logo
Detroit Art Institutions Resist Political Challenges to Diversity

Detroit Art Institutions Resist Political Challenges to Diversity

New York Times23-04-2025
Back in the 1960s, a prominent Detroit obstetrician had two passions — delivering babies and collecting artifacts that told the African American story.
And just as those babies grew up, so did his collection.
Today, the Charles H. Wright Museum of African American History, named after that doctor, is one of the nation's pre-eminent and largest museums of its type, second only in size and scope to the Smithsonian's National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C.
Yet, as the Wright prepares to celebrate its 60th anniversary, the diversity it represents is coming under attack by the Trump administration, which has moved to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion programs wherever it can. Rather than retreat, the museum's leaders say, these attacks make its mission ever more urgent.
Located in downtown Detroit, a city that is more than 70 percent Black, the museum traces the African American experience from slavery to the presidency of Barack Obama and beyond. The museum, started by Wright, contains works by Black artists, historical documents and letters, and offers an array of programs including a speaker series and an annual festival. To commemorate its 60 years, the museum is presenting a number of activities along with a special multimedia exhibit, 'Luminosity: A Detroit Arts Gathering,' which features Black artists who have worked, lived or studied in Detroit. (It opened April 4 and runs through March 31, 2026.)
However unsettling the political winds from Washington may be, Neil Barclay, president and chief executive of the museum, said its core mission of elevating African American voices, as well as the upcoming celebration, will not change.
'We have to resist and persevere,' Barclay said in a video interview. 'Attempts to undermine the significance of our culture are nothing new to us. We will continue to tell our stories.'
He added: 'We see African American history as part of American history and not separate from it. Inclusion is part of our mission. We want to use the resilience and courage of African Americans as a source of unity and not divisiveness.'
The Wright museum is one of around 300 museums and institutions in the United States that are focused on African American culture and history. And there are no signs so far that anyone is in retreat. VedetColeman-Robinson, the president and chief executive of the Association of African American Museums, said that the Trump administration's attacks on diversity 'feel like the rug was pulled out from under us.' Even so, she said: 'I have not seen any indication we will slow down.'
'D.E.I. is part of our DNA,' Coleman-Robinson said by video. 'It's nothing we can just stop. We have a duty to tell the truth and make sure people coming to our spaces walk away with something they didn't know before.
'There was a time when we were not allowed to tell our stories and we did,' she added. 'As a community we pulled together and that's what's going to have to happen. We're going to have to depend on each other a little more.'
Another leading Detroit institution, the Museum of Contemporary Art Detroit, known as MOCAD and located blocks from the Wright, is also standing firm with two shows opening on May 2 that feature Black artists and themes of interest to Detroit's large Black population. One show focuses on gun violence and the other on African American artists in the internet age.
'D.E.I. is part of our core values,' said Marie Madison-Patton, MOCAD's co-director and chief financial officer, in a video interview. 'There is no change in how we do this work. We have a diverse perspective and our programs are a reflection of that.'
The Wright museum traces its origins to Dr. Charles Wright's efforts to commemorate African American history by setting up a museum in 1965 for his collection, first in his medical office and then in a trailer parked outside his downtown Detroit practice.
To describe Wright as a passionate collector is an understatement. He amassed rare documents, photographs, African masks, fine art, personal items from key historical figures and all sorts of memorabilia. Over time, the collection grew to include material from the civil rights era and oral histories of Black leaders. Wright also became one of the founders of the Association of African American Museums. He died in 2002.
In 1997, with money from the city of Detroit, the 125,000-square-foot Wright museum was built, just a stone's throw from the Detroit Institute of Arts and in the heart of the city's cultural center. Designed by the city's oldest Black-owned architectural firm, Sims-Varner Associates (now SDG Associates), the building is based on an African village, with a central gathering spot as its core and galleries extending from it. The museum's most striking feature is the 140-foot domed Ford Freedom Rotunda and its 'Ring of Genealogy,' a floor installation encircled by bronze nameplates of hundreds of prominent African Americans.
Heading the permanent collection is 'And Still We Rise,' a 22,000-square-foot exhibition spanning 20 galleries that looks at the African American experience from the Middle Passage when slave ships crossed the Atlantic Ocean, to the civil rights era, to today. This exhibition includes a life-size slave ship and accounts of those who survived the journey. The museum has hosted memorial services for Rosa Parks and Aretha Franklin, and sponsors the annual African World Festival, a three-day celebration of art, music and food. There have even been — and more are planned — events for residents who were delivered as babies by Wright.
'Our work is about telling the African American story from the point of view of African Americans,' Barclay said. Yet while the story may be of the Black experience, visitors come from a wide range of backgrounds and locations, Barclay said, including Detroit's largely white suburbs, and represent the kind of diversity and inclusion that the museum aims to achieve.
Last year, around 53,000 visitors came to the Wright museum. It is considered one of Detroit's top tourist sites.
The highlight of the 60th celebration 'Luminosity' is an exhibition of film, sculpture, installation art, collages, sketches and other artistic expressions. Some 97 works will be shown, featuring 69 artists with a link to Detroit.
'There has to be a strong connection,' Vera Ingrid Grant, the show's guest curator, said in a video interview, adding that the show's inspiration came from Marvin Gaye's protest song 'What's Going On.' 'We are focusing on the production of a glorious canopy of art and putting it all together,.'
The show is in two parts — 'Daylight" and 'Nightlight.' 'Daylight' features works of brightness and joy, exploring such themes as self-examination, motherhood and family. 'Nightlight' will be darker — and quite literally in a more darkened gallery — and deal with themes of grief, protest and violence.
While most of the art selected is contemporary, 'Luminosity' will also display work by Robert S. Duncanson, a 19th-century landscape painter who is considered to be the first African American artist to be internationally known, and who settled in the Detroit area.
'The show will be encyclopedic and show the range of what is out there,' Grant said. 'We want to recognize the significance of the museum and to celebrate the artists of Detroit.'
Detroit has long been a city of creativity. For years, designers and engineers working for auto and auto-adjacent companies made the city a leader in industrial design and the arts in general. The Detroit Institute of Arts is considered one of the premier museums in the country. More recently, the city's low cost of living, raw urban space and gritty history have attracted a new wave of young artists from elsewhere.
The Wright can stand firm against attacks on D.E.I. in large part because it gets very little federal money. Its biggest support comes from the city of Detroit, which gave the museum $2.6 million in fiscal year 2024, and the state of Michigan, which provided $3.2 million. Other big donors include the Ford Motor Company Fund, the Mellon Foundation and a number of local foundations. The Wright has an operating budget of around $12 million. It recently spent $15 million to upgrade infrastructure and is about two-thirds through a multiyear program for mechanical improvements.
The Wright would like to get more of its funding from local homeowners. In 2020, voters in Detroit and nearby suburbs approved a 10-year property tax hike to support the Detroit Institute of Arts. The Wright, along with the Detroit Historical Museum, plans to put a similar property tax proposal on the ballot in 2026 for voters in Wayne and Oakland Counties.
MOCAD is the only contemporary museum in Detroit. Housed in a former car dealership, which provides it with 22,000 square feet of raw industrial space, it is not a collecting museum. Rather, it is a space for a rotating group of art exhibitions and events. Next year, it will celebrate its 20th anniversary.
The two exhibitions opening on May 2 have been shown at other locations and are now traveling to MOCAD. One is the 'Gun Violence Memorial Project,' a collection of 700 glass bricks arranged into four houses, with each house representing one week of lives lost to gun violence. As part of the exhibit, friends and family members are invited to place remembrance objects from someone lost to gun violence in the glass bricks. Each brick will then have the name and birth and death dates of the person being remembered.
During the exhibit, community groups will have tables at MOCAD to provide information on antidrug and anti-violence projects, as well as information on overdose prevention and grief support.
'Gun violence is no stranger to Detroit,' said Jova Lynne, MOCAD's co-director and artistic director, in a video interview. 'This will be presenting a monument to the community.'
The other exhibition opening May 2 is 'Code Switch: Distributing Blackness, Reprogramming Internet Art,' presented in partnership with The Kitchen, a New York artists collective, and The Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture in New York's Harlem.
'Code Switch' features Black artists — from Detroit and elsewhere — dealing with issues of the internet age, including technology, automation and disruption. Works include paintings, sculpture, video, photographs and other installations. Lynne said one reason the exhibit is in Detroit is because of the city's legacy of creative technologies and industrial innovation.
Like the Wright, MOCAD receives little financial support from the federal government. It has an annual operating budget of around $2 million and recently received a $1.6 million grant from the Ford Foundation. Other major donors include the Mellon, Kresge and Hudson-Webber Foundations.
'We are as committed to showing diverse artists as we have ever been,' Lynne said. 'This season it is mostly Black. Other seasons it has been white artists. Diversity to us is celebrating everyone. Our mission is to reflect the world.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kohberger's ‘living hell,' Trump wants more control of DC police and Zelensky on US / Russia summit
Kohberger's ‘living hell,' Trump wants more control of DC police and Zelensky on US / Russia summit

