logo
Badenoch urges Tory councils to challenge asylum hotels in court

Badenoch urges Tory councils to challenge asylum hotels in court

Rhyl Journal11 hours ago
In a letter to Tory councils, Mrs Badenoch said she was 'encouraging' them to 'take the same steps' as Epping Council 'if your legal advice supports it'.
Labour dismissed her letter as 'desperate and hypocritical nonsense', but several of its own local authorities have already suggested they too, could mount legal action against asylum hotels in their areas.
Epping secured a temporary injunction from the High Court on Tuesday, blocking the use of the Essex town's Bell Hotel as accommodation for asylum seekers on planning grounds.
The decision has prompted councils controlled by Labour, the Conservatives and Reform UK to investigate whether they could pursue a similar course of action.
These include Labour-run Tamworth and Wirral councils, Tory-run Broxbourne and East Lindsey councils and Reform's Staffordshire and West Northamptonshire councils.
Patrick Harley, the leader of Conservative-run Dudley Council, told the Daily Mail it was looking at taking legal action, a verdict echoed by Richard Biggs, the Tory leader of Reigate and Banstead Council.
But Labour's Newcastle City Council and Brighton and Hove City Council have both ruled out legal action.
Tuesday's High Court decision has also caused a potential headache for the Home Office, which has a legal duty to house destitute asylum seekers while their claims are being dealt with.
If planning laws prevent the Government from using hotels, ministers will face a scramble to find alternative accommodation, potentially in the private rented sector.
In her letter, Mrs Badenoch praised Epping Council's legal challenge and told Tory councils she would 'back you to take similar action to protect your community'.
But she added that the situation would 'depend on individual circumstances of the case' and suggested Tory councils could pursue 'other planning enforcement options'.
She also accused Labour of 'trying to ram through such asylum hotels without consultation and proper process', saying the Government had reopened the Bell Hotel as asylum accommodation after the Conservatives had closed it.
The hotel had previously been used as asylum accommodation briefly in 2020 and then between 2022 and 2024 under the previous Conservative government.
Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick echoed the Opposition leader's views, saying the country is 'in a mess'.
He told the Daily Express: 'Every patriotic council, whether Conservative, Reform, whatever, should follow Epping's lead and seek an injunction'.
A Labour spokesperson said Mrs Badenoch's letter was a 'pathetic stunt' and 'desperate and hypocritical nonsense from the architects of the broken asylum system', saying there were now '20,000 fewer asylum seekers in hotels than at their peak under the Tories'.
The letter comes ahead of the publication on Thursday of figures showing how many asylum seekers were being temporarily housed in hotels at the end of June this year.
Home Office figures from the previous quarter show there were 32,345 asylum seekers being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March.
This was down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier.
Figures on those staying in hotels date back to December 2022 and showed numbers hit a peak at the end of September 2023, when there were 56,042 asylum seekers in hotels.
Data is not released on the number of hotels in use, but it is thought there were more than 400 asylum hotels open in summer 2023.
Labour has said this has since been reduced to fewer than 210.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Asylum applications hit new record high while backlog drops, figures show
Asylum applications hit new record high while backlog drops, figures show

North Wales Chronicle

time16 minutes ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Asylum applications hit new record high while backlog drops, figures show

A total of 111,084 people applied for asylum in the UK in the year to June 2025, the highest number for any 12-month period since current records began in 2001. The number is up 14% from 97,107 in the year to June 2024, according to figures published by the Home Office. Of the claims, 39% were made by people who arrived in the UK after crossing the English Channel. A researcher said there are several potential reasons for the rise in asylum applications. Nuni Jorgensen, of the Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford, said: 'They include the intensification of smuggling activity (especially across the Channel), larger numbers of people claiming asylum after arriving on visas, a larger number of pending and recently refused asylum seekers in Europe. 'It is hard to know to what extent the repeal of the previous government's asylum policies has contributed, not least because those policies were never fully implemented and their impact was unclear.' The most common nationalities among asylum applicants in the year to June 2025 were Pakistani (10.1% of the total), Afghan (7.5%), Iranian (7.0%) and Eritrean (6.7%). The record level of applications comes as the backlog of people waiting for an initial decision on their claims dropped to 90,812 at the end of June. This is down 17% from 109,536 at the end of March and down 24% from 118,882 a year earlier at the end of June 2024. The total peaked at 175,457 at the end of June 2023, which was the highest figure since current records began in 2010. Dr Jorgensen added that reducing the backlog in processing asylum claims is 'critical' to any plan to reduce the use of hotels to house asylum seekers. It comes as ministers face fresh pressure over hotels after Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary injunction by the High Court on Tuesday, which will force asylum seekers to be removed from a hotel in the Essex town. The Government is bracing for further legal challenges from councils across the country, while scrambling for an alternative to house the Epping asylum seekers elsewhere. Dr Jorgensen said: 'Although the initial decision backlog is down since Labour came to office, a new backlog has built up in the courts due to appeals against unsuccessful decisions. 'The Government will be hoping that its enforcement activities and the new returns agreement with France will reduce the number of people applying for asylum and requiring accommodation, but there is no sign of this in the data so far.' The Refugee Council said 'good work' to cut the backlog is 'at risk' of poor quality decisions. Its chief executive, Enver Solomon, said: 'Right now nearly half of appeals are successful. 'These mistakes have life-changing consequences for the people we work with, who have fled persecution in countries like Sudan and Afghanistan.' Elsewhere separate figures published on Thursday show the number of enforced returns of people who have no legal right to stay in the UK rose slightly in the latest quarter. Some 2,323 returns by the Home Office took place in April-June 2025, up from 2,314 in January-March this year. A total of 9,072 enforced returns took place in the year to June, up 25% from 7,253 in the previous year and the highest figure for a 12-month period since the year to December 2018 (9,236). The Government has vowed to ramp up removals of migrants with no right to be in the UK to deter those coming or staying in the country illegally. Of migrants arriving in the UK after crossing the English Channel, some 569 people were returned in April-June this year. This is down from 605 in the previous quarter, and is made up of both enforced and voluntary returns, where people who face deportation left of their own accord. Some 2,330 migrants who arrived in small boats were returned during the year to June, down from 2,516 in the previous 12 months. Of the 2,330 returns in the year to June, 75% were Albanian nationals.

James Dobson, influential American evangelical leader, dies aged 89
James Dobson, influential American evangelical leader, dies aged 89

BBC News

time18 minutes ago

  • BBC News

James Dobson, influential American evangelical leader, dies aged 89

Dr James Dobson, a prominent and influential evangelical leader who advised four US presidents, has died aged 89. Dobson was a fixture in conservative US politics for decades and most recently served on Donald Trump's advisory board for evangelical ministry he founded, Focus on the Family, is one of the largest in the world, with a presence in nearly 100 well as Trump, Dobson advised three other Republican presidents: Ronald Reagan, George H W Bush, and George W Bush. Born in Louisiana in 1936, Dobson founded Focus on the Family in 1977, with the stated mission of affirming "the God-ordained institution of the family". His radio programme was eventually broadcast by 4,000 radio stations across North America. He published his first of more than 70 books - Dare To Discipline, which advocated for strict parental authority and corporal punishment - while working as an associate clinical professor of paediatrics at the University of California School of Bauer of the Dr James Dobson Family Institute described the organisation's founder as a "pioneer" and "a man of deep conviction whose voice shaped the way generations view faith, family and culture".While he never ran for public office, Dobson was considered extremely influential in conservative political circles in the founded the Family Research Council in 1981, a think-tank that advocates for socially conservative causes, and coordinated state-level lobbying organisations across the country. In 1982, he was appointed to a national advisory committee on youth justice by then-President Ronald Reagan. Dobson later acted as an adviser during both Bush presidencies, and endorsed Donald Trump in the 2020 election, as well as offering him vocal support during impeachment views lead to several controversies over his 2014, he was accused of hijacking a National Day of Prayer event by calling Barack Obama "the abortion president" - prompting former California congresswoman Janice Hahn to storm out of the event. Dobson was also considered a hard-liner on LGBTQ+ issues, and in 1973 resigned from the American Psychological Association after it removed homosexuality from its list of mental disorders. In 2010, his Family Research Council was formally designated as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center for what it described as "anti-gay propaganda throughout its history", a charge the group vehemently denied. He was often dismissive of his critics, writing in a 2019 newsletter that "left-wing activists typically hate committed Christians". "It begins with resentment for everything we stand for," he wrote. "They despise this belief system because it threatens their godless worldview." In 2022, Dobson claimed a victory after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade, which gave women in the US a constitutional right to abortion across the country. "At last, the tide has changed, and the legality of abortion has been given to the people to decide - where it belonged in the first place," he said at the time.

Conservatives call for review of Witney hotel asylum use
Conservatives call for review of Witney hotel asylum use

BBC News

time18 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Conservatives call for review of Witney hotel asylum use

A Conservative group has written to a Lib Dem-led district council, urging for review of its position about the use of a hotel for asylum Oxfordshire Conservatives is asking West Oxfordshire District Council chief executive Giles Hughes to clarify the planning status of the Witney Four Pillars follows a High Court injunction granted to Epping Forest District Council to stop migrants being placed at The Bell Hotel in BBC has contacted West Oxfordshire District Council for a comment. The group writes it is a matter of record "that the hotel has not applied for, nor been granted, planning permission for a change of use".It says in the case of Epping Forest District Council v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the High Court rules "that the use of a hotel for asylum seeker accommodation did amount to a material change of use requiring planning permission". "This provides a clear legal precedent that must now be considered by other local authorities, including West Oxfordshire," it group "specifically" asks the local authority to "reassess whether the Witney Four Pillars Hotel current use constitutes a material change of use under planning law" and "consider seeking injunctive relief from the High Court to prevent the ongoing use of the hotel without planning permission, as other councils have successfully done".It writes that failure to act now would risk the council "being seen as disregarding both legal precedent and the will of local residents".Deputy group leader Liam Walker said judging by the daily figures of how many people were crossing the Channel, "this issue is only getting worse". New figures show there were 32,059 asylum seekers in UK hotels at the end of June, up 8% on the same point 12 months ago. You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store