logo
Corbyn has a big ego and his new party will fail, claims Reeves

Corbyn has a big ego and his new party will fail, claims Reeves

Telegraph3 days ago
Rachel Reeves has accused Jeremy Corbyn of having a 'big ego' and insists his new Left-wing party does not present a threat to Labour.
The Chancellor said voters had resoundingly rejected the veteran socialist twice and 'will have the same reaction' again at the next election.
At the Edinburgh Fringe Festival on Saturday, she also acknowledged a 'risk' voters would turn to Reform because of anger with the two main parties.
Mr Corbyn, who led Labour to election defeats in 2017 and 2019, is setting up a new populist movement to challenge his old party from the Left.
It is also being fronted by Zarah Sultana, a fellow former Labour MP, and is set to campaign heavily on Gaza and calls for more wealth taxes.
Ms Reeves, who was interviewed by Iain Dale, the radio presenter, was asked whether she was worried that the new party represented a threat to Labour akin to the problem the Tories face with Reform.
She said: 'Jeremy Corbyn had two chances to be prime minister and the country gave their verdict, most recently in 2019 when Labour had its worst result since 1935.
'If he wants to give it another go, be my guest. I think the voters will have the same reaction.'
Asked by Dale if she was being complacent, she replied: 'It's not being complacent. He tried to destroy my party, he can have himself his own party.
'The country has rejected him twice. The bloke's got a big ego. He can have another go but I think the country will give the same verdict.'
Her remarks came a day after Labour lost its first councillor to the new Corbyn party, which does not yet have a name or official leadership.
Grace Lewis, a 22-year-old who sits on Coventry city council, resigned from Labour on Friday to join the rival Left-wing political movement.
It has a placeholder name of Your Party, and is expected to hold its founding conference, at which a formal leadership contest could happen, in November.
Last month, a YouGov poll found that almost one in three Labour supporters would consider voting for Mr Corbyn's new movement at the next election.
Ms Reeves also admitted during the interview that Labour has 'disappointed' people so far and will not 'deserve' to win re-election if it does not improve.
She insisted she had the balance right between tax, spending and borrowing but said achieving that had forced her to make unpopular decisions.
'Our job is to deliver on promises'
She added: 'Of course you're going to disappoint people. No one wants to pay more taxes.
'Everyone wants more money... and borrowing is not a free option, because you've got to pay for it.
'I think people know those sort of constraints, but no one really likes them and I'm the one that has to sort the sums.'
She admitted that there was a possibility that voters who were fed up with both Labour and the Tories would turn to Reform as an alternative.
'That is the risk and so our job is to deliver on the promises we made in our manifesto but also to show when we're making decisions who we're prioritising,' she said.
'That we're always prioritising the ordinary, working person on a modest and middle income who have been battered by cost of living challenges the last few years.
'Who haven't found their wages keeping up with inflation, when they want to see a doctor they can't get an appointment, when they're on a hospital waiting list they're on it for months.
'We need to show that things can be different, and if we don't address those things not only will we not win again, we won't deserve to win again.
'Because people voted for change and it's our job to deliver it.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How will the UK-France migrants return deal work as it comes into force?
How will the UK-France migrants return deal work as it comes into force?

Leader Live

time27 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

How will the UK-France migrants return deal work as it comes into force?

