Huge Native Title problem that's costing Aussies big as state deals with almost 40 claims - and one has lasted more than two decades
Councils in the state are currently responding to 38 Native Title claims, with one contest for sea territory in the Torres Strait now running for 24 years.
Redland City Council is at the forefront of calls for external funding after spending eight years responding to a Native Title claim over much of its coastline.
While Native Titles don't affect freehold property - including residential houses and businesses - the council expressed confusion about the future of its properties.
About 3,500 properties owned or managed by Redland City Council have been included in the Quandamooka Coast claim area.
The Queensland Government assessed 1,300 of those properties and found 80 could be subject to the title claim, including an animal shelter and cemetery.
However, the council has been lumped with the task of processing its remaining properties through the Federal Court to determine if they are eligible for Native Title claim.
Typically, exclusion is given when public works - like roads, playgrounds, shelters - were built before December 23, 1996.
Redland City Council did not own some of the contested properties before that date but has built parks, recreation areas, and infrastructure on them.
The ongoing debate over the properties has already cost the council $2million and its legal bill will continue to grow with a four-week hearing scheduled in September.
The council unsuccessfully asked the extended assessment be covered by the Queensland Government, noting 'having clarity over the history of the lots of land will ensure there are no legacy issues down the track'.
Senator Pauline Hanson earlier this month called for the state government to take the pressure off small councils being hit with Native Title claim bills.
'While the claimants have their legal costs fully funded by the National Indigenous Australians Agency, Queensland councils had their support taken away long ago,' Hanson said.
'Queensland councils were acknowledged as among the best in responding to Native Title claims until Labor changed the Native Title Respondent Funding Scheme in 2013 and effectively put the cost burden on local ratepayers.
'The Albanese government has since abolished the scheme altogether.
'It's a burden that few, if any, regional Queensland councils can bear.'
The Senator echoed the sentiment of councils around the state, saying the Native Title claims 'are often very complex and can take years to resolve, resulting in huge legal costs for respondents'.
The Quandamooka Coast claim area includes a small part of Brisbane City, most of mainland Redlands and areas of Lamb Island, Macleay Island, Karragarra Island, Coochiemudlo Island, Cassim Island, Sandy Island, Tindappah Island, Green Island, King Island, St Helena Island and Mud Island.
It is being overseen by the Quandamooka Yoolooburrabee Aboriginal Corporation, which in 2011 was granted Native Title over nearby North Stradbroke Island.
Local Government Association of Queensland chief executive officer Alison Smith told the Courier Mail she supported calls for funding to be reinstated.
'Local governments are automatically joined as respondents when a Native Title claim affecting the local government area is lodged in the Federal Court,' she said.
'It is critical that the Commonwealth reinstates the Financial Assistance Scheme so local governments are able to access funding to participate in the claim process.'
Local Government Minister Ann Leahy wouldn't comment on funding for Native Title claims, instead pointing to decreased 'red tape'.
'While Labor walked away from supporting councils for a decade, the Crisafulli government is helping reduce red tape and costs to ensure they can deliver for their communities,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
PETER VAN ONSELEN: UN climate boss makes LUDICROUS claim about daily habit Aussies will be forced to give up because of warming - turning off the very people he needs to win over
When Simon Stiell, the UN's top climate official, warns Australians that unless we lift our game on emissions, fruit and veggies will become 'a once-a-year treat', you know he's jumped the shark. That kind of rhetoric may stir applause from activists who are already won over to the climate cause, but it risks turning off the very people who weigh up what practical action should look like. You don't have to be a climate change denier to fall into that category. Climate change is real, most people accept that. The science is sound, people know that too. The dangers posed by a warming planet are therefore not to be underestimated. But packaging the argument in short term apocalyptic headlines doesn't strengthen the cause, it weakens it. It sounds like activism, not expert analysis, and that distinction matters. When the debate becomes saturated with worst case scenarios and doom-laden predictions, most people dismiss those who deliver inflated rhetoric as lacking credibility. Stiell might believe he's spurring governments into action, but for mainstream voters, the ones who decide elections, this sort of messaging can feel more like an old fashioned guilt trip. It becomes counterproductive to the cause. Australia is preparing to update its 2035 emissions reduction target right when the Labor government has ambitions to co-host a global climate summit. And the UN's climate tsar seems to think fresh alarmism will spur Labor into more action. But that will not be the case if his sensationalising makes the government look like its plans are rooted in activism. Younger voters tend to be more inclined to listen to the alarmism, but the electorate is broader than one generation still finding their feet in life. The case for serious emissions reduction is strong, but it must be made with rigour. Suggesting fresh produce will become a luxury good - or that living standards are set to collapse without dramatic policy shifts in Australia - makes for a good headline but is poor public engagement. It risks framing