Rights' violations: PTI finalises post-Ashura protest plan
According to the PTI Punjab, meetings are underway across different regions of the party under the supervision of Chief Organiser Punjab Aliya Hamza. Regional leadership is being consulted, and practical, on-the-ground strategies are being devised. To mobilise party workers, organisational office-bearers at the district, tehsil, and regional levels have been assigned responsibilities.
'In the face of this oppression and injustice, protest is now our only remaining option. The inhumane treatment and cruelty being inflicted upon PTI founder Imran Khan is condemnable and intolerable; detaining a political leader under such severe restrictions and in clear violation of human rights is the worst form of state oppression and political revenge,' it added.
According to the party, Khan is kept confined for 22 hours a day in a small, dark cell with no sunlight or fresh air. This is not merely imprisonment, but it is systematic mental and physical torture. As a result of this inhumane treatment, he is rapidly losing weight, and his health is deteriorating. Yet the extent of state oppression is such that he is not even allowed to meet his physician. To make matters worse, Khan has been completely isolated from his family, legal team, and party leadership. This represents a grim image of authoritarianism in Pakistan.
'This treatment of Pakistan's greatest national hero is not only a clear violation of the Constitution of Pakistan and the Pakistan Prison Rules 1978 but also of the United Nations' Nelson Mandela Rules. According to these regulations, every prisoner has an inalienable right to natural light and air, a balanced diet, daily exercise and walking, regular medical checkups, and meetings with family, lawyers, and associates. If a globally renowned leader, a former Prime Minister, and a national hero can be deprived of these basic rights, it raises a painful question for the entire world: is Pakistan truly a democracy or has it become a political torture chamber,' it said.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Imran 'found linked' to May 9: LHC
The Lahore High Court (LHC) has observed while referring to the testimonies of two police officials that former prime minister Imran Khan has been found involved in a conspiracy hatched for the violent events that occurred on May 9, 2023. An LHC division bench headed by Justice Syed Shahbaz Ali Rizvi issued the detailed order regarding the dismissal of Khan's post-arrest bail applications recently. The bench had dismissed the bail applications in eight first information reports (FIRs) registered against the former PM in connection with the May 9 riots. Inspector Ismat Kamal and Assistant Sub-Inspector (ASI) Hassan Afzal had in their statements termed Imran Khan the mastermind of the incidents that had occurred on May 9. They said that in meetings held on May 4, 2023, at the Chakri Rest Area in Rawalpindi, and on May 7 and 9 in Lahore, Khan had given directions to the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leadership to attack military and sate installations in addition to police officials to build pressure in case he was arrested. The officials stated that the leader had said that no one should go home until his release. They said the party leadership had termed Imran their red line and said they would jam the country by inciting the public if he was arrested. The court observed that the role attributed to the petitioner, as evident from the reproduced statements, attracts the provisions of Section 120-B and Section 121-A of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC), which stood applied in the case. The reproduced statements of Inspector Ismat Kamal and ASI Hassan Afzal prima facie reflect that a conspiracy and abetment related to the offences committed on May 9 were perpetrated by the petitioner in different meetings, it observed. Meanwhile, an anti-terrorism court summoned more prosecution witnesses on July 10 in a case registered against PTI leaders regarding the May 9 riots after the arrest of the party's founding chairman. The ATC judge recorded the statements of five prosecution witnesses in the case. Sarwar Road police had registered the case against the leaders over disturbing law and order, creating chaos, arson and inciting the public after the arrest. The ATC extended the bail hearing till July 8 of Shah Mehmood Qureshi, Umar Sarfraz Cheema and other leaders in cases registered against in connection with the riots. In another case of setting ablaze vehicles outside Jinnah House, the judge fixed July 10 for further proceedings. Defamation case A district court reserved its decision on Prime Minister Mian Shehbaz Sharif's application for making a legal notice part of the record and to record secondary evidence in a defamation suit against Imran Khan. The district court judge was hearing the PM's defamation suit filed against the PTI founder, seeking Rs10 billion in compensation over an accusation of offering him bribe to withdraw the Panama Papers case. The PTI counsel opposed the application, arguing that the legal notice was not signed by the petitioner and no secondary evidence could be recorded at this stage. The petitioner's counsel argued that suit had been filed after fulfilling legal formalities and the notice had been sent. He requested the court to allow secondary evidence. After hearing arguments from both sides, the judge reserved the decision, which is likely to be announced by July 10. On June 2, the prime minister had replied to the queries of the counsel representing the PTI founding chairman during cross-examination. The queries revolved around PM Shehbaz Sharif's affidavit, including its content, institution, stamps, attestation and other aspects of the case. The PM had appeared through video link. He had admitted that his name had been neither mentioned in the anchorperson's questions nor in the replies given by the respondent, but asserted that it was clear that the baseless accusations were aimed at him.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Regime change in K-P?
