Partisan infighting taking a toll on Wisconsin kids' ability to learn to read
This is the first of two columns on reading initiatives in Wisconsin.
What's a higher priority, fighting over partisan control within the state Capitol or helping Wisconsin's children learn to read?
The fight over partisan controls is well on its way to being the winner as gridlock within the Capitol is making it likely that $49 million of already-approved money for reading instruction continues to be held up.
If the battle between Republicans and Democrats cannot be resolved before June 30, the $49 million will be returned unspent to state coffers, with growing chances that no comparable amount will be approved for the two-year budget cycle that will begin July 1.
The impact already has been to greatly crimp the reading initiative approved in 2023 by the Republican-controlled legislature and Democratic Gov. Tony Evers. If nothing further happens during the current budget period or in the period beginning in July, it will amount to a major retreat from a statewide initiative to promote the phonics-oriented 'science of reading.' Some elements of what was called for in the 2023 law known as Act 20 will probably continue, but a larger-scale commitment will have yielded almost nothing at the state level.
The deadlock over the reading money comes at a time when reading scores across Wisconsin have been a source of concern, especially when it comes to low-income and Black and Hispanic students. The gaps between higher-income students and lower-income students when it comes to reading success have grown since the COVID pandemic began in 2020. And recently released reading scores for fourth- and eighth-graders nationwide found that the gaps between white students and Black students in Wisconsin were the largest of any state, as has been the case for many years.
Act 20 approved $50 million to be spent to help school districts statewide launch or increase 'science of reading' efforts. The money was to go to support three dozen reading coaches to work with educators across the state and to support some of the cost of new curriculum materials being purchased by schools.
The law made Wisconsin one of about 40 states nationwide that took action in recent years to promote a shift away from reading instruction often labeled 'balanced literacy' toward instruction that is best known for its emphasis on phonics. In short, balanced literacy relies, in large part, on teaching reading to early-grade students through learning to recognize words, including use of context and visual clues. Critics say that approach has failed many students and that the more structured 'science of reading' approach that includes teaching students to sound out letters and combine them into words has more support from research.
Of the $50 million, less than $1 million was released by the Legislature's joint finance committee to be used to create a reading office within the state Department of Public Instruction and to support efforts such as a special council that recommended curriculums that met the standards of Act 20. The remaining $49-plus million was to be used to directly help teachers and students.
In short, in action on a separate law, Evers used a partial veto that affected who could control release of the $49 million, the joint finance committee or DPI. Democrats have argued that Evers' action was within his powers as governor; Republicans have argued that Evers broke a deal with them over how the money would be controlled. A Dane County judge ruled that Evers' action was within his powers but did not order the reading money to be released. The Wisconsin Supreme Court has agreed to bypass an appeals court and take the case up this spring. But a decision may not come before the clock runs out on spending the money during the current budget cycle. And no one involved in the dispute has budged.
State Rep. Joel Kitchens (R-Sturgeon Bay) is chair of the Assembly education committee and has been Act 20's leading supporter. Kitchens said in recent months that he was aiming for action in the Capitol that would release the $49 million. But he has not been successful in getting agreement on that, and he said Feb. 19 that it is now likely the money won't be spent.
'It's a long shot that it (the dispute) will be settled during this biennium,' he said in an interview, referring to the June 30 end of the current budget cycle.
He said he continued to regard reading as 'the most important thing in education,' and that he is not giving up on the fight to implement the science of reading approach statewide. 'Unfortunately, it got caught up in politics,' Kitchens said.
He said that brings into doubt whether money for reform in reading instruction will be included in the 2025-27 state budget, which is now in its formative stages. In his budget address last week, Evers called for including $80 million to support the reading effort over those two years. But Kitchens said Republicans may not agree to including money in the budget if Evers wins control through court action of how it will be spent
'How do we do that after how he acted last time?' Kitchens said. 'If you can't negotiate with somebody in good faith, I don't know how anything happens.' He added, 'I'm not giving up on it, but it's going to be very difficult.'
In a statement, Jill Underly, the state superintendent of public instruction, said, 'Schools committed to transformational literacy initiatives with the understanding that the legislature would contribute $50 million to support those efforts. Now, nearly two years after Act 20 was signed, Wisconsin students have yet to see a single cent of this promised funding. Meanwhile, our schools have made substantial investments to meet their obligations. This delay is an outright betrayal of our students and a failure of leadership. Legislative leaders have let down both our children and our schools. I don't want to hear another elected official complaining about literacy outcomes — they have no one to blame but themselves.'
