Partisan infighting taking a toll on Wisconsin kids' ability to learn to read
What's a higher priority, fighting over partisan control within the state Capitol or helping Wisconsin's children learn to read?
The fight over partisan controls is well on its way to being the winner as gridlock within the Capitol is making it likely that $49 million of already-approved money for reading instruction continues to be held up.
If the battle between Republicans and Democrats cannot be resolved before June 30, the $49 million will be returned unspent to state coffers, with growing chances that no comparable amount will be approved for the two-year budget cycle that will begin July 1.
The impact already has been to greatly crimp the reading initiative approved in 2023 by the Republican-controlled legislature and Democratic Gov. Tony Evers. If nothing further happens during the current budget period or in the period beginning in July, it will amount to a major retreat from a statewide initiative to promote the phonics-oriented 'science of reading.' Some elements of what was called for in the 2023 law known as Act 20 will probably continue, but a larger-scale commitment will have yielded almost nothing at the state level.
The deadlock over the reading money comes at a time when reading scores across Wisconsin have been a source of concern, especially when it comes to low-income and Black and Hispanic students. The gaps between higher-income students and lower-income students when it comes to reading success have grown since the COVID pandemic began in 2020. And recently released reading scores for fourth- and eighth-graders nationwide found that the gaps between white students and Black students in Wisconsin were the largest of any state, as has been the case for many years.
Act 20 approved $50 million to be spent to help school districts statewide launch or increase 'science of reading' efforts. The money was to go to support three dozen reading coaches to work with educators across the state and to support some of the cost of new curriculum materials being purchased by schools.
The law made Wisconsin one of about 40 states nationwide that took action in recent years to promote a shift away from reading instruction often labeled 'balanced literacy' toward instruction that is best known for its emphasis on phonics. In short, balanced literacy relies, in large part, on teaching reading to early-grade students through learning to recognize words, including use of context and visual clues. Critics say that approach has failed many students and that the more structured 'science of reading' approach that includes teaching students to sound out letters and combine them into words has more support from research.
Of the $50 million, less than $1 million was released by the Legislature's joint finance committee to be used to create a reading office within the state Department of Public Instruction and to support efforts such as a special council that recommended curriculums that met the standards of Act 20. The remaining $49-plus million was to be used to directly help teachers and students.
In short, in action on a separate law, Evers used a partial veto that affected who could control release of the $49 million, the joint finance committee or DPI. Democrats have argued that Evers' action was within his powers as governor; Republicans have argued that Evers broke a deal with them over how the money would be controlled. A Dane County judge ruled that Evers' action was within his powers but did not order the reading money to be released. The Wisconsin Supreme Court has agreed to bypass an appeals court and take the case up this spring. But a decision may not come before the clock runs out on spending the money during the current budget cycle. And no one involved in the dispute has budged.
State Rep. Joel Kitchens (R-Sturgeon Bay) is chair of the Assembly education committee and has been Act 20's leading supporter. Kitchens said in recent months that he was aiming for action in the Capitol that would release the $49 million. But he has not been successful in getting agreement on that, and he said Feb. 19 that it is now likely the money won't be spent.
'It's a long shot that it (the dispute) will be settled during this biennium,' he said in an interview, referring to the June 30 end of the current budget cycle.
He said he continued to regard reading as 'the most important thing in education,' and that he is not giving up on the fight to implement the science of reading approach statewide. 'Unfortunately, it got caught up in politics,' Kitchens said.
He said that brings into doubt whether money for reform in reading instruction will be included in the 2025-27 state budget, which is now in its formative stages. In his budget address last week, Evers called for including $80 million to support the reading effort over those two years. But Kitchens said Republicans may not agree to including money in the budget if Evers wins control through court action of how it will be spent
'How do we do that after how he acted last time?' Kitchens said. 'If you can't negotiate with somebody in good faith, I don't know how anything happens.' He added, 'I'm not giving up on it, but it's going to be very difficult.'
In a statement, Jill Underly, the state superintendent of public instruction, said, 'Schools committed to transformational literacy initiatives with the understanding that the legislature would contribute $50 million to support those efforts. Now, nearly two years after Act 20 was signed, Wisconsin students have yet to see a single cent of this promised funding. Meanwhile, our schools have made substantial investments to meet their obligations. This delay is an outright betrayal of our students and a failure of leadership. Legislative leaders have let down both our children and our schools. I don't want to hear another elected official complaining about literacy outcomes — they have no one to blame but themselves.'