Listen to article The simmering row between Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and the federal government is a precursor to more political instability. The reported moves by the ruling coalition at the Center to dislodge the PTI dispensation in Peshawar are ill-advised. The seasoned men at the helm in Islamabad should desist from any such brinkmanship. It is unfortunate that no lessons have been learnt from such bitter episodes of our chequered political history, as democracy and public representation are falling down the abyss. Thus, the evolving diatribe of regime change in K-P will not only have a severe political fallout, especially as the opposition is already pushed to the wall, but also grave ramifications for the restive province that is engaged in a showdown with non-state actors. The opportunity to dismantle the PTI's two-third majority in K-P has arisen in the wake of the Constitutional Bench's decision on reserved seats. While the party has been stripped of its due share, the wafer-thin opposition in the provincial legislature is all set to grab 25 seats — something that emboldens them to usher in a change of guard by luring 35 more legislators into their ranks. But it goes without saying that this floor-crossing, under coercion, will breed discontent and instability. Other measures being contemplated are dissolution of the assembly and imposing Governor Rule. But such tactics — resorted to in Punjab, Balochistan and K-P in the past — are unlikely to stand in the court of law, or in public opinion. The federation should avoid being judgmental on K-P government's performance, as it is not its cup of tea. The way ahead is to let the Gandapur government be on its own, and launch efforts to kickstart a dialogue for bringing down the political temperature. PTI's stance that it is open for talks should be responded to by the coalition in Islamabad with a sincere roadmap, which could entail redressing grievances of the party, especially release of political prisoners including former PM Imran Khan. Such a move would offset PTI's plans for agitation, and usher in a semblance of serenity.
Express Tribune
10 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Imran involved in May 9 conspiracy, rules LHC
Listen to article The Lahore High Court (LHC) ruled on Thursday that former prime minister Imran Khan was involved in a conspiracy behind the violent events of May 9, 2023, citing testimonies from two police officials. The court dismissed Imran's post-arrest bail petition, noting sufficient grounds for criminal conspiracy and abetment. According to the detailed order, statements by Inspector Ismat Kamal and Assistant Sub-Inspector (ASI) Hassan Afzal place Imran as the one who perpetrated meetings held on May 4 at Chakri Rest Area, Rawalpindi, and on May 7 and 9 in Lahore. The court said this undermines the argument that Imran was in jail during the violence on May 9. 'These statements attract the provisions of Section 120-B and Section 121-A of the Pakistan Penal Code,' reads the judgment. Both sections deal with criminal conspiracy and abetment of mutiny, which carry serious legal consequences. Read: LHC rejects Imran's bail in eight May 9 cases During the hearing, the court observed that Imran's prior conviction in the Al-Qadir Trust case was uncontested. It also said that his alleged statements and actions had led to the loss of lives and damage to state property. The prosecution submitted audio and video clips, including transcripts prepared by the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA), which require forensic examination. The authorities had obtained court permission to conduct photogrammetry, polygraph and voice-matching tests within jail premises. However, investigators reported that Imran repeatedly refused to cooperate, hindering progress. The court concluded that the charges fall under the prohibitory clause of Section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), which bars bail in serious offences. It found no new circumstances to justify further inquiry or release on bail. 'In collective consideration of the are not inclined to grant post-arrest bail to the petitioner,' the court stated, dismissing the petition outright.
