CRZ Yoga has built a cult following for its near-perfect dupe - short for duplicate - of Lululemon leggings. 'The quality is just the same,' said Rinaldi, 34. 'There's more acceptance around not going for the brand name.'
Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post.
From copycat brands to store-label groceries, budget alternatives to everyday essentials and indulgences are having a moment. Rather than the cheap knockoffs of old, they often come close to their brand equivalent in quality. More Americans are prioritizing price and value in lieu of national brand loyalty, according to spending data and company earnings calls - while influencers are also embracing the change.
'The dupe feels like you've cheated or one-upped the system … especially in a time of economic uncertainty,' said Lauren Beitelspacher, a professor of marketing at Babson College in Wellesley, Massachusetts.
Brands and retailers are hustling to meet the moment as persistently high grocery prices, increasing personal debt levels and tariff uncertainty weigh heavily on consumers, creating a sense of urgency to save. Albertsons CEO Susan Morris told investors last week in its first quarter earnings call that the grocery retailer is 'leaning heavily into own brands,' looking to meet customer demand for more options at lower prices. This expansion could also be a 'great solution for our customer' when tariffs push up grocery prices, she said.
Even mid- to high-income consumers are changing how they spend, despite 'still doing pretty well' on paper, said Chedly Louis, a retail analyst and vice president at Moody's. They are trading down to retailers such as Walmart, Dollar General and Dollar Tree, which historically serve low- to mid-income consumers. And the increasing popularity of store brands signals 'higher caution from the consumer,' she said.
The same is true in some discretionary categories, where there are more options for quality products at attainable prices.
'People may not feel so beholden to a single brand - rather it's more about an overall aesthetic or niche that they want to express,' Jenna Drenten, a marketing professor specializing in digital consumer culture at Loyola University Chicago, wrote in an email. 'For every single one of the brand name 'must-haves', there are suggestions for the cheaper (but still good) version to buy instead.'
- - -
The private-label boom
The trend is most evident in the grocery aisles, said Sally Lyons Wyatt, of the market research firm Circana. Large supermarket chains, big-box stores and value retailers have been leaning into private labels, which have higher margins than name brands, for decades. But they doubled down in 2022 as prices surged, noted Lyon Wyatt, the company's senior adviser on global packaged goods and the food service industry.
By 2024, sales on private-label food and nonfood grocery products hit an all-time high of $270.6 billion, a 4 percent increase over 2023, according to a report from Circana and the Private Label Manufacturers Association. That is about a fifth of total sales last year. National brands climbed 1 percent.
'The investments have certainly been worth it for grocers,' said Neil Saunders, a managing director at retail analytics firm GlobalData. 'They'll probably push on it even harder.'
Canned food company Del Monte, which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy earlier this month, and General Mills, the maker of Cheerios and Cinnamon Toast Crunch, have pointed to private labels as being increasingly tough competition. In a 2024 Ipsos poll, a third of respondents said most or all of their groceries within the previous week were store brands, while only 24 percent said the same of national brands. (Forty-one percent responded that the share was half and half.)
These products often look strikingly similar to their national-brand equivalent, Beitelspacher said, 'to signal to the customer that they're the same quality.'
Customers are also more clued in, with a better understanding that store brand products are sometimes manufactured in the same facility as the national brand, according to Saunders.
Stephanie Olson, 31, said it wasn't until she lost her job during the coronavirus pandemic that she started planning her grocery lists around sales and coupons. Olson said she shops at Kroger in part because she lives in its hometown of Cincinnati, and because the store brands often have the best discounts and coupons, making the price gap against national brands even wider.
'They definitely make it enticing to buy their brand,' said Olson, who works in talent acquisition.
In the past few years, retailers not only announced new private-label lines, but also improved branding, quality and selection, Saunders said. Target invested in its organic line Good and Gather and its indulgent offerings from Favorite Day. Albertsons' line of sweets - Overjoyed - is reminiscent of Target's, using brightly colored packaging and whimsical font.