The treaty was laid in Parliament on Tuesday, and will take effect from Wednesday with detentions expected in the coming days. The UK-France deal, which will also bring approved asylum seekers under a safe route to Britain, was agreed last month on the last day of French President Emmanuel Macron's state visit to the UK. Here is a closer look at the plan and what the issue is. – What is the concern over the Channel crossings? Some 25,436 migrants have arrived in the UK after crossing the English Channel this year – a record for this point in the year since data began being collected in 2018. This is up 48% on this point last year (17,170) and 70% higher than at this stage in 2023 (14,994), according to PA news agency analysis of Home Office data. At least 10 people have died while attempting the journey this year, according to reports by French and UK authorities, but there is no official record of fatalities in the Channel. Ministers want to end the crossings because they 'threaten lives and undermine our border security'. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has said smuggling gangs have been allowed to take hold along the UK's borders over the last six years, making millions out of the dangerous journeys. On Tuesday, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch claimed the failure to stop migrants crossing the Channel is putting community cohesion at risk. Data on the crossings of migrants in 'small boats' like inflatable dinghies has been collected since 2018. In the first year of data, just 299 people were recorded to have arrived in the UK this way. Since 2018, 94% of migrants who arrived by small boat crossing have claimed asylum in the UK, or 145,834 out of 154,354 people. – What has the Labour Government's approach been to the issue? Since Labour came to power last July, the party has vowed to 'smash the gangs'. Ministers are seeking to ramp up enforcement action against smugglers with new legislation to hand counter terror-style powers to police, and new criminal offences aiming to crack down on the illegal trade. This is my message to the people smuggling gangs: we will end your vile trade. For the very first time, migrants arriving via small boat will be detained and returned to France. My government has led the way in taking our countries' co-operation to a new level. — Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) July 10, 2025 The Government is also seeking to reset the UK's relationship with Europe over the crossings, and France has agreed to change its rules to allow police to intervene when boats are in shallow water, rather than requiring them to still be on land. Meanwhile ministers are hoping to deter new arrivals promised jobs when they come to the UK by cracking down on illegal working and deportations of ineligible asylum seekers. – What is the new deal and how will it work? Last month, the Prime Minister and French president agreed a plan to send back small boats migrants, with an asylum seeker being sent to the UK in exchange in equal numbers. Under the pilot scheme, adults arriving on a small boat can be detained and returned to France for the first time. The trial is set to run until June 11 2026, pending a longer-term agreement or cancellation by either the UK or France with one months' notice. Asylum seekers accepted to come to the UK under the deal would travel via a safe, legal route, 'subject to strict security checks'. Those in France could express an interest to apply for asylum to the UK through an online platform developed by the Home Office, and would then carry out the standard visa application process and checks. Priority will be given to people from countries where they are most likely to be granted asylum as genuine refugees, who are most likely to be exploited by smuggling gangs, and also asylum seekers who have connections to the UK. Borders are being breached by criminal gangs worldwide. Life-threatening Channel crossings have occurred for years – it is time to act. Border Security Command is how we fight back. — Home Office (@ukhomeoffice) March 4, 2025 If accepted, they would be given three months in the UK to claim asylum or apply for a visa, and would be subject to the same rules for all asylum seekers not allowed to work, study or have access to benefits. Their claim could still be rejected during their time in the UK, and they could then be removed from the country. It is not clear what the criteria will be for deciding which migrants who arrive in the UK by small boat will be sent back to France, other than being aged over 18. New arrivals will be screened at Manston processing centre, in Kent, which is current procedure, before individuals determined to be suitable for the pilot and for detention, will be picked and held in an immigration removal centre. Their removal is expected to be made on the grounds of inadmissibility, that they have arrived from the UK from a safe country where their case can be heard instead, because an agreement is in place with France. The treaty confirms the migrants would be returned back to France by plane, and commits for a return to be completed within three months in all cases. It also agrees for a joint committee to be set up to monitor the agreement and arrange logistics. Migrants will be able to appeal against the decision based on exceptional circumstances. The Home Office said it had learned from the 'lengthy legal challenges' over the previous government's Rwanda scheme and would 'robustly defend' any attempts to block removal through the courts. – How many people will be part of the pilot and much will it cost? No official number of migrants has been confirmed to take part in the pilot, but it is understood numbers will grow over the pilot period and depend on operational factors. The Home Secretary has said the Government does not want to put a number on the amount as she believes it could aid criminal gangs. It has been reported that about 50 a week could be sent to France. This would be a stark contrast to the more than 800 people every week who on average have arrived in the UK via small boat this year. There is no funding to France associated with this agreement, and operations around the returns and arrivals will be paid for from the existing Home Office budget. – What has the reaction been to the deal? Opposition politicians were scathing about the Prime Minister's deal with Mr Macron, with shadow home secretary Chris Philp claiming the small percentage of arrivals to be removed would 'make no difference whatsoever'. On Tuesday, he added: 'This deal is unworkable and wide open to abuse.' Reform UK leader Nigel Farage also branded it a 'humiliation'. Meanwhile refugee charities have also criticised the plan and have urged the Government to provide more safe, legal routes for asylum seekers instead. Reacting to the plan coming into force, Amnesty International UK's refugee rights director, Steve Valdez-Symonds, said: 'Once again, refugees are treated like parcels, not people, while the public is left to pay the price for, yet another cruel, costly failure dressed up as policy.'

Corbyn vs Starmer, modern manners, and a crumbling NHS
Corbyn vs Starmer, modern manners, and a crumbling NHS

Metro

time27 minutes ago

  • Metro

Corbyn vs Starmer, modern manners, and a crumbling NHS

Do you agree with our readers? Have your say on these MetroTalk topics and more in the comments. Robert Hughes (MetroTalk, Mon) says that 'Labour has little to fear by losing the niche hard left and should let Corbyn and his disciples get on with it'. It is worth remembering that in 2017, the Labour Party under Corbyn received 3 million more votes than it did in 2024 under Starmer. Even in 2019, a catastrophic election insofar as the number of parliamentary seats was concerned, it received half a million more actual votes than in 2024. This represents quite a large niche. Political parties striving to attract more supporters should understand that it is even more important to keep those they already have. I am not sure that Starmer and his colleagues have really grasped this point. Rory O'Kelly, Beckenham So Robert Johnson takes issue with Chris Sheperd (MetroTalk, Tue) over the government's record. Under Labour: Unemployment is up; small businesses are closing at their biggest rate in more than ten years; government borrowing is going through the roof; crime in general is up; inflation is up. Also, waiting lists are not down –appointments have been met due to lack of strikes, so that's a sleight of hand with the figures. Labour gave in to the doctors once on pay and look what has happened – more strikes. As for Labour councils going bankrupt all over the country, is that the Conservatives' fault? I would argue there's more illegal immigration than ever before, too. So yes, let's judge the country in five years. I can wait. Gary, Essex I know this has been mentioned by other readers before but why are people so self-centred and lacking in simple manners or consideration for others? Behaviour that we thought was just kids being obnoxious is now being exhibited by grown men and women, adults who should know better. My rant is about the very disgusting trend of listening or playing videos etc without a headset on public transport. It's annoying that one is constantly put in a position of having to say something, and risk abuse or worse. With the demise of any kind of onboard supervision empowered to tackle this anti-social behaviour, ordinary citizens are taking the risk of challenging it themselves. It angers me that I am forced to say something and it's just awful by those who do it, daring anyone to comment or say anything. Shame on you all. I know your mothers taught you better than that! Agatha, Surrey One thing I would like to bring back from yonder years is queuing at bus stops. However, this would only work if the buses stopped right at the bus stop. If it stops 20 yards after or 20 yards before, as seems the case often nowadays, it wouldn't work. Richard Farrar, London Whilst I don't wish to make light of this lady's horrible experience of having 'rodent droppings found in her drawers' (Metro, Mon), I do think you would have been wise to substitute 'drawers' for 'bedside cabinet' to avoid any ambiguity. William Buckley, Reading The front page headline of Monday's Metro ('Rat horror for hospital gran') will come as little surprise to people who've worked in our hospitals for any length of time. A theatre nurse friend of mine told me stories of a large hospital in London which had all manner of pests – rats, mice, cockroaches – cropping up throughout the building, including in operating theatres and kitchens. This was 20 years ago, mind, but I'm sure there are still many hospitals around the country with similar infestations. Nowadays, my friend works in a smaller hospital, which was built from RAAC concrete, so they have to watch out for bits of the roof falling on them during surgery. I'm not even joking. I'm afraid this is what happens when we don't fund our health service properly. These are the things I think of whenever anyone claims that taxes are too high. And you can't pin this on immigration either, because our hospitals rely on immigrants – they are a large and established part of the workforce. Sharon, Manchester Why are hundreds of Gaza children being brought into destitute Britain for treatment – this will only lead to the underfunded NHS's waiting lists becoming even longer. The children should be sent to oil-rich countries such as Saudi Appley, Kent The cost of items in my local charity shops has rocketed. I was shocked to see a T-shirt priced at £5.99, while it is currently on sale in Primark for £6. Mrs AH East, Leeds Mark Hardinge (MetroTalk, Mon) is mistaken when talking about the 'futile net zero programme'. Net zero is the only way we will have good quality jobs and sustainable industries for future generations. It is the most patriotic action we can take. Nigel Farage is backed by oil and gas companies – surely the only reason he champions backward-looking and catastrophic policies. Christina, Sheffield Thank you Michael D Baker (MetroTalk, July 29) for your anecdote about Ozzy Osbourne meeting Leicester band Spring at Rockfield studios in Monmouth. More Trending Spring were a little-known band, who made an almost forgotten, long-lost great British album in my view – although drummer Pick Withers did subsequently find some fame with Dire Straits. Coincidentally, another band, Indian Summer from Coventry, shared both management and a residency at Henry's Blueshouse in Birmingham with Black Sabbath and also made a great, long-lost British album on the same label, Neon. Collectors have always recognised the quality in these albums and both originals are now fetching large sums of money. But for me the enormity of Sabbath and the anonymity of Spring and Indian Summer is impossible to comprehend. It never ceases to amaze me. Lots of things fascinate me about music, this surely one I am destined personally never to understand. Lionel Hutt, Keynsham MORE: The Metro daily cartoon by Guy Venables MORE: I'm a fashion expert – here's what I'm buying in Aligne's unmissable sale MORE: Titan sub pilot Stockton Rush could have faced criminal charges if he survived, report finds

