The ‘Oil Industry, African Energy Chamber (AEC) and Africa Bromance' Remains Committed to Africa's Energy Development Despite Attacks from Foreign Funded Groups
Groups such as Extinction Rebellion has been consistent in their attacks against the industry, turning to violent and disruptive measures to voice their biases and relentless opposition. Rather than peaceful protests, foreign funded environmental groups have turned to climate-motivated sabotage. Activists from Shut the System, for example, sabotaged internet cables in London in early 2025. Following which, the group stated that they 'vow to wage a campaign of sabotage targeting the tools, property and machinery of those most responsible for global warming.' This is a direct attack on the industry.
Another group, Just Stop Oil, has also been relentless. Attacks include throwing soup at Van Gogh's Sunflowers painting, throwing paint on Stonehenge, gluing themselves to roads to stop traffic, cable-tying themselves to goal posts at sports events and England-wide blockades at ten critical oil facilities in 2022. Just Stop Oil protestors were also given multi-year prison sentences in England in 2024 for their roles in closing multiple junctions of the M25 motorway. In the US, Greenpeace was issued to pay $660 million in damages in 2025 for malicious interference with the Dakota Access Pipeline. The group also has a history of occupying coal power plants and blocking coal shipments in New Zealand, Australia and the UK. But it is the group's attacks on the industry in Africa that stand to bring far-reaching disruptions.
Greenpeace has been strongly opposing exploration in Africa by companies such as Shell, Meren Energy (formerly Africa Oil Corp), TotalEnergies and more. All three companies have secured environmental authorization and/or financing for their offshore activities but Greenpeace continues to launch attacks against these companies. The company challenged Shell's exploration rights in court and continues to ask for donations to support its attacks on oil companies.
'We at the chamber expected these attacks as we approach this next edition of AEW: Invest in African Energies. These attacks always come. We denounce the violence of Extinction rebellion. We hope that we will have a robust conversation about Africans right to drill and provide energy for the millions of Africans that live without access to electricity or clean cooking solutions. The AEC-Africa-Oil and Gas Industry bromance will continue fighting for Africa. We will continue fighting to make energy poverty history. We will continue fighting for generations to come,' states NJ Ayuk, Executive Chairman of the AEC.
It is clear that the writer Peden does not fully understand the African context. If the writer truly understood what every day Africans in Mali, Mozambique, Namibia and other countries go through, she would not have this extremist and radical environmental agenda against the continent's energy development. We must be reminded that over 600 million Africans live without access to electricity while over 900 million people live without access to clean cooking solutions. But it seems that Extinction Rebellion is bent on ensuring that Africans remain without access to electricity or the energy they need for the future. This is exactly what the AEC opposes. This is also why we are proud to be part of a bromance with Africa and the global oil and gas industry. This is why we will continue fighting for oil and gas exploration.
It is surprising to see that Extinction Rebellion and Peden criticize African exploration efforts when they fail to criticize the bromance between countries in other parts of the world and the oil and gas industry. They do not criticize Norway for producing four million bpd and sanctioning new energy projects or the UK which is drilling in the North Sea or the US in the Gulf. It is Africa, where people want to drill for more oil and gas to help lift the continent out of poverty, that the attacks come.
