The ‘death of creativity'? AI job fears stalk advertising industry
From using motion capture tech to allow the Indian cricketing star Rahul Dravid to give personalised coaching tips for children to an algorithm trained on Shakespeare's handwriting powering a robotic arm to rewrite Romeo and Juliet, artificial intelligence is rapidly revolutionising the global advertising industry.
Those AI-created adverts, for the Cadbury's drink brand Bournvita and the pen maker Bic, were produced by agency group WPP, which is spending £300m annually on data, tech and machine learning to remain competitive.
Mark Read, the chief executive of the London-listed marketing services group, has said AI is 'fundamental' to the future of its business, while admitting that it will drastically reshape the ad industry workforce.
Related: WPP chief Mark Read to step down as ad agency battles AI
Now Read has announced he is to leave at the end of this year, after almost seven years as chief executive and more than 30 at WPP, as the company struggles to keep pace with its peers and also counter moves by big tech to muscle in to the AI-driven future of advertising.
For ad agencies, the upheaval originates from a familiar source. Over more than a decade, Google and the Facebook owner, Meta, successfully built tech tools for publishers and ad buyers that helped them to dominate online. Big tech hoovered up almost two-thirds of the £45bn spent by advertisers in the UK this year. Now, Mark Zuckerberg wants to take over making the ads, too.
The Meta boss is gearing up to unleash AI tools to allow advertisers to fully create and target campaigns on his social media sites, prompting fears of the 'death of creativity' – and widespread job cuts at agencies.
Last week it emerged that these tools are to be rolled out by the end of next year, with Zuckerberg describing the capability in a recent interview as a 'redefinition of the category of advertising. You don't need any creative, you don't need any targeting, you don't need any measurement, except to be able to read the results that we spit out,' he said last month, in comments that appear to render much of the advertising industry obsolete.
Agencies of all sizes – and particularly the deep-pocketed international groups such as WPP, Publicis and Omnicom – are pouring investment into developing their own AI tools and working with tech companies such as Meta and Google. But the plan is meant to be to keep clients, not lose them.
'I think there is no doubt AI will disintermediate a large number of jobs,' says the chief executive of one big ad agency. 'Having said that, there are many agencies with big corporate clients that really could do with being slimmed down a lot. I can see staffing in areas like strategy, consumer insight and some conceptual roles being safe, but what will be really hit is those involved in production and the realisation of ideas.'
Big tech executives espoused the benefits of AI at the annual Enders Deloitte conference on the media and telecoms industry last week.
Stephan Pretorius, who described himself as 'WPP's AI guy' as he co-led a session with Meta, said: 'Creativity, in its purest form, remains a human skill.'
He argued that AI does not equate to job cuts but admitted that agencies need to restructure and advertising client relationships are changing.
'AI replaces tasks, it eliminates tasks, it doesn't eliminate jobs,' he said. 'A lot of what we used to get paid for is now getting automated and therefore our commercial models have to change, our team structures have to change. The way we are incentivised by our clients is changing. But that is the transition.'
Last month WPP said there would be an undisclosed number of redundancies globally across WPP Media, formerly known as GroupM, which plans and buys billions of pounds of ad space for clients across digital and traditional media.
'You have a situation where the big holding companies are in a dilemma,' another ad agency chief executive says. 'Clients expect us to invest millions developing AI so they can cut their budgets because things can be done quicker and cheaper. Lots of clients are asking for fee reductions.'
So far the AI revolution does not appear to be having a big impact on the UK industry.
There were a record 26,787 people employed in media, creative and digital agencies last year, according to the Institute of Practitioners in Advertising (IPA), the trade body for agencies that represent 85% of ad spend by clients in the UK.
The IPA has been measuring the size of the market since 1960, when there were 19,000 employees, hitting a low point of just under 12,000 in the early 1990s.
The amount spent on advertising has also grown exponentially, driven by the advent of the internet era, from £60m recorded in the pre-TV era in 1938.
By 1982 the UK market was worth £3.1bn and this year it is forecast to cross £45bn, according to the Advertising Association/Warc, which has been publishing figures annually since 1980.
Agency bosses believe that for the biggest household name advertisers there is too much brand risk handing over the full creative process to AI, which, for now at least, does not have the capability to make top-quality ads.