Meanwhile, Walmart has seen success with Bettergoods, which features organic and 'healthier' products that have been a draw for higher-income customers. Amazon turned to the other end of the spectrum, announcing Amazon Saver, a no-frills line of grocery staples. (Amazon founder Jeff Bezos owns The Washington Post.)
Then there are the wholesale chains, most notably Costco and its Kirkland Signature brand, which have long dominated in the space, Lyons Wyatt said. The brand, which includes apparel, alcohol and groceries, accounted for 23 percent of Costco's revenue last year, generating $56 billion, according to the PLMA report. Those sales alone exceed those of Best Buy, Coca-Cola and Dollar General.
Newer competitors are the Germany-based value retailers Aldi and Lidl, which have been rapidly expanding in the U.S. Aldi opened 120 new U.S. stores last year and its U.S. sales grew 14 percent over 2023, reaching $54 billion, according to the National Retail Federation. One quarter of U.S. households now shop at Aldi, Dave Rinaldo, then the president of Aldi USA, said at a PLMA conference.
Jack Salzman, 29, doesn't mind walking a bit farther outside his neighborhood in Chicago to go to Aldi because his money 'goes a lot further,' the freelance TV and film production assistant said. 'I can spend under $100 and have enough stuff for a full week, and then some, at Aldi.' Plus, he often can't taste the difference between the store brand versus the national brand.
Sydney Patterson, 30, feels similarly about over-the-counter medication. Growing up, she was used to seeing Tylenol, Advil and Aleve in her medicine cabinet. Now she thinks twice before reaching for those familiar brands, looking instead to the 'Target version that's $5 cheaper,' the fundraising consultant in Dallas said.
- - -
Discretionary dupes
While it's true that aspirational brands still hold weight in the fashion and beauty space, consumers are more open minded about trying cheaper alternatives, said Drenten, of Loyola University Chicago.
Influencers were the catalyst, she added, because by speaking openly and enthusiastically about a dupe, it gives permission to followers to do the same - and even brag about it.
Brands like Quince, E.L.F. Beauty, Few Moda and Dossier have built their customer base by explicitly duping expensive, popular products. Dossier, which went viral on TikTok for its 'impression perfumes' of designer brands, recently opened its first store in New York City. Instead of spending $335 on Maison Francis Kurkdjian's Baccarat Rouge 540, Dossier has its own version called Amber Saffron for $49.
Sales of fragrance dupe brands surged 103 percent in mid-June compared to the same period last year, according to NielsenIQ. Cosmetic dupe sales increased almost 10 percent and facial skin dupe brands were up about 27 percent.
Consumers are also allocating more of their spending to cheaper goods over expensive ones, according to Adobe Analytics, which tracked sales from June 2024 to June 2025. In apparel, the share of the cheapest goods increased about 9 percent, while the share of most expensive goods decreased by 5.7 percent.
Quince, which sells apparel, accessories, suitcases, homeware and kitchenware, is more reminiscent of a private label model, in which its products are made and sold by the factories making them. While its website doesn't advertise the brand it's copying, Quince has made the comparison in marketing texts: 'Our answer to the $5K Bottega bag is here,' one text read. 'Same luxe craftsmanship. Same premium handwoven Italian leather.' Quince's version costs $130.
Few Moda, a membership-model fashion website, asserts that its products are 'made by the same manufacturers as the leading brands you know and love, at cost' and that it bypasses 'the middlemen and the markups.' Most items on the website note which pricey brand's manufacturer it shares, such as that of Staud, Theory and Ted Baker.
Then there is Amazon, where many fashion and accessory sellers dupe trends - as CRZ Yoga does. Rinaldi, who works in ad tech in New York, said she and her friends are often sharing and showing off their finds.
'I just complimented my friend's outfit and … 50 percent of what she was wearing was from Amazon,' she said. 'Now, it's socially acceptable.'
Related Content
'Buckingham Nicks,' the missing link of the Fleetwood Mac saga, is back
Family adopts a shelter dog — then learns he's the father of their late dog
Can the Fed stay independent? Trump-era adviser may put it to the test.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The numbers in Trump's EU trade deal are a joke
The numbers in Trump's EU trade deal are a joke

The Hill

time18 minutes ago

  • The Hill

The numbers in Trump's EU trade deal are a joke

President Trump announced a trade deal with the European Union last month, proclaiming a 'generational modernization of the transatlantic alliance' that will 'provide Americans with unprecedented levels of market access' and is 'yet another agreement that positions the United States as the world's preeminent destination for investment, innovation, and advanced manufacturing.' The EU has been criticized heavily for folding to Trump. However, after many years of studying, practicing and teaching negotiations, I am not nearly so critical of the European strategy. Negotiating with Trump inevitably leads to three possible tactics: ignoring, retaliating or capitulating. Everyone goes for one or more of these tactics. But most have ended up at the last one, capitulating. The U.K. (like Columbia University, and perhaps soon Harvard) was much derided when it pioneered the capitulation strategy in May. But it is not necessarily a bad strategy when confronted by Trump. Alan Beattie of the Financial Times perceptively notes that 'Trump likes deals that aren't worth the handshake they're written on.' 'Roll with the punch,' he suggests, 'get the lowest baseline tariff you can, offer him some concessions with good optics but low impact, talk up the importance of the deal for the benefit of his ego and hope he moves on.' And so the EU has done. The U.S.-EU trade 'agreement' is apocryphal. Others have called it delusional. It is both — and thus important to understand. First, some context. In 2015, roughly the end of the Bretton Woods era for trade, the average weighted U.S. tariff against all goods was about 1.7 percent. Against EU goods it was 1.47 percent, versus 1.35 percent on U.S. goods into the EU. America currently imports more than $605 billion a year in goods from the EU. Trump's 'biggest deal ever made,' with a few exceptions, 'reduces' tariffs to 15 percent (steel and aluminum remain at 50 percent). However, it is not technically a deal. It is filled with numerous ' commitments ' such as 'work to address' and 'intend to work together,' or 'intend to address' and, curiously, 'take complementary actions to address.' This is the type of language used in a preliminary phase of a framework agreement, which would be the precursor to a serious trade negotiation. The White House is claiming that, first, that the EU will invest $600 billion directly in the U.S. during Trump's term (three times the rate it has invested in the past). This is, if not delusional, at least fantastical. The second concrete claim by the White House is that 'the EU will double down on America as the Energy Superpower by purchasing $750 billion of U.S. energy exports through 2028.' As Clyde Russell shows clearly in Reuters, these numbers simply do not make sense. But then, they need not. They serve their performative purpose well enough. Chalk up a specious victory and move on. Consider that in 2024, the EU imported 573 million barrels of crude oil from the U.S., which is valued currently at about $40.1 billion. The EU imported U.S. liquified natural gas in 2024 worth about $21.78 billion and bought about $2.67 billion in U.S. coal. So EU energy imports (at $64.55 billion) are about 26 percent of the $250 billion the EU is supposed to spend on American energy each year under the framework agreement. If the EU reaches the $250 billion a year goal, U.S. imports would account for 85 percent of its total spending on those energy commodities. While this appears to be a plus for U.S. producers, it would massively disrupt global energy markets (not to mention violate many long-term supply contracts). But more startling, it would exceed total current U.S. exports. Putting together the value of U.S. exports for all three energy commodities totals $165.8 billion, Russell calculates, 'meaning that even if the EU bought the entire volume it would still fall well short of the $250 billion.' Including nuclear adds a few billion dollars at best. Expanding to refined products, such as diesel? Perhaps another $10 billion. So the EU's commitment to buy $250 billion worth of American energy is entirely unrealistic and unachievable. 'The smart people in the room must know this,' Russell writes, so 'why agree to what is obviously a ridiculous number?' The only answer is the obvious one, and the most troubling. Substance doesn't matter, only performance. Where businesses must operate on substance and factual reality, politicians operate increasingly on attention-gaining performance. This may explain why Trump has done so poorly in business and so well in politics (and in the businesses he is generating based on politics). So, despite substantive criticisms of the EU team, they in fact made a perfectly understandable agreement. Specifically, when only attention matters and the substance of the deal is a mere side story of the performance, one can agree to almost anything. In this case, the more fantastical the better. Why didn't EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen promise $900 billion? Trump would be even happier and Europe even less likely to uphold the 'agreement.' Smile, suck-up, sign, shrug and move on. The real negotiation is somewhere down the road; perhaps tomorrow afternoon. Well, maybe. Trump's authority even to make such a deal is still being litigated. The one unavoidable fact is that America has abandoned the rules-based trading system it carefully built over three-quarters of a century. It is a brave new world of U.S. trade 'agreements' based on rapid-fire, plainly meaningless commitments — but what a performance! Robert A. Rogowsky is professor of trade and diplomacy at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies and adjunct professor at Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service. He is a former chief economist and director of operations at the U.S. International Trade Commission.

Lululemon Releases Split Shift Running Shoe With ‘Responsive' Feel
Lululemon Releases Split Shift Running Shoe With ‘Responsive' Feel

Forbes

time32 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Lululemon Releases Split Shift Running Shoe With ‘Responsive' Feel

Lululemon's footwear category has a new silhouette. That silhouette, the Split Shift, comes with a fresh underfoot foam. The Aug. 5 launch of the Split Shift running shoe features the brand's new proprietary ShiftFoam cushioning, meant to provide a responsive, springy feel, as tested during the brand's six-day ultramarathon in 2024. George Robusti, Lululemon vice president of footwear design, tells me the ShfitFoam is the brand's lightest and most responsive. The proprietary blend is designed to return more energy to the runner than the foam used in the brand's popular Beyondfeel shoe. 'We were impressed with the athletes' responses,' he says about the 2,880 miles run during Further, a six-day ultramarathon. 'This foam offered more of a springy and energized feeling. And their real-world validation was essential in refining the underfoot experience for the final product.' Lululemon's footwear category continues to grow since the original launch in 2022. Now the brand has its Beyondfeel running shoe, a Wildfeel trail runner that launched earlier this year, the trainer styles of Chargefeel and Strongfeel and the Cityverse casual shoe. Building on the running lineup was a natural evolution. 'We saw an opportunity to expand our running assortment with a shoe that delivers a different type of experience, one that's light, energetic and springy, and gives runners more options to choose from,' Robusti says. 'Split Shift is built for runners who want a little more pop in their stride, whether they're heading out for an easy run or looking to pick up the pace. It brings a new feel state to the mix and complements the smoother, more relaxed ride of the Beyondfeel.' To differentiate between the foam used in the Beyondfeel, Lululemon introduced the new foam on a rocker-style footbed to encourage heel-to-toe transition. Robusti says the shape helps 'gently roll the runner forward, supporting a smooth transition.' The mesh upper is meant to improve airflow while providing structure, and the gusseted tongue is designed for fit and feel. 'Together,' he says, 'these elements help create that effortless, energized sensation that defines the Split Shift.' Robusti says choosing between the Lululemon lineup for runners comes down to feel. 'Split Shift is for the runner who wants that energized, more responsive ride,' he says, 'someone looking for a shoe they can take on everyday runs but also turn to when picking up the pace for moderate or tempo efforts. Beyondfeel is all about smoothness and ease. It's a more relaxed ride, perfect for recovery days or when you just want to get out and log steady miles.' MORE: Lululemon's Growth In Tennis: A Collaboration With Leylah Fernandez Lululemon started in shoes with women's-specific models by creating different lasts and performance attributes for female runners. Creating a lineup with men's-specific lasts and attributes was added to the mix later. While there are similarities in how Lululemon builds both the men's and women's shoes, it's not the exact same across models and each has its own design intent. The Split Shift features differing lasts for each—the men's size 9 is 9.1 ounces with a 7mm heel-to-toe drop, while the women's size 8 is 7.8 ounces with the same 7mm heel-to-doe drop—and each features flex grooves in the outsole for designed to mirror either a male's natural foot strike or a female's foot strike. The women's model also includes additional arch reinforcements. Lululemon isn't taking anything off the table for future expansion of the running lineup, with Robusti saying they are constantly looking at how to solve athletic and lifestyle footwear needs. 'This can range,' he says, 'from refining and evolving our existing models or introducing completely new solutions.'