climate policy as a punitive exercise rather than an economic and technological opportunity. It also ignores the reality that Australia is a very small emitter on the global stage even if our per capita emissions are too high. What we do, or don't do, matters little if the likes of China and India don't do much more than they currently are. There are plenty of nations in greater need of lectures than we are. Australians aren't oblivious to climate risks, but they are wary of poor policies, broken promises and emissions targets that are often costly and don't get met anyway. Voters want action that's credible, not utopian and dreamy. They also want costed plans, not alarmist lectures, especially in the context of rising energy prices and concerns about reliability. The Coalition is already highlighting the economic burden of the government's major emissions reduction policy - known as the safeguard mechanism - and other net zero policies. The public will want proper answers to a problem - not simplistic fear mongering. The credibility of climate action depends on public trust. That means being transparent about costs and benefits, about timelines, trade-offs and targets. It means avoiding exaggerated claims that can't be sustained if the short-term doesn't mirror the long-term projection. Just because opponents of climate action use fear and verbosity is no reason for advocates who claim to be on the side of science to dash their credibility by returning fire. If the government wants to be taken seriously at home and abroad, it should focus less on emotionally charged appeals and more on policy design that builds confidence. There's merit in the idea of setting ambitious targets with built-in flexibility, allowing for adjustments as new technology develops and economic conditions change. That's the kind of thinking that builds consensus and keeps momentum going. Those urging rapid decarbonisation, net zero within a decade, or 65 per cent emissions cuts by 2035 need to ground their calls in practical pathways. Without them, they risk pushing the conversation to the fringes. There's nothing wrong with urgency, but it should be channelled into persuading the undecided rather than trying to pressure them. If Stiell wants Australia to lead, avoid the junk threats. After all, science is already on his side.
Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Donald Trump flags huge tariff hike that will impact Australia
Australian exporters may be hit with tariffs of up to 20 per cent at the US border, after President Donald Trump flagged a hike in the baseline impost. On Monday, the US President suggested countries that do not negotiate separate trade deals would soon be hit with a new minimum tariff up to twice as high. 'We are going to be setting a tariff, for essentially the rest of the world, and that's what they're going to pay if you want to do business in the United States,' he told reports at a press conference at his luxury golf resort in Turnberry, Scotland. Asked what the new rate would be, he answered: 'I would say it'll be somewhere in the 15 to 20 per cent range.' 'Probably one of those two numbers'. Trump floated broad-sweeping tariffs as a key election promise last year which, he claimed, would encourage more manufacturing firms to set up shop in the US. Australia is among the roughly 200 countries expected to be hit with the new baseline tariff despite its bilateral free-trade agreement with the US. Shadow Finance Minister James Paterson said the update shed new light on the need for the Australian Prime Minister to meet with Trump. 'I think there is enough evidence now in the public realm that we do have a problem in the bilateral relationship between Australia and the United States,' he told Sky News. 'It's more than 260 days since the president was elected, Anthony Albanese has still not sat down and met with him.' Mr Albanese sought to discuss the tariffs with Trump during their attendance at the G7 summit in Canada last month before the US President cut his trip short. Mr Peterson added it remained 'unclear' whether Ambassador to the US Kevin Rudd had yet to meet with the White House administration since Trump was sworn in in January. 'I suspect we would know about it if he had, I suspect it would be all over social media if he had, so I think it's a reasonable inference now that there has been no meetings.' For its part, the Albanese government has restated its opposition to the tariffs but has downplayed what it says about the two country's relationships. 'We are a country that relies on trade, we are a country with a very high proportion of jobs that rely on trade,' Assistant Treasurer Dan Mulino told Sky News. 'That remains the position of this government. So, we would rather a situation in which the world doesn't go down the path of imposing tariffs. 'But what I can say is that Australia remains in a situation where we've got as good a deal as anybody, and we continue to engage with the US Government intensely on these matters.' A spokesperson for Trade Minister Don Farrell said Australia would continue to engage 'at all levels' to advocate for the removal of the tariffs. 'Our position is unchanged – any tariffs on Australian goods are unjustified and an act of economic self-harm,' they said. It comes only days after Australia lifted its ban on importing US beef - eliminating a key reason cited by the Trump administration for its tariff on Aussie goods. Mr Albanese insisted the move was the outcome of a review that had been underway for years, but Trump's officials have celebrated it as a win for the president.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Morning Mail: Clare pledges childcare action, Harbour Bridge Gaza protest row grows, questions over Adani's tax bill
