From Back Office To Brain Trust: Why GCCs Need To Become AI Innovation Engines
India's global capability centers (GCCs) are light years from where they started life as low-cost delivery centers. They now occupy a position of leadership at the intersection of enterprise retransformation and technological rebirth. As the era of AI-born business speeds up, GCCs come to a critical juncture: Will they drive change to intelligence-driven innovation or be left in the dust?
In order to survive this new world, GCCs will have to transform from execution machines to AI-fueled centers of innovation. The potential is not abstract—it's already taking shape, and India is particularly well-placed to drive it.
India's Strategic Advantage: Talent With Traction
India's advantage isn't in quantities, but in quality. Indian GCCs now boast more than 160,000 product professionals. No longer are they passive appendages to global operations but serve as active co-creators of value.
For example, look at RapidAI: It co-produced real-time stroke care technology from its India center. Or consider Mercari India, which was instrumental in pioneering mobile payments and digital asset platforms. These instances show a broader movement: India is no longer implementing innovation—it is pioneering it.
Four Imperatives To Redefine GCCs
To maximize AI, GCCs need to reinvent their setup, strategy and capabilities. Here's how the most advanced centers are redirecting:
1. Build capability tracks, not career rracks. Rather than vertical hierarchies, GCCs are enabling cross-disciplinary development in AI engineering, platform design and product strategy, fostering innovation through integrated teams.
2. Co-create IP with business units. GCCs are putting engineers and product leaders in business pods together to co-design roadmaps—not just implement them. This combination brings velocity, pertinence and ingenuity.
3. Institutionalize AI-first centers of excellence. At the forefront of GCCs are codifying their innovation frameworks with results-driven centers of excellence (CoEs) in generative AI, intelligent automation and cyber resilience. These are not think tanks—these are creators of measurable value.
4. Align KPIs with outcomes, not outputs. Legacy delivery metrics are being replaced by impact-based KPIs—like AI model deployment rate, product velocity and innovation cycles with business outcomes.
The AI-First Operating Playbook
GCCs at the forefront of this transformation are adopting a systematic, AI-native model for transformation that entails:
• AI-Native Development Environments: Integration of AI across all phases of product delivery from development to test and deployment speeds up and streamlines.
• Data As A Product: GCCs are shifting focus from data management to generating monetizable insights-as-a-service through strong governance.
• Adaptive Applications: Static platforms are giving way to smart systems that tailor experiences and adapt based on user behavior. Services-as-software are being redesigned as modular, reusable AI building blocks that scale effectively across functions.
• Responsible AI Governance: Ethical AI practices, performance dashboards and business-aligned impact metrics are now integrated into GCC operating frameworks from the ground up.
While GCCs enjoy significant in-house momentum, many struggle at scale with AI solutions. Poor access to nascent technologies, toolchains and industry patterns is a common roadblock. Here's where specialist system integrators (SIs) play key collaborative partners—never to outsource but to speed things up.
A hybrid GCC-SI model can enable businesses to combine profound internal knowledge with external execution speed and expert AI knowledge.
Where GCCs Should Cooperate
To accelerate impact, GCCs need to collaborate with specialist SIs in these strategic domains:
• AI Model Development: For enterprise-level personalization and decision intelligence.
• Cybersecurity And Risk: AI-driven threat monitoring for threats, fraud and compliance.
• Cloud And MLOps: Scalable infrastructure for continuous AI delivery and monitoring.
• Business Process Automation: Intelligent workflows in finance, HR and supply chain.
• Industry-Specific AI Solutions: Industry-specific use cases in BFSI, healthcare, retail and more.
• Data Ethics And Governance: Fairness, explainability and auditability.
• Future-Proofing with Next-Gen AI Readiness: Understanding quantum and edge AI technologies for future-proofing.
A Blueprint For Strategic Co-Ownership
The future will not be for GCCs that are stuck in legacy models or attempt to scale AI alone. It will be for those that assume ownership of AI strategy and governance, with the ability to scale innovation quickly and responsibly with the help of trusted partners.