70% of Americans Don't Think They'll Reach $1 Million for Retirement: 8 Things They Can Do Now
70% of Americans Don't Think They'll Reach $1 Million for Retirement: 8 Things They Can Do Now

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

70% of Americans Don't Think They'll Reach $1 Million for Retirement: 8 Things They Can Do Now

Hitting $1 million for retirement might feel out of reach, and most Americans agree. In fact, 70% say they don't think they'll ever get there. Learn More: Try This: But with the right steps now, building a more secure financial future is still possible. How People Feel About Saving for Retirement According to CNBC, a survey that was conducted by Schroders, an investment management company, shows that Americans who have an employer-sponsored retirement plan feel that they will need to have at least $1.28 million put aside for retirement. Only 30% of workers with a retirement plan will expect to have $1 million saved, 48% will possibly have $500,000 and only 26% think they will have $250,000 saved. Other studies find that 68% of Americans feel that they could work till they retire and still not have enough money for retirement. With bills, loans and other expenses that are unexpected, it may be tempting for some individuals to want to use funds that they would have put aside for retirement to help pay off debt. This may leave most Americans with a feeling of doubt about the actual ability to have enough money saved for retirement. Read Next: Ways To Boost Retirement Savings Americans need not despair because there are some easy ways to help build retirement savings. After enrolling in an employer's retirement savings plan, check whether it allows pre-tax contributions. These reduce taxable income by deducting money before federal income taxes are calculated. For instance, someone in the 12% tax bracket who sets aside $100 each pay period would see take-home pay reduced by about $88, plus any required Medicare, Social Security and state and local taxes, according to Merrill. Check whether an employer offers a 401(k) plan with contribution matching, and be sure to contribute enough to receive the full match. For example, if the employer matches 50% contributions up to 5% of an employee's salary, and the annual salary is $50,000 with a $2,500 contribution, the employer would add $1,250. If age 50 or older, look into catch-up contributions to IRA or 401(k) plans since yearly contributions are limited if under the age of 50. Consider opening a traditional IRA or a Roth IRA. With a traditional IRA, contributions may be tax deductible and are made pre-tax, which means potential investment earnings will be able to grow without taxes until withdrawals are made during retirement. With a Roth IRA, contributions are made after taxes and withdrawals will be free of federal taxes after age 59-1/2. Think about putting 1% or 2% of salary towards retirement savings, and then each year, raise the amount by 1% or 2% more, per This Is Pretirement. Any time extra money like a bonus or a raise happens, put at least half of the amount towards retirement. Contemplate delaying retirement as far as possible. Every year retirement is delayed before the age of 70 will increase the monthly benefits available. Reflect on possibly having a side job or hobby as a way to make extra money to save for retirement, according to This Is Pretirement. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 6 Popular SUVs That Aren't Worth the Cost -- and 6 Affordable Alternatives 8 Common Mistakes Retirees Make With Their Social Security Checks This article originally appeared on 70% of Americans Don't Think They'll Reach $1 Million for Retirement: 8 Things They Can Do Now Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store