Colonial land feud boils over
A DISPUTE between a British-owned tea plantation and a local community in western Kenya has come to the boil in what could be a sign of turbulent times ahead for tea producers facing a growing backlash over colonial-era injustices.
On the rolling green hills of the Sitoi estate in Nandi county, more than 100 residents are occupying 140ha of land, picking tea and living in huts made of mud and rusty iron sheets while grazing their cattle.
They say the land was gifted to them in 1986 by Eastern Produce Kenya. EPK, which is majority owned by London-listed Camellia Plc, says the gift was for 82ha, not the 222ha that the local Kimasas farmers' cooperative claims.
Kimasas chairman Daniel Biwott said his grandfather lived on the land before it was seized by British colonists around 1905 and that reclaiming the disputed land would right a historical wrong.
'Nothing has happened all these years,' said Biwott, standing among knee-high bushes where he, his father and his grandfather once worked as EPK employees. 'This is the time to solve it.'
The standoff follows several violent incidents at estates in Kenya, the world's fourth-leading tea producer.
In January, a farm belonging to Sri Lankan-owned Browns Plantations was attacked and more than 100 eucalyptus trees uprooted, according to the Kenya Tea Growers Association (KTGA).
A worker walks inside the Chemomi Tea Factory owned by the Eastern Produce Kenya in Mosine village of Nandi County. — Reuters
The industry group said in a statement that 'criminal gangs who appear to enjoy political cover' were behind the 'Zimbabwe-like illegal land invasion' of Sitoi, referring to seizures of white-owned farms in the early 2000s.
It said EPK was losing over US$200,000 per month and the incidents threaten an industry that accounts for nearly a quarter of Kenya's export revenues and supports five million livelihoods.
Several people working on land issues said the attacks reflect broader frustration with a failure to remedy colonial land grabs.
'I have tried hard to use the legal system,' said Joel Kimutai Bosek, a lawyer who has brought litigation against tea companies and the UK government on behalf of local communities without success. 'I think the new or coming generation will be more aggressive.'
Few remedies
During the colonial era from 1895-1963, British authorities seized vast tracts of land, much of which became tea plantations, according to a 2021 UN report.
Awareness of historical injustices has grown since 2010, when Kenya established the National Land Commission (NLC) to address the issue, said Samuel Tororei, who was a commissioner until 2019.
But Tororei said the commission's effectiveness was undermined by its limited mandate and an 'unholy marriage' between tea companies and political elites.
Under Kenya's 2010 constitution, tea companies' previous 999-year leases were reduced to 99 years but activists complain the government has not used its ownership of the land to extract meaningful concessions in land or money for local communities.
'The underlying cause of tension is that you have overseas owners of large-scale plantations which are based on land that was taken from the community,' said Guy Chambers, managing director from 2015-2022 of Britain's James Finlay, which had tea estates in Kenya until 2023.
Tea is processed at the Chemomi Tea Factory owned by the Eastern Produce Kenya in Mosine village of Nandi County. — Reuters
Kenyan government spokesmen did not respond to requests for comment. The companies say they comply with Kenyan law and accuse some politicians of exploiting historical tensions to undermine their land tenures and advance personal business interests.
Other community attempts to reclaim land have yielded little. Legal options are constrained by statutes of limitations and official immunities, the UN report said.
The private equity firm Chambers runs and a community group in the tea-growing county of Kericho jointly bid last year for estates belonging to CVC Capital-owned Lipton in an arrangement that would have fully transferred control to the community within two decades.
Lipton eventually sold to Browns. A spokesman for Lipton said it chose the best bidder who could help raise standards in the industry.
Browns did not respond to a request for comment.
In a 2019 report, the NLC called on the British government to apologise to communities in Kericho and provide reparations.
The British government has not directly responded to that call.
Asked for comment, the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said: 'We are concerned by the attacks on tea farms in Nandi and are in contact with the Kenyan authorities.'
'Dangerous precedent'
EPK first acquired land in Nandi in 1948. It said the current dispute is not over a historical land injustice but rather a gift made on a 'willing donor, willing donee basis'.
The NLC found in 2019 that all 222ha belonged to Kimasas. EPK contested that in court, saying Kimasas' evidence was forged.
As litigation proceeded, more than 200 people, including a national lawmaker from the area, overran the disputed plot on Aug 3, 2023 and began plucking tea.
A court issued an injunction the following day, ordering them to leave.
Eastern Produce Kenya tea pickers loading their produce on a truck in Mosine village of Nandi County. — Reuters
Most did, but many then returned. In January, squatters attacked a company car and employees, EPK said.
The company said police have not enforced the injunction, while the public prosecutor's office told it that any prosecutions risked interfering with the civil case.
'If we allow this kind of situation where the younger generations now start saying they don't have enough and they want more, then it is a dangerous precedent that should be stopped at all costs,' said EPK general manager Peter Goin.
Police and prosecutor's office did not respond to requests for comment.
Biwott said Kimasas felt justified occupying the land because there was no final ruling against it. — Reuters
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Is Labubu the next Hello Kitty? Analysts debate Pop Mart's limits
Pop Mart, the company behind the hit collectible character Labubu, was virtually unknown outside mainland China before 2024, but now some analysts are comparing its success to that of Sanrio and its Hello Kitty property, suggesting that the Beijing toymaker could have created a new playbook for cultural exports. Labubu, a sharp-fanged but cute little monster that is often sold as a plush clip-on charm for handbags, has attracted high-profile fans including the family of football star David Beckham. Its popularity pushed Pop Mart's Hong Kong-listed shares to a record high of HK$234 last week, after the company's market capitalisation topped HK$300 billion (US$38 billion) the week before. The rally followed the April debut of the Labubu 3.0 series, which drew long queues in London, New York, and Dubai. 'For years, there's been a push [for Chinese companies] to 'go global' by exporting heritage and storytelling,' said Chris Pereira, founder and CEO at iMpact, a brand consulting company in Singapore. 'But Labubu flips that script. It's not trying to explain China, it's just trying to be lovable.' The sustained hype around Labubu had 'great similarities' to Hello Kitty, which turned 50 last year, according to JPMorgan Chase. The US bank said that beyond common traits in character design and business model, Labubu was also catching up with Hello Kitty in areas such as merchandising, licensing and Google Trends search interest. With international sales surging more than 480 per cent year on year in the first quarter, led by increases of 900 per cent in the US and 600 per cent in Europe, Pop Mart has become a new favourite among investors. Pereira said the popularity of the intellectual property (IP) opens the door for a wave of Chinese brands to succeed not because they are about China, but because they tap into universal emotions through strong design and clever marketing. 'They are telling a successful Chinese story without ever mentioning China,' he said. JPMorgan Chase initiated coverage of Pop Mart last week with a rating of overweight, and set its price target at HK$250 – the most bullish prediction among 43 analysts covering the toymaker. 'Labubu's meteoric rise is driven by a combination of factors,' said Richard Lin, chief consumer analyst at SPDB International, a Hong Kong-based investment bank. 'This includes the scarcity of the product itself, which has fuelled spontaneous social-media promotion by those lucky enough to get their hands on the toy' – a form of conspicuous consumption, he noted. Moreover, the character appeals to global consumers with its 'mischievous, cheeky image' that fans find irresistible, he said. 'I think this kind of vibe stands out more compared to something like Hello Kitty,' Lin added. 'In today's context, Hello Kitty might not resonate as much with younger audiences, who tend to look for characters with more individuality and edge.' With Pop Mart's shares rising nearly tenfold over the past year following Labubu's surge in popularity across Southeast Asia, JPMorgan is bullish on the company's long-term growth prospects. The bank identified 'multiple potential sources of incremental earnings,' ranging from new super IP launches and licensing to stationery, jewellery and even theme parks. 'Labubu's success is really a reflection of Pop Mart's own strengths in operations, marketing and product development,' said SPDB International's Lin. 'So what people can have confidence in is that even if Labubu cools down today, there will be new IPs coming tomorrow.' That sentiment is not universal, however. As stunning as Labubu's success has been, it has decades to go to match Hello Kitty's staying power, and whether the company can nurture other hit products is an open question. 'We think the biggest uncertainty lies in the relevance of Pop Mart's IPs, as they may become less popular among global pop-toy fans over the next few years,' said Jeff Zhang, an equity analyst who covers Pop Mart for Morningstar. 'Additionally, Pop Mart might overexpand in regions where demand for its products is weaker and see less operating leverage as a result.' Sanrio, the Japanese company that owns the Hello Kitty and Kuromi IPs, has returned investors a total 646 per cent, including share price gains and dividend payouts, since its listing in 1982. Pop Mart has returned 488 per cent so far. Additional reporting by Zhang Shidong - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST


Malaysian Reserve
an hour ago
- Malaysian Reserve
Moomoo Malaysia Supported by Bursa Malaysia Launch Campaign to Drive Retail Investor Growth and Capability
KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia, June 6, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. ('Moomoo Malaysia') has launched a strategic investor development campaign supported by Bursa Malaysia in conjunction with Bursa Malaysia's Shares2U program, aimed at equipping Malaysian retail investors with the tools, incentives, and market structure needed to engage capital markets with greater confidence and competence. Running from 6 June to 7 July 2025, this campaign blends incentive-led onboarding with performance-based learning. New and experienced investors alike can access a streamlined, technology-driven trading experience via the Moomoo Malaysia platform, which offers tools, insights, and live data to support smarter investment decisions. The campaign introduces a two-pronged opportunity for Malaysians to build investing confidence through: Rewards worth up to RM 2,200 for new moomoo users, including RM 400 worth of Bursa-listed stocks, and A national Malaysia stock trading challenge that is open to all users, with a total prize pool of up to RM 14,000, designed to sharpen real-market trading skills. Central to the campaign is moomoo's emphasis on capability-building. The platform delivers real-time market data, advanced screeners, and analytics tools typically used by professional investors tailored for Malaysian users. By aligning incentives with trading education and decision-making, the campaign supports more informed, self-directed participation in Malaysia's capital markets. 'The long-term health of Malaysia's capital markets will be shaped not by short-term retail surges, but by sustained, self-directed investor capability,' said Ivan Mok, Chief Executive Officer of Moomoo Malaysia. 'This campaign supports that trajectory – not just through access to market, but through informed engagement with the market. In partnership with Bursa Malaysia, we're combining institutional trust with our professional-grade, real-time trading tools to help Malaysians become active, smart and informed participants in the stock market.' Elevating Investor Literacy at Scale Unlike traditional campaigns focused solely on incentives, this initiative emphasises market experience and financial literacy. The moomoo platform provides Malaysian users with institutional-grade tools, including real-time data feeds, advanced screeners, and analytics, in a retail-accessible environment. This technology-first approach is intended to strengthen trading discipline and investor readiness across market cycles. 'With markets entering a more uncertain phase – from renewed trade tensions to sector-level volatility, the gap between simply participating and investing with discipline is becoming more obvious,' said Ivan Mok, CEO of Moomoo Malaysia. 'In this environment, investors need more than access. They need the tools and experience to think strategically, manage risk, and stay engaged. That's the focus of this campaign, to help investors build capability in real time, with the tools and experience to think strategically, manage risk, and stay engaged in the market.' The trading challenge is open to all users, while additional rewards are available exclusively to new users who meet the qualifying deposit criteria. For more information, visit our website. *T&Cs apply. Stock rewards value will fluctuate based on market conditions. Investments involve risk. Full disclaimers at This advertisement has not been reviewed by SC.


New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Indonesia wealth fund considers stake in Grab-GoTo deal
KUALA LUMPUR: Newly launched sovereign wealth fund Danantara Indonesia is in early talks with GoTo to get a piece of US-listed rival Grab's potential buyout of the ride-hailing and food delivery firm, Bloomberg News reported on Friday. The fund is seeking a minority stake in the combined entity, which could help ease the Indonesian government's concerns of Singapore-headquartered Grab owning the country's biggest tech firm, the report said, citing people familiar with the matter. Indonesia's antitrust regulator last month started research aimed at identifying risks from a possible deal between the tech giants, who have yet to confirm merger talks. Grab is looking to strike a deal in the second quarter and could value GoTo at around US$7 billion, sources with knowledge of the matter told Reuters last month. The companies have made progress on the structure of the deal, but talks had slowed down recently due to potential regulatory demands, Bloomberg News said. Indonesia launched Danantara in February, aiming to invest in a wide range of projects from metal processing to artificial intelligence. It will hold government stakes in state firms and is intended to operate like Singapore's investment arm Temasek.