‘Secret' mobile phone provided to contact John Magnier's rival bidder for Barne Estate, court hears
John Magnier
for the property.
Mr Thomson-Moore told the court on Friday that, after an exclusivity agreement with the Magnier bid expired, he was in contact with Mr Regan on his personal phone anyway and did not understand the reason for the proffered new phone.
Mr Magnier is suing Mr Thomson-Moore and Barne over the collapse of the purchase.
The estate has been owned by the Thompson-Moore family for generations. Mr Magnier wants the court to enforce the deal he claims he sealed with Mr Thomson-Moore with a €15 million handshake agreement for the 751-acre estate on August 22nd, 2023, at Mr Magnier's Coolmore home.
READ MORE
The Magnier side has sued the Barne Estate, Mr Thomson-Moore and three companies of IQEQ (Jersey) Ltd group, seeking to enforce the purported deal, which they say had been 'unequivocally' agreed.
The Barne defendants say there was never any such agreement, as they needed the consent of the trustees to finalise any deal.
Mr Thomson-Moore has told the court that while a 'price' was agreed with Mr Magnier for Barne, a 'deal' was not.
After agreeing on €15 million, Barne and the Magniers entered into an exclusivity agreement stipulating that Barne would not permit itself or its representatives to solicit or encourage any expression of interest, inquiry or offer on the property from anyone other than Mr Magnier between August 31st and September 30th, 2023. The trustees who hold the estate initially decided to remain loyal to the Magnier offer and felt a higher offer from Mr Regan could be seen as 'provocative'.
After the exclusivity period had ended, the trustees decided to go with Mr Regan's offer of €22.25 million. Mr Regan is not a party to the case.
[
Heir of Barne Estate 'shocked' by €50,000 'luck penny' offer from John Magnier
Opens in new window
]
At the
High Court
on Friday, Mr Thomson-Moore told Caren Geoghegan SC, for the Magnier side, that he found out the third party was allegedly in regular contact with Mr Regan about the deal only after document discovery prior to the case.
Ms Geoghegan said it was her client's case that the third party had been updating Mr Regan on developments in the deal and she read out certain text messages to the court.
Ms Geoghegan put it to the witness that the third party had offered Mr Thomson-Moore a 'secret', ready-to-go-phone so that Mr Thomson-Moore could contact Mr Regan without being traced.
Mr Thomson Moore said he did not personally receive the phone but that the third party had placed it in his kitchen. Mr Thomson-Moore said he never touched or used the phone.
Text messages read out by Ms Geoghegan allegedly showed Mr Regan sending a message to the third party saying 'I think we are in with a chance' and for the third party to keep him 'updated' and to have his 'ear to the ground'.
Another message allegedly from the third party to Mr Regan said that the third party had spoken to Mr Thomson-Moore about local estate agent John Stokes, who was dealing with the sale.
[
Magnier's Coolmore group branded 'professional bullies' by rival in bitter Barne Estate row
Opens in new window
]
Ms Geoghegan partially quoted an alleged text from the third party to Mr Regan, saying that Mr Thomson-Moore had allegedly told him: ''the more I think of things the more I think Stokes is a ... derogatory, disparaging word', she said.
On September 20th, 2023, she submitted that the third party texted Mr Regan to say that Mr Thomson-Moore had told him, 'everybody thinks it's done but it is far from done'.
Mr Thomson-Moore did not deny saying so. Mr Thomson-Moore said that his wife, Anna, had been frustrated by the trustees of Barne not considering one of Mr Regan's offers – of €20 million – and that the family were in discussion of how to let the exclusivity agreement expire in order to 're-set' their approach to the deal now worth 'life-changing money'.
Ms Geoghegan submitted that the Thomson-Moores were 'using tax matters' to stall the Magnier deal.
'You can read it that way but we were very concerned about tax,' said Mr Thomson-Moore.