More: DPI Superintendent Jill Underly seeks release of funding for state literacy program
Kitchen said the good news is that a significant number of school districts around the state — although there is no count of how many — have made moves to implement 'science of reading' approaches. 'The districts I talk to are doing very well and are happy with the results they're getting,' Kitchens said. 'They obviously would like (financial) support,' he added. The law, he said, 'is still having an impact, but it's not happening as quickly as we would like.'
Act 20 included provisions that have been moving forward at local school levels. They include screening of kindergarten through third-grade students to identify those who need extra help learning to read and providing individualized plans for helping those students. Also, an independent council created under Act 20 examined curriculum options for schools and recommended a handful of programs that meet the standards set in the law. Some school districts are moving to adopt curriculums from that list, even without the state aid that was expected to underwrite some of the cost.
More: Wisconsin politicians wrangle over new recommended reading curriculum list
More: Nearly half of Green Bay Schools' K-3 students are 'at risk' of not meeting reading goals, district says
Jeanne Schopf, president of The Reading League Wisconsin, which advocates for 'science of reading' instruction, was critical in a recent interview of the leadership in state government on reading issues. 'This is very critical to the future of our children and our state,' she said. 'Our challenge in Wisconsin is having leaders who are leading this in a unified way.'
Schopf said, 'Act 20 is just a piece of paper until it is fully implemented as designed.'
Kitchens said, 'There are kids who are not going to learn to read because of this screwing around.'
Next: A look at what is happening in some schools and school districts that are adopting science of reading plans.
Alan J. Borsuk is senior fellow in law and public policy at Marquette Law School. Reach him at alan.borsuk@marquette.edu.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Lawmakers are withholding $49 million intended to help reading efforts
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump target on mail-in ballots stokes controversy in Nevada, nationwide
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — President Donald Trump on Monday reignited controversy over how Americans vote, announcing plans on Truth Social to 'lead a movement' to eliminate mail-in ballots and certain voting machines ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Trump is preparing an executive order to mandate the change. However, legal experts warn he lacks the constitutional authority. 'Mail in ballots are corrupt you can never have a real democracy with mail in ballots,' Trump said. Trump said the voting machines that count those mail-in ballots are highly inaccurate. Democrats showed a stronger preference for mail ballots in the 2024 primary, with 79% of their votes cast via mail, compared to 60% of Republicans. 'We would get secure elections and much faster results. The machines say we will get the results in two weeks but with paper ballots you have the results that night,' Trump said. Statistics show 45% of the votes cast in the 2024 election in Nevada were mail ballots. Legal experts say any executive order Trump signs would almost certainly face lawsuits, and with primaries already on the horizon, it's unlikely states could overhaul their election systems in time, even if the courts allowed it. 'Nevadans have accepted and adopted mail in ballots, and the reason is Nevada is a 24/7 economy. We are a working community. We want to have as many people participate in the process as possible,' Nevada Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar said. Aguilar said when you take away the accessibility of mail-in ballots, it hurts the future of our state. 'Mail ballots are determined in Nevada by the legislature and the governor. Until they decide we're going to have a different process, we are going to continue with mail ballots,' Aguilar said. Trump's pledge to target mail-in ballots signals that election rules will remain a hot topic heading into next year's midterms. For now, though, the secretary of state said the chances of a nationwide ban appear slim. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

18 minutes ago
US troops won't be sent to help defend Ukraine, Trump says
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump on Tuesday offered his assurances that U.S. troops would not be sent to help defend Ukraine against Russia after seeming to leave open the possibility the day before. Trump also said in a morning TV interview that Ukraine's hopes of joining NATO and regaining the Crimean Peninsula from Russia are 'impossible.' The Republican president, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other European leaders held hours of talks at the White House on Monday aimed at bringing an end to Russia's war against Ukraine. While answering questions from journalists, Trump did not rule out sending U.S. troops to participate in a European-led effort to defend Ukraine as part of security guarantees sought by Zelenskyy. Trump said after his meeting in Alaska last week with Russian President Vladimir Putin that Putin was open to the idea of security guarantees for Ukraine. But asked Tuesday on Fox News Channel's 'Fox & Friends' what assurances he could provide going forward and beyond his term that American troops would not be part of defending Ukraine's border, Trump said, 'Well, you have my assurance, and I'm president.' Trump would have no control over the U.S. military after his term ends in January 2029. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt later on Tuesday emphasized that 'U.S. boots will not be on the ground' as part of any potential peacekeeping mission. The president also said in the interview that he is optimistic that a deal can be reached to end the Russian invasion, but he underscored that Ukraine will have to set aside its hope of getting back Crimea, which was seized by Russian forces in 2014, and its long-held aspirations of joining the NATO military alliance. 'Both of those things are impossible,' Trump said. Putin, as part of any potential deal to pull his forces out of Ukraine, is looking for the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, as well as recognition of Crimea as Russian territory. Trump on Monday said that he was arranging for direct talks between Putin and Zelenskyy. But the Kremlin has not yet said whether Putin, who has resisted previous calls by Trump and others for direct negotiations on ending the war, is committed to a face-to-face meeting with the Ukrainian leader. Asked whether Putin has promised Trump that he'll meet directly with the Ukrainian leader, Leavitt responded affirmatively. 'He has,' Leavitt said of Putin. Trump, early on Monday during talks with Zelenskyy and European leaders, said that he was pressing for three-way talks among Zelenskyy, Putin and himself. But after speaking to Putin later in the day, Trump said that he was arranging first for a face-to-face between Zelenskyy and Putin and that three-way talks would follow if necessary. 'It was an idea that evolved in the course of the president's conversations with both President Putin, President Zelensky and the European leaders yesterday,' Leavitt explained. But when discussing a phone call held after the meeting between Trump and the Russian leader, Putin's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov gave no indication that either a bilateral or a trilateral meeting with Ukraine had been agreed. Trump said he believed Putin's course of action would become clear in the coming weeks. 'I think Putin is tired of it,' Trump said. 'I think they're all tired of it. But you never know. We're going to find out about President Putin in the next couple of weeks. That I can tell you.'
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas unveils state maps that could give Republicans 5 more US House seats
WASHINGTON — Republicans could secure five more House seats in Texas after the state unveiled its proposed map for the 2026 midterm elections, following through with demands from President Donald Trump to find some cushion room protecting the party's slim majority. The Texas state legislature revealed the new boundaries on Wednesday, altering the map to create new districts in areas that Trump carried by more than 10 points in the 2024 election. Most of the new districts also reside in heavily Hispanic areas, a crucial demographic shift that helped secure Trump's victory in November — a risky gamble if Hispanic voters lean back toward Democratic candidates next year. The maps come as state lawmakers meet for an emergency session, which is scheduled to end on Aug. 19. However, Democrats in the legislature are considering whether to stage a walkout, denying Republicans the minimum attendance required to consider legislation. If the map is approved and no House members move districts, the new boundaries also set the stage for half a dozen incumbent-on-incumbent matchups next year. Republicans currently hold a 219-212 majority in the U.S. House of Representatives, a historically slim margin that has often made it difficult for the party to advance legislation even with a Republican trifecta. With control of the White House and Senate, Republicans have enjoyed total control of Washington — something that is at risk next November. Historical trends show that the party of the sitting president typically loses control of the House during midterm elections. If Democrats manage to flip the House, it would deal a massive blow to Trump and likely thwart his agenda for his final two years. But Democrats have made clear they won't just accept new maps without any defense mechanism of their own. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries is expected to meet with Democratic state lawmakers on Wednesday to discuss a path forward as party leaders openly toy with the idea of revising other state maps in their favor. The top House Democrat said earlier this month he would engage in conversations with state delegations to 'explore what the opportunities and possibilities are in order to make sure that the congressional map in 2026 is as fair as possible.' Although Republicans may not face as many legal or political obstacles in Texas, they are likely to experience some voter backlash — potentially putting their majority at risk anyway. The state legislature sought to redraw the congressional map in 2011 to secure Republican-safe seats, only to watch those be flipped by Democrats in the so-called 'blue wave' of 2018. As a result, state Republicans were more careful when they adjusted the map in 2021 to preserve the GOP stronghold districts. Now, if Republicans attempt to drastically change the maps, they could face a similar defeat in 2026.