Creative Technology names late founder Sim Wong Hoo's brother as new CEO
SINGAPORE: Creative Technology has named Mr Freddy Sim, the younger brother of its late founder and billionaire entrepreneur Sim Wong Hoo, as CEO with effect from Friday (May 16).
Just like his brother, who served as chairman and CEO until his death in 2023, Mr Freddy Sim will be drawing a nominal monthly salary of S$1 (US$0.80), the company said in an announcement on the Singapore Exchange (SGX) on Friday evening.
Creative Technology was founded in 1981 and is best known for its Sound Blaster sound cards. The company designs and manufactures digital entertainment products.
"This appointment is an honour and I will undertake this new role in full recognition that we are all building upon what my brother Sim Wong Hoo started all those years ago,' said Mr Freddy Sim.
'Creative is renowned as the flagbearer for innovation in the technology industry. The new senior management team have re-strategised and refocused on our core DNA of innovation, and revitalised the entrepreneurial spirit of daring to venture into the leading edge.'
In its announcement, Creative Technology said that Mr Freddy Sim is a "seasoned entrepreneur" with more than 40 years of experience in consumer electronics and technology.
"His expertise and seasoned leadership will continue to accelerate Creative on its journey of renewal; and its momentum to deliver industry-leading innovative products," it added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
DBS tops US$100 billion market value in Singapore Exchange first
South-east Asia's top lender closed 0.8 per cent higher at $45.49 in Singapore trading on June 9, giving it a market capitalisation of $129.36 billion. ST PHOTO: LIM YAOHUI SINGAPORE – DBS Group Holdings became the first listed company in Singapore to top US$100 billion (S$128.6 billion) in market value, helped by a weaker US dollar that amplified gains on the local stock market. South-east Asia's top lender closed 0.8 per cent higher at $45.49 in Singapore trading on June 9, giving it a market capitalisation of $129.36 billion (US$100.6 billion), extending its gains this year to more than 4 per cent. The advance in DBS's share price in US-dollar terms was driven by the weaker greenback. So far this year, the Singapore dollar has appreciated about 6 per cent against the US dollar. In local currency terms, DBS has eased slightly from its record closing high of $46.67 on Feb 26. At the current market value, DBS ranks about 22nd among global banks, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That's ahead of Tokyo-based Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, but half that of HSBC Holdings. Some of Asia's biggest banks like Commonwealth Bank of Australia and India's HDFC Bank have bigger market capitalisations. The milestone comes after Singapore banks pledged in recent months to hand over billions of dollars in surplus capital to investors, encouraged by record-high earnings in 2024. DBS in particular, has benefited from increases in lending and wealth fees. Other than DBS, Singapore-based Sea that is listed in New York reached this valuation before. DBS chief executive officer Tan Su Shan took charge of the bank in March from Piyush Gupta after his 15-year leadership. Ms Tan said at her first earnings call in May that the bank seeks to benefit from supply-chain changes undertaken by its clients and increased demand for hedging foreign exchange exposure amid US President Donald Trump's tariff moves. 'A lot of DBS's out-performance has been due to the larger growth of its wealth management, which is really starting to challenge top players in Asia,' said Michael Makdad, a senior analyst at Morningstar, adding he sees the business continuing to grow. 'Despite Trump's tariffs, the environment remains relatively benign for Singapore banks which are increasing share dividends and buybacks more than we would've expected a year ago.' DBS is the third-largest wealth manager in Asia, excluding mainland China, according to data compiled by industry publication Asian Private Banker. Net new money for its business catering to the rich came in at $21 billion last year, demonstrating the strong inflows that have exceeded $20 billion for the past three years through 2024. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Grab says it's not in talks to buy Gojek parent GoTo ‘at this time'
Grab, the largest of South-east Asia's ride-hailing and delivery firms, has been locked in fierce competition with GoTo for almost a decade. PHOTO: ST FILE Grab says it's not in talks to buy Gojek parent GoTo 'at this time' SINGAPORE – Grab Holdings said it isn't in talks to acquire Gojek parent GoTo Group 'at this time,' signalling it's halting or at least pausing a planned US$7 billion (S$9 billion) acquisition of its South-east Asia internet peer. 'The parties are not involved in any discussions at this time and Grab has not entered into any definitive agreements,' Grab said in a statement on June 9. 'Indonesia continues to be an important country in serving our mission as we continue to outserve our Indonesian customers, driver- and merchant-partners.' Singapore's Grab and Indonesia's GoTo had made headway on a potential deal structure, but the pace of talks had slowed recently over concerns about potential regulatory demands, Bloomberg News reported previously. Indonesia's antitrust agency said in May it would look into potential risks and urged the companies to ensure any deal won't create a monopoly. Shares of Grab dropped 3.9 per cent to US$4.98 in US trading on June 9. The stock has advanced 41 per cent in the past 12 months as Grab's profitability improved, but remains down more than 50 per cent since its listing in New York through a merger with a blank-cheque firm in late 2021. Grab, which is backed by Uber Technologies, has held on-and-off talks with GoTo for years. But a merger never materialized, partly because of antitrust concerns likely to arise from combining South-east Asia's two dominant ride-hailing and food-delivery companies. Uber left the region in 2018 in exchange for a stake in Grab, and smaller competitors haven't eaten significantly into Grab and GoTo's market share in Indonesia and Singapore. Indonesia's sovereign wealth fund Danantara has been considering a role in the combination, possibly helping to assuage concerns in the government resulting from the sale of the national tech champion, Bloomberg News reported last week. A potential sale of GoTo has sparked worries among Indonesia's political leadership about the loss of independence and developer and engineer jobs. Some have also expressed concerns that ride-hailing and food-delivery prices would rise if Grab becomes dominant in a tough economy where consumers are already facing hardship. Grab, the largest of South-east Asia's ride-hailing and delivery firms, has been locked in fierce competition with GoTo for almost a decade. The Singapore-based company is the leading provider in its home market and countries including Malaysia and Thailand. While the companies' rivalry has weighed on their efforts to reach consistent profitability, they have benefited from user growth in the emerging economies they operate in. On-demand transactions – including meal delivery – grew 19 per cent in the two-month period covering April and May, versus a year earlier, Grab said in a separate release on June 19. GoTo has pulled out from countries including Thailand and Vietnam after a fierce cost-cutting drive, but remains a formidable player in Indonesia – the region's biggest market. Acquiring GoTo would give Grab a stronger position in the country of more than 275 million. 'We will continue to maintain a high hurdle rate when deploying our capital, and will have a balanced approach to investing for organic, profitable growth, and be highly selective on inorganic opportunities, in line with our capital allocation framework,' Grab said in its statement. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Commentary: Trump and Musk are fighting. It's difficult to pick a side
SINGAPORE: Once inseparable, United States President Donald Trump and the world's richest man, Elon Musk, are now locked in a very public - and very bitter - divorce. In a matter of days, Mr Musk torched Mr Trump's signature "big, beautiful" Bill, condemned his spending plans, threatened to form a new political party and even suggested the president be impeached. Mr Trump retaliated in kind. He called Mr Musk 'a big-time drug addict', threatened to cut his companies off from government contracts and warned of ' serious consequences ' if the billionaire were to finance Democratic Party candidates running against Republicans. "I have no intention of speaking to him," Mr Trump told NBC on Saturday (Jun 7), saying he believed their relationship was over. Unlike most public spats between public figures, this one offers no easy side to take. The two men are, in many ways, cut from the same cloth. They operate with little patience for deliberation and considerable appetite for the spotlight, and are accustomed to getting their own ways. A PERSONAL FIGHT WITH NATIONAL CONSEQUENCES The trouble with breakups is that any fallout doesn't stay between the warring parties. There's always collateral damage. For example, after Mr Trump threatened to pull government deals with Mr Musk's companies, Tesla shares tanked 14 per cent and lost US$150 billion in value. This very public falling-out carries risks for both men. For Mr Trump, the feud with Mr Musk marks the first major rift with a prominent adviser in his second term. It has shattered the 'bromance' that many assumed would continue and could fracture Mr Trump's support among tech leaders and wealthy donors. Mr Musk, who spent nearly US$300 million in last year's elections, was not only Mr Trump's richest backer, but also a key bridge to Silicon Valley. He helped connect Mr Trump to tech investors and gave the pro-business wing of the Republican Party reason to support the president. Now, Mr Musk's defection could