Members Demand Answers from Black Farmers Advocacy Group
On January 30th, attorneys representing an advocacy organization for black farmers are scheduled to go before an appeals court to argue their case about expanding payments to more farmers, previously excluded from a recent government assistance program.
Meanwhile, a months-long WREG investigation reveals complaints from several of the organization's members who say the group claiming to help them is in fact hurting them.
Consider it a calling Stephanie Smith hadn't planned to answer. As a young woman, Smith says she didn't see herself living on a farm, let alone helping to tend to cows.
'Now, I couldn't imagine myself anywhere else. This home, this is us,' said Smith as she leaned on a fence that separates their home from the rest of the land on their sprawling property.
Smith's husband is a fourth-generation farmer in West Tennessee.
'It's so important that we keep all of this in the family,' said Smith.
But carrying on that legacy, including caring for cattle on 50-plus acres isn't easy or cheap.
Smith explained to WREG, 'You have to buy food, you have to make sure that they're warm, you have to make sure that they are healthy.'
So after being denied government loans in the past, the Smiths decided to apply for the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Discrimination Financial Assistance Program.DFAP would issue payments to farmers and ranchers to help grow or start operations.
MSCS could file lawsuit if state takes over the school board
Smith said, 'We were thinking, this is going to be just what we need.'
Smith says her family met with a group led by a local pastor and his wife to learn more about the program.
'They talked a lot about racism over the years and how hard it was for people to even complete the application process,' Smith told the NewsChannel 3 Investigators.
She says they were also encouraged to become a part of the Black Farmers and Agriculturalists Association.
The national organization headquartered in Memphis has been around for nearly 30 years and boasts about its history of helping black farmers.
'In order for them to be able to assist us, we needed to join their organization. So there was a $100 fee,' said Smith.
Smith continued, 'They did stress to us, we're not charging you to complete the 40 pages, but you do have to give us a donation.'
Which according to Smith was $40.
However, Smith explained it seemed like a small price to pay for the assistance of people who understood the paperwork.
Smith walked us through how it was presented to them, 'We know what they're looking for. We understand the language and we're going to take care of that entire process for you.'
So Smith added, 'We felt like we were going to be in good hands.'
The DFAP application deadline was extended from October of 2023 to January 17, 2024.Smith said months passed, and they never heard anything, except a request for an additional donation from the couple they'd handed over payments to and lots of personal information to file on their behalf.
And because farming is a family affair, Smith's sister-in-law Mildred and her husband who help with the cattle and farm row crops also joined in, along with other relatives.
'So at this point, they've gotten a total of $260, you know, per person,' explained Smith.
Then in August of 2024, Stephanie Smith's husband received a letter from the USDA.
She read it aloud to WREG as we sat in her kitchen on a late summer afternoon.
'This letter is to inform you that your application has not been found eligible for financial assistance under the parameters of the program.'
The reason cited in the letter read, 'The application was submitted after the deadline.'
Smith explained their confusion after receiving the letter, 'We came to you and we gave our money to you all the way back in October, long before any deadline!'
Her sister-in-law Mildred Smith said, 'You guys…took our money and we need to know what's going on!'
Smith's denial letter is dated August 1st.A day earlier, the USDA announced it issued more than $2 billion in payments to more than 40,000 applicants for its Discrimination Financial Assistance Program.
Residents concerned after Main Event opens hours after shooting
Smith said when she called the couple that helped them she was told, 'Oh don't worry about that, that letter is a scam!'
However, the Smith's denial letter was no scam. In fact, around the same time, the USDA was warning about scams on its website.
A spokesperson told the WREG Investigators 'We are aware of scams misleading people to believe the program will reopen, which is not true, and that some organizations have collected fees from potential applicants under false pretenses.'
After getting the runaround, including claims of a system crash, Smith says from the people who agreed to help file the application, she called the USDA directly and said a representative told her exactly when the application was submitted.
'That's so unfortunate because we received your application June 11th, 2024,' said Smith of what she learned after reaching out to the DFAP hotline included on their denial letter.
That date was five months after the deadline.
WREG asked Smith, 'How did you feel when you heard all of that from DFAP?'
She replied, 'We were hurt, there's no other word. We were hurt.'
The USDA sent NewsChannel 3 a list of organizations it contracted with that held free meetings across the country to educate people about its Discrimination Financial Assistance Program. The Black Farmers and Agriculturalists Association wasn't one of them.
We tried to speak with James Williams, who Smith says signed them up for BFAA, taking their membership dues and that donation.
Mr. Williams answered the door and after introducing ourselves, The WREG Investigators explained we were working on a story about DFAP and we had received some complaints from people who said that their applications were not submitted.
Williams replied, 'I decline to comment on this time. We'll get back with you later.'
We never heard back from Mr. Williams, but asked BFAA's President and Founder Thomas Burrell if he was familiar with Williams, his wife or the complaints surrounding his organization.
The NewsChannel 3 Investigators asked Burrell, 'Did you all ask people or require them to pay to join and then sign up before engaging in conversation about DFAP or anything else that you all were working on at the time?'
He replied, 'There is an emphatic answer to that one Zaneta, and it's no!'
We continued, 'Okay because these folks, they, several of them submitted to Pastor James and Marcia Williams…who said they were working for the organization.'
Burrell continued, 'Trust me, no one in this office, the individuals that you just name does not work (here). They're not affiliated with this office.'
Formerly incarcerated struggle to find housing, making re-entry harder
In fact, Burrell says his organization encouraged their members not to apply for the Discrimination Financial Assistance Program.
They sued the head of the USDA in federal court, on the basis that DFAP should allow applications submitted on behalf of estates, or heirs of farmers who have since passed away.
'As long as USDA is discriminating against black farmers, why shouldn't there be a means to compensate these individuals?,' was the question Burrell posed about DFAP in explaining why they sued.
The WREG Investigators also asked Burrell if he filled out an application himself.
'No. I didn't think it would have been right for me to fill out that application and get paid and at the same time advocating that there's something wrong and suing USDA,' said Burrell.
BFAA's case is headed to a federal appeals court. Oral arguments are scheduled for Thursday, January 30th.
'If we prevail in this lawsuit, those very individuals, except the ones who swung at the foul ball, will be a part of this,' Burrell told WREG.
Meanwhile, Smith told WREG that as of fall 2024, 'They are still taking applications, they are still getting money from families and so for us, it, you know, became we have to stop them.'
Smith says they haven't been able to get a copy of her husband's application from DFAP, but the denial letter shows it was submitted in his late father's name.
'This is submitted like he's alive, a living person,' said Smith who told WREG that was a big concern.
Smith filed a complaint against the Black Farmers and Agriculturalists Association with the USDA's Office of Inspector General and the Tennessee Attorney General, where the WREG Investigators found several others.
Smith told the WREG Investigators, 'The government can't be at a point where they acknowledge the wrongdoing that they did to us and then just stand by and watch another organization continue to do us wrong.'
Despite the disappointment of everything that's happened, Smith says her family will forge on, turning to their own family's history of resilience to move forward.
