West Point Bible crest controversy spurs Pentagon lawsuit from conservative watchdog
FIRST ON FOX: A conservative judicial and government watchdog group has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Defense over documents related to a controversy surrounding the U.S. Military Academy at West Point crest on Bibles in the West Point Cadet Chapel.
Judicial Watch originally submitted a FOIA request in December 2024 for documents related to the Bibles, after the MacArthur Society, a group for West Point graduates concerned about potential politicization at the military academy, tipped them off to the potential removal of the crest.
The original request for the documents said: "Upon information and belief, the West Point Crest has appeared on the cover of the Bibles in the West Point Chapel since 1984, but circa December 2024, the Crest has been removed from the Bibles."
It's unclear why the crest was removed, prompting Judicial Watch to file the original FOIA request to learn more about the decision, amid concerns that the military academy is seeking to wipe out any affiliation with what the group calls "traditional values."
Mixing religious material with military paraphernalia has come under scrutiny in the past. For example, all four branches of the military yanked approval in 2012 for a military series of Holman Christian Standard Bibles that were sold at military exchanges, due to concerns that the series signaled the Bible was the official religious text of the military services, according to the Military Religious Freedom Foundation.
The West Point crest has undergone multiple variations, but historically has featured an eagle above the school's mascot, the Black Knights.
A spokesperson for West Point told Fox News Digital that the chapel's Bibles now feature the name of the military academy.
"The bibles purchased for the West Point Cadet Chapel are emblazoned, 'The United States Miliary Academy, West Point, New York,'" the spokesperson said in a statement to Fox News Digital.
The Department of Defense told Fox News Digital it does not comment on pending litigation.
WEST POINT DECISION TO CUT 'DUTY, HONOR, COUNTRY' FROM MISSION STATEMENT UNDER FIRE AGAIN'
Even so, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit for the documents pertaining to the Bibles Tuesday after receiving no response for the requested records.
"It appears the Biden administration and its leftist accomplices were determined to sever all connections between West Point and traditional values," Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement to Fox News Digital. "They added divisive DEI programs to the curriculum and removed 'Duty, Honor, Country' from the Military Academy's mission statement. Now, we learn they removed the West Point crest from Bibles in the West Point Chapel. It's a wonder they didn't remove the Bibles."
This isn't the first time West Point has come under scrutiny from the conservative watchdog.
HEGSETH QUIPS '99.9%' OF DEI INITIATIVES ARE GONE FROM THE MILITARY UNDER TRUMP'S WATCH
In May, Judicial Watch claimed that West Point engaged in a "cover up" scheme when it altered its mission statement in 2024 from "duty, honor, country" to "Army Values." According to the watchdog group, the change was part of an effort to advance a diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) agenda.
Even so, West Point's mission statement has been changed nine times in the past century, and the words "duty, honor, country" didn't make it into West Point's mission statement until 1998.
When asked about the mission statement change in May, an Army spokesperson directed Fox News Digital to West Point Superintendent Lt. Gen. Steven Gilland's original announcement: "Our absolute focus on developing leaders of character ready to lead our Army's Soldiers on increasingly lethal battlefields remains unchanged."
West Point is one of several U.S. military academies that trains students to become military officers.
TRUMP DOD CREATES TASK FORCE TO ABOLISH DEI OFFICES THAT 'PROMOTE SYSTEMIC RACISM'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump signs executive order to stop banks from cutting off crypto
Trump signs executive order to stop banks from cutting off crypto originally appeared on TheStreet. On Aug. 7, President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at what the administration characterizes as the ideological "debanking" of crypto individuals and organizations from U.S. banks. The order explicitly instructs federal banking regulators to eliminate 'reputational risk' as a basis for scrutinizing or severing relationships with customers. The White House argued that this vague term — often used by the Federal Reserve and FDIC — has been weaponized to cut off crypto firms from the U.S. financial system. 'The digital assets industry has also been the target of unfair debanking initiatives,' the White House said in a fact sheet. 'These practices erode public trust in banking institutions and regulators, harm livelihoods, freeze payrolls, and impose significant financial burdens on law-abiding Americans.'Trump's move directly targets what the crypto industry has long described as 'Operation Choke Point 2.0' — a term popularized by Castle Island Ventures co-founder Nic Carter in 2023 to describe an alleged backdoor campaign by regulators to isolate crypto businesses from the banking sector. The original Operation Choke Point was a 2013 DOJ initiative that pressured banks to de-risk from entire industries like payday lenders and firearm can't blacklist crypto The executive order mandates that federal agencies such as the Federal Reserve, OCC, and FDIC remove 'reputational risk' considerations from their internal guidelines and training materials. The Fed previously defined reputational risk as the 'potential that negative publicity regarding an institution's business practices… will cause a decline in the customer base.' Crypto advocates say that definition allowed regulators to subtly discourage banks from servicing crypto firms without having to admit bias. The order further directs regulators to audit prior debanking incidents and provide a report detailing whether any financial institution denied services unlawfully based on ideology. Those found guilty could face sanctions, including fines and restitution. Gemini-JPMorgan dispute intensified pressure The executive order comes weeks after a public clash between crypto exchange Gemini and JPMorgan, where the bank refused to onboard the exchange. Gemini co-founder Tyler Winklevoss accused JPMorgan of carrying out a 'modern-day Operation Choke Point,' aimed at suffocating fintech innovation. Ten exchanges reportedly sent a joint letter to President Trump shortly after the incident, urging the administration to act. The August 7 order appears to be a response. Financial institutions regulated by the Small Business Administration are also now required to review accounts previously closed on ideological grounds — and reinstate them where appropriate. Trump signs executive order to stop banks from cutting off crypto first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 7, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 7, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
With TX lawmakers in toe, CA Dems tie redistricting efforts to Trump opposition
Six Texas state Democrats appeared in Sacramento on Friday, backed by Gov. Gavin Newsom and House Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi, and said despite legal threats, they would not back down from their efforts to retaliate against Republican efforts to recarve congressional districts. In June, Trump began pressing Texas Republican leaders to consider redrawing their congressional districts to ensure the GOP retained its razor-thin House majority in the 2026 midterms. Dozens of Texas Democrats fled Austin Sunday to California, New York, Illinois and Massachusetts to break the Republicans' quorum and stop them from moving forward. In response, Texas GOP leaders have issued arrest warrants, issued the lawmakers $500 daily fines, and filed lawsuits to force them from office. 'We are running from nothing,' Texas Rep. Ann Johnson said during a press conference with Newsom, Pelosi, and other California Democrats. 'We are running to the front lines to stand with other Democrats across the state of Texas, across the state of California, across this nation, to ensure that each and every individual has the opportunity to pick, to decide that government is for the people by the people, and not the politicians selecting them.' Newsom has become the Democrats' most public champion to respond in kind by asking the legislature to approve a November special election that would ask California voters to temporarily approve new congressional boundaries. He and state leaders tied their efforts, which would move more liberal voters to five districts currently held by Republicans, to voters' growing discontent with Trump on issues like immigration enforcement, tariffs, and a $1 billion fine that his administration levied on UCLA this week, which Newsom called 'extortion.' 'That's what's at stake with this all about elevating the deeper consciousness of the line that Donald Trump continues to cross,' Newsom told reporters. 'It's not about him playing by a different set of rules. There are no rules for Donald Trump. This is a serious moment in American history.' Pelosi compared the absconding Texas Democrats to the Founding Fathers, calling them 'defenders of democracy.' 'We thank you not only for your courage, but for your patriotism,' she said. 'At the beginning of our country, Thomas Paine said, 'The times have found us.' And now the times have found us, especially our Texas delegation, to save our constitution.' Legislative Democrats overcame their initial reticence and have thrown their weight behind Newsom, who has asked that new maps be drawn for the 2026, 2028, and 2030 election cycles. If he succeeds, congressional redistricting power would revert back after 2030 to the independent Citizen Redistricting Commission. Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas, D-Hollister, said Friday that the map would come out next week, ahead of the Aug. 22 deadline that Secretary of State Shirley Weber set for lawmakers to decide if the election will take place. The Legislature returns from summer break on Aug. 18, and is expected to immediately begin work on related legislation. The Republican effort to redraw districts in their favor has now expanded to Indiana, Missouri, and Florida, all states where redistricting power lies with Republican-held legislatures, making it likely that even if California successfully redistricts, it won't be enough to offset the GOP's gains. Newsom said few other states could act with the 'scale and scope' of California: 'It's always the right thing to do the right thing.' 'California has to be prepared to respond. It is our sacred responsibility to California, to our country, and we know that there is no bottom to Trump's dystopian plan,' said Senate President pro Tem Mike McGuire, D-Santa Rosa. 'I'm firm in my belief that if the legislature puts a redistricting initiative on the ballot, I believe the people of the Golden State will do the right thing. I trust the voters of California more than I would ever trust Trump and his lackeys in Texas.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What is the American Worker Rebate Act of 2025? Status update on Trump stimulus check
The American Worker Rebate Act of 2025 was introduced after President Donald Trump floated the idea of a tariff rebate check for taxpayers, much like the stimulus checks that were given during the COVID-19 pandemic. On July 25, responding to a reporter that asked about all of the "tariff revenue coming in" and the "possibility of a rebate to the American public,' Trump said: "We're thinking about that actually." "We have so much money coming in, we're thinking about a little rebate. But the big thing we want to do is pay down debt. But we're thinking about a rebate." A few days after the presidents' tariff rebate comments, Missouri Republican Sen. Josh Hawley announced the American Worker Rebate Act of 2025 aimed at sending checks to Americans. Here's what to know about a possible stimulus or rebate check, how much and who would qualify. What is the American Worker Rebate Act of 2025? Hawley's bill, called the American Worker Rebate Act of 2025, would provide a minimum of $600 per adult and dependent child, or $2,400 for a family of four, according to news officials. The benefit would be reduced by 5% for joint filers with an adusted gross income above $150,000 or single filers earning more than $75,000 individually. According to an analysis from The Budget Lab at Yale released July 28, Trump's tariffs could cost U.S. households an average of $2,400 in 2025 through higher prices passed on from companies paying higher tariff taxes. The Treasury Department said on July 25, that the U.S. government posted a $27 billion surplus in June, following a $316 billion deficit in May. Customs duties totaled approximately $27 billion for the month, up from $23 billion in May and 301% higher than June 2024. On an annual basis, tariff collections have totaled $113 billion, or 86% more than a year ago. The bill would allow for a larger rebate if the tariff revenue exceeds projections. Are we getting a stimulus check or Trump tariff rebate in 2025? Trump floated the idea of using part of the governement revenue being generated by the new tariffs and returning it to taxpayers of a certain income level in the form of a rebate check. The rebate idea would be similar to the stimulus checks sent during the pandemic. A rebate is a partial refund of the purchase price that a consumer paid, often upon meeting certain conditions — more like a discount that is refunded after the purchase versus a discount that is applied at the point of sale. A stimulus check on the other hand, is a direct payment to encourage spending and stimulate the economy by putting money directly into the consumers' hands. In February, Trump said he would consider the plan to pay out $5,000 stimulus checks to taxpayers in the form of a 'DOGE dividend' during a summit in Miami. He explained it as using part of the 20% of the savings identified by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and giving it back to taxpayers. However, he has not shared any further specifics or details about the possible 'DOGE dividend' or its certainty since then. Are we getting an economic relief package in 2025? While speculation about a of $2,000 has surfaced on social media and unverified websites, there has been no official confirmation of any additional economic relief package in 2025 from Congress or the IRS to support this claim. Any such news should be taken with caution as it could be misinformation or attempted fraud. Maria Francis is a Pennsylvania-based journalist with the Mid-Atlantic Connect Team. This article originally appeared on Asbury Park Press: Are we getting a stimulus check? Economic relief package 2025 rebate Solve the daily Crossword