India's GCCs are poised to lead this transformation, with the market projected to grow from $64.6 billion in FY24 to over $100 billion by FY30. The moment is now to double down on reinvention—because the GCCs that co-create the future will create the enterprises of tomorrow.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Mahindra South Africa doubles footprint with new vehicle assembly site
Mahindra South Africa, part of the Indian conglomerate Mahindra Group, has launched its new vehicle assembly facility in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa Initially announced in October 2024, the plant is situated at the Dube TradePort Special Economic Zone. It will be able to assemble over 1,000 Pik-Up models per month, more than doubling its production capacity. Additionally, the plant also offers the flexibility to accommodate new upcoming car models. The new 14,000sqm facility, located close to its previous site, is both more technically superior and larger. It features advanced quality control systems, expanded production lines, and dedicated customisation zones for customers. Rajesh Gupta, CEO of Mahindra South Africa, stated that the company's original facility 'played a pivotal role' in establishing its local footprint. 'As demand for our locally assembled Pik Up range continued to rise, we needed a facility with the scale, flexibility, and technology to meet future growth,' he added. Sachin Arolkar, Head of International Operations at Mahindra & Mahindra, referred to South Africa as a cornerstone market in Mahindra's international growth strategy. 'This new facility strengthens our ability to serve local customers and also enhances our regional manufacturing capabilities,' he added. eThekwini Mayor Cyril Xaba remarked that the new plant marked a significant milestone for Durban and KwaZulu-Natal. He also appreciated Mahindra's investment decision as it would boost local job creation. "Mahindra South Africa doubles footprint with new vehicle assembly site" was originally created and published by Investment Monitor, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump's economic war on India is a gift to China
President Trump's decision to slap secondary sanctions on India over its imports of Russian oil, while also unleashing a tariff barrage on Indian exports, is more than a trade dispute. It is a self-inflicted wound to America's most vital strategic partnership in Asia, and it comes at a time when China is flexing its military muscle throughout the region. Washington has long courted India as a bulwark against an expansionist China and as a critical pillar of its ' free and open Indo-Pacific ' strategy. Yet Trump's punitive steps against India are eroding the very trust on which strategic alignment rests — to Beijing's delight. The mutual trust painstakingly built over years underpins bilateral cooperation. Once lost, it will be hard to rebuild. Even if the administration eventually reaches a trade deal with India, it may not be able to repair the damage. Targeting India over Russian oil purchases smacks of selective enforcement. The European Union's large imports of Russian energy products, especially liquefied natural gas, have been left untouched. Such European imports not only contribute more to Russia's coffers than India's purchases, but Europe spends more on Russian energy than on assisting Ukraine. Trump has also spared the world's largest buyer of Russian oil and gas: China. But India, the very country Washington has spent years courting as an Asian counterweight, has become the first victim of his secondary sanctions. This suggests Trump's tactics are less about punishing Moscow than about pressuring New Delhi. Russian oil is a pretext to strong-arm India into accepting a Trump-dictated trade agreement, much as he foisted a largely one-sided deal on the European Union. That his tariffs on India have little to do with Russian oil is evident from one telling fact: Indian exports to the U.S. of refined fuels such as gasoline, diesel and jet fuel — increasingly made from Russian crude — remain exempt from his tariffs. Such is the Trumpian logic. He has hit Indian non-energy exports with steep tariffs, but spared booming exports of refined fuels made largely from Russian crude. Trump seems to have no problem with Russian oil — as long as it is refined in India and then pumped into American planes, trucks and cars. Furthermore, given continued U.S. imports of Russian enriched uranium, fertilizers and chemicals, Trump does not seem troubled that his own administration is helping fund Russia's war in Ukraine while still locked in a proxy war with Moscow. In truth, Trump is using New Delhi's Russian oil purchases as a crude bargaining tactic to secure a bilateral trade deal on his terms. India illustrates how the Trump administration has weaponized tariffs not merely to extract trade concessions but also to bind other countries more closely to American strategic and security interests. In seeking to bend India to its will, it has targeted that country's traditionally independent approach to global affairs, including neutrality on conflicts. Indian exports to the U.S. now face a steep 50 percent tariff, signaling the end of Trump's bromance with Prime Minister Narendra Modi. His moves against strategic-partner India are harsher than against China. This marks a dramatic U-turn from his first term, when bilateral relations thrived to the extent that Trump declared at a huge February 2020 rally in Modi's home state of Gujarat, 'America loves India, America respects India, and America will always be faithful and loyal friends to the Indian people.' In Trump's second term, Modi was among the first world leaders to visit the White House, agreeing to fast-track trade negotiations. In July, the Indians believed they had reached an interim deal, awaiting only Trump's approval. But in characteristic fashion, Trump abruptly rejected the accord and embarked on punishing India. New Delhi has publicly criticized the Trump administration's double standards. But it is more concerned about a deeper question: If Washington can so easily turn its coercive tools on a supposed ally, what is to stop it from doing so again? U.S.