logo
Corruption In Ukraine Spells Potential Trouble For Post-War Economic Rebuilding

Corruption In Ukraine Spells Potential Trouble For Post-War Economic Rebuilding

Forbes23-04-2025

Ever since the relationship between former President Joe Biden's son, Hunter, and a Ukrainian energy company called Burisma became public, Ukrainian energy companies have been in the public eye. That remains the case, as the Trump Administration and Ukraine work to finalize a framework agreement where US companies could invest in Ukrainian resources and minerals. This appears to be for the purpose of funding potential reconstruction following the war with Russia. A problem has arisen, however, which appears to show that the Ukrainian government may be seizing assets unlawfully from privately owned companies in Ukraine's gas, oil and minerals sectors for the benefit of the Kyiv central government and certain well-connected individuals. If true, this move could lead to years of court litigation, inhibit future private investment in Ukraine, and limit the nation's ability to produce energy when it is most needed.
Among the companies targeted by the Ukrainian state are Enwell Energy, a public company traded on the London Stock Exchange, and Ukrnaftaburinnya (UNB). Since 2022, the Ukrainian government has proceeded systematically to expropriate the assets of these companies, diminishing the interests of private investors, and, in the end, decreasing the amount of energy actually produced.
According to Forbes Ukraine, UNB was, at one time, one of the three largest privately owned producers of oil and gas in Ukraine. It was developing the largest field in Ukraine, known as the Sakhalin Gas Condensate Field (no relation to Russia's Sakhalin Island in the Pacific Ocean). By the start of the Russo-Ukrainian War in 2022, Sakhalin was responsible for 5% of total Ukrainian natural gas production.
Then the trouble started. In 2023, the Ukrainian government began making moves to seize UNB, starting with a seizure of a stake in UNB by a Kyiv Court in 2023, under the claim that UNB was a material witness in a case to which it was not a party. By 2024, the government had replaced the management of the company, placed UNB entirely under state control, held corporate meetings to pass resolutions changing the composition of the company, amended the company's charter, and distributed over $20M of the company's assets as dividends that ended up in Ukrainian state coffers. The original management and shareholders in UNB had no say in these affairs.
UNB's shareholders refused to go quietly. To date they have filed approximately twenty litigations in the Ukrainian courts, but few have confidence in the independence of the Ukrainian judiciary, which is moving very slowly on these cases. Shareholders of UNB have told Forbes they have approached international law firms about filing lawsuits seeking over $1B in compensation. Andriy Pasishnyk, CEO of JKX Oil and Gas Group, a British-owned private player in Ukrainian oil and gas, told Forbes that 'unfortunately, as of today, the courts are in no hurry to take a stance in favor of justice and the rule of law, given the administrative pressure exerted by interested parties within the state authorities. New laws were retrospectively created, and artificial justifications for nationalization were invented to legitimize the process. This is not a matter of state policy – it is outright plunder, disguised under lofty slogans.'
Oleksy Goncharenko, a member of the Budget Committee of Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, confirmed that corruption remains a serious problem in Ukraine and is not limited to energy. 'Partly,' he notes, 'some confiscations are justified because they were the property of Russian oligarchs...,' but this can extend beyond the property of such oligarchs, making it a very big national problem.
Further evidence of Mr. Goncharenko's concern is the story of Smart Energy, also one of the top private oil and gas businesses in Ukraine, whose two production companies, UGV and Enwell Energy, saw their production halted last year. Enwell Energy, a public company listed on the London Stock Exchange, shuttered its Ukrainian operations in November 2024 after the Ukrainian government suspended its subsoil licenses by imposing sanctions on certain shareholders.
At first, the national security council sanctioned Vadim Novinsky, who has ties to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, which the Ukrainian government claims is controlled by Moscow. As Novinsky had transferred his assets to a trust, they also sanctioned the Cypriot-based trustees. Enwell's licenses now have been suspended for ten years, forcing the company to mothball its gas wells.
Ivan Gerasymovich, CEO of Smart Holding, said the following when interviewed by Forbes: 'We have repeatedly offered the authorities mechanisms to unblock the assets (without lifting sanctions) while preserving national security interests, which would allow us to resume operations and gas production, as well as prevent job losses. …However, for reasons that are completely unclear, the government is ignoring the business's request and is in no hurry to resume operations.'
As all of this is happening, Ukraine's energy issues are becoming more acute. With Russia continuing to attack Ukraine's energy infrastructure, the actions against private energy companies seem irrational. Overall, according to Gas Infrastructure Europe, Ukraine's natural gas storage has fallen to only 12% of its capacity, compared to 56% for the rest of Europe. Taking steps against one's own energy industry at a time of existential peril seems unusual, but it raises the legitimate question of whether corruption in Ukraine is so endemic that it threatens the future of the state itself. JKX Oil and Gas Group, announced in February that it was being raided by law enforcement officers and was targeted by a defamation campaign in Ukraine aiming to create legal grounds for initiating a criminal investigation. Searches without court warrants were conducted at the offices of its subsidiary. Poltava Petroleum Company, and the homes of its senior executives, some of whom are citizens of the United States.
Energy is not the only area where corruption threatens the stability of Ukraine. Currently, there is confusion about the status of American military aid to that country, which apparently totals approximately $177B since the start of the 2022 Russian war. Mr. Goncharenko, however, strongly disputes the claim that any military assistance has been misused or lost. All of this is properly accounted for, he insists.
Regardless of whether or not huge sums of American aid are missing, the reputation of Ukraine as a country rife with corruption, evidenced by its moves against its own energy sector, absolutely hurts the investment climate. This is at a time when Ukraine needs all of the foreign investment it can get. If the Zelensky government cannot convince investors that their money is safe, Ukraine's troubles may only be beginning.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israeli forces board Gaza-bound aid boat, Freedom Flotilla Coalition says
Israeli forces board Gaza-bound aid boat, Freedom Flotilla Coalition says

USA Today

time31 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Israeli forces board Gaza-bound aid boat, Freedom Flotilla Coalition says

Israeli forces board Gaza-bound aid boat, Freedom Flotilla Coalition says Show Caption Hide Caption Israel prepares to 'conquer' and 'clear out' all of Gaza Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he plans to "take over" Gaza and move the civilian population southward. JERUSALEM — Israeli forces have boarded a charity vessel attempting to reach the Gaza Strip in defiance of an Israeli naval blockade, the Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC) said early on June 9. The British-flagged yacht Madleen, operated by the pro-Palestinian FFC, had departed from Sicily on June 6 and had hoped to reach Gaza later in the day, when the interception occurred, the group said on its Telegram account. Among those on board the boat are Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg and Rima Hassan, a French member of the European Parliament. The Israeli military had no immediate comment. Shortly before the FFC statement, the Israeli Foreign Ministry posted a video on X showing the Israeli Navy communicating with the Madleen over a loudspeaker, urging it to change course. "The maritime zone off the coast of Gaza is closed to naval traffic as part of a legal naval blockade," a soldier said. "If you wish to deliver humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip, you are able to do so through the (Israeli) port of Ashdod." The yacht, with its 12-person crew, was carrying a symbolic shipment of humanitarian aid, including rice and baby formula. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz ordered the military on June 8 to prevent the Madleen from reaching Gaza, calling the mission a propaganda effort in support of Hamas. Israel imposed a naval blockade on the coastal enclave after Hamas took control of Gaza in 2007. The blockade has remained in place through multiple conflicts, including the current war, which began after a Hamas-led assault on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, that killed more than 1,200 people, according to an Israeli tally. Gaza's health ministry says over 54,000 Palestinians have been killed since the start of Israel's military campaign. The United Nations has warned that most of Gaza's more than 2 million residents are facing famine. The Israeli government says the blockade is essential to prevent weapons from reaching Hamas. (Reporting by Crispian Balmer, Yomna Ehab and Enas Alashray; Editing by Richard Chang)

Albo urged to go hard on Trump
Albo urged to go hard on Trump

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Albo urged to go hard on Trump

Anthony Albanese should play hardball with the US on beef as tariff talks grind on, Nationals leader David Littleproud says. American beef imports have emerged as a key negotiating item in the Albanese government's efforts to secure a tariff carve out. The Trump administration has been pushing for Australia to loosen import rules to include beef from cattle originating in Canada and Mexico but slaughtered in the US. The Prime Minister has confirmed biosecurity officials were reviewing the request but vowed his government would not 'compromise' Australia's strict bio laws. But the prospect of changing laws has sparked unease among cattle farmers worried about keeping bovine diseases well away from the country's shores. With beef imports seemingly key to securing a US tariff exemption, Mr Littleproud on Monday said there needed to be some 'perspective'. 'The United States does need Australia and other countries to import beef to be able to put on their hamburgers,' he told Sky News. 'They don't have the production capacity to be able to produce the type of beef that goes on their hamburgers. 'So this is a tax on themselves that they put on Australian beef.' Despite being subject to the blanket 10 per cent tariffs on foreign imports, Australian beef into the US has risen by 32 per cent this year, according to Meat and Livestock Australia. Meanwhile, the cost of domestically produced beef within the US has been climbing, as cattle farmers struggle with drought. Mr Littleproud said the Nationals were not against importing American beef provided that it was from cattle 'born in the United States and bred all the way through to their slaughter in the United States'. But beef from cattle originating in third countries was a risk because 'we don't have the traceability that we have over the US production system'. 'And that's why Anthony Albanese needed to rule out straight away that he would not open that up to those cattle that were born in Canada, Mexico, or anywhere else in the Americas, because that poses a significant risk unless we can trace those cattle,' Mr Littleproud said. Mr Albanese has been clear in saying he would 'never loosen any rules regarding our biosecurity'. But he has also said that if a deal can be struck 'in a way that protects our biosecurity, of course we don't just say no'. Mr Littleproud acknowledged Mr Albanese's words but said 'when you see reports from departments saying this is what's on the table in terms of negotiations – where there's smoke, there's fire'. In addition to the baseline 10 per cent duties on foreign goods, Australia has also been subjected to 50 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium. Only the UK has been able to secure a partial exemption from the Donald Trump's tariffs. A key UK concession was scrapping its 20 per cent imposts on American beef and raising the import quota to 13,000 metric tonnes. But with many British goods still subject to tariffs, analysts have questioned whether the deal was worth it. The US has trade surpluses with both the UK and Australia. Though, Australia also has a free-trade agreement with the US, meaning goods should be traded mostly uninhibited. The Albanese government has repeatedly criticised Mr Trump's decision to slap tariffs on Australian products as 'economic self-harm' and 'not the act of a friend'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store