Calls for delayed West Lothian train station to be funded by Scottish Government
A veteran councillor in West Lothian called on the Scottish Government to 'put its money where its mouth is' on plans for a railway station in Winchburgh.
As the council and Winchburgh Developments prepare to meet potential funders of the long delayed station , Labour's Linlithgow councillor Tom Conn called on the SNP government to 'stop ducking and diving.'
Designs were revealed on Friday with the news that a planning application would come to West Lothian Council 'imminently.'
READ MORE: Two major roads through Bathgate will see upgrades and resurfacing work
A report to the Executive described the recently published Scottish Government Programme for Government 2025/26.
It said: 'The programme makes specific reference to a railway station at Winchburgh in the section on A Safe Sustainable Transport System for Scotland.'
Having committed to that, Councillor Conn called for a commitment to meet costs of the £22.5m development.
Welcoming the news that progression had been made in the ten months of cooperation between the council, Winchburgh developments, Transport Scotland Network Rail - councillors echoed concerns that there have been no concrete guarantees of funding.
Councillor Conn said: 'There needs to be public money invested directly by Scottish Government in Winchburgh. They cannot continually suggest it's other people, other organisations that need to find the money.
'This is an abdication of responsibility by the Scottish Government. If they don't want to take responsibility for it, they shouldn't put it in Programme for Government 2025/26.
'The Scottish government needs to stop ducking and diving and need to put their money where their mouth is. This is talking about rail investment strategy. If all it is is words, not backed up with cash, stop speaking. It's not helping.'
Fellow Linlithgow councillor Sally Pattle said the progress had been like wading through treacle as she sought clarification of when a business plan could come to the council.
When told it would be two to three months she responded: 'I would just like to welcome the fact that the Scottish Government reference Winchburgh in their programme for government although I'm slightly unclear as to what that will mean in practical terms to actually getting this project moving forward.
'I do welcome all the work that has been undertaken collaboratively between key stakeholders since last September but I have to say that still feels like we are moving through treacle. I would also very much like it to be recognised by officers and key stakeholders that the longer this drags on the greater the negative impact it is having on my ward of Linlithgow because of all the commuters that come into use the train station and then park anti-socially across the town to do so so it would be good if that could recognised going forward.'
The report detailed passenger usage at neighbouring stations, including Linlithgow which sees 1,400 a day using the station.
Gordon Brown, Roads and Transportation Manager told the meeting: 'Progress on the Outline Business Case now allows the steering group to progress discussions with the Scottish Government on the case for investment, alignment with the overall rail strategy, public value and contribution to government priorities.
'These matters will be addressed as part of the funding application subject, of course, to the City Region Deal Joint Committee supporting an application via that route.'
The City Region Deal is a mechanism for accelerating growth. It is made up of six local authorities, universities and the private sector working with the Scottish and UK government to pull in investment.'
Winchburgh councillor Angela Doran-Timson pressed Mr Brown on what other alternative investment options there would be if the City Region Deal did not agree to fund the station. ' Was there a plan B?" she asked.
Mr Brown said there was ' no plan B' but to date 'no alternative funding sources had been identified'
Councillor Doran-Timson said: 'I'll echo what Tom Conn said. I welcome the report, fingers crossed that the funding does come forward from the Scottish Government."
A spokesperson for Transport Scotland responded by issuing a joint statement issued on behalf of West Lothian Council, Winchburgh Developments Ltd, Transport Scotland, Network Rail and ScotRail which said: 'Further work continues to explore opportunities for innovative construction techniques to support efficient and low-disruption delivery.
'A stakeholder meeting with Minister for Agriculture and Connectivity, Jim Fairlie MSP, is scheduled to take place in Winchburgh on 18 June. This will offer the minister the opportunity to see first-hand the progress made by the project partners.'
That same statement contained comments from council leader Lawrence Fitzpatrick: 'It's extremely encouraging to see this project continuing to move forward at pace. With the planning application submitted and business case prepared, we're entering an important phase, which reflects the positive collaboration between all parties."
Sign up to Edinburgh Live newsletters for more headlines straight to your inbox
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
ONS admits inflation blunder
Britain's beleaguered statistics agency has admitted that it overstated April's inflation figures after uncovering errors in its data. On Thursday, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) confirmed annual inflation hit 3.4pc last month, compared to its previous calculation of 3.5pc. Official blamed the blunder on faulty car tax data provided by the Government, as Whitehall provided the relevant numbers on Vehicle Excise Duty (VED). However, the mishap will no doubt pile pressure on the ONS, which has been repeatedly criticised over the past year for publishing flawed data about the UK jobs market. As well as lowing the headline rate of inflation, Thursday's correction will also take 0.1 percentage points off the retail price index, reducing that measure to 4.4pc. This embedded content is not available in your region. This will be of significance for Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, as a significant chunk of the Government's debt is linked to the measure. Some economists will also breathe a sigh of relief after last month's price rises were higher than they expected. It comes at a critical time for the economy as the Bank seeks to work out how far and how fast to cut interest rates. Threadneedle Street's policymakers, led by Governor Andrew Bailey, try to set borrowing costs to keep inflation at or around 2pc, with their decisions are guided by data from the ONS on price rises and unemployment. However, Mr Bailey told MPs this week that the Bank of England is now now using a much broader range of data after recent shortcomings at the ONS, which has struggled with a poor response rate post-Covid. 'It is a work in progress,' said Mr Bailey. 'I don't want to take away from the fact that the ONS is working very hard at this. 'There is a very severe health warning on every release they make. Until they introduce what they call the new transformed labour force survey (LFS), which will not be until next year, we should still regard the LFS with a great deal of caution and a big health warning.' The latest admission from the ONS startled analysts and moved financial markets, with potential repercussions for household and business finances. Bruna Skarica, at Wall Street bank Morgan Stanley, noted the jump was far larger than anything she had thought possible. It also fed straight into forecasts for the Bank of England's interest rate cuts. 'Today's data raises doubts on expectations for two further cuts this year,' said Gabriella Dickens, economist at AXA Investment Managers. Critically for borrowers, those forecasts have already led to trades trimming their bets for a summer rate cut, meaning borrowing costs are likely to remain higher for longer. The ONS was approached for comment. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rachel Reeves's days as Chancellor are numbered
The Labour Left is reportedly delighted about reports that Chancellor Rachel Reeves has been forced to back down from attempts to cut spending on a key net zero programme. The Prime Minister chose to side with Ed Miliband rather than his own Chancellor over the climate secretary's £13 billion warm homes programme, which will now emerge largely undiluted following next week's spending review. The latest reversal for Reeves's attempts to impose some fiscal discipline on her cabinet colleagues will not help dispel rumours that she is being lined up for a change of job at the next reshuffle. In a speech yesterday she warned that 'not every department will get everything that they want next week' and that she has had to 'say no' to spending requests that, in an ideal world, she would support. But such repeated assertions of tough spending choices and ruthless budget decisions, all for the long term good of the country, sound increasingly meaningless when they coincide with a series of U-turns on spending cuts already made. Reeves's infamous decision to scrap winter fuel payments for some pensioners has already been walked back by the Prime Minister, even though it remains unclear where the money necessary to reverse at least part of the cut will come from. Meanwhile Reeves remains under political pressure from the direction of the Deputy Prime Minister's office: Angela Rayner has boosted her own popularity among backbenchers by suggesting in a (conveniently leaked) memo to the Chancellor that tax rises, rather than departmental budget cuts, should be considered to fund extra spending. This is music to the ears of Labour activists too, who never met a tax rise they didn't like. The next big spending challenge for Reeves and the Government is more complicated than an attempt to divert billions away from benefit claimants and towards other priorities: the Work and Pensions Secretary, Liz Kendall, believes structural changes to the benefits regime are needed in order to create new incentives for claimants to seek paid employment. This is a generational change that would also, as it happens, save money in the long term. But that is not how many backbenchers see it. Long-term plans don't help MPs hoping to defend their parliamentary majorities in the next four years and even fewer of them are willing to defend the changes that came to the Chancellor's aid over the winter fuel payments. Reeves is seen increasingly as a bean counter; she doesn't have the same reach in the party that one of her predecessors, Gordon Brown, had as Chancellor, and which gave him so much leeway when making tough and 'prudent' economic choices. All it will take for her to lose all the authority necessary to remain in her job is one more policy reversal. She certainly cannot afford to lose any more spending battles with cabinet colleagues while retaining what is left of her stated willingness to tell them 'no'. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Tusk's Coalition Closes Ranks After Polish Election Defeat
Poland's ruling coalition sought to turn the page on the crisis sparked by the defeat of its candidate in presidential elections, vowing to rejuvenate the pro-European Union alliance halfway through the parliamentary term. 'The coalition is in good shape,' Deputy Prime Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz, the leader of the Polish Peasants Party, told reporters Thursday following a meeting of leaders from the ruling alliance. 'Emotions were high but we found common ground.'