'I was hoping the she would bring Greta Thunberg along because she will protest anything. Moraig Peden and the foreign funded green groups now have the Mantashe Derangement Syndrome. The attacks on Africans by Moraig Peden and Extinction rebellion deceitful and dishonest, Or blatantly dishonest. This is just the beginning, Africans and the energy industry have been through tough times, but you've never seen me quit and there's no quitting on our fight to make energy poverty history and industrialize Africa. We see Moraig Peden's attacks as simply hypocrisy especially coming from a wealthy woman with a Eurocentric view of energy who believes Africans should stay in the dark while she is shopping for car elevators' Concluded Ayuk. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of African Energy Chamber.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Zawya
36 minutes ago
- Zawya
Egyptian Ambassador to Seychelles pays farewell call on Minister for Foreign Affairs and Tourism
As part of his farewell tour, the outgoing Ambassador of the Arab Republic of Egypt to the Republic of Seychelles, H.E. Mr. Wael M. Nasr Eldin M. Attiya, called on the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Tourism, Mr. Sylvestre Radegonde on Monday 28th July 2025 at Maison Quéau de Quinssy. Minister Radegonde thanked Ambassador Attiya for his dedication towards the advancement of the strong bilateral relations between the Seychelles and Egypt. The diplomats discussed the successful signing of the Visa Waiver Agreement which allows Seychelles' Official and Diplomatic Passport holders to enter Egypt visa free, the agreement will take effect in the next 30 days. Minister Radegonde also reiterated the wish the Seychelles' request to sign a similar agreement for normal passport holders. Collaboration in the areas of Culture, Trade, Tourism, and Health were also discussed, particularly, capacity building for health professionals. Discussions also took place on the possibility of concluding a Prisoner Transfer Agreement. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Tourism, Republic of Seychelles.

Zawya
5 hours ago
- Zawya
African Union Commission (AUC) Chairperson received His Excellency Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, President of the Federal Republic of Somalia
The Chairperson of the African Union Commission, H.E. Mahmoud Ali Youssouf, this afternoon received H.E. Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, President of the Federal Republic of Somalia, at the AU Headquarters. They deliberated on the peace&security situation in Somalia&the region. The Chairperson commended the President for the progress made in Somalia's stabilisation&development. The Chairperson reaffirmed the Union's unwavering commitment to supporting Somalia's path to peace. President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, in turn, expressed appreciation for the warm welcome&the AU's continued support. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of African Union (AU).


Zawya
5 hours ago
- Zawya
What happened to real economic development in Zimbabwe ?
In recent months, Zimbabweans have been bombarded with announcement after announcement of so-called 'revolving funds' launched by President Emmerson Mnangagwa's government, supposedly as a form of economic empowerment. To directly receive articles from Tendai Ruben Mbofana, please join his WhatsApp Channel on: The most recent was a US$300,000 fund, with US$200,000 earmarked for Health Ambassadors for Economic Development – a ZANU PF affiliate operating under the banner of 'Health Ambassadors for ED' – and US$100,000 for 'BoysDzamdara', another partisan group. Just a day earlier, the same government launched another US$200,000 fund for 'Mapositori for ED', also a ZANU PF-aligned group. Over the past year, we have witnessed similar schemes targeting war veterans, youth, teachers, women's groups, hairdressers, pastors, and many others – all under the banner of revolving funds intended to stimulate so-called 'projects'. But how is plunging citizens into debt supposed to be empowerment? Is this truly the vision of economic development under the so-called 'Second Republic'? When a government claims to be empowering its people but does so through debt, forcing citizens into the precarious world of informal survivalist projects – often far removed from their training, passion, and professional aspirations – then something is fundamentally broken. This growing tendency by the Mnangagwa administration to reduce empowerment to loans for 'projects' exposes a deep and systemic failure to create a functional economy. Take myself, for example. I am a journalist by training. My passion and profession lie in writing, in informing the public, in shaping national discourse. But in the Zimbabwe of today, I cannot earn a decent living through this passion, despite my qualifications and decades of experience. Instead, if I want to 'empower' myself under this government's model, I must take a loan – a debt – and perhaps start a poultry project or sell tomatoes on the roadside. But I never studied poultry farming. I have no particular love for selling tomatoes. These are not choices born of passion or vision. They are choices born out of desperation. In any normal country with a working economy, people pursue careers aligned with their skills and interests and are able to live decent lives doing so. Side projects, where they exist, are driven by personal interest – not by poverty, not by the failure of the state to ensure a functioning economy. Yet in Zimbabwe, that is the cruel reality. A trained teacher is no longer just a teacher. They must become a vendor, selling airtime, snacks, or vegetables on the side. A nurse is no longer simply a nurse. She is now also a hairdresser, or perhaps baking cakes to make ends meet. These so-called 'projects' are nothing more than desperate attempts to survive in a broken economy, where wages are not only insufficient but often irregular and meaningless in the face of hyperinflation and exchange rate volatility. These are not symbols of entrepreneurship – they are symptoms of state-authored poverty. Worse still, these revolving funds being paraded as government achievements are pitiful in both scale and impact. Take the US$200,000 for Mapositori, for instance. How many Mapositori exist across Zimbabwe? Tens of thousands, possibly more. How many are expected to benefit from this amount? A few hundred? A few thousand? Even if each beneficiary receives US$200 – a figure far too little to meaningfully start any business – that would only cover 1,000 individuals. What happens to the tens of thousands left out? And more critically, what are the realistic chances that those who do receive the money will succeed in repaying it? Then comes the hard question: in a hostile and dysfunctional economy that has already plunged these same citizens into poverty and shut down countless companies, what are the realistic chances that these beneficiaries will repay their loans? With formal unemployment hovering above 90%, and most Zimbabweans barely scraping by in the informal sector, how many of these so-called 'projects' are likely to succeed — let alone generate enough income to settle debts? In such a bleak economic landscape, where survival alone is an achievement, the sustainability of these revolving funds becomes more fantasy than fact. The very notion of a revolving fund presupposes that initial beneficiaries will be able to repay their loans so that others can benefit next. But what happens when those beneficiaries fail – not because they are lazy or irresponsible, but because they are operating in a hostile and dysfunctional economic environment? How long after the fund is launched will the second batch of recipients receive anything, if ever? It becomes painfully clear that these funds are not sustainable. They are not scalable. They are not empowering. They are political tokens – headline-grabbing gestures meant to create an illusion of activity and concern, while distracting from the fundamental collapse of the economy. In fact, trying to build an economy by pushing citizens into debt is a dangerous and irresponsible experiment. A truly empowered citizen is not one who is burdened with the anxiety of loan repayments. True empowerment comes when individuals can earn a decent income from their professions, live with dignity, and plan for their futures without having to beg for handouts or join partisan groups for access to resources. Under Mnangagwa's rule, however, people are being reduced to hustlers – not out of choice, but out of compulsion. And to make matters worse, the revolving funds are often channeled through ZANU PF structures, further politicising poverty and tying access to livelihoods to political loyalty. This entire model of so-called empowerment is an open admission that the Mnangagwa government has failed to build a sustainable economy. A functioning state does not need to intervene by giving out loans to individuals just to keep them afloat. In a thriving economy, people earn from their jobs, run profitable businesses based on genuine demand, and access funding through formal institutions like banks – not through politically-driven patronage schemes. If the President truly wants to empower Zimbabweans, he must focus on making the economy work again. That means creating a stable macroeconomic environment, ensuring the rule of law, eliminating corruption, and attracting real investors who can build factories, companies, and industries. It means fixing the public service so that teachers, nurses, and police officers are adequately paid and motivated. It means supporting small businesses by creating enabling conditions – reliable power, fair taxation, efficient transport – not by handing out scraps and expecting people to succeed in a storm. Zimbabweans deserve real empowerment – where their skills, qualifications, and passions are rewarded in a functioning system. They deserve to stand on their own two feet, not constantly reliant on government intervention or political favour. Until we see policies that restore the dignity of the worker, that rebuild the capacity of national institutions, and that foster genuine economic activity, then all these revolving funds are nothing more than a smoke screen. Debt is not empowerment. Poverty masked as opportunity is not development. And until the Mnangagwa administration realises that true empowerment lies in structural reform, not in political tokenism, Zimbabwe will remain stuck in this tragic cycle of desperation and deception.© Copyright The Zimbabwean. All rights reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (