NZ Warriors women feel NRLW travel pinch under semi-professional rules
Photo:
David Neilson/Photosport
NZ Warriors coach Ron Griffiths has called on the NRLW and Rugby League Players Association to reconsider rules that place unrealistic travel demands on the team for away fixtures.
The Auckland-based side will cross the Tasman for their 'Magic Round' encounter with North Queensland Cowboys at Newcastle on Sunday - the second time they have travelled to the New South Wales coastal town this season.
Two weeks ago, they fell 36-20 to the hometown Knights, whom Griffiths guided to back-to-back championships in 2022 and 2023, before switching allegiances to the Warriors, as they returned to the NRLW after a five-year hiatus.
He believes his new team were not only outclassed by one of the competition's top teams, they also fell victim to a travel schedule forced upon them by welfare guidelines.
To maintain the integrity of their semi-professional programmes, NRLW clubs can only call on their players for training, media/sponsorship commitments or travel outside the hours of 8am-4pm during the week, so they can also balance education or careers with rugby league.
"You can't travel inside the protected hours for the players," Griffiths said. "You can't travel on the Friday, because they don't get paid for the day off work."
For their season-opener against Sydney Roosters, the wahine flew across the ditch late on Friday night for an 11.50am Saturday kickoff in Sydney.
Last time they travelled to Newcastle, they gathered in Auckland on Saturday and conducted their 'captain's run' at home, before flying to Sydney, then bussing almost three hours to their destination.
By the time they arrived, it was late evening, but their bodies were still on NZ time two hours ahead. Griffiths reported players receiving massage at midnight local time.
"I was in the last group getting a massage in Newcastle," lock Laishon Albert-Jones confirmed. "It was late - if it's midnight there, then it's 2am at home, so we were essentially going to bed at 2am.
"I actually did fall asleep on the table, 100 percent. At one point, I thought I just might be sleeping there.
"I get that we had a late game, but your body clock still wakes you up at 6am, when you have to go to work, so it doesn't feel like you're rested properly."
The Warriors women played after the men on that occasion, kicking off at 6.15pm Sunday local time, so rules were probably bent getting them home the next day and the same will apply this time, despite an earlier 11.50am game.
"This time, we've done it differently," Griffiths said. "We're going to leave early Saturday morning and we're in Newcastle by lunchtime, which gives us the whole afternoon to reset.
Laishon Albert-Jones fell asleep on the massage table at Newcastle.
Photo:
Brett Phibbs/www.photosport.nz
"We'll frame our captain's run as it needs to be, particularly after a double travel - it only needs to be small anyway."
When he said "early", the flight leaves Auckland at 7am, so Albert-Jones has her alarm set for 3am.
"After the game, we're in Newcastle for that night, we'll drive to Sydney the next morning and travel on the Monday," Griffiths said, "Really - for us, internationally - you lose two days."
Surely, that's cutting into protected time under the rules?
"Great question," he winked. "Something we need to ask about."
That kind of itinerary seemingly detracts from the players' onfield performance and threatens the very wellbeing those rules were designed to safeguard.
"I don't want to give any excuses, because there should be no excuse why we couldn't put in a decent performance, but it does take a toll," Albert-Jones said. "At some point, you can't just keep going - you get burnt out and it is hard.
"As a team, if you think about it, it's a lot to do in the space of 36 hours - I don't even think it's a full 40 hours that we were in Newcastle.
"This week is better. We get to Newy a little bit earlier, but it would have been ideal if we got there on Friday night.
"We have a real busy day on Saturday, but it does mean we get to bed at a decent time and we do have the early game."
Meeting North Queensland on neutral ground at least spares the Warriors the dreaded round trip to Townsville, even more of an ordeal than the Newcastle jaunt.
Griffiths pointed out the Warriors weren't the only team figuring out the logistics of trans-Tasman travel.
"It's a year of firsts for us, understanding what that looks like, but it's also a year of firsts for other teams, who are feeling the same thing coming over here," he said.
"The only difference is we're doing it every second week - we do it this weekend and then we go again next week [against Canterbury Bulldogs], so two weeks in a row.
"There's been some key learnings for us as staff to make sure we get that right, but at the end of the day, if we're talking from a player perspective and best performance, we should be travelling Friday, captain's run on Saturday and play Sunday.
"The collective certainly need to get together and talk through what that looks like, and now that we're back in the competition, there are enough questions being asked that I'm sure that will happen."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
14 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Injury stricken Warriors squad to take on Dolphins
An injury stricken Warriors will try to shake off the cobwebs when they take on the Dolphins at home game comes off the back of a disappointing loss to the Gold Coast Titans last week who are currently second-to-last on the NRL table. While the Warriors are still in the top four, a loss could be a major hit for the team's championship ambitions. Sports reporter Jamie Wall spoke to Lisa Owen. Tags: To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.


NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Auckland stadiums: Having four separate venues is unsustainable
Ali Williams and Anna Mowbray were backing the proposed Auckland Arena at Western Springs. Photo / Supplied The proposal was curious in that: Auckland FC's debut season averaged 18,101 attendees yet it proposed a 12,500-capacity stadium with TAU acknowledging 'larger games would still require the capacity of Mt Smart or Eden Park'. The location lacked critical infrastructure, including hospitality venues, public transport links, public car parking and crowd dispersal routes for the proposed capacity. A '$200m-$300m' cost estimate presented a substantial $100m gap, suggesting cursory planning. The per-seat cost was significantly below Te Kaha in Christchurch, even accounting for the absence of a roof. It's worth wondering: Why was TAU supporting the building of another stadium when it contradicts 15 years of consistent advice the council has received? In 2020, a review of Auckland Council's resources led by Miriam Dean stated: 'The harsh economic reality is Auckland neither needs nor can afford four stadiums.' The Long-Term Plan 2024–2034 provides for $146.3m of ratepayer money just to maintain (not improve) the aging stadium network. This pattern of inaction isn't new. In 2006, the government offered to fully fund a waterfront stadium. Remarkably, the then-Auckland Regional Council rejected this proposal, turning down what would likely be well over $1b (from taxpayers) in today's money, preferring to maintain four aging stadiums (funded by ratepayers). One key aim of the Super City amalgamation in 2010 was to rationalise water, transport and the four 'main stadiums'. A 2019 confidential presentation to council highlighted issues with the region's stadium stock, noting 'under-utilisation leading to poor financial outcomes'. Councillors were told 'doing nothing is not an option'. In 2023, when the council looked for expressions of interest to develop a new 'Main Auckland Stadium', they reiterated Dean's key point: 'Auckland neither needs nor can afford four stadiums.' We should learn from other cities. Warriors fans at Allianz stadium, where league, rugby and football teams all play. Photo / Photosport In Sydney (population 5.5m), Allianz Stadium is home to the Waratahs (rugby), Roosters (league) and Sydney FC (football). In Brisbane (population 2.8m), Suncorp Stadium hosts four professional sports team across rugby, league and football. In Melbourne (population 5.3m), impressively 10 AFL teams collectively use just two stadiums, the MCG and Marvel. These stadiums also host international matches, concerts and community events. Contrast this with Auckland (population just 1.7m) where, remarkably, we could have seen four professional sports teams across four disparate stadiums (Blues at Eden Park, Warriors at Mt Smart, Auckland FC at Western Springs and Moana Pasifika at Albany). How could any stadium (or business) be fully utilised or financially sustainable with just 13 regular season games (Auckland FC) annually – effectively guaranteed to be 'open for business' less than 4% of the year? These four stadiums also compete with each other for the small number of concerts that come to Auckland. Of course, the condition of the stadiums means many world-class performers simply bypass Auckland entirely, limiting Down Under tours to superior Australian venues. When artists such as Adele have to perform in torrential rain at Mt Smart, Taylor Swift's decision to skip Auckland in 2024 becomes entirely understandable. Adele soaks up the rain at Mt Smart Stadium in Auckland. In the eight months since it was granted consent for 12 concerts a year, Eden Park has only hosted one artist, Luke Combs. For 2026, only the Royal Edinburgh Military Tattoo has been announced. The loss of major events costs Auckland money through the hospitality, accommodation, transport and retail sectors. The financial implications for ratepayers are stark. They face mounting maintenance and operational expenses, while construction costs for any new stadium escalate. Meanwhile, we're counting the lost revenue from those lost events. With Christchurch's world-class Te Kaha Stadium opening in 2026 and already revitalising the city, Auckland will become the only major Australasian city not to open a modern stadium this century. Te Kaha, in Christchurch, is due to open next year. Photo / Christchurch City Council The Long-Term Plan allocates $16b for water, $14.5b for transport, and $4.2b for community and parks. Yet while other cities have invested in this vital cultural infrastructure, Auckland remains held back by the legacy of four disparate, underutilised and ageing stadiums. Auckland generates ample content for a premier venue. Imagine a modern covered stadium hosting Taylor Swift, the Warriors, Blues, Auckland FC and Moana Pasifika, national teams in black, unlimited concerts and community festivals such as the Pasifika, Diwali or Lantern festivals. If situated on the waterfront, the venue could also host the prestigious sailing events that have made Auckland the renowned 'City of Sails'. Hiroki Sakai, Ardie Savea, Taylor Swift, Dallin Watene-Zelezniak and Michaela Brake The cultural and economic benefits to the city would be transformative. This vision is entirely achievable, as every other major city in Australasia has shown. It's time for Auckland to emulate Wellington, Dunedin and now Christchurch in charting a pathway which reflects a visionary and aspirational Auckland investing strategically for future generations. Rather than remaining constrained by legacy, shoestring maintenance, and decades of inaction, perhaps the rise of Christchurch's impressive Te Kaha Stadium can finally focus Auckland on the advice urged by experts for 15 years. We can emulate Wellington, Dunedin and now Christchurch in charting a pathway which reflects a visionary and aspirational Auckland investing strategically for future generations. Auckland neither needs nor can afford four stadiums... but surely it makes sense to have one great one. Richard Dellabarca was head of the Wynyard Point consortium which proposed a new stadium built on the Auckland waterfront.

RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Tennis: Auckland's tennis centre to get revamp ahead of next year's Classic
New Zealand tennis player Lulu Sun in front of a stand that will be demolished at Auckland Arena Photo: Supplied The demolition of an aging grandstand will increase the crowd capacity at the home of the ASB Classic, ahead of next year's tennis tournament and bring the venue in line with international requirements. A grant from Auckland Council's Sport and Recreation Facilities Investment Fund will allow Tennis Auckland to demolish the Robinson Grandstand at the southern end of the arena on Stanley street, which is one step towards getting a long-debated roof for centre court . The Robinson Grandstand, built in 1962, has "come to the end of its useful life" and will be replaced with a removable grandstand in place in time for the ASB Classic on 5 January, 2026. The new removable structure will allow the tournament organisers to ensure the Manuka Doctor Arena - formerly the ASB Tennis Centre - meets updated requirements from world tennis governing bodies WTA and ATP. In recent times, the ASB Classic has received dispensation to host the tournament due to the courts not meeting minimum court size and capacity for spectators also falling short of the minimum requirements. ASB Classic tournament director Nicolas Lamperin said the new stand, like those used in UK tournaments including the HSBC Championships at The Queen's Club, will be a significant positive development for the tournament. "We have had dispensation on minimum court size, but this has become challenging," Lamperin said. "We also need the extra capacity and the planned grandstand will provide an excellent addition for fans at the tournament. I am sure it will help attract some players and will be well received by all players." Work will start immediately on the demolition of the Robinson Stand, with council funding combined with a grant from Grassroots Trust. The court extension would allow for the potential to host other sports events, including basketball, netball, volleyball and beach volleyball. Tennis Auckland chief executive officer Rohan West said the new stand would accommodate seating to ensure the arena meets the ATP criteria and had the flexibility to offer a range of options from standard seats to high-end padded seats. West said Tennis Auckland was working "diligently" on its vision of a roof for the centre court, with the new grandstand part of that overall concept. "The ASB Classic is the largest driver of economic growth on Auckland's event calendar," West said. "Our overall vision for the Manuka Doctor Arena is a crucial way for the ASB Classic to compete against competition from more modern venues in Australia, Asia and the Middle East." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.