The case continues at the High Court before Mr Justice Max Barrett.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trade deal includes ‘zero for zero' arrangement for aviation, says Simon Harris
The agreed trade deal between the European Union and the United States has secured a 'zero for zero' arrangement for aviation, Simon Harris has said. The Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade wrote to the Government Trade Forum on Sunday night to say that while a 15 per cent baseline tariff was 'regrettable', it was the maximum tariff that could be imposed on the pharmaceutical sector even after the US administration's investigation into the sector's imports. He also confirmed that a 'zero for zero' agreement had also been secured for certain aircraft components, agricultural products and chemicals. The details were included in a letter sent by Mr Harris to the trade forum, which includes Government Ministers, State agencies, business organisations and trade unions. READ MORE In the letter, Mr Harris said that Sunday's agreement between European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and US president Donald Trump in Scotland will 'avoid tariffs of 30 per cent being imposed by the US on August 1st and will also avoid the EU imposing its own countermeasures'. Mr Harris described this as 'much-needed certainty for Irish, European and American businesses who together represent the most integrated trading relationship in the world'. 'While ultimately it is regrettable that the baseline tariff of 15 per cent is included in the agreement, it is important that we now have more certainty on the foundations for the EU-US trade relationship, which is essential for jobs, growth and investment. President von der Leyen described this as 15 per cent tariffs across the board and all-inclusive,' he said. 'We will examine the detail of the agreement in the coming days but it is our understanding from president von der Leyen that this rate of 15 per cent is a ceiling on any potential tariffs that may be imposed following the conclusion of the section 232 investigations, including those relating to pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. The EU will continue to work with the US to underline the closely integrated nature of the EU and US pharmaceutical sector.' 'While the baseline tariff is 15 per cent, there are important exclusions from that, including a zero-for-zero arrangement on aviation. Ireland had made the case throughout these negotiations for zero-for-zero arrangements in as many sectors as possible.' [ EU pushing to cap future tariffs on pharma in US deal Opens in new window ] 'The commission president has also confirmed that there has been agreement on zero tariff levels on a number of key strategic products – including all aircraft and component parts, certain chemicals, certain agricultural products, semiconductor equipment, natural resources and critical raw materials. As the framework negotiations continue, the EU will keep working to add more products.' He told the forum that the Irish Government will now be examining the 'full implications' of the agreement on the all-island economy, including any differential tariff rates on either side of the Border. He said the Government will also now be looking into the 'implications' of a 15 per cent tariff rate.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Call for Government to urgently support Irish businesses most at risk from US tariffs
Social Democrats finance spokesman Cian O'Callaghan says the Government must publish an updated summer economic statement to account for the EU 's tariff agreement with the US . In a statement on Sunday evening, Mr O'Callaghan welcomed a deal that 'avoids a catastrophic trade war', but said it is 'beyond doubt . . . that a 15 per cent tariff rate will be very damaging for many Irish businesses'. 'It is less than a week since the Government published its summer economic statement, using an assumption of no tariffs,' he added. 'This was despite the dogs on the street being aware that a 10 per cent tariff rate was the best possible outcome.' Mr O'Callaghan was one of a number of figures in Irish politics to publish statements regarding the trade deal on Sunday evening. Labour leader Ivana Bacik called on the Government to engage with Irish businesses, warning that continued uncertainty around pharmaceutical exports is evidence of 'just how difficult it is to engage constructively with the Trump administration'. READ MORE 'We in Labour are calling on the Government to fast-track the development of a new, modernised short-time work scheme to ensure that skilled jobs are not lost in sectors under pressure,' Ms Bacik said. 