More: DPI Superintendent Jill Underly seeks release of funding for state literacy program
Kitchen said the good news is that a significant number of school districts around the state — although there is no count of how many — have made moves to implement 'science of reading' approaches. 'The districts I talk to are doing very well and are happy with the results they're getting,' Kitchens said. 'They obviously would like (financial) support,' he added. The law, he said, 'is still having an impact, but it's not happening as quickly as we would like.'
Act 20 included provisions that have been moving forward at local school levels. They include screening of kindergarten through third-grade students to identify those who need extra help learning to read and providing individualized plans for helping those students. Also, an independent council created under Act 20 examined curriculum options for schools and recommended a handful of programs that meet the standards set in the law. Some school districts are moving to adopt curriculums from that list, even without the state aid that was expected to underwrite some of the cost.
More: Wisconsin politicians wrangle over new recommended reading curriculum list
More: Nearly half of Green Bay Schools' K-3 students are 'at risk' of not meeting reading goals, district says
Jeanne Schopf, president of The Reading League Wisconsin, which advocates for 'science of reading' instruction, was critical in a recent interview of the leadership in state government on reading issues. 'This is very critical to the future of our children and our state,' she said. 'Our challenge in Wisconsin is having leaders who are leading this in a unified way.'
Schopf said, 'Act 20 is just a piece of paper until it is fully implemented as designed.'
Kitchens said, 'There are kids who are not going to learn to read because of this screwing around.'
Next: A look at what is happening in some schools and school districts that are adopting science of reading plans.
Alan J. Borsuk is senior fellow in law and public policy at Marquette Law School. Reach him at alan.borsuk@marquette.edu.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Lawmakers are withholding $49 million intended to help reading efforts
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

41 minutes ago
New York lawmakers approve bill that would allow medically assisted suicide for the terminally ill
ALBANY, N.Y. -- Terminally ill New Yorkers would have the legal ability to end their own lives with pharmaceutical drugs under a bill passed Monday in the state Legislature. The proposal, which now moves to the governor's office, would allow a person with an incurable illness to be prescribed life-ending drugs if he or she requests the medication and gets approval from two physicians. A spokesperson for New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said she would review the legislation. The New York Senate gave final approval to the bill Monday night after hours of debate during which supporters said it would let terminally ill people die on their own terms. 'It's not about hastening death, but ending suffering,' said state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal, a Democrat who sponsored the proposal. Opponents have argued the state should instead improve end-of-life medical care or have objected on religious grounds. 'We should not be in the business of state-authorized suicide,' said state Sen. George Borrello, a Republican. The state Assembly passed the measure in late April. The proposal requires that a terminally ill person who is expected to die within six month make a written request for the drugs. Two witnesses would have sign the request to ensure that the patient is not being coerced. The request would then have to be approved by the person's attending physician as well as a consulting physician. The legislation was first introduced in 2016, Hoylman-Sigal said, though it has stalled year after year in the New York statehouse. Dennis Poust, executive director of the New York State Catholic Conference, which has opposed the measure, said 'This is a dark day for New York State." Eleven other states and Washington, D.C., have laws allowing medically assisted suicide, according to Compassion & Choices, an advocacy organization that backs the policy. Corinne Carey, the group's local campaign director, said lawmakers had 'recognized how important it is to give terminally ill New Yorkers the autonomy they deserve over their own end-of-life experiences.' 'The option of medical aid in dying provides comfort, allowing those who are dying to live their time more fully and peacefully until the end,' said Carey.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Planning to vote in New Jersey's June 10 primary? This is what you need to know
The New Jersey primary election is under way. Voters should know their options before heading to the polls. This year's gubernatorial primary will be held June 10, and it is a packed field for the top spot on both sides of the aisle. There are 11 candidates in all — six Democrats and five Republicans. They are vying to represent their respective party in the race for governor this November. There are also contested local primary elections and some contested races for seats in the New Jersey Assembly, the lower house of the Legislature. It's also the first primary to be held without the county line ballot design, so voters will be able to familiarize themselves with the new design with the sample ballots they're set to receive by mail in the coming days. The block ballot design, which is used in all 49 other states, will replace the county line which traditionally gave candidates endorsed by the county party preferred ballot placement, and an edge in their efforts. It was dismantled by a federal judge last year. New Jersey has what's considered a semi-closed primary because all voters have to declare a party affiliation to participate, but unaffiliated voters can do so at the polls. Unaffiliated voters can register while voting in personon Election Day for either the Democratic Party or the Republican Party. After an unaffiliated voter casts an in-person vote in the Democratic or Republican Party primary election, the voter will be affiliated with that political party going forward. The voter can change affiliation by completing, signing and returning a change of party affiliation form to the municipal clerk or county commissioner of registration. The deadline to apply for a mail-in ballot has passed and early in-person voting has concluded. Election Day for this year's primary will be June 10. Polls are open June 10 from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. That is the deadline to postmark a mail-in ballot for it to be eligible. Mail-in ballots can also be delivered to County Boards of Election and authorized ballot drop boxes by 8 p.m. on June 10. Katie Sobko covers the New Jersey Statehouse. Email: sobko@ This article originally appeared on NJ primary election 2025: How to vote on June 10 date
![Dear Black Folks: The Protests Against ICE Are Absolutely Our Fight Too [Op-Ed]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnewsone.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fsites%2F22%2F2025%2F06%2F17495049643842.jpg%3Fquality%3D80%26strip%3Dall&w=3840&q=100)
![Dear Black Folks: The Protests Against ICE Are Absolutely Our Fight Too [Op-Ed]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fblackamericaweb.com.png&w=48&q=75)
Black America Web
an hour ago
- Black America Web
Dear Black Folks: The Protests Against ICE Are Absolutely Our Fight Too [Op-Ed]
Source: Nick Ut / Getty As Donald Trump sparks chaos by illegally deploying troops to Los Angeles, as immigration raids intensify, and as protesters are flooding the streets to demand dignity for migrants, far too many Black folks are sitting back on social media platforms singing a tired, familiar song. It's being sung off-key with a false sense of safety and a dangerous misunderstanding of how white supremacist violence works. The chorus of retreat sounds something like this: 'Black folks need to stay home.' 'Let them handle it. This is their fight.' 'Most Latinos voted for this mess.' 'ICE don't target us. We've got citizenship.' 'I ain't marching for nobody who won't march for me .' 'Latinos don't like us anyway.' But what's really being said underneath all that deflection is this: 'If they come for Latinos, I'll be quiet, as long as they leave me and mine alone.' But if you study history, I mean really study history, then you should already know that they never leave us alone. Not for long. I get it. Black folks are tired. We've carried the weight of every major freedom movement in this country. We've bled. We've died. And we've been betrayed. We've shown up, over and over, only to be met with anti-blackness in return. But this ain't about who likes us. It's about who's next! What ICE is doing to migrants isn't just an immigration issue. It's white supremacist violence at its core. It's separating families. It's state violence. It's stalking and snatching people from homes and workplaces and making them disappear. It's caging children. And for Black folks in America, this should all feel deeply familiar. The white supremacist machine of state violence doesn't make distinctions based on citizenship status. What ICE is doing to Latinx, West Indian, and African migrants is part of the same machinery that has policed and abused Black American bodies for centuries. We know what it means to have our families torn about by the state. We know what it means to be told that we don't belong in the land we built. We know exactly what it's like to be criminalized simply for existing, to be dehumanized by everyday language, media propaganda, policies, and bureaucrats in uniform. Black folks know what it means to live under surveillance, to be chased, cuffed, caged, and disappeared. We are the descendants of people who had to run. From plantations. From the Fugitive Slave Act and slave catchers. From the KKK and lynch mobs. Even if you were born right here in America, with ancestors going all the way back to slave ships, that border violence still echoes through Black lives. The ol' 'I got my papers, I'm safe' is a delusion. That little blue passport won't stop you from getting profiled, harassed, arrested, or shot by a cop who sees your Black skin before your citizenship status or hears your command of English. Just ask the countless Black immigrants already deported, or the U.S.-born Black folks ICE illegally detained anyway. Do you think that racist ICE agents caught up in immigration hysteria and round-up quotas will stop to check birth certificates? Just ask Peter Sean Brown, who was detained in the Florida Keys when an ICE agent mistakenly detained him as an undocumented immigrant from Jamaica. He spent weeks in custody and eventually sued. Or, ask Davino Watson, a native New Yorker who was imprisoned as a 'deportable alien' for more than three years despite claiming citizenship and then denied compensation by the court system. Source: Nick Ut / Getty ICE detentions are triggered by racial profiling, flawed algorithms, and sloppy data. Skin complexion, language, and citizenship won't shield us. Think about all the Black folks walking around without real IDs to prove they're citizens. Over a quarter of Black adult citizens do not have a driver's license with their current name and/or address and 18% don't have a license at all, according to the Center for Democracy and Civic Engagement. If ICE can mistakenly detain Black and Brown Americans born in the U.S., even if they have documentation, then no one is immune. Some Black folks are also citing the 2024 election exit polls to justify staying home and staying silent, like the ICE protests don't concern us. 