Morning everyone. The education minister, Jason Clare, has told Guardian Australia exclusively how he plans to use new powers as soon as possible to shake up the childcare sector after the shocking reports of abuse in Victoria and New South Wales. In other news, pro-Palestine protesters are digging in over plans to stage a rally on the Sydney Harbour Bridge, while our Full Story podcast asks if the outcry over pictures of starving children in Gaza is a tipping point. Plus, we ask why Adani doesn't pay corporate tax in Australia despite billions in revenue from its huge Queensland coalmine. Discrimination claim | Mary Kostakidis has asked the federal court in Adelaide to strike out an 'embarrassing' Zionist Federation of Australia racial discrimination claim on the grounds it fails to identify which race, ethnicity or nationality was offended by the former SBS journalist's social media posts about Israel. Meanwhile the Sydney lord mayor, Clover Moore, has said a pro-Palestine protest involving a march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge would be a 'powerful symbol'. Childcare crisis | The use of CCTV in childcare centres, a national register of teachers and mandatory child safety training are top of the agenda for a meeting of state and federal ministers, as governments race to respond to abuse in the early childhood sector. 'Missing' $22bn | Consumer price figures released tomorrow may determine whether a cautious Reserve Bank of Australia will give millions of mortgaged Australians a rate cut next month. Union anger | The NSW government is facing strong pushback against workers compensation changes designed to curb claims for psychological injury, with educators and the peak union group criticising the bill's failure to address underlying issues. Gaming backlash | Payment companies such as Visa, Mastercard and Stripe are facing public backlash for pressuring online gaming platforms to remove hundreds of games in response to a campaign from an Australian anti-porn lobby group. 'Dark day' | The French prime minister, François Bayrou, said the EU had capitulated to Donald Trump's threats of ever-increasing tariffs, as he labelled the framework deal struck in Scotland on Sunday as a 'dark day' for the EU. Here's an explainer about what the EU has agreed to and analysis on why they chose a deal over a trade war. 'Real starvation' | Two leading human rights organisations based in Israel, B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights, say Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza and the country's western allies have a legal and moral duty to stop it. For the first time, Donald Trump acknowledged that there is 'real starvation' in the region and told Benjamin Netanyahu to allow 'every ounce of food' into Gaza. Aeroflot hack | The Russian airline Aeroflot was forced to cancel dozens of flights after a pro-Ukraine hacking group with a track record of claiming responsibility for hacking targets in Russia said it had carried out a cyber-attack. Meanwhile Donald Trump has given Vladimir Putin a 12-day deadline to cut a peace deal with Ukraine. Gallagher charged | The older brother of Oasis's Noel and Liam Gallagher has been charged with rape and other sexual offences, Scotland Yard has said. Spidey senses | David Attenborough's new series, Parenthood – to be shown on Channel Ten – will feature footage of a 1,000-strong pack of young African social spiders hunting prey in a game of 'grandmother's footsteps' during which they freeze in unison then eat all their mothers and elderly relatives alive. Is this the tipping point in Gaza? Guardian Middle East correspondent William Christou speaks to Reged Ahmad from Jerusalem about whether this moment is a tipping point in the Israel-Gaza war. Sorry your browser does not support audio - but you can download here and listen $ More than three years after Adani started extracting coal from its Queensland mine, the Indian conglomerate has paid zero corporate tax from its Australian project – and tax experts say it may 'never pay a cent'. Our business correspondent, Jonathan Barrett, investigates how it has happened. A new Australian biography of the mythologiser of the American west, Zane Grey, has uncovered the unlikely tale of how the ageing writer and keen fisher spent his final years chasing his dream of catching a great white – and explains why a caravan park in southern NSW bears his name. Sign up to Morning Mail Our Australian morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Swimming | Alexandria Perkins (pictured on right) has taken a bronze medal for Australia on day two of the swimming world championships in Singapore, while Canadian superstar Summer McIntosh continued her winning ways. Football | As the world of women's football moves on after England's dramatic Euro win, the Matildas prepare for tonight's draw for the Asian Cup which will be held in Australia in March. Cricket | Kevin Pietersen has defended Ben Stokes after the England captain was criticised for his reaction to India's decision to bat on in the closing stages of the drawn fourth Test at Old Trafford. Rugby union | Our correspondent on the Lions tour, Gerard Meagher, explains why the 12-hour train journey between Melbourne and Sydney is an essential part of the experience. Victorian farmers are 'furious' about plans to hand VicGrid the power to access farmland to build transmission towers, according to the Australian Financial Review. In an editorial, the Courier Mail says sneering from Sydney and Melbourne won't stop Brisbane from having its moment. A couple whose baby was stillborn at Cowra hospital have thanked nurses for managing to make the experience 'deeply meaningful', the Central Western Daily reports. Energy | Australian Clean Energy Summit in Sydney. Courts | Interlocutory hearing at 10.15am for the racial discrimination case brought by the Zionist Federation of Australia against Mary Kostakidis. Perth | Case management hearing at 11.15am for Linda Reynolds v Commonwealth. If you would like to receive this Morning Mail update to your email inbox every weekday, sign up here, or finish your day with our Afternoon Update newsletter. You can follow the latest in US politics by signing up for This Week in Trumpland. And finally, here are the Guardian's crosswords to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword
