logo
AAC football once again full of great coaches (and Trent Dilfer)

AAC football once again full of great coaches (and Trent Dilfer)

New York Times04-07-2025
Until Saturday Newsletter 🏈 | This is The Athletic's college football newsletter. Sign up here to receive Until Saturday directly in your inbox.
Today in college football news, chickens are brining patriotically.
First, yes, I'm pretending I intentionally scheduled the American Athletic Conference edition of this newsletter's 2025 preview series for the Fourth of July. 🇺🇸 Next, the memory-jogging AAC basics:
In the bigger picture, the AAC remains a transient realm on the fringes of everything, in ways both good and … tolerable. Not a girl, but not yet a woman, in the words of one Mississippian. Just one example: Other than reigning champ Jeff Monken, every head coach who has ever won an AAC title game has soon wound up in a power-conference job.
It often seems like a curse, being the conference long thought of as juuust a step shy of the powers. Schools with more money turn to you first when they need new coaches, and the same goes for big leagues looking to splatter themselves across even more of the map via realignment.
But there's absolutely an upside. The AAC has a place in the pecking order, and it's far from the bottom. I know AAC fans hate seeing their league constantly referred to as if it's just a proving ground for ascendant coaches. Of course it's more than that. It's the conference that revived the Memphis-UAB Battle for the Bones trophy, for one thing. [In the newsletter version, I included a photo of the trophy. Subscribe today for photos of trophies.]
Advertisement
But I wonder this: How much does the AAC's transience really matter, when the conference has long proved itself capable of replenishing?
Consider Tulane. Despite losing Fritz to Houston, the Green Wave returned to the conference title game in year one under Jon Sumrall (swiped from Troy). And this season, despite losing about a dozen contributors to bigger programs, the New Orleans school is arguably the G5 favorite to land a CFP spot — because Tulane has yoinked 'a mid-major all-star team' away from lower-tier programs, as Bill Connelly put it.
In Chris Vannini's ranking of 2025's best G5 coaches, the AAC dominates the top (No. 2 Sumrall, No. 3 Monken, No. 5 Jeff Traylor of UTSA, No. 7 Ryan Silverfield of Memphis), but it's No. 9 Tim Albin of Charlotte who stands out to me. After going 30-10 in the last three years at Ohio, the Oklahoma native jumped from one of the MAC's best programs to one of the AAC's worst.
The AAC has earned its rep as the league always shepherding the nation's best pound-for-pound collection of coaches. And that means its standards are far too high for, say, coaches who have gone 7-17 in the football-revering state of Alabama while also doing frequent gaffes and bloopers. Good god, that's Trent Dilfer's music! (It's probably Kenny Chesney.)
Let's end with a question on the perpetual duality of the AAC: Will this league produce both this cycle's hottest P4 candidate and the season's first firing? Looking at a UAB schedule in which the Blazers might not be favored in any games after Week 3, along with revisiting this David Ubben story on everything that's gone wrong in the Dilfer era, there's a good chance.
🌽 Along with the ads you've probably seen in our newsletters for Ndamukong Suh's new podcast here at The Athletic, here is the world's fastest Suh interview, delivered at the speed of one sack of Colt McCoy:
If it were up to you, which of Nebraska's rivals would you add to the Big Ten?
Easy. Oklahoma.
Roughly how many times have people told you that you deserved more votes than you got in the 2009 Heisman race?
More times than I can count.
🌀 'Some other schools — notably Texas Tech, Miami and Oregon — will have the chance to prove otherwise, but I'm here to crown LSU as the winners of the offseason transfer portal.' Manny Navarro explains what that could mean this season.
📺 'The ACC is the first conference to use TV figures as a metric for conference payouts. Clemson estimated that the new model could yield an additional $120 million over a six-year period. That'd be enough to make the Tigers financially competitive with top programs in the SEC or Big Ten.' New details on ACC money.
Advertisement
🤔 'Perhaps his silence was a product of not being familiar enough with the college media landscape.' On the Big Ten having less messaging oomph than its alleged best new buddy, the SEC.
🧢 A month ago, Alabama ranked No. 45 in the 247Sports Composite. As of now, make that No. 7. Grace Raynor explains Kalen DeBoer's national surge, plus big developments elsewhere in recruiting.
Two brief notes:
What if the ACC and the Big 12 made a trade? ACC gets: Cincinnati, West Virginia and UCF. Big 12 gets: Stanford, Cal and SMU. Who says no? — Andy J., Columbus, Ohio
It makes way too much sense.
Stanford and Cal get to reunite with Arizona/Arizona State/Colorado/Utah, plus frequent nonconference foe BYU. SMU gets back natural rival TCU and fellow Southwest Conference expats Baylor, Texas Tech and Houston. Meanwhile, Cincinnati and West Virginia used to be in the Big East with Pitt, Syracuse, Louisville and Boston College. (The Mountaineers also overlapped with Virginia Tech.) And UCF gets more bus rides to Tallahassee and Miami, fewer flights to Stillwater and Ames.
Now, the Stanford and Cal administrations were pretty dismissive of Big 12 academics last time around, but that was before they got stuck playing 3,000 miles from home for a 30 percent paycheck. Presumably, times have changed. But would the Big 12 want them? On the one hand, they don't exactly help your football or men's basketball products. But it's not like the schools they're losing are necessarily headliners, either. Not to mention the Bay Area schools would immediately become the best programs in many of the Big 12's Olympic sports.
More Mandel mailbag here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

After one year, this MLB postseason schedule innovation is no longer
After one year, this MLB postseason schedule innovation is no longer

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

After one year, this MLB postseason schedule innovation is no longer

The World Series could end in November this year. Major League Baseball can do without all the "Mr. November" jokes, so the league took a creative step last year: a flexible start date for the World Series. It's not easy to cram a four-round postseason in a month. But it's even less ideal if the World Series teams roll through the league championship series, then sit around for close to a week before the World Series starts. MLB unveiled this creative reform last year: If both World Series teams complete the league championship series in no more than five games, the start of the World Series would move up three days. Nothing kills interest in an everyday sport like a week off before the most important games of the season. The reform did not come into play last season. Although the New York Yankees won the American League Championship Series in five games, the Dodgers needed six games to complete the NLCS. Read more: Yoshinobu Yamamoto rocked by Zach Neto and Angels as Dodgers' NL West lead falls to 1 When MLB announced its postseason schedule Tuesday, the flexible start date for the World Series was gone. With the Dodgers coming within one victory of making that happen last season, league officials and television partners had the chance to prepare for two possibilities for the start of the World Series. The uncertainty of what date to promote, and the need for alternate travel plans and hotel blocks, left the parties with the thought that a fixed date for the World Series remained a better plan. The World Series this year is set to start on Friday, Oct. 24, with a possible Game 7 on Saturday, Nov. 1. The wild-card round starts Tuesday, Sept. 30, with the division series round starting Saturday, Oct. 4. The teams with the top two records in each league earn a bye in the first round and advance directly to the division series. If the postseason started Tuesday, the Dodgers (68-51) would be the No. 3 seed in the NL, behind the Milwaukee Brewers (74-44) and the Philadelphia Phillies (69-49). The wild card teams, in order of seed, would be the Chicago Cubs (67-50), San Diego Padres (67-52) and the New York Mets (63-55). In that scenario, the Dodgers and Mets — the NLCS combatants last season — would meet in the wild-card round this season. Sign up for more Dodgers news with Dodgers Dugout. Delivered at the start of each series. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

The end of the UFC pay-per-view era is bittersweet
The end of the UFC pay-per-view era is bittersweet

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The end of the UFC pay-per-view era is bittersweet

Back in 2009, Dana White swore that if UFC 100 did a million pay-per-view buys he'd bungee jump off the Mandalay Bay. (It did, he didn't). When UFC 151 was canceled after Jon Jones refused an opponent switch, White called Jones' coach, Greg Jackson, a 'sport killer.' It left a crater in the UFC's schedule that only MMA fans could fully appreciate. A few years later, when Conor McGregor and Nate Diaz shattered the PPV record at UFC 196, it was a testament to how big the sport had become. We cared about those numbers as much as we did the outcome. Since UFC 1, when people paid out of morbid curiosity, pay-per-views have been a vital part of the identity of this sport. It's hard to get nostalgic over being gouged, and what follows here shouldn't be mistaken as such, but Monday's news of the UFC's coming $7.7 billion partnership with Paramount came with a small pang of sadness upon realizing the PPV model will soon belong to a bygone era. In our sport, people have long huddled around a UFC PPV as if it were a religious rite. When social media was gaining steam in the early-2010s, UFC PPVs were ladled out on Twitter (now X), 140 characters at a time from those on the ground level, as if they were transmissions from the war. Any MMA fan who didn't spring for the then-$59.99 price tag suffered instant FOMO. Why? Because getting the PPV meant attending the party. A sacrifice, it's true, but also a shared experience. The price of admission kept unserious fans out. What lurked behind the paywall was the sport's everything, and the feeling of camaraderie for any of us who willingly paid the door fees was priceless. A typical Monday conversation might go something like this: 'Did you get Saturday's pay-per-view?' 'Damn right I did. That GSP is a freaking monster.' 'I can't believe Dan Hardy didn't tap.' 'Dude is Gumby!' A UFC PPV stood for 'can't-miss event' for what was essentially a continuing saga — a long-running, fighting soap opera that early aficionados deemed sacred. Of course, it wasn't nearly as hipster as it sounds. If nothing else, the UFC has always been anti-hipster. It gladly poured Monster Energy drink over men in capris. It was more like a monthly concentration of our greatest focus, to see firsthand the best the sport could offer, which gave MMA its sense of community. It was a choice that could be regretted in the end — anybody who sprung for UFC 149 from Calgary never fully recovered from that groin kick — yet it was a choice we made because we didn't care for the alternative. All of this largely held true into the 2020s, even though pirating and illegal streams have long done away with the sacrifice. A few years ago, Dana proclaimed he was going to go after pirates himself, and it was fun to imagine him in a suburban tree with his binoculars searching through windows for glitchy Russian streams. But the writing has been on the wall for a long time that PPVs could be on the way out. The WWE, which is run by the same TKO ownership group as the UFC, came to that conclusion a couple of years back. The UFC has been tied to a dying animal, and it will be for five more PPVs in 2025. Still, you worry about the sport of MMA losing some of the vital distinction that made it. UFC Fight Night events, especially those held at the UFC Apex in Las Vegas, have become skippable affairs. PPVs have always meant title fights, which the UFC has done a masterful job over the years of holding to high standards. To see belts change hands, you paid for it. Even if that feels a little heisty in 2025, it served to force a value in its structure and interest, to keep a premium on things. To give title fights away, even at a subscription fee? Perhaps the value scale loses some of its natural escalation. The greatest fear is that things blend together, and the sport plays out on a gray plateau. Will the UFC even be as interested in developing stars without PPVs to sell them on? The savings on the pocketbook can't help but be a welcome thing for fans, ultimately. And who knows exactly how things are going to play out? Lester Bangs declared rock & roll dead in the 1970s, and some 50 years later there's still a pulse. Right after TKO COO and president Mark Shapiro said the 'PPV model was dead,' White wasn't so quick to pull the plug. 'A fight will pop up that I never saw coming,' White told the New York Post. 'A star will pop up out of somewhere. Anything is possible. And you could do a one-off pay-per-view. I am going to be on pay-per-view this Saturday. Pay-per-view is not dead.' But it'll be dead in the sense we knew it. And what that means is a paradigm shift in the sport. Fighters will no longer be linked to PPV points, which has always been a story within the story. Diehard fans who've willingly paid for (or at least went through the trouble of illegally streaming) PPVs will now share the sport with the homogenized sports world at large. Which I guess is the root of things. Homogeny is the scariest thing in combat sports. We didn't miss Dude Wipes until we saw the Reebok fight kits. Then we understood some soul was being sucked out of our rogue sport. The closer to the mainstream the sport drifts, the more it loses some of its lifeblood. It's hard to be nostalgic about being gouged, it's true, but you can't help but be protective of what got us here. Or to remember that at one time there was some good bang for the buck. Back in the mid-aughts, the UFC combined the tuxedo affairs of 1990s boxing with the vibes of an underground temptation. From there it slowly stockpiled its greatest passions behind the paywall. Remember how red Dana's face would turn as he tried to sell the PPV at the end of the televised portion of the card? Remember the names? B.J. Penn. Matt Hughes. Chuck Liddell. Tito Ortiz. Randy Couture. Georges St-Pierre. Quinton Jackson. Jon Jones. Brock Lesnar. Cain Velasquez. Conor McGregor. Ronda Rousey. Go through the posters of the past, and they were the special attractions, the names on the marquee for the numbered events. Those were some good parties we shelled out for. As MMA fans, they were ours. And if that passion is lost, those PPVs will seem like bargains next to the ultimate cost of business.

Major League Baseball announces dates of playoff games, in case Brewers fans are interested
Major League Baseball announces dates of playoff games, in case Brewers fans are interested

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Major League Baseball announces dates of playoff games, in case Brewers fans are interested

Major League Baseball released its schedule for the upcoming MLB postseason, which should highly interest Milwaukee Brewers fans watching their 74-44 team possessing the best record in baseball midway through August. The schedule follows its traditional custom from past years, with the best-of-three Wild Card series beginning the Tuesday after the regular season ends. In 2025, that means the games will run Sept. 30, Oct. 1 and Oct. 2 (Tuesday through Thursday), with the winners advancing to the division series. The Brewers, if their record finishes among the two best in the National League, won't have to worry about that part of the postseason and will advance straight to the NL Division Series, which begins Friday, Oct. 4. That means the Brewers would, as it stands today, have four days off before their first playoff game, hosted at American Family Field. The NLDS series will run Oct. 4-11. The NL Championship Series will run Oct. 13-21, with the World Series from Oct. 24-Nov. 1. The World Series will air on Fox, while the NLCS and NLDS will run on Turner networks like TBS. The wild-card series will air on ESPN networks. Times and opponents, of course, remain up in the air. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Major League Baseball sets dates of playoff games; Brewers fans await

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store