logo
Donald Trump confirms Mexico and Canada tariffs - prompting a stock sell off

Donald Trump confirms Mexico and Canada tariffs - prompting a stock sell off

Sky News04-03-2025

Donald Trump's 25% tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada have come into effect.
The US president confirmed the tariffs in a speech at the White House - and his announcement sent US stocks down sharply.
The tariffs will be felt heavily by US companies which have factories in Canada and Mexico, such as carmakers.
Mr Trump said: "They're going to have a tariff. So what they have to do is build their car plants, frankly, and other things in the United States, in which case they have no tariffs."
There's "no room left" for a deal that would see the tariffs shelved if fentanyl flowing into the US is curbed by its neighbours, he added.
As of 12:01am Eastern Standard Time (5.01am GMT), Mexico and Canada face tariffs of 25%, with 10% for Canadian energy, the Trump administration confirmed.
And tariffs on Chinese imports will double, raising them from 10% to 20%.
Canada announced it would retaliate immediately, imposing 25% tariffs on US imports worth C$30bn (£16.3bn). It added the tariffs would be extended in 21 days to cover more US goods entering the country if the US did not lift its sanctions against Canada.
China also vowed to retaliate and reiterated its stance that the Trump administration was trying to "shift the blame" and
"bully" Beijing over fentanyl flows.
2:45
Mr Trump's speech stoked fears of a trade war in North America prompting a financial market sell off.
Stock market indexes the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the Nasdaq Composite fell by 1.4% and 1.76% respectively on Monday.
The share prices for automobile companies including General Motors, which has significant truck production in Mexico, Automaker and Ford also fell.
👉 Follow Trump 100 on your podcast app 👈
Consumers in the US could see price hikes within days, an expert has said.
Gustavo Flores-Macias, a public policy professor at Cornell University, New York, said "the automobile sector, in particular, is likely to see considerable negative consequences".
This is due to supply chains that "crisscross the three countries in the manufacturing process" and " because of the expected increase in the price of vehicles, which can dampen demand," he added.
The Trump administration is gearing up to bring in other tariffs in the coming weeks.
On 2 April, reciprocal tariffs will take on effects on all countries that impose duties on US products.
He is also considering 25% tariffs on goods from the EU "very soon" after claiming the bloc was created to "screw the United States".

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Beijing-appointed Panchen Lama holds rare meeting with Chinese leader
Beijing-appointed Panchen Lama holds rare meeting with Chinese leader

South Wales Guardian

time31 minutes ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Beijing-appointed Panchen Lama holds rare meeting with Chinese leader

Gyaltsen Norbu, who is rarely seen in public, met behind closed doors with Mr Xi in Zhongnanhai, the government compound in the centre of Beijing, about 2,300 miles from his home monastery of Tashilhumpo, high on the Tibetan steppe. The 35-year-old said he would 'firmly support the leadership of the Communist Party of China and resolutely safeguard the unity of the motherland and national unity', the Xinhua News Agency reported. The Chinese government appointed him as the Panchen Lama of Tibetan Buddhism in 1995 at age five after followers of the Dalai Lama recognised a different boy, Gedhun Choekyi Nyima, as the Panchen's incarnation. That boy and his family disappeared in 1995 in what the US government has alleged was an abduction by the Chinese government and the Dalai Lama, 89, has refused to recognise the Chinese-appointed Panchen Lama. The Chinese government says Gedhun Choekyi Nyima is now a college graduate living a private life and working a stable job, while producing no evidence. The Chinese-appointed Panchen Lama was quoted on Friday by Xinhua as saying he would 'contribute to promoting national unity and progress, systematically promote the sinicisation of religion in China, and promote the modernisation of Tibet'. Mr Xi's government uses the term 'sinicisation' to mean that all religions including Christianity and Islam must take their orders from the Communist Party, reduce their non-Chinese aspects and limit their role in society. Mr Xi was quoted as telling the Chinese government's Panchen that he should continue Tibetan Buddhism's 'strong sense of community for the Chinese nation, systematically advancing the sinicisation of religion in China, and promoting the modernisation of Tibet'. Last month, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a statement marking the 30th anniversary of the disappearance of Gedhun Choekyi Nyima, saying he and his family had been abducted by the Chinese government. 'Chinese authorities should release Gedhun Choekyi Nyima immediately and stop persecuting Tibetans for their religious beliefs,' Mr Rubio's statement read. The position of Panchen Lama is especially sensitive since he is expected to take part in the recognition of a new Dalai Lama and serve as his tutor, a religious process that the officially atheist Communist Party is determined to control. The meeting on Friday also reflected Mr Xi's focus on economic and political stability within China's borders, where an economic slump has raised concerns of anti-government outbursts and control over minority groups is an overwhelming obsession.

EXCLUSIVE Republicans weigh in on whether Trump and Musk should make peace after talks called OFF
EXCLUSIVE Republicans weigh in on whether Trump and Musk should make peace after talks called OFF

Daily Mail​

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Republicans weigh in on whether Trump and Musk should make peace after talks called OFF

Elon Musk and Donald Trump should reconcile their differences Republican lawmakers told the Daily Mail. The two most powerful men in the world engaged in a historic blowup over differences about Trump's signature 'big beautiful bill.' It quickly turned ugly as Musk hurled insults at the president and Trump fired back on social media. Trump said earlier Friday that the two 'won't be speaking' for a while as a result of the back-and-forth falling out. 'I'm not even thinking about Elon,' Trump told CNN. 'He's got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem.' But GOP lawmakers are hopeful that the pair can patch up their differences in the coming days. Speaker Mike Johnson, who has been in the middle of the spat over the Big Beautiful Bill Act, said Friday he hopes Trump and Musk 'reconcile.' 'I believe in redemption,' Johnson said. 'That's part of my worldview, and I think it's good for the party and the country if all that's worked out.' The speaker appeared to downplay the spat on Thursday, saying that differences over policy are never personal despite Musk's below-the-belt claim that Trump has ties to pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Musk even went so far as to suggest the president should be impeached and replaced with JD Vance for wanting to sending the U.S. into 'debt slavery.' As tensions flared between the two leaders, Republicans in Congress appeared like children caught in a fight between their parents. Speaker Mike Johnson has said that the dispute over policy is not personal despite Musk calling for Trump to be impeached and insinuating he has nefarious links to the late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein 'I think they should reconcile,' Rep. Mike McCaul, R-Texas, told the Daily Mail. 'After all, they said they loved each other, so I think it's time for reconciliation for them.' 'My intel that I have is that they are going to reconcile today,' he disclosed. Many GOP lawmakers said the same, hoping for the two to iron out their differences. 'I hope they make up,' Rep. Kat Cammack, R-Fla., told the Daily Mail of the Musk-Trump divide. Rep. Kevin Hern, R-Okla., who sits on House GOP leadership, told the Daily Mail the attacks aren't new. 'It's not something that, you know, we haven't seen before,' he said of the feud, adding Musk's attacks 'are all falsehoods and for political show.' Firebrand Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., told the Daily Mail that it's up to Trump to decide whether he wants to make amends with the businessman. 'I don't get involved with things that involve him,' she said not wanting to instruct the president on how to react. 'They should reconcile,' Rep. Tom Tiffany, R-Wis., shared. 'I think its a great idea.' A member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus that often acts as a thorn in the side of GOP leadership, Tiffany bragged that the saga is evidence of a normal policy debate. 'I think the good robust debate is a good thing,' he added, noting that with the pace of the tweets sent out by Musk the pair could make up at any moment. Mark Bednar, a former senior staffer for Speaker Kevin McCarthy and Principal at Monument Advocacy, told the Daily Mail that the turbulence between Musk and the president amounts to 'just another week' of being a Republican in Washington. 'It also remains true that if and when Republicans are together, they can rack up massive legislative wins for the American people, and when they are apart it's the Democrats who benefit.' Trump, for his part, is not eager to talk to his former DOGE lieutenant. Speaking with ABC News on Friday morning, the president admitted he was 'not particularly' interested in speaking with the billionaire. The president referred to Musk as 'the man who has lost his mind,' saying that the Tesla owner wants to speak with him but he does not have interest in speaking.

Russia is at war with Britain and US no longer a reliable ally, UK adviser says
Russia is at war with Britain and US no longer a reliable ally, UK adviser says

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Russia is at war with Britain and US no longer a reliable ally, UK adviser says

Russia is at war with Britain, the US is no longer a reliable ally and the UK has to respond by becoming more cohesive and more resilient, according to one of the three authors of the strategic defence review. Fiona Hill, from county Durham, became the White House's chief Russia adviser during Donald Trump's first term and contributed to the British government's strategy, and made the remarks in an interview with the Guardian. 'We're in pretty big trouble,' Hill says, describing the UK's geopolitical situation as caught between 'the rock' of Vladimir Putin's Russia and 'the hard place' of Donald Trump's increasingly unpredictable United States. The best known of the reviewers appointed by Labour, alongside Lord Robertson, a former Nato secretary general, and retired general Sir Richard Barrons, Hill, 59, said she was happy to take on the role because it was 'such a major pivot point in global affairs'. She remains a dual national even after living over 30 years in the US. 'Russia has hardened as an adversary in ways that we probably hadn't fully anticipated,' Hill says, arguing that Putin sees the Ukraine war as a starting point to Moscow becoming 'a dominant military power in all of Europe'. As part of that long-term effort, Russia is already 'menacing the UK in various different ways,' she says, citing 'the poisonings, assassinations, sabotage operations, all kinds of cyber attacks and influence operations. The sensors that we see that they're putting down around critical pipelines, efforts to butcher undersea cables.' The conclusion, Hill says, is that 'Russia is at war with us'. Though the foreign policy expert, a long time Russia watcher, says she first made a similar warning in 2015, in a revised version of a book she wrote about the Russian president with Clifford Gaddy, reflecting on the invasion and annexation of Crimea. 'We said Putin had declared war on the West,' she says. At the time, other experts disagreed, but Hill says events since demonstrate 'he obviously had, and we haven't been paying attention to it'. The Russian leader, she argues, sees the fight in Ukraine as 'part of a proxy war with the United States; that's how he has persuaded China, North Korea and Iran to join in'. Putin believes, she says, that Ukraine has already been decoupled from the US relationship because 'Trump really wants to have a separate relationship with Putin to do arms control agreements and also business that will probably enrich their entourages further, though Putin doesn't need any more enrichment'. When it comes to defence, however, Hill says that the UK cannot rely on the military umbrella of the US as during the Cold War and in the generation that followed, at least 'not in the way that we did before'. In her description, the UK 'is having to manage its number one ally', though the challenge is not to overreact because 'you don't want to have a rupture'. This way of thinking even appears in the defence review published earlier this week, which says 'the UK's long-standing assumptions about global power balances and structures are no longer certain' – a rare acknowledgement in a British government document of how far and how fast Trumpism is affecting foreign policy certainties. The review team reported to Keir Starmer, Rachel Reeves, and defence secretary John Healey. Most of Hill's interaction were with Healey however, and Hill said she only met the prime minister once – describing him as 'pretty charming … in a proper and correct way' and as 'having read all the papers'. Hill is not drawn on if she advised Starmer or Healey on how to deal with Donald Trump, saying instead 'the advice I would give is the same I would give in a public setting'. She says simply that the Trump White House 'is not an administration, it is a court' in which a transactional president is driven by his 'own desires and interests, and who listens often to the last person he talks to'. She adds that unlike his close circle, Trump has 'a special affinity for the UK' based partly on his own family ties (his mother came from the Hebridean island of Lewis, emigrating to New York aged 18) and an admiration for the royal family, particularly the late Queen. 'He talked endlessly about that,' she says. On the other hand, Hill is no fan of the populist right administration in the White House and worries it could come to Britain if 'the same culture wars' are allowed to develop with the encouragement of Republicans from the US. Already, she notes, Reform UK won a string of council elections last month, including in her native Durham, and leader Nigel Farage wants to emulate some of the aggressive efforts to restructure government led by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) before his falling out with Trump. 'When Nigel Farage says he wants to do a Doge against the local county council, he should come over here [to the US] and see what kind of impact that has,' she says. 'This is going to be the largest layoffs in US history happening all at once, much bigger than hits to steel works and coal mines.' Hill's argument is that in a time of profound uncertainty, Britain needs greater internal cohesion if it is to protect itself. 'We can't rely exclusively on anyone any more,' she says, arguing that Britain needs to have 'a different mindset' based as much on traditional defence as on social resilience. Some of that, Hill says, is about a greater recognition of the level of external threat and initiatives for greater integration, by teaching first aid in schools or encouraging more teenagers to join school cadet forces, a recommendation of the defence review. 'What you need to do is get people engaged in all kinds of different ways in support of their communities,' she says. Hill says she sees that deindustrialisation and a rise of inequality in Russia and the US has contributed to the rise in national populism in both countries. Politicians in Britain, or elsewhere, 'have to be much more creative and engage people where they are at' as part of a 'national effort'. If this seems far away from a conventional view of defence, that is because it is, though Hill also argues that traditional conceptions of war are changing as technology evolves and with it what makes a potent force. 'People keep saying the British army has the smallest number of troops since the Napoleonic era. Why is the Napoleonic era relevant? Or that we have fewer ships than the time of Charles II. The metrics are all off here,' Hill says. 'The Ukrainians are fighting with drones. Even though they have no navy, they sank a third of the Russian Black Sea fleet.' Her aim, therefore, is not just to be critical but to propose solutions. Hill recalls that a close family friend, on hearing that she had taken on the defence review, had told her: ''Don't tell us how shite we are, tell us what we can do, how we can fix things.' People understand that we have a problem and that the world has changed.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store