'You can often tell a [pure] AI piece of work a thousand yards away – glossy, very idealised and slightly plasticky looking,' the chief of one creative agency says. 'But that will change. You hear creatives saying that AI is never going to come up with something as brilliant as, say, a gorilla playing drums for Cadbury, but I am not so sure. AI will eventually become fine-tuned enough to react to the quite left-field conceptual prompting.'
Since making the comments that the industry took to mean that Meta is seeking to supplant the role of agencies, Zuckerberg has tried to clarify that the AI tools are primarily expected to be used by small and medium-sized businesses.
'In the future, if you were working with a creative agency to make creative, you'll probably keep doing that,' he said at the Stripe conference, clarifying his position a week after making his initial comments about the scope of Meta's AI advertising plans. 'If you aren't and you're just hacking something together and throwing it into Meta's ad system, well now we're going to be able to come up with 4,000 different versions of your creative and just test them and figure out which one works best.'
Meta and Google have always considered that they have 'democratised' advertising by enabling the long tail of millions of small businesses that do not have the financial wherewithal to run TV ad campaigns, or employ an ad agency to run campaigns.
'That is the smokescreen they always use,' the ad agency boss says. 'When they first emerged as new ad channels decades ago it was all about small businesses, and now they take nearly two-thirds of all UK ad spend.'
In the noughties, as big tech grew increasingly powerful, Sir Martin Sorrell, who built WPP into the world's biggest ad group and is now the chief executive of S4 Capital, labelled Meta and Google 'frenemies' – meaning they can be seen as a partner and as a competitive threat to agencies.
Two decades on, the rise of AI in advertising is the latest technological development forcing the industry to once again adapt to survive.
'Meta's new promise to 'auto-generate your ad in seconds' is the clearest sign yet that the production sausage factory is about to be fully mechanised,' says Patrick Garvey, the co-founder of the independent agency We Are Pi. 'It's not the death of agencies. It's the death of outdated agency models.'
He is supportive of small businesses benefiting from the changes but says Meta's approach to AI is akin to the 'fast food of advertising'. For traditional companies in adland, it could be a difficult meal to stomach.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
13 minutes ago
- Forbes
Update Every App On Your Phone That's On This List
Update these apps now. The recent warning that Meta and Yandex have been secretly tracking billions of phones is a stark reminder that your most sensitive data is at risk. That loophole will now close, as others will be found. Let's not forget Google itself was caught doing broadly the same. It's now four years since Apple's game-changing App Privacy Labels exposed the sheer extent of data harvesting targeting iPhone users, with the assumption that Android must be even worse. I covered that extensively at the time, and it was clear then — as it is now — that when you're not paying for a product, you are the product. Multiple reports since have highlighted that permission abuse is still rife, with apps requesting access to data and functions they do not need to deliver the features of the app itself. This is data monetization, pure and simple, your data monetization. Top-1o data hungry apps Now the researchers at Apteco have revisited Apple's privacy labels to find out 'who's collecting most of your data' in 2025. The study focused specifically on 'Data linked to you,' as this is the type of data that ties directly back to your identity.' Apteco's key findings are unsurprising: 'Social media apps are the most data hungry,' and the most collected personal data is 'contact information (such as your name, phone number and home address).' But the range of harvested data goes far beyond that, as you can see from Apteco's table reporting the data accessed during testing. Data collected from users. Apteco's list 'is dominated by social media… highlighting how important data collection is to these types of platforms in order to customize content to show things such as posts and friend suggestions [and] which build detailed social profiles.' Apteco's top-1o list is dominated by global brands with apps installed by hundreds of millions if not billions of users. This isn't a call to delete those apps — albeit you should be aware of the data they're collecting while running on your phone. App settings on iPhone Instead, you should update the permissions granted to apps on this list, deciding if you want to give them blanket access to location and other sensitive data. You should also be aware that when you operate within the confines of an app, for example using its own browser, you are not protected by the usual web tracking defenses on your phone. You don't need to grant all the permissions requested, and you can limit those permissions that might be needed — such as location — to only apply when using the app or to manually request each time before sharing. You can also restrict location data such that it's not precise and just gives a general idea of where you are. Here are instructions for iPhone and Android on how to apply updates. 'The study highlights how extensive data collection has become across a huge variety of apps,' Apteco says. 'The sheer scale of data collected highlights why understanding and managing app permissions and data policies is increasingly important for users [who] need to be aware of how to actively manage app permissions and data policies.'
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UK interest rates predicted to stay at 4.25% with Bank ‘nimble' amid uncertainty
UK interest rates are set to stay at 4.25% after inflation jumped in April and policymakers remain 'nimble' to the evolving economic backdrop, economists have predicted. Most economists think the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) will opt to keep rates on hold when it meets on Thursday. The MPC has voted to cut rates at every other meeting since it started easing borrowing costs last August, from a peak of 5.25%. This has been possible while the rate of UK inflation has been steadily falling from the highs reached in 2023, at the peak of the cost-of-living crisis. However, inflation jumped to its highest level for more than a year in April, according to the latest figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Consumer Prices Index (CPI) inflation hit 3.5% in April, up from 2.6% in March. Since releasing the data, the ONS said that an error in vehicle tax data collected meant the April figure should have been 3.4%. Ellie Henderson, an economist for Investec, said monetary policy 'seems to be in a good position, allowing the Bank of England to wait and see how economic conditions and the international political backdrop evolve'. 'Ultimately, this is a highly uncertain time that requires a potentially nimble response from central banks, limiting any great foresight,' she said. 'Although the June decision might seem clear cut, how the MPC responds to the evolving economic backdrop thereafter much depends on the details of the world in which we find ourselves.' On Friday, oil prices were soaring after Israel launched an attack on Iran's nuclear programme, raising anxieties about possible disruption to the supply of the commodity in the Middle East. And ongoing uncertainty over US President Donald Trump's tariffs, which surveys suggest have dampened business confidence and reduced exports, also remains in focus for policymakers. Meanwhile, new official figures showed wage growth for UK workers eased sharply in the three months to April and the unemployment rate increased, as employers feel the effects of higher costs. Rob Wood and Elliott Jordan-Doak, economists for Pantheon Macroeconomics, said a weaker jobs market 'will reassure the MPC that it can plan on further rate cuts', but added that 'one month's data is far from enough to allow the MPC to bin its 'gradual and careful' approach to easing monetary policy.' Bank chief economist Huw Pill, who is also an MPC member, said last month that he thought rates had been cut too quickly partly due to the risk of 'stubbornly strong' pay growth on overall inflation. New UK inflation figures for May will be released on Wednesday, while the US central bank is also widely expected to keep its interest rates on hold. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Some Investors May Be Willing To Look Past Dr. Martens' (LON:DOCS) Soft Earnings
Dr. Martens plc's (LON:DOCS) stock was strong despite it releasing a soft earnings report last week. However, we think the company is showing some signs that things are more promising than they seem. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. As finance nerds would already know, the accrual ratio from cashflow is a key measure for assessing how well a company's free cash flow (FCF) matches its profit. The accrual ratio subtracts the FCF from the profit for a given period, and divides the result by the average operating assets of the company over that time. You could think of the accrual ratio from cashflow as the 'non-FCF profit ratio'. That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future". For the year to March 2025, Dr. Martens had an accrual ratio of -0.34. That implies it has very good cash conversion, and that its earnings in the last year actually significantly understate its free cash flow. Indeed, in the last twelve months it reported free cash flow of UK£178m, well over the UK£4.50m it reported in profit. Dr. Martens shareholders are no doubt pleased that free cash flow improved over the last twelve months. Having said that, there is more to the story. The accrual ratio is reflecting the impact of unusual items on statutory profit, at least in part. See our latest analysis for Dr. Martens That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates. Dr. Martens' profit was reduced by unusual items worth UK£22m in the last twelve months, and this helped it produce high cash conversion, as reflected by its unusual items. This is what you'd expect to see where a company has a non-cash charge reducing paper profits. It's never great to see unusual items costing the company profits, but on the upside, things might improve sooner rather than later. When we analysed the vast majority of listed companies worldwide, we found that significant unusual items are often not repeated. And that's hardly a surprise given these line items are considered unusual. Assuming those unusual expenses don't come up again, we'd therefore expect Dr. Martens to produce a higher profit next year, all else being equal. In conclusion, both Dr. Martens' accrual ratio and its unusual items suggest that its statutory earnings are probably reasonably conservative. Based on these factors, we think Dr. Martens' underlying earnings potential is as good as, or probably even better, than the statutory profit makes it seem! Keep in mind, when it comes to analysing a stock it's worth noting the risks involved. For example, we've discovered 4 warning signs that you should run your eye over to get a better picture of Dr. Martens. After our examination into the nature of Dr. Martens' profit, we've come away optimistic for the company. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data