
As eviction looms large, Bitra islanders collect land records
TOI reported on Saturday about the Lakshadweep revenue department's proposal to acquire the island and transfer it to relevant defence and strategic agencies.
Lakshadweep administration is yet to come out with an official communication on the issue. At the same time, the notification was clear that the acquisition was necessitated by the island's strategic location, national security relevance and the inherent logistical and administrative challenges associated with civilian habitation.
Bitra resident Muhammed Yasin is apprehensive that they will have to eventually leave the island since the proposal is to hand it over for defence purposes.
"I spoke to a lawyer and he said since the Lakshadweep natives are categorised as Scheduled Tribes (ST), our land cannot be seized that quickly. I am also hopeful that the discussions by political leaders, including our MP, will be fruitful," said Yasin.
He said they took out a rally on Friday evening to mark their protest.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Become an American citizen - Apply for a Green card
americ24
Undo
"Since the notification has mentioned that the survey (as part of the social impact assessment) may take two months to complete, we have started doing whatever we need to. We have entrusted a group of youngsters with the task of collecting landowners' details by visiting their houses. In Bitra, there are some landowners who are not permanent residents of the island.
We plan to identify even those non-resident landowners so that we can present a united front," said Yasin, adding that they were also preparing to move court.
Another Bitra resident said on condition of anonymity that while a section of the population has relatives and property on adjacent islands, a significant number has nowhere else to go.
Meanwhile, the Lakshadweep Students Association (LSA), an independent organisation formed in 1970, held a protest in Kochi, burning the notification. "The move can only be considered as a continuation of the Lakshadweep administration's efforts to take over the islanders' land.
The properties in the name of the islanders in uninhabited islands, where they used to farm, were earlier acquired, ignoring the natives' claims.
Subsequently, there was an attempt to claim the land in inhabited islands possessed by natives categorised as Pandaram land. Now, they are going to take over an entire island, uprooting the islanders from their habitat," said LSA president Misbahudheen P.
He said it was worrying that the notification said that the consent of gram sabhas or owners was not mandatory to acquire the lands.
"The notification lacks clarity and raises a lot of questions. Even if they are taking over the island for security reasons, where would the people go? There is no reference about the same. The opinion of the residents was not sought either before issuing the notification," said Misbahudheen, adding that they would launch further protests if the administration went ahead with the proposal.
Kochi: As eviction looms large, the residents of Bitra Island in Lakshadweep are growing increasingly anxious.
The residents are busy collecting details of land records to ensure that they are in order in the backdrop of the Lakshadweep UT administration's move to acquire the island's entire land area for defence purposes.
TOI reported on Saturday about the Lakshadweep revenue department's proposal to acquire the island and transfer it to relevant defence and strategic agencies.
Lakshadweep administration is yet to come out with an official communication on the issue.
At the same time, the notification was clear that the acquisition was necessitated by the island's strategic location, national security relevance and the inherent logistical and administrative challenges associated with civilian habitation.
Bitra resident Muhammed Yasin is apprehensive that they will have to eventually leave the island since the proposal is to hand it over for defence purposes.
"I spoke to a lawyer and he said since the Lakshadweep natives are categorised as Scheduled Tribes (ST), our land cannot be seized that quickly.
I am also hopeful that the discussions by political leaders, including our MP, will be fruitful," said Yasin.
He said they took out a rally on Friday evening to mark their protest. "Since the notification has mentioned that the survey (as part of the social impact assessment) may take two months to complete, we have started doing whatever we need to. We have entrusted a group of youngsters with the task of collecting landowners' details by visiting their houses.
In Bitra, there are some landowners who are not permanent residents of the island.
We plan to identify even those non-resident landowners so that we can present a united front," said Yasin, adding that they were also preparing to move court.
Another Bitra resident said on condition of anonymity that while a section of the population has relatives and property on adjacent islands, a significant number has nowhere else to go.
Meanwhile, the Lakshadweep Students Association (LSA), an independent organisation formed in 1970, held a protest in Kochi, burning the notification. "The move can only be considered as a continuation of the Lakshadweep administration's efforts to take over the islanders' land. The properties in the name of the islanders in uninhabited islands, where they used to farm, were earlier acquired, ignoring the natives' claims.
Subsequently, there was an attempt to claim the land in inhabited islands possessed by natives categorised as Pandaram land. Now, they are going to take over an entire island, uprooting the islanders from their habitat," said LSA president Misbahudheen P.
He said it was worrying that the notification said that the consent of gram sabhas or owners was not mandatory to acquire the lands. "The notification lacks clarity and raises a lot of questions. Even if they are taking over the island for security reasons, where would the people go? There is no reference about the same. The opinion of the residents was not sought either before issuing the notification," said Misbahudheen, adding that they would launch further protests if the administration went ahead with the proposal.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
20 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Will defend national interest, says Centre after tariff shock
India will take 'all necessary steps' to secure its national interest, commerce minister Piyush Goyal told parliament on Thursday, a day after US President Donald Trump announced punitive tariffs on Indian goods. While acknowledging Donald Trump's Wednesday post as reason for making a suo moto statement in Parliament, Piyush Goyal on Thursday reiterated the Trump administration's April 2 executive order.(File/ANI) 'The implications of the recent development are being examined by the government,' Goyal said in a suo motu statement, making a tacit reference to Trump's Truth Social post on Wednesday that India will face a 25% reciprocal tariff plus an unspecified additional penalty for purchasing Russian crude oil from August 1. The minister said the commerce ministry is engaged with all stakeholders, including exporters and industry for taking feedback on their assessment of the situation. Trump's reaction was an outcome of India refusing to budge on retaining protections for its agriculture, dairy and micro, small and medium enterprises from unfettered American imports. On Thursday, the American president continued his targeting of India. 'I don't care what India does with Russia,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on Thursday. 'They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care.' In Washington, a US appeals court sharply questioned whether Trump's tariffs were justified by the president's emergency powers, after a lower court said he exceeded his authority with sweeping levies on imported goods from a wide variety of countries. The US emergency powers law 'doesn't even say tariffs, doesn't even mention them,' one of the judges said. 'The government attaches the utmost importance to protecting and promoting the welfare of our farmers, workers, entrepreneurs, exporters, MSMEs and all sections of Industry. We will take all necessary steps to secure and advance our national interest,' Goyal told both houses of Parliament. People close to the development said the Trump administration is yet to send any formal communication over the tariffs or the quantum of the penalty. 'Situation will be clear in the next two days, which will help to assess the impact for considered action,' one of them said. 'The government is in touch with stakeholders and the industry is willing to cooperate with the government,' a second person said. Both people requested anonymity. They said negotiations for the proposed first tranche of the India-US bilateral trade agreement (BTA) are continuing, and so far, the New Delhi visit of the American negotiating team is unchanged on August 24 for the sixth round of talks. Federation of Indian Export Organisations (Fieo) director general Ajay Sahai said: 'The current development seems temporary as both sides are negotiating a BTA, which will resolve issues of punitive tariffs. Meanwhile, during this temporary phase, both exporters and importers may absorb the impact of the US tariff action.' Industry experts said not all Indian goods would be subjected to reciprocal or punitive tariff as about 45-50% goods by value fall in the exempt category. India exported goods worth about $86 billion to the US in 2024-25. Sectors such as electronics, energy, pharmaceutical ingredients, and precious metals remain exempt from additional duties under existing US trade regulations, potentially protecting billions in Indian exports. However, key export sectors such as textiles, engineering goods, and processed foods face the full tariff burden. According to the people mentioned above, since Trump's message came informally through a social media handle, the minister ostensibly chose not to mention specific details of the President's Wednesday post in Parliament. Instead, he recounted the last official position of the White House in the executive order. While acknowledging Trump's Wednesday post as reason for making a suo moto statement in Parliament, Goyal on Thursday reiterated the Trump administration's April 2 executive order. 'I would like to apprise the House about the statement by the President of the United States of America (US) on 30th July 2025 regarding the applicable tariff on bilateral trade from 1st August 2025. On 2nd April 2025, the US President had issued an executive order on reciprocal tariffs imposing additional duties ranging from 10% to 50% on imports from its trading partners. A baseline duty of 10% has been effective from 5th April 2025,' he said. 'The additional duty on India was announced at 26% including baseline tariff of 10%. Originally, the full country specific additional duty was to be effective from 9th April 2025 but was postponed initially for 90 days on 10th April 2025 and further extended up to 1st August 2025,' his statement in Parliament said. India and the US entered into negotiations for a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement (BTA) in March 2025 with a target to complete the first tranche of the agreement by fall of 2025, the minister said. 'The two sides finalised the detailed Terms of Reference (ToR) to enter into negotiations of the BTA on 29th March 2025 during the first physical round of discussions held at New Delhi. Thereafter, four physical rounds of negotiations have taken place between both sides, in New Delhi and Washington D.C., to work towards finalisation of the BTA in accordance with the agreed ToR. In addition, there have been many virtual meetings between the two sides,' he added. On Wednesday, Trump indicated that the two countries were still negotiating. US secretary of state Marco Rubio on Thursday offered a more nuanced view of the relationship in a Fox News podcast, describing India as a strategic partner while acknowledging the energy purchases as a 'point of irritation.' 'Like anything in foreign policy, you're not going to align a hundred percent of the time on everything,' Rubio said. 'India has huge energy needs and that includes the ability to buy oil and coal and gas that it needs to power its economy like every country does, and it buys it from Russia, because Russian oil is sanctioned and cheap.' However, Rubio emphasised the administration's frustration with the arrangement. 'Unfortunately that is helping to sustain the Russian war effort. So it is most certainly a point of irritation in our relationship with India—not the only point of irritation. We also have many other points of cooperation with them.' 'What you're seeing the President express is the very clear frustration that with so many other oil vendors available, India continues to buy so much from Russia, which in essence is helping to fund the war effort and allowing this war to continue in Ukraine,' he added.


India Today
20 minutes ago
- India Today
Trump believes Netanyahu is prolonging Gaza war for political survival: Report
US President Donald Trump believes that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is prolonging Israel's war in Gaza to hold on to political power, according to two Trump administration officials who spoke to The Thursday report claimed, based on several unnamed sources, that Trump and many of his aides are more eager than ever to bring the fighting in Gaza to a close amid widespread condemnation of Israel's wartime conduct, including from a growing faction of isolationists in the Republican negotiations for a hostage and ceasefire deal once again facing steep hurdles, the American president has reportedly become convinced that Israel has already achieved its military objectives in Gaza long ago, and that the current fighting is fuelled chiefly by the premier's political MEETS NETANYAHU The report was published as Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff met with Netanyahu in Jerusalem on Thursday afternoon to discuss the stalled negotiations between Israel and Hamas. Steve Witkoff will also travel to Gaza on Friday, to assess the growing humanitarian crisis. He will be joined by Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, "The special envoy and the ambassador will brief the president to approve the final plan for food and aid distribution into the region." She added that the trip aims to study current food delivery systems and find ways to improve has been at war with Hamas since October 7, 2023, when Hamas launched a surprise Trump administration has been trying to find a solution. However, talks for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas fell apart last week. US officials blamed Hamas for not taking the talks seriously.- EndsWith inputs from ReutersTune InTrending Reel


Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Telangana guv sends 42% BC quota ordinance to President
Hyderabad: Telangana governor Jishnu Dev Varma has sent the Panchayat Raj (Amendment) Ordinance to the President of India for a decision. The ordinance — aimed at enabling 42% reservations for Backward Classes (BCs) in local bodies in Telangana — was submitted by the Congress govt on July 14 and officially forwarded by the Raj Bhavan on Tuesday. The timing is crucial. With the high court mandating local body elections be held by Sept 30, the President's response will determine whether the state can proceed with its plan to raise the BC quota — a move that challenges the Supreme Court's 50% reservation ceiling. The ordinance, along with two earlier bills seeking 42% BC quota in education, employment, and local bodies, now hangs in the balance. If the 42% reservation for BCs is cleared by the President, total reservation in the state could reach 77% with 15% for SCs, 10% for STs and another 10% for the economically weaker sections. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad At the heart of the issue is section 285A of the Telangana Panchayat Raj Act, 2018, which stipulates reservation norms for village panchayats, mandal parishads, and zilla parishads. As per Supreme Court guidelines, total reservations for SCs, STs, and BCs in local bodies cannot exceed 50%. Under the previous BRS regime, had elections been held, BC reservations would have remained capped at around 22–23%. To address this, the Congress-led govt conducted a comprehensive caste census and, based on empirical data, proposed increasing BC reservations to 42%. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Writing in English Doesn't Have to Feel Hard Grammarly Learn More Undo This led to the formulation of the Panchayat Raj (Amendment) Ordinance, which sought to remove the 50% cap in local body reservations. Governor's rationale Sources indicate that the governor's decision to escalate the matter to the President stemmed from two main concerns: The state's attempt to override the 50% reservation ceiling — a threshold reaffirmed by various Supreme Court rulings — through legislative amendments and legal ambiguity over whether a state govt possesses the authority to unilaterally remove this cap without prior central approval. Given these concerns — and with the two BC reservation bills already awaiting Presidential assent — the governor chose to refer the ordinance to the President for further examination, sources said. Legal precedent The move also invokes the landmark 1992 Indra Sawhney versus Union of India judgment, in which the Supreme Court ruled that reservations exceeding 50% are permissible only under "extraordinary circumstances" with robust, data-backed justification. The Telangana govt, citing such exceptional grounds, amended section 285A to base reservations on findings from its caste census. However, the ordinance now awaits Presidential review before it can be implemented. The delay in local body elections has already had tangible consequences. In compliance with the high court's orders, the govt aimed to finalise reservations by July 25 and then announce the election schedule. However, the absence of elected bodies has stalled governance at the grassroots level. Development works in villages have come to a grinding halt, and crucial Finance Commission funds — amounting to over ₹1,600 crore — remain frozen, as these can only be released to duly constituted local bodies. The term of existing local governing institutions expired over 18 months ago, resulting in a vacuum of leadership — no sarpanches, mandal parishad territorial constituency members, or zilla parishad territorial constituency members are in place. Cong plans next moves To push for the Centre's assent, the Congress govt has drawn up an action plan. A series of political programmes are scheduled to be held in Delhi between Aug 5 and 7. The state plans to wait until Aug 15 for a response from the Centre. If there is no progress, the govt is contemplating holding the elections with 42% BC reservations regardless of the pending assent, sources said.