'Latinos voted for Trump.' But exit polls don't tell the whole story. They only sample registered voters who actually voted, and they never account for the millions of undocumented immigrants who can't vote. They also oversample precincts that don't match the demographic reality, skewing results toward the dominant group in those districts. Most Latinos, like Black Americans, did not vote for Trump. According to national polls, 56% of Latinos who voted cast their ballot for Kamala Harris, while 42% went for Trump. Yes, Trump made gains among Latino men, but gains don't equate to dominance. The Latino vote split along familiar gender and generational lines, just like our communities. We can't turn a sampling of voter turnout into 'most Latinos voted for Trump,' and we can't let bad math be an excuse to justify apathy. And there's this one: 'I ain't marching for nobody that won't march for me.' Or its equally tired fraternal twin: 'Latinos don't like us anyway.' This is scarcity-minded, historically illiterate nonsense that treats solidarity as some sort of tit-for-tat transaction. If that's how our ancestors thought, then there wouldn't have been an Underground Railroad, no Civil Rights Act, A Voting Rights Act, or a Montgomery Bus Boycott. Solidarity is a strategy, not some popularity contest. If you're out here claiming Latinos don't march for us, then clearly you haven't picked up a history book. Y'all must not know about Cesar Chavez and Dolores Huerta who led the United Farm Workers who stood with Martin Luther King Jr. Y'all must not know about the Puerto Rican Young Lords working hand-in-hand with the Black Panther Party to run free clinics, breakfast programs, and tenant organizing drives in Chicago and New York City. Or, about the Mexican students who took their cue from SNCC and Malcolm X during the 1968 East LA walkouts and launched the Chicano civil rights crusade. In recent years, Afro-Latinos have been at the forefront of Black Lives Matter chapters, organizing vigils, raising bail funding, and pushing for police accountability across the country. In Chicago's Little Village, Latino organizers launched the 'Brown Squad for Black Lives' and established a Black and Brown Unity food pantry. Martin Luther King III has been working alongside Mi Familia Vota , a national Black-Brown coalition whose mission is to combat hate crimes, anti-immigrant policies, and attacks on voting rights— together —not as separate communities. Just because these sustained interracial commitments and coalitions aren't trendy headlines or going viral on social media doesn't mean solidarity isn't unfolding in schools, community centers, neighborhoods, and politics. It's one thing to let white folks battle each other, whether it's MAGA vs. neoliberal, liberals vs. conservatives, or Karens vs. Capitol Hill. White folks battling each other is the empire fighting over who gets to steer the ship while it is already sinking. You want to sit back and watch that unfold while sipping tea or eating popcorn? Fine. Letting white folks eat each other doesn't carry the same moral weight as turning your back on another marginalized community facing the same white supremacist violence as us. Let's also remember that anti-Blackness is global. It lives in every community, including our own. Black Americans can be just as anti-immigrant, just as colorist, just as xenophobic, just as colonized in our thinking. So, if you're sitting out because of what some Latinos, West Indians, or Africans said about us, then you're not protecting yourself. You're just waiting for your turn. So, what do we do? Source: Jason Armond / Getty We organize. We show up at ICE protests so the system doesn't get to isolate people in silence. We donate to immigrant bail funds and deportation defense teams like the Haitian Bridge Alliance, Black Alliance for Just Immigration, and UndocuBlack. Use your platforms to amplify the stories, organizing, resistance, and victories of undocumented folks. Build local coalitions to organize teach-ins, mutual aid drives and community safety networks that bridge Black and Brown neighborhoods. We also need to unlearn the anti-immigrant, anti-Black, and anti-Indigenous narratives this country feeds us because solidarity starts in the mind. Black folks cannot afford to pretend that citizenship or birthright assures our protection. A system built on racial profiling, quotas, and militarized tactics never stops at 'not us.' It doesn't send ICE to the border and leave us in peace. These immigration raids strengthen a culture of normalized, dehumanizing state violence against anyone who looks 'other.' Immigration will become the excuse to expand the surveillance state and militarized policing in Black communities. This is absolutely our fight! Dr. Stacey Patton is an award-winning journalist and author of 'Spare The Kids: Why Whupping Children Won't Save Black America' and the forthcoming 'Strung Up: The Lynching of Black Children In Jim Crow America.' Read her Substack here . SEE ALSO: Trump's Job Corps 'Pause' Is MAGA's Plan To Eliminate Poor Youth Harvard And White America's Creepy Obsession With Hoarding Black Remains SEE ALSO Dear Black Folks: The Protests Against ICE Are Absolutely Our Fight Too [Op-Ed] was originally published on Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE