Londonderry: Police say union flag theft was sectarian hate crime
Under legislation, the union flag is flown from government buildings in Northern Ireland on designated days each year.It was being flown from the civil service building at Lisahally to mark the 78th birthday of Queen Camilla on 17 July.The department did not confirm that the Irish flag was erected on the flagpole. But BBC News NI has spoken to workers who say this was the case.The PSNI said the theft of the union flag was reported to them last Thursday afternoon and they have appealed for anyone with information to come forward.
The Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) described the removal of the union flag and its replacement with the Irish tricolour as "an idiotic act"."Such silly attention-seeking behaviour is disrespectful and totally unacceptable," Foyle MLA Gary Middleton said. "Those involved should be dealt with by the law."Ulster Unionist councillor Darren Guy said those responsible were fuelled by "hate and sectarianism"."Over the past few weeks, we have had acts of theft and vandalism occur throughout the city and district," he said."Soldier statues beheaded at a memorial in Artigarvan; a historical US flag stolen from Foyle College; poppy wreaths had to be removed immediately after being laid in remembrance of the Battle of the Somme - the one left was stolen that night and countless attacks on Protestant homes in The Fountain [a mainly unionist estate]."Guy criticised the SDLP and Sinn Féin over their response to similar incidents."Yet, these actions fuelled by hate and sectarianism continue, unchallenged, from their own elected representatives," he said."If this is acceptable now, then it's not surprising that unionists will never want to be part of the pipe dream that is a united Ireland."But the criticism was rejected by Sinn Féin and the SDLP.Sinn Féin said it had been "unequivocal, consistent and vocal" in asserting that all cultures must be respected."All and every incident of hate crime must be called out," a spokesperson said."In stark contrast we have seen the selective approach and double standards of unionist politicians in response to illegal bonfires and hate crimes."
SDLP MLA Mark H Durkan said the incidents were damaging community relations."The SDLP has always called urged tolerance around these issues and condemn those who engage in any attacks, sectarianism or intimidation," he said."I would urge anyone involved in this kind of activity to stop, they are achieving nothing but hurting their own city."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
22 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Plot targeting Miami Showband would have impacted Irish everywhere
Stephen Travers said he is not only relieved to have survived the atrocity, but also that the plot did not succeed. Mr Travers, along with fellow bandmate and survivor Des Lee, revisited the roadside close to Newry where they had come under attack 50 years ago for a commemoration on Thursday. The band's minibus had been stopped by loyalist terrorists operating a fake army checkpoint as they drove to Dublin following a gig in Banbridge on July 31, 1975. They were ordered out of the bus, and an attempt was made to place a bomb on board, but that device exploded prematurely and killed two of the attackers. Gunmen then opened fire on the band members, killing singer Fran O'Toole, guitarist Tony Geraghty and trumpeter Brian McCoy. Mr Travers said the sight he saw on the road was 'horrendous', and that watching current scenes from Gaza makes him feel guilty as he made a plea for the violence to stop. He said he had mixed emotions being back at the site 50 years later. 'I remember when the killing and the shooting and the screaming all stopped and we were fairly certain they had gone away, and Des managed to get up on to the road, I remember looking up at the sky, there was a half-moon, and thinking to myself, what has just happened here,' he said. 'We were under the impression for a while that we were caught in some sort of cross-fire, but over the years we have discovered it was a plan that was in operation, we believe, for two years. 'When I consider the awful things that I saw, I was here for almost an hour crawling around between the bodies of our lads and the body parts of the unfortunate men who blew themselves up. Those memories will stay with me forever. 'The simple plan was to frame us. Had this operation gone successfully, had we been framed as terrorists, our families would have been destroyed.' He referred to the Maguire Seven, who were falsely accused of handling explosives in connection with the Guildford pub bombings in 1974 and whose names were not cleared until their convictions were quashed in 1991. 'I'm sure lots of you saw Fran's (O'Toole) father when he tried to follow his son into the grave in various clips on the television – can you just imagine bringing that man into a police station and questioning him as to what he knew about his terrorist son,' Mr Travers said. 'This is the tragedy. It's not just us that this thing was aimed at – it was a brilliant plan, had it worked. Every single Irish passport holder across the world would have been suspect and dragged into this. had it worked. 'So today when I'm asked how I feel about this, it is of mixed emotion, one is of great relief that I'm alive, and that Des is alive after 50 years, but there is another relief that the Irish people were saved the ignominy of being dragged into police stations whether they were crossing the border of Germany into Switzerland, or whether they were crossing from Canada into America.'