Ofwat chief executive David Black to stand down
Ofwat chief executive David Black to stand down

The Independent

time27 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Ofwat chief executive David Black to stand down

The chief executive of Ofwat is to step down as the embattled water regulator prepares to be abolished. David Black will leave the role at the end of August and an interim chief executive will be appointed in due course. The Government last month announced the regulator would be axed in a regulatory shake-up that comes as part of its response to public outrage over rising bills, sewage pollution and large bonuses for bosses. Ofwat may not be formally axed until at least 2027, with the process to overhaul the current system likely to be complex. The regulator said Mr Black, who took over as chief executive in 2021 and had worked in various roles at Ofwat since 2012, had decided the time is right for him to pursue new opportunities. In a statement on Tuesday, he said: 'I have been privileged to be able to lead Ofwat over the last four years, during which time we have achieved a huge amount together as a team for customers and the environment. 'I wish the team every success as they continue their important work.' The four bodies responsible for regulating the sector have faced intense criticism for overseeing companies during the years where they paid out to shareholders and accrued large debts – while ageing infrastructure crumbled and sewage spills skyrocketed. Currently, Ofwat oversees how much water companies in England and Wales can charge for services, the Drinking Water Inspectorate ensures that public water supplies are safe, while the Environment Agency and Natural England have regulatory functions to monitor the industry's impact on nature. Under Government plans, measures will be rolled out to merge their regulatory responsibilities into a 'single, powerful' regulator – one for England and another for Wales. The move was recommended by an independent review into the sector, which was commissioned by ministers to answer public fury over the ailing state of the water sector. Led by former Bank of England governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, the review advised far-reaching changes to the way the water system is regulated as one of 88 measures to tackle problems in industry. As part of its own response to the crisis, Ofwat said it would allow firms to raise average bills from 2025 to 2030 to help finance a £104 billion upgrade for the sector as part of its so-called price review, published in December. In his statement on Tuesday, Mr Black said: 'The 2024 price review backed an investment programme of £104 billion, along with a further £50 billion investment in major new water resources, which will improve service, environmental outcomes and resilience in the years to come.' Consumer groups at the time warned that the increases were 'more than what many people can afford', with companies able to raise average bills by £157 in total over the next five years to £597 to help finance the £104 billion. Ofwat chairman Iain Coucher said: 'David has worked, tirelessly, to bring about transformational change in the water sector. 'He has sought new regulatory powers and resources to hold companies to account, taken major enforcement action and provided funding and incentive packages that drive continual improvements for customers. 'On behalf of the board and everyone at Ofwat, I would like to thank David for his leadership and his service over the last 13 years and to wish him every success in the future.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store