Tech minister Kyle vows action on children's ‘compulsive' use of social media
Peter Kyle said he wanted to tackle 'compulsive behaviour' and ministers are reportedly considering a two-hour limit, with curfews also under discussion.
The Cabinet minister said he would be making an announcement about his plans for under-16s 'in the near future'.
He told Sky News: 'I am looking very carefully about the overall time kids spend on these apps.
'I think some parents feel a bit disempowered about how to actually make their kids healthier online.
'I think some kids feel that sometimes there is so much compulsive behaviour with interaction with the apps they need some help just to take control of their online lives and those are things I'm looking at really carefully.'
Sky reported that a two-hour cap per platform is being considered, while night-time or school-time curfews have also been discussed.
Mr Kyle said: 'We talk a lot about a healthy childhood offline. We need to do the same online.
'I think sleep is very important, to be able to focus on studying is very important.'
He said he wanted to 'tip the balance' in favour of parents so they were 'not always being the ones who are just ripping phones out of the kids' hands'.
Mr Kyle also said it was 'total madness' that some adults were able to use apps or gaming platforms to contact children online.
He said 'many of the apps or the companies have taken action to restrict contacts that adults, particularly strangers, have with children, but we need to go further'.
'At the moment, I think the balance is tipped slightly in the wrong direction.
'Parents don't feel they have the skills, the tools or the ability to really have a grip on the childhood experience online, how much time, what they're seeing, they don't feel that kids are protected from unhealthy activity or content when they are online.'
In a separate interview with parenting site Mumsnet, Mr Kyle said he was 'deeply concerned' about addictive apps being used by children.
Speaking to Mumsnet founder Justine Roberts on Monday, the Technology Secretary said he would be 'nailing down harder on age verification'.
He said: 'I think we can have a national conversation about what healthy childhood looks like online.
'We do it offline all the time. Parents set curfews and diet and exercise as part of a language and a vocabulary within families.
'We haven't had that national debate about what health looks like and a healthy childhood looks like online yet.'
Schools in England were given non-statutory Government guidance in February last year, intended to stop the use of phones during the school day.
But the Conservatives have been calling on the Labour Government to bring in a statutory ban on smartphones in schools.
Mr Kyle said: 'Smartphones should not be used routinely in schools.
'Now, there might be some classes where they are brought in because of a specific purpose in the class, but that has to be determined and it should be the exception not the norm.'
He added: 'If we need to nail down hard on it, we will nail down hard on it.
'But please think very carefully about asking politicians to pass a law which criminalises by definition.
'Because if you pass a law that doesn't criminalise it's not a law that means anything'.
A series of already-announced measures to protect children will come into effect from Friday.
The codes of practice set out by Ofcom include requiring firms to ensure that any algorithms used to recommend content on their platforms must be configured to filter out harmful content from children's feeds.
In addition, the riskiest platforms, such as those hosting pornography, must have effective age checks to identify which users are children.
The checks could be done using facial age estimation technology, asking users to provide photo-ID for verification or a credit card check.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
4 minutes ago
- Reuters
US and EU clinch trade deal to avert prohibitive US tariffs, Trump says
TURNBERRY, Scotland, July 27 (Reuters) - The United States has struck a framework trade deal with Europe, U.S. President Donald Trump announced on Sunday, averting a spiralling row between two allies who account for almost a third of global trade. The deal, that includes a 15% tariff on EU goods entering the U.S. and significant EU purchases of U.S. energy and military equipment, will bring welcome clarity for EU companies. However, the baseline tariff of 15% will be seen by many in Europe as a poor outcome compared to the initial European ambition of a zero-for-zero tariff deal, although it is better than the threatened 30% rate. The announcement came after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen travelled to Scotland for talks with U.S. President Donald Trump to push a hard-fought deal over the line. Trump, who is seeking to reorder the global economy and reduce decades-old U.S. trade deficits, has so far reeled in agreements with Britain, Japan, Indonesia and Vietnam, although his administration has failed to deliver on a promise of "90 deals in 90 days." Trump has periodically railed against the European Union saying it was "formed to screw the United States" on trade. His main bugbear is the U.S. merchandise trade deficit with the EU, which in 2024 reached $235 billion, according to U.S. Census Bureau data. The EU points to the U.S. surplus in services, which it says partially redresses the balance.
Reuters
5 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump says US is close to reaching a trade deal with China
TURNBERRY, Scotland, July 27 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Sunday his administration was close to reaching a trade deal with China, but gave no other details. "We're very close to a deal with China. We really sort of made a deal with China, but we'll see how that goes," Trump told reporters at the start of a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland.
The Guardian
5 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Remembering victims of historical injustice
Campaigners are right to say that the miners' strike, which saw the violent repression of strikers at Orgreave in 1984, remains an enduring source of injustice (Government launches Orgreave inquiry, 40 years after clashes at miners' strike, 20 July). And Pete Wilcox, the bishop of Sheffield, who is to chair the Orgreave inquiry, is right to recognise that the acknowledgment of truth is essential for long-term community healing. Sadly, Orgreave is not the only example of where truth and justice have been forsaken when excessive violence has been used against people on strike. Two hundred years ago, on 3 August 1825, six people were seriously wounded and seven killed by soldiers at North Sands, Sunderland, during the 1825 seamen's strike. The killings were met with anger and outrage, with many local people believing that those who died had been wilfully murdered. Soldiers had fired like target practice into a crowd of 100 from a boat on the River Wear. The threat posed by the crowd, made up of a combination of women, children, strikers, workers and bystanders, was greatly exaggerated. The only inquiries were two short inquests into just two of the seven deaths. At the time, the killings were reported in national newspapers and were undoubtedly one of the most significant events of 1825. What happened at Sunderland is not so different from that six years earlier at Peterloo, on 16 August 1819, yet knowledge and awareness of these two massacres are vastly different. The Sunderland seafarers' union, the Seamen's Loyal Standard Association, stated that 3 August 1825 should 'ever be remembered', but over time, the North Sands Massacre has been virtually forgotten. The denial of truth and justice at Orgreave is unfortunately just one of several incidents where those policing industrial action have used unnecessary violence and then placed the blame on their victims. All victims of historical injustice should be remembered and their communities allowed to David Gordon ScottThe Open University Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
