Sabah assembly passes sweeping state sales tax amendments
This came amid concerns by assemblymen over a clause to limit judicial review of its collection powers.
State Finance Minister Datuk Seri Masidi Manjun said the amendments were to remove any grey areas and put in place a proper tax collection system to benefit taxpayers and tighten any loopholes.
Speaking at the winding up of the debates on the 37 amendments on Tuesday (July 8), Masidi said the state had sought the help of tax consultants from Kuala Lumpur as well as the advice of the Sabah Attorney General in drafting the amendments.
During the debates, nominated assemblyman Datuk Yong Teck Lee (GRS) raised a concern that the amendment to restrict judicial review powers could be unconstitutional.
Yong was questioning part of the amendment that read 'in any proceedings under this section, the court shall not entertain any plea that the amount of State sales tax, penalty and surcharge sought to be recovered is excessive, incorrectly assessed, under appeal or incorrectly increased under sections 14, 14A, paragraph 18(a) or 18(b)."
'To me, this law is standing on shaky ground.
'Even if we pass it today, it's shaky. Why? Last week, the Federal Court struck down a part of the Peaceful Assembly Act because it was unconstitutional.
'I do not believe that our state assembly can limit judicial review,' Yong said.
In response, Masidi gave an assurance that the power of the court – and in this context, judicial review – will always be there and cannot be precluded by any law.
'In this amendment, we have an appeal tribunal if someone is not satisfied. This amendment has become more transparent.
'If (anyone is) unhappy, they can go to the tribunal court,' he added.
State Opposition leader Datuk Seri Mohd Shafie Apdal (Warisan-Senallang) asked if this would further burden the people, as some of the amendments could add costs that trickle down to end consumers.
He also asked that the state pursue the matter of getting 40% of federal tax revenue under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) returned to Sabah instead of implementing stringent state taxes.
Datuk Jannie Lasimbang (PH-Kapayan) said many of the amended clauses, including the one concerning judicial review, needed clarification.
Jamil Hamzah (Warisan-Bugaya) was concerned about possible overlapping and multi-layered taxes, while Datuk Darell Leiking (Warisan-Moyog) wanted to know if these amendments would result in taxpayers and consumers paying more for products and services, as well as taxes.
Masidi stressed that these 37 amendments were drafted thoroughly to ensure better management and collection of taxes.
It is meant to increase tax revenue collection and ensure that all processes are conducted with transparency, accountability and strictness, he added.
It also ensures that taxpayers' rights are heard and protected, he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Borneo Post
3 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Masidi: Bond repayment pre-planned since 2014, not Warisan's one-year feat
Masidi KOTA KINABALU (Aug 13): Sabah's Finance Minister Datuk Seri Panglima Masidi Manjun has refuted claims by Datuk Seri Shafie Apdal that the RM1 billion State Government bond repayment in 2019 was an extraordinary achievement of the Warisan administration. 'The repayment was never a sudden burden. It was planned since 2014 under a Bank Negara Malaysia requirement to set up a Sinking Fund, with RM200 million allocated annually over five years. By the time Warisan came into office, the funds were already budgeted, and only the final RM380 million instalment was tabled during their tenure,' he said in a statement on Wednesday. Masidi was replying to the statement of the Warisan president regarding the repayment of the RM1 billion State Government bond in 2019. He stressed that allegations of RM500 million from the bond proceeds being spent in another state were 'unfounded and irresponsible.' 'Official records are crystal clear, RM544 million repaid the first State Government bond from 2009, and RM456 million financed development projects under Sabah's 2014 Budget. Not a single sen went to another state,' he said. Masidi reiterated that repaying the bond was a legal and contractual obligation, not an optional gesture. 'The financial discipline enabling this repayment was put in place in 2014, not 2018. Public discussion on State finances must be based on documented facts, not politically convenient narratives. The people of Sabah deserve nothing less,' he said.