-India relations have probably plunged to their lowest point in the 21st century, thanks to Trump's economic war and his singling out of India for secondary sanctions. The fallout will extend beyond lost trade. India could respond by doubling down on strategic autonomy — hedging between the U.S., Russia and others — and diversifying its economic and security partnerships. Trump's gamble may wring out trade concessions in the short term, but it risks undermining the security architecture in the Indo-Pacific, where unity among key democracies is the only real check on China's expansionism. America is effectively handing China an opening to court a disillusioned India. New Delhi is already signaling that it has other geopolitical options. Russian President Vladimir Putin is expected to visit India in the coming weeks. In less than three weeks, Modi is scheduled to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit, which Putin will also attend. Moscow is pushing for a revived Russia-India-China grouping. A stable Indo-Pacific order demands more than joint military exercises and communiqués; it requires political will to accommodate each other's core interests. Punishing India in ways that ignore its legitimate security and energy needs sends the opposite message. Ironically, Trump's sanctions-and-tariffs blitz may have done India a favor by exposing the strategic reality of America's unreliability. By presenting the U.S. as a transactional power, Trump has signaled that Washington cannot be counted on to separate short-term commercial considerations from long-term strategic imperatives. Trump's economic coercion risks alienating a vast, still-growing market that U.S. firms see as central to their future growth. India remains the world's fastest-growing major economy, and as many other economies stagnate and populations shrink, it stands out as a rising giant. Sacrificing a linchpin of Indo-Pacific stability for a fleeting win in a tariff war is not tough bargaining. It is strategic recklessness — and a gift to China.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive-India set to allow its private firms to mine and import uranium to help nuclear expansion
By Sarita Chaganti Singh NEW DELHI (Reuters) -India aims to allow private firms to mine, import and process uranium as part of plans to end a decades-old state monopoly over the nuclear sector and bring in billions of dollars to boost the industry, two government sources said. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government plans to expand nuclear power production capacity by 12 times by 2047 and it is also relaxing requirements to allow foreign players to take a minority stake in power plants, Reuters reported in April. If it meets its expansion goal, nuclear will provide 5% of India's total power needs, according to government estimates. Until now, the state has maintained control over the mining, import and processing of uranium fuel because of concerns over the possible misuse of nuclear material, radiation safety and strategic security. It will retain its grip on reprocessing spent uranium fuel and managing plutonium waste, in line with global practice. But to help meet a surge in demand for nuclear fuel as it expands nuclear power production, the government plans to draw up a regulatory framework that would allow private Indian firms to mine, import and process uranium, the two government sources told Reuters. They asked not to be named because the plans are not yet public. The proposed policy, which the sources said was likely to be made public in the current fiscal year, will also permit private players to supply critical control system equipment for nuclear power plants, they said. The Finance Ministry, Department of Atomic Energy and Prime Minister's Office did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment. Outside India, countries including Canada, South Africa and the United States allow private firms to mine and process uranium. DOMESTIC SUPPLY IS NOT ENOUGH India has an estimated 76,000 tonnes of uranium enough to fuel 10,000 megawatts of nuclear power for 30 years, according to government data. But the sources said domestic resources would only be able to meet about 25% of the projected increase. The rest would have to be imported and India would need to increase its processing capacity. In announcing its budget on February 1, the government made public its plans to open up the sector without giving details. Some of India's big conglomerates subsequently began drawing up investment plans. But analysts said amending the legislation could be complex. "It's a major and bold initiative by the Indian Government which is critical for achieving the target," said Charudatta Palekar, independent power sector consultant. "The challenge will be to define quickly the rules of engagement with private sector." New Delhi will have to change five laws, including the ones regulating mining and electricity sectors and India's foreign direct investment policy to enable private participation in many identified activities, the sources said.