New York Post

time21 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Kohberger's ‘living hell,' Trump wants more control of DC police and Zelensky on US / Russia summit

Bryan Kohberger, the man convicted of slaughtering four University of Idaho students in 2022 is being hazed in prison and the guards are letting it slide, President Trump is planning to ask Congress for a crime bill that will allow the feds to control the DC Police longer and Ukrainian President Zelensky catches up with President Trump ahead of Friday's key meeting with Vladimir Putin.

Trump's deal with Nvidia puts our national security on sale to the highest bidder
Trump's deal with Nvidia puts our national security on sale to the highest bidder

Los Angeles Times

time21 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Trump's deal with Nvidia puts our national security on sale to the highest bidder

One thing that can be said about Donald Trump's transactional approach to policy-making is that, as destructive as it might be to our economic health, it gives business leaders clear options to get what they want out of the White House. The latest case-in-point are the deals struck by chipmakers Nvidia and AMD to secure licenses to export their products to China. The White House named the price — 15% of their revenues from such sales — and the companies assented willingly. Never mind that the exports originally had been banned — by the Biden administration and Trump himself — because of national security concerns. Never mind that the U.S. constitution explicitly prohibits charging any tax or duty on exports. Never mind that a stack of U.S. laws, including the Export Control Reform Act of 2018, which Trump signed, don't provide a pay-to-play escape clause from export restrictions. Never mind that the exports may strengthen the domestic industry and even its military of China, a country that has been the consistent target of Trump trade policies. Despite all that, Trump treated the deals as a win for the U.S. Explaining his side of the conversation when Nvidia asked for relief from the export ban, he related, 'I said, 'If I'm going to do that, I want you to pay us as a country something, because I'm giving you a release.'' Under the circumstances, it shouldn't be surprising that some trade professionals and investors see something corrupt in the arrangements. Among them is Christopher Padilla, an export control official under George W. Bush, who told the Washington Post: 'Export controls are in place to protect national security, not raise revenue for the government. This arrangement seems like bribery or blackmail, or both.'' Nvidia, as it happens, has a written anti-corruption policy stating, 'We do not tolerate bribery or corruption in our business.' The policy bars 'promising, offering, providing, or authorizing the provision of money or anything of value ... to obtain, retain, or direct regulatory approvals, contracts, business, or other benefits.' When I asked Nvidia about the deal, the company referred me to the sole comment it has made in response to questions about it: 'We follow rules the U.S. government sets for our participation in worldwide markets.' AMD didn't respond to my request for comment. These deals are unprecedented; as the Financial Times observed, citing trade experts, 'no US company has ever agreed to pay a portion of their revenues to obtain export licenses.' There's no question that Nvidia lobbied ferociously for a lifting of the export ban. The company made a $1-million contribution to Trump's inaugural committee. Its CEO, Jensen Huang, met directly with Trump to discuss the ban; media reports say that Trump initially demanded a 20% fee, but Huang negotiated it down to 15%. As has been the case with other Trump-negotiated trade deals, the details of this one are murky in the extreme. The terms haven't been reduced to writing. Indeed, White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday that its 'legality ... is still being ironed out by the Department of Commerce,' with an eye toward replicating it with other companies. Among the questions is how the fee would be paid, and how the money would be spent. Still, what's known has caused concern for export regulators, experts and legislators. 'Export controls are a frontline defense in protecting our national security,' tweeted Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), chair of the House select committee on the Chinese Communist Party, 'and we should not set a precedent that incentivizes the Government to grant licenses to sell China technology that will enhance its AI capabilities.' The effect of this deal on other companies also raises the hackles of economists and trade experts. 