'Other EU countries have long-standing schemes that help employers retain staff during economic shocks. We need a system in place in Ireland that can respond to future volatility or sectoral downturns quickly and effectively.' Taoiseach Micheál Martin welcomed the agreement, saying it 'will help to protect many jobs in Ireland'. He added that it 'brings clarity and predictability to the trading relationship between the EU and the US – the biggest in the world". Mr Martin acknowledged that higher tariffs will make trade 'more expensive and more challenging' but said that the agreement 'creates a new era of stability that can hopefully contribute to a growing and deepening relationship between the EU and the US'. [ EU-US deal good for Ireland as it averts trade war but vital details remain unclear Opens in new window ] The Taoiseach pledged to study the details of the agreement, including its implications for Irish businesses exporting to the US and for other sectors operating here. 'Given the very real risk that existed for escalation and for the imposition of punitively high tariffs, this news will be welcomed by many,' his statement concluded. There were further calls to support Irish businesses from Sinn Féin spokesperson on foreign affairs and trade, Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire. 'Ultimately, while a deal is preferable to tit-for-tat tariffs, the reality is, tariffs of this kind are bad for businesses, consumers and workers,' he said. 'We need to take the necessary steps to support our indigenous businesses, to increase exports to new markets, to grow talent across the island and to trade across the island and internationally." Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Harris echoed the Taoiseach in welcoming the transatlantic trade agreement, noting that European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen described the 15 per cent tariff rate as 'all-inclusive'. 'While Ireland regrets that the baseline tariff of 15 per cent is included in the agreement, it is important that we now have more certainty on the foundations of the EU-US trade relationship, which is essential for jobs, growth and investment,' Mr Harris said. Finally, Danny McCoy, CEO of business lobby Ibec, said the trade agreement represents a 'substantial burden for many industries', particularly those relying heavily on the US market to operate. 'Our message to the Government, as it was with the 10 per cent tariff, is that the most exposed sectors will require support similar to the interventions provided as a response to Brexit,' Mr McCoy said.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the EU/US trade deal: a step towards economic stability
The agreement of an outline trade deal between the EU and the US is positive, to the extent that it avoids the risk of a full-scale tariffs war between the two sides. For Ireland, the EU state most exposed to US trade and investment, this could have been particularly damaging. What the EU has been dealing with here is damage limitation. Average tariffs of 15 per cent on EU imports into the US - a central part of the deal - are roughly three times the rate that applied when Donald Trump came to office. This will cause economic damage on both sides of the Atlantic. Whatever Trump's objections are to the way the EU treats US imports, dealing with them this way ensures US consumers will pay more for their goods, as well as damaging Europe. Trump is claiming the deal, which also includes promises of EU purchases of US energy and military equipment, as a triumph. And he did get a lot of what he wanted. Perhaps driven in large part by the desire to see continued US support for Nato and Ukraine, the EU has been on the back foot. It has been faced by a US president pursuing a relentless tariff agenda, partly driven by economic nationalism and partly by the need to raise cash for the US exchequer. The main gain for the EU – and for Ireland - of the outline deal is that it avoids the risk of a trade war, which would have had unpredictable and dangerous consequences. Trump had threatened a general tariff level of 30 per cent to apply from next week on EU imports and, had there not been a deal, the EU had a list of US goods ready on which it planned to impose tariffs. This could have escalated quickly, potentially drawing in US digital tech companies, many with international bases in Ireland. READ MORE Details have still to be spelled out on how the 15 per cent tariffs will be applied and these will be important. The impact will vary across different sectors of exporters from Ireland to the US and will be difficult in some areas. It may be some weeks before this is clear. Importantly for Ireland, Trump has said a separate process examining what should happen to the pharma sector will continue and he again underlined that he wanted key drugs and ingredients made in the US. While there was some uncertainty on this in the immediate wake of the deal, the risk of higher tariffs in this area, or other action to try to get pharma companies to relocate production to the US, appears to remain. And while European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said that in general the deal would bring 'stability', the final details have still to be agreed and published. With Trump in office, uncertainty will remain. However, it is still better to have a basic deal which, provided it holds, will now start to restore some level of certainty to trade between the US and EU.