'You know, we've done it for so many years without assistance, looking back. They made a way and we're going to continue to make a way,' said Smith.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
4 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
No Supreme Court win, but Mexico pressures U.S. on southbound guns
MEXICO CITY — More than a decade ago, Mexican authorities erected a billboard along the border in Ciudad Juárez, across the Rio Grande from El Paso. 'No More Weapons,' was the stark message, written in English and crafted from 3 tons of firearms that had been seized and crushed. It was a desperate entreaty to U.S. officials to stanch the so-called Iron River, the southbound flow of arms that was fueling record levels of carnage in Mexico. But the guns kept coming — and the bloodletting and mayhem grew. Finally, with homicides soaring to record levels, exasperated authorities pivoted to a novel strategy: Mexico filed a $10-billion suit in U.S. federal court seeking to have Smith & Wesson and other signature manufacturers held accountable for the country's epidemic of shooting deaths. The uphill battle against the powerful gun lobby survived an appeals court challenge, but last week the U.S. Supreme Court threw out Mexico's lawsuit, ruling unanimously that federal law shields gunmakers from nearly all liability. Although the litigation stalled, advocates say the high-profile gambit did notch a significant achievement: Dramatizing the role of Made-in-U.S.A. arms in Mexico's daily drumbeat of assassinations, massacres and disappearances. 'Notwithstanding the Supreme Court ruling, Mexico's lawsuit has accomplished a great deal,' said Jonathan Lowy, president of Global Action on Gun Violence, a Washington-based advocacy group. 'It has put the issue of gun trafficking — and the industry's role in facilitating the gun pipeline — on the bilateral and international agenda,' said Lowy, who was co-counsel in Mexico's lawsuit. A few hours after the high court decision, Ronald Johnson, the U.S. ambassador in Mexico City, wrote on X that the White House was intent on working with Mexico 'to stop southbound arms trafficking and dismantle networks fueling cartel violence.' The comments mark the first time that Washington — which has strong-armed Mexico to cut down on the northbound traffic of fentanyl and other illicit drugs — has acknowledged a reciprocal responsibility to clamp down on southbound guns, said President Claudia Sheinbaum. She hailed it as a breakthrough, years in the making. 'This is not just about the passage of narcotics from Mexico to the United States,' Sheinbaum said Friday. 'But that there [must] also be no passage of arms from the United States to Mexico.' Mexico is mulling options after the Supreme Court rebuff, Sheinbaum said. Still pending is a separate lawsuit by Mexico in U.S. federal court accusing five gun dealers in Arizona of trafficking weapons and ammunition to the cartels. Meanwhile, U.S. officials say that the Trump administration's recent designation of six Mexican cartels as foreign terrorist organizations means that weapons traffickers may face terrorism-related charges. 'In essence, the cartels that operate within Mexico and threaten the state are armed from weapons that are bought in the United States and shipped there,' U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told a congressional panel last month. 'We want to help stop that flow.' On Monday, federal agents gathered at an international bridge in Laredo, Texas, before an array of seized arms — from snub-nosed revolvers to mounted machine guns — to demonstrate what they insist is a newfound resolve to stop the illicit gun commerce. 'This isn't a weapon just going to Mexico,' Craig Larrabee, special agent in charge of Homeland Security Investigations in San Antonio, told reporters. 'It's going to arm the cartels. It's going to fight police officers and create terror throughout Mexico.' In documents submitted to the Supreme Court, Mexican authorities charged that it defied credibility that U.S. gunmakers were unaware that their products were destined for Mexican cartels — a charge denied by manufacturers. The gun industry also disputed Mexico's argument that manufacturers deliberately produce military-style assault rifles and other weapons that, for both practical and aesthetic reasons, appeal to mobsters. Mexico cited several .38-caliber Colt offerings, including a gold-plated, Jefe de Jefes ('Boss of Bosses') pistol; and a handgun dubbed the 'Emiliano Zapata,' emblazoned with an image of the revered Mexican revolutionary hero and his celebrated motto: 'It is better to die standing than to live on your knees.' Compared with the United States, Mexico has a much more stringent approach to firearms. Like the 2nd Amendment, Mexico's Constitution guarantees the right to bear arms. But it also stipulates that federal law 'will determine the cases, conditions, requirements and places' of gun ownership. There are just two stores nationwide, both run by the military, where people can legally purchase guns. At the bigger store, in Mexico City, fewer than 50 guns are sold on average each day. Buyers are required to provide names, addresses and fingerprints in a process that can drag on for months. And unlike the United States, Mexico maintains a national registry. But the vast availability of U.S.-origin, black-market weapons undermines Mexico's strict guidelines. According to Mexican officials, an estimated 200,000 to half a million guns are smuggled annually into Mexico. Data collected by the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives illustrate where criminals in Mexico are obtaining their firepower. Of the 132,823 guns recovered at crime scenes in Mexico from 2009 to 2018, fully 70% were found to have originated in the U.S. — mostly in Texas and other Southwest border states. In their lawsuit, Mexican authorities cited even higher numbers: Almost 90% of guns seized at crime scenes came from north of the border. Experts say most firearms in Mexico are bought legally at U.S. gun shows or retail outlets by so-called straw purchasers,who smuggle the weapons across the border. It's a surprisingly easy task: More than a million people and about $1.8 billion in goods cross the border legally each day, and Mexico rarely inspects vehicles heading south. In recent years, the flood of weapons from the United States has accelerated, fueling record levels of violence. Mexican organized crime groups have expanded their turf and moved into rackets beyond drug trafficking, including extortion, fuel-smuggling and the exploitation of timber, minerals and other natural resources. In 2004, guns accounted for one-quarter of Mexico's homicides. Today, guns are used in roughly three-quarters of killings. Mexican leaders have long been sounding alarms. Former President Felipe Calderón, who, with U.S. backing, launched what is now widely viewed as a catastrophic 'war' on Mexican drug traffickers in late 2006, personally pleaded with U.S. lawmakers to reinstate a congressional prohibition on purchases of high-powered assault rifles. The expiration of the ban in 2004 meant that any adult with a clean record could enter a store in most states and walk out with weapons that, in much of the world, are legally reserved for military use. 'Many of these guns are not going to honest American hands,' Calderon said in a 2010 address to the U.S. Congress. 'Instead, thousands are ending up in the hands of criminals.' It was Calderón who, near the end of his term, ventured to the northern border to unveil the massive billboard urging U.S. authorities to stop the weapons flow. His appeals, and those of subsequent Mexican leaders, went largely unheeded. The verdict is still out on whether Washington will follow up on its latest vows to throttle the gun traffic. 'The Trump administration has said very clearly that it wants to go after Mexican organized crime groups,' said David Shirk, a political scientist at San Diego University who studies violence in Mexico. 'And, if you're going to get serious about Mexican cartels, you have to take away their guns.' Special correspondent Cecilia Sánchez Vidal contributed to this report.
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Inside KELOLAND: Task force members highlight $600 million prison cap
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (KELO) — After meeting for more than eight hours in Pierre this past week, members of South Dakota's Project Prison Reset task force have narrowed the focus of where a new men's prison should be built and how big it should be. Huron company added to prison discussion On Tuesday, task force members unanimously supported building a facility, or multiple, at existing Department of Corrections spots or at proposed sites in the Worthing or Mitchell areas. The state has previously spent more than $50 million in land purchase and design costs for a new men's prison in rural Lincoln County at a site that has now been officially rejected by the task force. The goal is to build new prison facilities to house 1,500 to 1,700 inmates with a maximum cost of $600 million. JE Dunn Construction has been tasked with bringing proposals in front of the task force at its July meeting. On this week's Inside KELOLAND, Republican Sen. Chris Karr and Democratic Sen. Jamie Smith shared what they took away from the task force's latest decisions. Karr said state lawmakers have challenged contractors and the state engineer to provide options that meet the 1,500 beds and no more than $600 million price tag. 'I look forward to hearing back at our next meeting about what they come up for us for options,' Karr said. Karr said the previous price tag for a men's prison in Lincoln County at the cost of $825 million was too high to get the necessary two-thirds majority vote in the House and Senate to be approved. 'We need to do something,' Karr said, who added the Department of Corrections' design choices of a campus style prison that is built to last 100 years dicated some of the higher costs. Smith said the longer the state continues to delay taking action, the more expensive future prison needs will become. 'If we only spend the $600 million, we've got to make sure that this is the right thing to build,' Smith said. 'If we build under way too much, we're going to be having this conversation right away again.' Smith said he believes the Department of Corrections needs more space and staff to help incorporate more rehabilitation, treatment options and vocation with inmates. 'Then it's the re-entry too,' Smith said. 'We need to get all those put together to be able to help people be successful in the future.' Karr said in 2024, 63% of the men released from a state prison served less than one year. Karr said DOC is having more success with rehabilitation in Springfield and not Sioux Falls because of a lack of space. 'We're too overcrowded in Sioux Falls,' Karr said. Smith said lawmakers should consider what policies and investments the state could make to keep people out of prison. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Here's what to know about American Samoans in Alaska who are being prosecuted after trying to vote