'Other American semiconductor companies like Qualcomm and Intel may say, 'If we develop this cutting-edge chip and the government decides that it has some national security interest in that chip, we might have some of our revenue taken away as well,'' says Kyle Handley, a trade economist at UC San Diego, 'so they may decide not to do the R&D investments and the innovation and hire the workers to develop those things.' The revenue payback 'will certainly have a chilling effect,' Handley told me, because the government fee 'might make the initial investment appear uneconomical.' That's especially so if the administration tries to apply the arrangement to industries such as software or pharmaceuticals. The export charge could become a particular burden on startups — Nvidia plainly has enough money to pay the fee, but many other innovative companies wouldn't. Whether or how the export tax can be stopped is an open question. For one thing, it's unclear who would have standing to bring a lawsuit to stop it. Nvidia and AMD have accepted the deal, so they presumably wouldn't file a case. Companies that fear the imposition of export fees on their own products might have to wait until they could show concrete damage to their own interests in order to bring a case in federal court. As long as manufacturers such as Nvidia are willing to bow to Trump's demands, he may have a clear field. If a legal challenge does emerge, the administration has tried to characterize the export fee as something other than a tax in order to circumvent the constitutional prohibition. Nvidia developed the H20 chip at the heart of its deal specifically to address an export ban the Biden administration imposed on the company's sales to China in 2023. The Chinese government, however, isn't enamored of the chip. Chinese regulators have been pressuring domestic companies to avoid the chips out of cybersecurity concerns, including suspicion that the chips could contain hidden code that could subject them to outside control. (Nvidia has denied that the chips contain any such back-door exposure.) The chips also are outmoded for some AI applications compared to the company's top-of-the-line Blackwell series, which are still subject to a U.S. export ban. As my colleague Queenie Wong reported, Trump seems to think that he and Nvidia's Huang had put something over on the Chinese. Trump called the H20 chip 'obsolete' and said Huang was 'selling a essentially old chip.' But others say the H20s may yet be preferable to Chinese-designed chips for Chinese firms, although Chinese products are consistently improving. 'The H20 is a potent accelerator of China's frontier AI capabilities, not an outdated AI chip,' as 20 former government trade officials told Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who oversees trade policy, in a July 28 letter. 'If the U.S. backs off of export controls to China, we believe that China's next generation of frontier AI will be built on the backs of the H20,' the officials wrote. The chip 'will not simply power consumer products or factory logistics; they will enable autonomous weapons systems, intelligence surveillance platforms, and rapid advances in battlefield decision-making.' How the export deal may affect Nvidia's top or bottom lines is murky, though its immediate effect doesn't seem all that significant. In May, the company announced a $4.5-billion writedown of unsold H20 inventories in the first quarter ended April 27 because of the U.S. ban on H20 sales. But it still recorded $23.3 billion in operating profit for the quarter on sale of $44.1 billion. For its last full fiscal year ended Jan. 26, Nvidia reported a pre-tax profit of $84 billion profit on sales of $130.5 billion. In stock market terms, Nvidia is the world's most valuable company, with a market value of $4.4 trillion; its price-earnings multiple is a robust 58.4. With a gain in share price so far this year of nearly 35%, it's one of a handful of AI-related companies that has kept the market buoyant despite investor concerns about a developing economic slowdown due in part to Trump's trade policies. But the company is looking ahead to further incursions into the China market over the long term. 'The China market is about $50 billion a year,' Huang told Taiwan-based technology strategist Ben Thompson in May, bemoaning the need to leave behind 'the profits that go with that, the scale that goes with that, the ecosystem building that goes with that' while the export ban was in place. So it made sense to allow Nvidia to extract revenue and profits from the cross-border trade. China is sure to power ahead on AI technology with or without Nvidia's chips, Huang said — 'anybody who thought that one chess move to somehow ban China from H20s would somehow cut off their ability to do AI is deeply uninformed.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store