undermine Republican unity on Capitol Hill. His vocal criticism of the debt impact has emboldened some Republican fiscal hawks to oppose Mr Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which passed the US House late last month. The Bill, which combines tax breaks, spending cuts, border security funding and other priorities, is the centrepiece of Mr Trump's domestic policy agenda. Critics, however, have said it could increase the deficit by as much as US$4 trillion over a decade. If it falters in the Senate due to Republican defections, it would be a significant blow to Mr Trump's legislative agenda. Moreover, Mr Musk's talk of a new centrist party and his massive online influence hint at a potential challenge to the two-party status quo, which should alarm Republican strategists. Although an actual third party is a long shot, even the suggestion feeds a narrative that Mr Trump's brand of Republicanism is alienating a segment of his base. A prolonged Trump-Musk feud could make it harder for Republicans to hold Congress in next year's midterms, given Mr Musk's financial clout and devoted following. FEUD SPREADS TO SPACE Mr Trump, for his part, appears eager to show he won't be dictated to by a billionaire ally. A White House official stressed that the administration is 'not beholden to Elon Musk on policy' and that by attacking the Bill, Mr Musk 'has clearly picked a side' against Mr Trump. In the short term, Mr Trump's hardline stance may shore up his image as a president who puts his agenda above any one person, even the world's richest man. His core base, many of whom harbour scepticism toward tech elites, might even cheer him for standing up to Mr Musk. However, Mr Trump's unpredictable retaliatory streak raises questions in Washington and on Wall Street. Would he really cut off federal contracts to SpaceX and Tesla to punish Mr Musk, even if it jeopardises US interests? NASA and the Pentagon rely heavily on SpaceX for America's spaceflight capabilities and military satellite launches. Pulling the plug on SpaceX partnerships could set back crucial programmes (like the International Space Station transport, Moon missions and defence satellite deployments) and force the government to scramble for alternatives. It's an open question how far Mr Trump is willing to go. Even some within Mr Trump's circle may urge caution, given the billions at stake and the fact that SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft is integral to US-led space efforts (NASA has invested roughly US$15 billion in SpaceX projects). So, while the president talks tough, cutting Mr Musk off is not without consequences. Rattled by Mr Musk's initial threat to retire the Dragon spacecraft, NASA and Pentagon officials have contacted at least three competitors - Rocket Lab, Stoke Space and Blue Origin - to assess their rocket development and availability for government missions, according to a report by the Washington Post over the weekend. CAN MUSK AFFORD TO ALIENATE WASHINGTON? For Mr Musk, this episode is a high-stakes gamble that could redefine his role in the tech and political ecosystems. On one hand, Mr Musk has rebranded himself as an independent voice, unafraid to challenge a president he once supported. This could salvage his reputation among moderates or Tesla customers who were uneasy with his closeness to Mr Trump. By distancing himself from Mr Trump, Mr Musk may refocus attention on his companies' innovations rather than partisan politics. He has already said he will curtail political spending going forward, signalling a retreat from the kingmaker role he played in 2024. On the other hand, Mr Musk is now on a collision course with the US government that could have serious business implications. If Mr Trump were to follow through on cancelling contracts, SpaceX stands to lose enormous revenue (an estimated US$22 billion in government deals is now at risk). Mr Musk must also consider the broader impact on Tesla, which until now has benefited from government electric vehicle (EV) incentives and a friendly regulatory environment. If Mr Trump now views Mr Musk as an adversary, Tesla could face a chillier reception in policy areas important to it (such as environmental credits, infrastructure support or foreign trade deals). AN EXPENSIVE BREAKUP What happens next is very much anyone's guess; it could well depend on what either man decides to post next. The Trump-Musk fallout has escalated from a policy disagreement into a personal and political reckoning. Mr Trump is defending his legislative legacy and asserting authority over a defiant former ally. Mr Musk is recasting himself as an independent visionary, willing to challenge power, but at the cost of political access. Whether this fades or hardens, the consequences will be felt well beyond Washington. Ben Chester Cheong is a law lecturer at the Singapore University of Social Sciences, and of counsel at RHTLaw Asia. He is a visiting fellow in law at the University of Reading, and a centre researcher at the University of Cambridge.