WHITTIER, Alaska (AP) — They were born on U.S. soil, are entitled to U.S. passports and allowed to serve in the U.S. military, but 11 people in a small Alaska town are facing criminal charges after they tried to participate in a fundamental part of American democracy: voting. The defendants, who range in age from their 20s to their 60s, were all born in American Samoa — the only U.S. territory where residents are not automatically granted citizenship at birth. Prosecutors say they falsely claimed American citizenship when registering or trying to vote. The cases are highlighting another side of the debate over exaggerated allegations of voting by noncitizens, as well as what it means to be born on American soil, as President Donald Trump tries to redefine birthright citizenship by ending it for children of people who are in the country illegally. Here's what to know about the prosecutions in Alaska and the status of American Samoans when it comes to voting. What is the Alaska case about? The investigation began after Tupe Smith, a mom in the cruise-ship stop of Whittier, decided to run for a vacant seat on the regional school board in 2023. She was unopposed and won with about 95% of the vote. That's when she learned she wasn't allowed to hold public office because she wasn't a U.S. citizen. Smith says she knew she wasn't allowed to vote in federal elections but thought she could vote in local or state races, and that she never would have voted if she knew it wasn't legal. She says she told elections workers that she was a U.S. national, not a citizen, and was told to check a box saying she was a citizen anyway. About 10 months later, troopers returned to Whittier and issued court summonses to her husband and nine other American Samoans. While Smith appeals the charges against her, the state filed charges against the others in April. The state argues that Smith's false claim of citizenship was intentional, and her claim to the contrary was undercut by the clear language on the voter application forms she filled out in 2020 and 2022. The forms said that if the applicant did not answer yes to being over 18 years old and a U.S. citizen, 'do not complete this form, as you are not eligible to vote.' Why can't American Samoans vote in the U.S.? The 14th Amendment to the Constitution promises U.S. citizenship to those born on U.S. soil and subject to its jurisdiction. American Samoa has been U.S. soil since 1900, when several of its chiefs ceded their land and vowed allegiance to the United States. For that reason, Smith's lawyers argue, American Samoans must be recognized as U.S. citizens by birthright, and they should be allowed to vote in the U.S. But the islands' residents have never been so considered — Congress declined to extend birthright citizenship to American Samoa in the 1930s — and many American Samoans don't want it. They worry that it would disrupt their cultural practices, including communal land ownership. The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals cited that in 2021 when it declined to extend automatic citizenship to those born in American Samoa, saying it would be wrong to force citizenship on those who don't want it. The Supreme Court declined to review the decision. People born in all other U.S. territories — Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Northern Mariana Islands and Guam — are U.S. citizens. They can vote in U.S. elections if they move to a state. American Samoans can participate in local elections on American Samoa, including for a nonvoting representative in Congress. Have other states prosecuted American Samoans for trying to vote? Supporters of the American Samoans in Whittier have called the prosecutions unprecedented. One of Smith's attorneys, Neil Weare, suggested authorities are going after 'low-hanging fruit' in the absence of evidence that illegal immigrants frequently cast ballots in U.S. elections. Even state-level investigations have found voting by noncitizens to be exceptionally rare. In Oregon, officials inadvertently registered nearly 200 American Samoan residents to vote when they got their driver's licenses under the state's motor-voter law. Of those, 10 cast ballots in an election, according to the Oregon Secretary of State's office, but officials found they did not intend to break the law and no crime was committed. In Hawaii, one resident who was born in American Samoa, Sai Timoteo, ran for the state Legislature in 2018 before learning she wasn't allowed to hold public office or vote. She also avoided charges. Is there any legislation to fix this? American Samoans can become U.S. citizens — a requirement not just for voting, but for certain jobs, such as those that require a security clearance. However, the process can be costly and cumbersome. Given that many oppose automatic citizenship, the territory's nonvoting representative in Congress, Aumua Amata Coleman Radewagen, has introduced legislation that would streamline the naturalization of American Samoans who do wish to become U.S. citizens. The bill would allow U.S. nationals in outlying U.S. territories — that is, American Samoa — to be naturalized without relocating to one of the U.S. states. It would also allow the Department of Homeland Security to waive personal interviews of U.S. nationals as part of the process and to reduce fees for them. ___ Bohrer reported from Juneau, Alaska, and Johnson from Seattle.