Free Malaysia Today
4 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
High Court to hear Najib's house arrest suit
Former prime minister Najib Razak, who was convicted of misappropriating RM42 million in SRC International funds, has been serving his sentence at Kajang prison since Aug 23, 2022. PUTRAJAYA : Former prime minister Najib Razak will have his day in court in his attempt to compel the government to enforce a royal addendum allowing him to serve the remainder of his jail term under house arrest. This follows today's Federal Court ruling affirming the Jan 6 majority decision of the Court of Appeal, which allowed Najib to adduce additional evidence and ordered the High Court to hear his judicial review application. The attorney-general had said that Najib did not have an arguable case warranting a substantive hearing. Chief Judge of Malaya Hasnah Hashim led a three-member bench that heard the appeal on July 2 and July 9. Also on the bench were Justices Zabariah Yusof and Hanipah Farikullah. Zabariah, who delivered the unanimous decision, said Najib could also adduce fresh evidence on the purported existence of the supplementary addendum. 'But as of now, the addendum order exists, and its validity or whether it is genuine needs to be ascertained at the substantive hearing. We do not consider it right or fair to express any view at this stage,' she said. Zabariah also said the bench took note that the attorney-general, who came as the guardian of public interest at the leave stage, had conceded the existence of the addendum. She said Najib had fulfilled all of the requirements for the introduction of new evidence at the judicial review hearing. 'He made numerous efforts to confirm the addendum with the help of his lawyer, though he was in prison,' she said, adding that the former prime minister also satisfied the condition of reasonable diligence. Hasnah said the hearing would be before a new judge who had been transferred to the Kuala Lumpur High Court from the Shah Alam High Court. She directed that a case management be held on Aug 18. 'The judge will then fix an early hearing date, which should be a month after parties file their affidavits,' she said. She also directed Najib and the respondents – the home minister, commissioner-general of the prisons department, attorney-general, Federal Territories Pardons Board (FTPB), law and institutional reform minister, director-general of the legal affairs division in the Prime Minister's Department, and the government – to file their affidavits simultaneously. On July 2 last year, High Court judge Amarjeet Singh refused Najib leave as the affidavits filed in support of his application were hearsay evidence. Najib learned of the addendum order after the FTPB announced, in early February last year, that his 12-year jail term had been halved and his RM210 million fine reduced to RM50 million. He is currently serving a six-year jail sentence in connection with the SRC International case. Najib filed leave for judicial review last April, relying on affidavits filed by Umno president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi and Pahang menteri besar Wan Rosdy Wan Ismail based on what they had read on Tengku Zafrul Aziz's mobile phone. Najib said he had sent letters to Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, his deputy Zahid, the law and institutional reform minister, and four other respondents asking them to confirm the existence of the addendum, but received no response. Najib's son, Nizar, filed an affidavit just before the Court of Appeal hearing in support of his father's application to adduce fresh evidence, which the appellate court allowed. Nizar claimed the comptroller of the Sultan of Pahang's royal household, Ahmad Khirrizal Ab Rahman, had confirmed the existence of the addendum order and verified its authenticity.
Free Malaysia Today
4 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Ex-AG Terrirudin may be subpoenaed over Najib's addendum bid, says lawyer
Senior counsel Shafee Abdullah speaking to the media at the Palace of Justice, Putrajaya, after the Federal Court hearing today. PUTRAJAYA : Senior counsel Shafee Abdullah said today former attorney-general Ahmad Terrirudin Salleh could be subpoenaed to testify in Najib Razak's upcoming judicial review hearing on the royal addendum at the High Court. Shafee said they might call several witnesses, including Terrirudin and other officers, to give evidence either through affidavits or in person. 'We have to do a very tight adduction of the facts during the hearing of the judicial review,' he told reporters after the Federal Court ruling, which affirmed the Jan 6 majority decision of the Court of Appeal allowing Najib to adduce additional evidence and ordering the High Court to hear his judicial review application. He said they were considering using discovery and interrogatories in the proceedings. 'We can make requests for discovery, for an immediate show of where the addendum is, and what happened to the addendum that has been delayed for a year and a half. 'We can (also) interrogate the other side to tell us what truly happened, why the addendum has not surfaced for such a long time,' he said. Earlier today, a three-member bench led by Chief Judge of Malaya Hasnah Hashim ruled that Najib could present fresh evidence on the supplementary addendum. Najib is currently in Kajang prison serving the jail sentence meted out for misappropriating RM42 million from SRC International Sdn Bhd. He was initially sentenced to 12 years in jail and fined RM210 million, which he began serving on Aug 23, 2022. However, the Federal Territories Pardons Board reduced his sentence to six years and the fine to RM50 million in January 2024. He later claimed to have learned of the addendum's existence, which purportedly allows him to serve the remainder of his sentence under house arrest.