Scottish Sun
32 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Conor McGregor LOSES appeal over Nikita Hand civil rape case ruling after hairdresser awarded €248k in damages
Ms Hand was embraced by her supporters in court after the judgment was delivered DISGRACED Conor McGregor today LOST his appeal over his civil rape case after he attacked a woman in a hotel. The Irish mixed martial arts fighter, 36, was accused of "brutally raping and battering" Nikita Hand at a hotel penthouse in Dublin in December 2018. Advertisement 4 Nikita Hand, who is also known as Nikita Ni Laimhin, outside the Court of Appeal this afternoon Credit: Collins Photos 4 Conor McGregor outside the High Court in Dublin Credit: Brian Lawless/PA Wire The MMA fighter, who was not present in court today, lost his appeal on all five grounds that the case was taken. Ms Hand, 35, successfully sued McGregor in a civil court over an incident in which he was alleged to have "brutally raped and battered" her in the penthouse of the Beacon Hotel in Sandyford. During a three-week case at the High Court last November, the fighter told the court the pair had 'consensual' sex. A jury of eight women and four men found him civilly liable for assault and Ms Hand was awarded €248,603.60 in damages. Advertisement McGregor was also ordered to pay about €1.3 million in legal costs following November's trial. The fighter then launched an appeal on the basis of five grounds, intending to introduce fresh evidence to the court. He had provided affidavits by Samantha O'Reilly and her partner Steven Cummins, former neighbours of Ms Hand when she lived in Drimnagh, to the Court of Appeal. Samantha O'Reilly said she had witnessed a physical row between Ms Hand and her then-partner at about the same time of the incident at the Beacon hotel. Advertisement Ms Hand denied any altercation with her former partner and the court heard she characterised the claims from Ms O'Reilly and Ms O'Reilly's partner Steven Cummins as 'lies'. Earlier this month, McGregor's legal team dramatically withdrew that ground of appeal, saying it would no longer be relying on the material. The appeal continued on other grounds. This was that his garda interviews with "no comment" answers should not have been admitted into evidence and that the jury was asked to deliberate on an "assault" rather than "sexual assault". Advertisement HAND 'RETRAUMATISED' BY APPEAL Speaking outside court this afternoon, Ms Hand said the appeal had "retraumatised" her but she can finally "move on" following the judges' verdict today. She said: "I want to begin by thanking my legal team, the rape crisis centre and the three judges who delivered the decision today. "I'm also deeply grateful for everyone who supported me, those who believed in me and stood by my side throughout this long and painful journey. "This appeal has retraumatised me over and over again. Being forced to relive what happened has had a huge impact on me. Advertisement "To every survivor out there, I know how hard it is but please don't be silenced. You deserve to be heard. You also deserve justice. "Today I can finally move on and try to heal." REASONS FOR APPEAL DISMISSAL Meanwhile, McGregor's co-defendant has also lost his appeal against the trial judge's decision not to award him his legal costs. During the same trial in November, the jury did not find James Lawrence had assaulted Ms Hand at the hotel. Advertisement However, the trial judge decided that Ms Hand would not have to pay Mr Lawrence's costs. His legal team challenged whether that decision was correct and reasonable, arguing that Ms Hand should have to pay as the jury did not find he had assaulted her. Delivering their judgment on Thursday, the three judges of the court - Ms Justice Isobel Kennedy, Mr Justice Brian O'Moore and Mr Justice Patrick MacGrath - agreed to dismiss both appeals in their entirety. Reading out the judgment on behalf of the three-judge panel, Mr Justice O'Moore summarised the grounds for appeal before explaining the Court of Appeal's reasons for dismissing all five grounds. Advertisement He said: "I therefore dismiss the appeal in its entirety." Ms Hand was embraced by her supporters in court after the judgment was delivered. Neither McGregor nor Mr Lawrence were present in court. 4 Ms Hand speaking to the media outside the High Court in Dublin after the jury returned with their verdicts in the civil trial against McGregor Credit: Brian Lawless/PA Wire Advertisement
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Police officer sacked for sending racist and sexualised WhatsApp messages
A police officer in has been sacked after sending 'highly inappropriate and offensive' messages via WhatsApp. The office of the Police Ombudsman said the messages, which were sent while the officer was on duty, contained material which was sectarian, racist, homophobic, anti-semitic, misogynistic and sexualised. The complainant contacted the Police Ombudsman when the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) officer continued to send the material, despite being asked to stop on two occasions. Nikki Davis, director of investigations at the ombudsman's office, said: 'Digital analysis of the police officer's phone showed that he had sent multiple images and videos, which were highly inappropriate and offensive, to the complainant, other members of the public and other police officers. 'This was not a one-off, isolated incident, which could potentially be attributed to a lapse in judgment. 'It was sustained, consistent behaviour, exacerbated by the police officer's view, when interviewed by our investigators, that he did not consider the material to be offensive or his actions to be in breach of the PSNI Code of Ethics.' Mrs Davis added: 'When this kind of messaging specifically targets women and combines sexual, racist and sectarian references, it moves into the realm of online gender-based hate speech 'For a police officer to display these attitudes and behaviours towards women is unacceptable, and specifically undermines the PSNI's commitment to ending violence against women and girls. 'However, this case demonstrates that allegations of misconduct will be robustly investigated and that officers will be held to account, all of which contributes positively to public confidence in policing.' Following the conclusion of the Police Ombudsman investigation, a file was submitted to the Public Prosecution Service (PPS) in relation to the potential offences of Misconduct in Public Office and sending grossly offensive messages contrary to the Communications Act (2003). The PPS directed no prosecution. A misconduct file was then submitted to the PSNI Professional Standards Department. Chief Constable Jon Boutcher held a special hearing, after which the police officer was dismissed. He was found to have breached a number of articles of the PSNI Code of Ethics, including those relating to professional duty, equality and integrity. Eight police officers, who received the messages and failed to report or challenge them, were referred to the PSNI in relation to potential breaches of the code of ethics. The Police Ombudsman received the complaint about the police officer in July 2023. The office has previously called for fast-tracking powers in cases where it is clear from an early stage in an investigation that there is criminality or gross misconduct which could result in an officer being dismissed without undue delay. The chairman of the Police Federation for Northern Ireland, Liam Kelly, said such behaviour would not be tolerated. He said: 'Police officers are held to the highest possible standards both on and off duty. 'Behaviour such as this case has rightly resulted in dismissal from service and should serve as a timely reminder that similar behaviour is totally unacceptable and will not be tolerated.'
